Apple Bans "Hot Dog Down a Hallway" Game

May 21, 2009 -

Inexplicable content decisions continue to be made by the people running the iTunes AppStore.

In the latest example, Apple has banned a new version of Metaversal Studio's Hot Dog Down a Hallway game due to sexual innuendo. However, an earlier version was previously approved and remains available - double entendres included - for $0.99.

As reported by the Boston Globe:

In the game, players try to launch a hot dog down a corridor lined with various hazards. Players earn "achievement" awards, which are described using suggestive slang terms.


Comments

Re: Apple Bans "Hot Dog Down a Hallway" Game

kinda remins me of Dungeon Keeper, most creatures shot a screaming red suage looking thing in FP mode.

 


I am a criminal because I purchase media,I am a criminal because I use media, I am a criminal because I chose to own media..We shall remain criminals until Corporate stay's outside our bedrooms..


http://zippydsmlee.wordpress.com


Copyright infringement is nothing more than civil disobedience to a bad set of laws. Let's renegotiate them.

---

Patreon

Deviantart

Re: Apple Bans "Hot Dog Down a Hallway" Game

 Oh my dog! Sexual innuendo! What are we gonna do?

 

Does this trend ever stop? It's like this is a race to beome the worlds most prudish bunch. And everyone's a winner untill they all have blue tennisballs or tingly tummies.

 

Seriously, this overly prudish act is not healthy.

 

Re: Apple Bans "Hot Dog Down a Hallway" Game

*snicker*

Blue tennisballs...

Re: Apple Bans "Hot Dog Down a Hallway" Game

Why did someone not stop them and say "At least it's not about shooting people"? Or better question...what would be the average response to that statement, when said in the context of being offended by sexual material? We should carry out this experiment.

GameSnooper

Re: Apple Bans "Hot Dog Down a Hallway" Game

Hold the man-ase!! -- ZippyDMSlee

Re: Apple Bans "Hot Dog Down a Hallway" Game

I guess the popular Apple phrase "It just works" does not apply to the app store's content approval system.

Re: Apple Bans "Hot Dog Down a Hallway" Game

I don't think there is an "approval system", just a complaint based afterthought moderation system.

Re: Apple Bans "Hot Dog Down a Hallway" Game

Re: Apple Bans "Hot Dog Down a Hallway" Game

If my ex had any money to buy an iPod touch, I'd send this to her as she could relate to the game no problem. Hmmm... maybe have the dirty old man she shacked up with buy it perhaps?

 

"The Good, the Bad, and the Videogame" Reviews on the best, worst, and controversial issues of Videogames. gryphonosiris.blogspot.com/

"The Good, the Bad, and the Videogame" Reviews on the best, worst, and controversial issues of Videogames. gryphonosiris.blogspot.com/

Re: Apple Bans "Hot Dog Down a Hallway" Game

Here's an idea Apple, create a policy on content, and stick with it. If you want, you can come right out and say you won't have 'adult' themed content on your system. But to just randomly ban certain apps that happen to catch your eye is only going to encourage more 'hidden' content and more user backlash.

Re: Apple Bans "Hot Dog Down a Hallway" Game

Onec again the Bipolar process of iTunes App store approval. They need to stop all this. First it was the on again off again baby shaker and now the denial of the sequal for issues present in the first.

What the crap?

E. Zachary Knight
Oklahoma City Chapter of the ECA
http://www.theeca.com/chapters_oklahoma

Re: Apple Bans "Hot Dog Down a Hallway" Game

Here's a more "What the crap?"

Ebook application rejected because it can download the Kama Sutra off of Gutenburg.

As can several others that have been approved, as well as Safari itself.

 

Re: Apple Bans "Hot Dog Down a Hallway" Game

Link about the EBook application, Eucalyputus, being rejected because it can read the Karma Sutra:

 

http://www.blog.montgomerie.net/whither-eucalyptus

Re: Apple Bans "Hot Dog Down a Hallway" Game

They're only doing this for people with no sense of humor.

Re: Apple Bans "Hot Dog Down a Hallway" Game

This is happening and will continue to happen until they can admit the need for a content rating system, hell, any "system" at all would help them to look less like mindless idiots.

The reason this probably happened is because when the 2nd version was banned, there was no call to review the system to see if other games under the same title were available.

I'm not in any way saying the 2nd game deserved it's ban, i'm just offering suggestions. The Apple store looks more every day like a comunity driven website, with tonnes of opinionated moderators and no administrators keeping them on the same path.

Re: Apple Bans "Hot Dog Down a Hallway" Game

people should know by now if you go with apple you will be beholden to arbitary restrictions on what you can do as determined by apple and how it currently feels now.

When was the last time microsoft, nokia, google or anyone like that told you what you can and can't do with your product?

apple is the nanny state of technology companies.

Re: Apple Bans "Hot Dog Down a Hallway" Game

NO! No content rating system! If there's a content rating system, then there's a clearly defined set of rules. If there are rules, someone will bend them without breaking them. If that happens, then the same things that are happening to games will happen to iPhone apps.

---You are likely to be eaten by a Grue.

---You are likely to be eaten by a Grue.
 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
Andrew EisenI don't know who you think the two groups are but I've never seen anyone claim that one group has a monopoly on people who misbehave (unless you're grouping the people who misbehave, of course).05/04/2015 - 8:14pm
MattsworknameI dont disagree on the jerks sentiment Andrew, so long as all agree that both side had there fair share of jerks got inolved with this whole clusterfark.05/04/2015 - 8:10pm
Andrew EisenI speak from experience. I'm not a jerk face and I've never had a problem discussing things with a huge variety of people.05/04/2015 - 7:59pm
Andrew EisenGreat, so long as they're not jerk faces, they should have no problem.05/04/2015 - 7:58pm
Goth_SkunkOr if they have the unfortunate distinction of following certain undesirables on Twitter. i.e. Milo Yiannopolous, Roguestar, Mundane Matt, C.H. Sommers, Mark Kern, Adam Baldwin et al.05/04/2015 - 7:53pm
Andrew EisenThere's no need for anyone who's not a jerk face to admit to vile actions they didn't commit.05/04/2015 - 7:52pm
Goth_SkunkI disagree. I believe all the parties wanting discussion are on the GG side. The parties against GamerGate aren't interested in discussion, as evidenced by the propensity to simply block people on social media the moment they identify as pro-GG.05/04/2015 - 7:51pm
Andrew EisenShe used to allow comments on her videos. Blame the jerk faces that that's no longer the case.05/04/2015 - 7:49pm
Andrew EisenSarkeesian has given plenty of talks in venues where anyone is welcome to attend. It's not her fault that most of her audience supports her. That said, she HAS fielded questions from detractors.05/04/2015 - 7:49pm
Mattsworknameboth sides to start taking things off the table that are not relevant to the actuall issues they hold, so we can find out where these 2 groups really stand, not what a biased media labeled them ass05/04/2015 - 7:48pm
Mattsworknamechallenge her or disagree. Second ,I want both sides to admit to the vile actions there more fringe and extreme supports commited and admit it was wrong on both sides. I want both sides to argue what there core issues are and why they hold them, and i wan05/04/2015 - 7:47pm
MattsworknameTo clarify andrew, in all that ive seen, anita only talks or gives qas to audiance that share her views, never any opposing viewpoints. She does not allow any commensts on her videos and only ever did interviews with those who support her, not those who05/04/2015 - 7:42pm
Andrew EisenIf so, I'd have to agree with most that those are viewpoints that are simply not worth entertaining.05/04/2015 - 7:23pm
Andrew EisenAre you really looking for a discussion where one side is advocating hate, bullied self censorship and no discussions of women in video games?05/04/2015 - 7:22pm
Andrew EisenAnd for your three things you'd like to see discussed, Sarkeesain wants the hate to stop, doesn't want to bully the industry into self censorship and already talks about women in video games.05/04/2015 - 7:22pm
Andrew EisenDon't know about Yiannopoulos. I don't follow his work because I find it roundly terrible.05/04/2015 - 7:19pm
Andrew EisenGG and anti-GG aren't groups. You can't organize people like that. It doesn't work that way. Sarkeesian participates in discussions complete with Q/A all the damn time. It's why her videos take so damn long.05/04/2015 - 7:18pm
MattsworknameMaybe among themselves andrew, but I cant find any indicatoin that the gg or anti gg groups ever tried to honestly debate each other, name one time anita debated someone or milo debaated someone from the other side, I cant find any05/04/2015 - 7:15pm
Andrew EisenNot at all true. It's just the jerk faces that aren't willing to be decent, civil human beings. Everyone else is fine and more than willing to talk about stuff.05/04/2015 - 7:04pm
MattsworknameTrue andrew, but to my best effort research, i can find no indication of either side being willing to do that. As far as i can tell, neither side is willing to discusss or debate the other. They just keep attacking each other.05/04/2015 - 6:59pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician