New Charity Lets You Donate Games & Systems to Underprivileged Kids

June 16, 2009 -

If you've got games that you're not using anymore, don't leave them to collect dust on a shelf. Donate them instead.

Pixel Equity, a new not-for-profit matches donated games and systems up with economically disadvantaged kids. From the organization's website:

Video gaming is a fun and enriching activity, but it remains out of reach for many. Games cost upwards of $50 and consoles cost hundreds, so it’s no surprise that large groups of young people who are interested in playing never get the chance.

No games to send? Pixel Equity will also accept cash donations, no matter how small. That part is kind of sweet because you can actually see how your donation will help reach the amount needed to buy a specific game requested by a child (see pic at left).

There's also a bit of game-oriented fun built into the donation system:

Since this is an organization about video games, we thought that we would make a game out of giving. Every contribution you make will help you gain levels. Each level corresponds to an image of a game archetype, including warriors, clerics, mages, and more, that you will be able to post on your facebook profile by using our facebook app (app coming soon!). Show your friends that you’re making a difference!

Via: Kotaku


Comments

Re: New Charity Lets You Donate Games & Systems to ...

They can give this shit all the colors of the friggin rainbow nothing will change. Parents will still claim ignorance and blame everything under the sun except their lack of parenting skills.

 

For those who are offedned by everything they see and hear....The most effective form of protest is: DON'T WATCH! DON'T LISTEN!

"With free speech either all of it is ok or none of it is." Kyle Broflovski

Re: New Charity Lets You Donate Games & Systems to ...

Wow I can't believe some of the responses here. I agree poor folks need to have their base needs met first. What I can't believe is how some of the responses here are basically saying. Poor kids shouldn't get donated video games primarily based on the fact that,

1. Their poor they need food and clothes.

-Theres tons of organizations out there now doing this.

 

2. Video games are a luxury item.

-Screw the poor little bastards, mommy and daddy should have had the foresight to see how badly this economy would become. Even knew in advance their job would go away.

Not every poor family is due to substance abuse or laziness. I personally know a guy that has a college degree and currently manages a damned Subway shop because noone in the area is hiring.

 

Every kid deserves the chance to get to enjoy video games toys and their childhoods. Other wise we wind up with a hell of a lot more Jack Thompsons.

Re: New Charity Lets You Donate Games & Systems to ...

No, what we are saying is that their basic needs should be attended to first.

Have you ever seen the M.A.S.H. episode, "Death Takes a Holiday"? In it, Charles Winchester donates a box of candy to an orphanage, whose owner turns around and sells it on the black market.

At first Charles is furious, until he's told just how long the money from that candy will feed the orphans for.

In his own words: "It is sadly inappropriate to give dessert to a child who has no meal."

Your comment - and this charity - demonstrate a lack of comprehension of true poverty. Just to run that donated game, you'll need steady a place to stay, steady electricity, a television, console, etc. People who are truly in need can't afford these things.

There are plenty of alternative, cheaper, more accessible means of entertainment. Books, board games, etc.  Neither I nor the previous posters are saying they shouldn't play video games - only that, perhaps, there are more important things to be helping them with, first.

Re: New Charity Lets You Donate Games & Systems to ...

I'd rather give to http://www.childsplaycharity.org/ then this rubbish.  The website looks like a cheap premade flash website, and who is going to care if I have a donating warrior avatar for FB?

 

Trevor Gray ganjookie@yahoo.com

Trevor Gray
ganjookie@yahoo.com

Re: New Charity Lets You Donate Games & Systems to ...

I'm sorry, I don't agree with this.

When we're talking about donating to hospitals and community centers and the like, it's completely understandable.

But donating to families who are, bluntly put, poor items which, technically, are luxury items, this I don't agree with.  Families need the essentials.  Food, clothing, a place to live, money for high priced utllities, etc.  Now, if we were talking about computers, even bare bones ones, that helped with education, whether educational software or for use with school work, then I'd be more supportive.  I'm not suggesting that those who are poor be deprived of anything that counts as luxury.  Just that the NEEDS should come first.  And entertainment can come in many other forms than in-home, personally owned products.  Perhaps that doesn't come out exactly right, but I think I came close.

Nightwng2000

NW2K Software http://www.facebook.com/nightwing2000

Nightwng2000 is now admin to the group "Parents For Education, Not Legislation" on MySpace as http://groups.myspace.com/pfenl

Nightwng2000 NW2K Software http://www.facebook.com/nightwing2000 Nightwng2000 is now admin to the group "Parents For Education, Not Legislation" on MySpace as http://groups.myspace.com/pfenl

Re: New Charity Lets You Donate Games & Systems to ...

Just wanted to add that I agree with this.

I thought about posting something to that effect earlier, but decided I was too tired to adequately articulate myself.

You worded it far better than I would have - thank you.

Re: New Charity Lets You Donate Games & Systems to ...

Uh...wow, I actually agree with this. You said it the best way that it could be said, and I think you're right. Education is a much more important thing (because without it the children won't ever grow up to do anything with a decent pay) than just gaming. Granted, educational gaming can be a good thing, but doesn't meet up with some of the other essentials.

-If an apple a day keeps the doctor away....what happens when a doctor eats an apple?-

-Optimum est pati quod emendare non possis-It is best to endure what you cannot change-

Re: New Charity Lets You Donate Games & Systems to ...

Glad to see some happy news.

Hopefully these guys enforce a ratings 'ceiling', so that we don't have drama from politicians over this. I can see it now...

"THESE MURDERERS ARE GIVING THEIR MURDER SIMULATORS TO THE NEXT GENERATION OF SUSCEPTIBLE KIDS"

 

Forgive my pessimism. I hope I'm wrong and just gunshy after all the DRM and violence BS.

Re: New Charity Lets You Donate Games & Systems to ...

It's great to see some positive gaming news. 

Re: New Charity Lets You Donate Games & Systems to ...

I´m underprivileged. Give me your games NAO ;)

 

The cynical side of videogames (spanish only): http://thelostlevel.blogspot.com/ My DeviantArt Page (aka DeviantCensorship): http://www.darkknightstrikes.deviantart.com/

Re: New Charity Lets You Donate Games & Systems to ...

I can now give away my GameCube cool

Never underestimate the power of idiots in large amounts.

Re: New Charity Lets You Donate Games & Systems to ...

"Underprivileged"....there was a time when you were just privileged...and those who weren't privileged....just weren't.

Now we have underprivileged which is just another way to say 'poor' I guess...

"You know what I wish? I wish all the scum of the Earth had one throat and I had my hands about it."

"You know what I wish? I wish all the scum of the Earth had one throat and I had my hands about it."

Re: New Charity Lets You Donate Games & Systems to ...

Not sure what your point is here.  Are you trying to say the poor shouldn't really be talked about?  Are you perhaps suggesting a return to Victorian values where poor folks were sent to workhouses so they could be ignored by the more privileged folks?

Re: New Charity Lets You Donate Games & Systems to ...

My point is this: Our 'poor' are not as 'poor' as they once were.

I suppose what I'm saying is this does nothing to help the impovershed. The 'underpriveleged' that have the amenities neccasary to play video games generally have the resources to take some community college classes and better their circumstances. The impovershed that do not have the money to buy these basic amenities, do not.

It's almost like giving caviar to people who can afford crackers, instead of giving crackers to people who can't afford any food. Come to think of it, I think this project shouldn't give the consoles directly to end users, but instead to organizations like the YMCA/other recreational centers that encourage self improvement.

Re: New Charity Lets You Donate Games & Systems to ...

So children should continue to suffer because of bad parents, like the single mother I had who refused to get a job because "God told her not to work"?

Re: New Charity Lets You Donate Games & Systems to ...

I absolutely agree.

"We have the electricity to power the LCD TV to watch high definition DVD movies, running water, air conditioning, cable, transportation, free emergency medical care, but want video games!"

At least, for kids old enough to get a job I agree. For the 8 year old thats parents are crack heads living off of wellfare, we should be getting them out of the situation and sterilizing the parents (yep, I said it), not giving the parents more stuff to sell.

Of course, there are a LOT of people with both parents working their asses off just barely able to make ends meet that could benefit from this. That's 'underpriveleged', in my opinion. of course no charity has any way to judge the difference, really, so...

</rant>

Anyway, I agree with your statement for about 30% of the group we're talking about.

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
Andrew EisenHence the "Uh, yeah. Obviously."09/02/2014 - 12:53am
SleakerI think Nintendo has proven over the last 2 years that it doesn't.09/02/2014 - 12:31am
Andrew EisenSleaker - Uh, yeah. Obviously.09/01/2014 - 8:20pm
Sleaker@AE - exclusives do not a console business make.09/01/2014 - 8:03pm
Papa MidnightI find it disappointing that, despite the presence of a snopes article and multiple articles countering it, people are still spreading a fake news story about a "SWATter" being sentenced to X (because the number seems to keep changing) years in prison.09/01/2014 - 5:08pm
Papa MidnightAnd resulting in PC gaming continuing to be held back by developer habits09/01/2014 - 5:07pm
Papa MidnightI find it disappointing that the current gen of consoles is representative of 2009-2010 in PC gaming, and will be the bar by which games are released over the next 8 years - resulting in more years of poor PC ports (if they're ever ported)09/01/2014 - 5:06pm
Andrew EisenMeanwhile, 6 of Wii U's top 12 are exclusive: Mario 3D World, Nintendo Land, Pikmin 3, Mario Kart 8, Wonderful 101, and ZombiU. (Wind Waker HD is on the list too but I didn't count it.)09/01/2014 - 4:36pm
Andrew EisenLikewise, only two of Xbox One's top 12 are exclusive: Dead Rising 3 and Ryse: Son of Rome (if you ignore a PC release later this year).09/01/2014 - 4:34pm
Andrew EisenNot to disrespect the current gen of consoles but I find it telling that of the "12 Best Games For The PS4" (per Kotaku), only two are exclusive to the system: Infamous: Second Son and Resogun.09/01/2014 - 4:30pm
MaskedPixelantehttp://www.joystiq.com/2014/09/01/beyond-two-souls-ps4-trophies-emerge-directors-cut-reported/ MMM MMM, nothing quire like reheated last gen games to make you appreciate the 400 bucks you spent on a new console.09/01/2014 - 4:24pm
Andrew EisenThat's actually a super depressing thought, that a bunch of retweeters are taking that pic as an illustration of the actual issue instead of an example of a complete misunderstanding of it.09/01/2014 - 4:20pm
Andrew EisenObviously, the picture was created by someone who doesn't understand what the issue actually is (or, possibly, someone trying to satire said misunderstanding).09/01/2014 - 4:10pm
Papa MidnightPeople fear and attack what they do not understand.09/01/2014 - 4:04pm
Papa MidnightWell, let's not forget. Someone held their hand in a peace sign a few weeks ago and people started claiming it was a gang sign. Or a police chief displayed the hand signal of their fraternity and was accused of the same.09/01/2014 - 4:04pm
SleakerEither people don't understand that what the picture is saying is true, or the picture was created out of a misunderstanding of what sexism is.09/01/2014 - 3:52pm
Sleaker@AE ok yah that's where the kind of confusion I'm getting. Your tweet can be taken to mean two different things.09/01/2014 - 3:51pm
Andrew EisenSleaker - No. No, not even remotely. The pic attached to my tweet was not made by me; it's not a statement I'm making. It's an illustration of the complete misunderstanding of the issue my tweet is referring to.09/01/2014 - 3:13pm
Papa MidnightIn other news, Netflix states why it paid Comcast: http://money.cnn.com/2014/08/29/technology/netflix-comcast/index.html?hpt=hp_t209/01/2014 - 3:10pm
Papa MidnightAndrew Eisen: Sites like Tumblr make things seem much bigger than they are. A vocal extreme minority start complaining and things go as they do.09/01/2014 - 3:09pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician