IGDA Names New Executive Director

July 2, 2009 -

Following months of seraching, the International Game Developers Association has named a new executive director.

Gamasutra reports that Joshua Caulfield (left) will replace Jason Della Rocca, who departed earlier this year. Caulfield's background is in trade association management, not gaming, His previous gig was as the Executive VP of the American Machine Tool Distributors Association. He does, however, enjoy games:

I'm an avid gamer. I'm clearly not a game developer, and there's a big difference there, but I do understand the medium. I play a lot of games; I have a group and we play a lot of MMOs. I'm quite familair with the industry from a gamer's perspective. So that helps a lot...

 

I have most of the consoles, and I pull them out when I have a little alone time, but my true love is MMOs on the PC. I'm generally an RPGer. My group just got off a stint on World of Warcraft, where I play a Shadow Priest. I play the backup healer, because if the main healer goes down, your backup healer better be ready.

We're right now playing Guild Wars, and I'm playing a Monk, so I'm a healer again. I tend to do the support role a lot.

Caulfield expects to maintain a lower public profile than Della Rocca, with the IGDA board taking on the public interface role. Caulfield also talked about his vision for the game developers' organization:

The IGDA's mission has remained very much the same: That is, to support the professional game developer -- specifically, I believe, to serve individuals to create video games, to enhance the lives of game developers, to connect developers with their peers, and so on...

There are a lot of differences between a union and a professional association. I really can't say whether this industry needs a union or not, because I don't know enough about the individuals of this industry yet.


Comments

Re: IGDA Names New Executive Director

I dunno... it's the International Game DEVELOPERS Association... not the International Game PLAYERS Association.

Seems like a bad move to name a non-developer to the top position.

Hopefully I'm wrong. 

------- Morality has always been in decline. As you get older, you notice it. When you were younger, you enjoyed it.

Re: IGDA Names New Executive Director

You are wrong ;)

 

He was hired to run a association, not a studio... Thing that took some time to realize...

 

criadordejogos.wordpress.com

--- MaurĂ­cio Gomes twitter.com/agfgames

Re: IGDA Names New Executive Director

Not a bad move at all. Tehy got someone with a lot of experience running professional associations. That is something they have needed for a while. Sure being a game developer helps, but if you have no experience running such an organization, it will take you even longer to get going.

He has plenty of game developers on the board to help him understand. He knows about games and games regularly, so he is not completely clueless.

I think this is the best move the IGDA could have made. His experience could move the IGDA forward and make it a more well known and trusted organization.

E. Zachary Knight
Oklahoma City Chapter of the ECA
http://www.theeca.com/chapters_oklahoma

Re: IGDA Names New Executive Director

Pretty non-commital speech, but then, I get the feelings the new Boss has a lot of ropes to learn, so he can't really make statements of policy this early in the game.

Good luck to him either way.

Re: IGDA Names New Executive Director

He won't be doing that. The IGDA board chair stated that the E.D. would be concentrating on running IGDA, and the more vocal, visible, external role that Jason used to fill will now be performed by the Chair of the Board.

Interesting, to say the least. I wonder if there were any "behind-the-scenes" reasons for that.

-- Dan "SWATJester" Rosenthal; Executive Director, http://www.gameslaw.net

-- Dan Rosenthal

Re: IGDA Names New Executive Director

There are a reason:

Jason talked too much and did little. They decided to do the inverse now. Not that Jason sucked or anythign like that, he did a decent job, but not a excellent job.

 

Also there are a bad reason too: Ensure that the board will continue defendign itself when someone do shit (like Mike Capps or Tim Langdell)

 

criadordejogos.wordpress.com

--- MaurĂ­cio Gomes twitter.com/agfgames

Re: IGDA Names New Executive Director

That's certainly unusual, maybe it's [i]because[/i] of his lack of deep knowledge on the subject. He might be great at making connections, raising funds etc, but not be able to make policy decisions on many things because he hasn't really got the technical background to do so?

Re: IGDA Names New Executive Director

"I'm suited to this job because I play WoW"

Er...what?

--------------------------------------------------

I LIKE the fence. I get 2 groups to laugh at then.

-------------------------------------------------- I LIKE the fence. I get 2 groups to laugh at then.

Re: IGDA Names New Executive Director

If you'll read carefully, he didn't say that. He preemptively addressed the concern that he is not an "insider" by pointing out that he is a gamer, which HELPS. He's not saying that it is why he is suited for the job. He's suited for the job due to his leadership expertise.

 

-- Dan "SWATJester" Rosenthal; Executive Director, http://www.gameslaw.net

-- Dan Rosenthal
 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
E. Zachary KnightGot that same recommendation on Twitter. So I guess that is a good sign.09/15/2014 - 8:39pm
prh99Portlandia, though I don't watch a lot of sitcoms. Heard it was good though.09/15/2014 - 8:02pm
E. Zachary KnightSitcom recommendations for someone who like Parks and Rec but hates The Office: Go.09/15/2014 - 6:08pm
NeenekoEven if they do change their policy, they can only do it moving forward and I could see the mod/pack community simply branching.09/15/2014 - 12:50pm
Michael ChandraAs for take the money and run, the guy must have a networth of 8~9 digits already.09/15/2014 - 10:33am
Michael ChandraMe, I'm more betting on some form of mod API where servers must run donations/payments through them and they take a cut.09/15/2014 - 10:32am
Michael ChandraEspecially since they want it for promoting their phones. Killing user interest is the dumbest move to make.09/15/2014 - 10:32am
Michael ChandraGiven how the EULA actively allows for LPs, I'm not sure Microsoft is ready for the backlash of disallowing that.09/15/2014 - 10:31am
Matthew Wilsonthey wont do that, the backlash would be too big.09/15/2014 - 10:25am
ConsterSleaker: how is that a flipside? Sounds to me like that's basically what Notch himself said, except rudely.09/15/2014 - 10:18am
MaskedPixelanteOn the plus side, no more lazy Minecraft LPs, since iirc Microsoft has a strict "no monetization period" policy when it comes to their stuff.09/15/2014 - 10:13am
james_fudgeBut it continues to sell on every platform it is on, so there's that09/15/2014 - 10:09am
james_fudgeOh, well that's another matter :)09/15/2014 - 10:08am
E. Zachary KnightNothing against Notch here. I think it is great that he made something so cool. I just can't understand how it is worth $2.5 bil09/15/2014 - 9:59am
InfophileWhat a world we live in: Becoming a billionaire was the easy way out for Notch.09/15/2014 - 9:42am
james_fudgelots of hate for Notch here. I don't get it. Sorry he made a game everyone loved. What a monster he is!09/15/2014 - 9:37am
SleakerOn the flipside, Notch has been a horrible CEO for Mojang, and the company has grown on sheer inertia, DESPITE being mishandled over and over.09/15/2014 - 9:33am
SleakerI can understand Notch's statements he made to Kotaku about growing bigger than he intended, and getting hate for EULA changes he didn't enact.09/15/2014 - 9:32am
MaskedPixelantehttp://pastebin.com/n1qTeikM Notch's statement about the MS acquisition. He wanted out for a long time and this was the easiest way.09/15/2014 - 9:08am
ConsterEh, I can't blame him.09/15/2014 - 9:01am
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician