New Study Links Youth Violence to Depression & Peers, Not Video Games

September 14, 2009 -

Dr. Christopher Ferguson (left) of Texas A&M International University dropped GamePolitics a line this morning to say that he has published a new study with some interesting findings about media violence.

Ferguson's new work (co-authored by Claudia San Miguel and Richard Hartley) appears in the Journal of Pediatrics and maintains that youth violence is linked to depression and peer delinquency, not consumption of violent media. Ferguson summarized his findings in an e-mail to GP:

We examined multiple risk factors for violence in a sample of 603 mostly Hispanic youth... We assessed results across seven separate measures of youth violence and serious youth aggression, including the Child Behavior Checklist aggression and rule-breaking scales as reported by both children and their parents, involvement in violent and non-violent criminal behaviors and bullying behaviors against peers. 

 

We found that depressed mood and association with delinquent peers were the strongest and most consistent risk factors for youth violence across outcome measures.  Parents' use of verbal cruelty in domestic relationships and the child's antisocial personality traits were also reasonably strong predictors of violent behavior.  By contrast video game violence exposure and television violence exposure were not found to be predictors of youth violence. 


Comments

Re: New Study Links Youth Violence to Depression & Peers, ...

Duh.

The only reply on the planet that fits this article

 

Never underestimate the power of idiots in large amounts.

Never underestimate the power of idiots in large amounts.

Re: New Study Links Youth Violence to Depression & Peers, ...

Currently taking a Effects and Prosses of Mass Communication class, where we talk about just this.  The professor took a poll at the begining of class.  "How many of you watch Violent shows?"  Everyone raises there hands.  "How many of you actualy participate in Violent crimes"  Nobody raises there hand.  Point is, Violence doesn't occur becuase you see it or play it on a video game.  It occurs when you are prone to it anyway.  Usualy that means your eather not right psycologicly or you have other issues such as Depression. 

Reminds me of another point I learned in my years of being bullied.  Bullies Bully only because they suffer from there own personal issues.  The only way they can make themselves feel better about themselves is by hurting others and making themselves feel more important.  Nothing to do with video games.

Re: New Study Links Youth Violence to Depression & Peers, ...

Ferguson given a look at his history of doing Psychology at Texas and the way he does his research should be an interesting comparison compared to the likes of Anderson, Bushman and other people who have tried many times to link violence in Videogames to real life violence.

 

Hey, even politicians who seem to be so busy running their countries and singing in laws don't have enough time to study the facts hard enough to realize that their legislation on violence and pornography in Videogames is not really solving any of society's problems.

 

And on the flip side, violence and pornography in videogames when done right might also be better as it talks about the strong and uncomfortable themes of society's problems done though an entertainment medium and not though the news that can be even more distressing because the news (claims) to report on real life events, where videogames and movies can be fictional where the themes are used to portray the story about issues in real life.

 

It is only just my idea from what I have seen/played though videogames though, but my opinions can be different compared to other people on here.

TBoneTony

Re: New Study Links Youth Violence to Depression & Peers, ...

one phrase comes to mind

NO $**T SHERLOCK

Re: New Study Links Youth Violence to Depression & Peers, ...

dammit, beat me to it.

---

I once had a dream about God. In it, he was looking down upon the planet and the havoc we recked and he said unto us, "Damn Kids get off my lawn!"

I once had a dream about God. In it, he was looking down upon the planet and the havoc we recked and he said unto us, "Damn Kids get off my lawn!"

Re: New Study Links Youth Violence to Depression & Peers, ...

We found that depressed mood and association with delinquent peers were the strongest and most consistent risk factors for youth violence across outcome measures.  Parents' use of verbal cruelty in domestic relationships and the child's antisocial personality traits were also reasonably strong predictors of violent behavior.  By contrast video game violence exposure and television violence exposure were not found to be predictors of youth violence. 

This is where I blame bad parenting, poverty, and the child's psyche for the youth violence not video game, or TV.  I've seen and hear report that youth violence was caused by bad parenting (even abuses like sexual), and sometime a child can be born with antisocial personality, or sociopath.  How do you think Ted Bundy, Son of Sam, Charles Manson got those from? Video game?  Yeah, I bet Son of Sam killed people because he played Grand Theft Auto 4, and I bet Charles Manson killed women in his apartment because he was a big fan of Manhunt series.

 

No, it was never video game, it was on how the child was raise or/and how they were born.  IT WAS NEVER VIDEO GAME THAT MAKE THEM DO IT!!!!!!

*cue JT, Anderson, and Bushman saying Ferguson is a tool of the industry and covering up the true cause of youth violence in 3...2...1* 

 

Re: New Study Links Youth Violence to Depression & Peers, ...

I understand they're always going to be people like them crying foul...And the traitor john bruce & the immoral crusaders cares more about money and attention than  "for the children."

 

Hoping the study is accurate.

Magic Taco

Re: New Study Links Youth Violence to Depression & Peers, ...

Isn't this kind of an obvious conclusion?  I bet next we are going to hear that poor exonomic conditions also contributes to violence...

Re: New Study Links Youth Violence to Depression & Peers, ...

One needs to state the obvious for the ass hats who choose to ignore it.

Re: New Study Links Youth Violence to Depression & Peers, ...

Talkin about Jack Thompson?

Re: New Study Links Youth Violence to Depression & Peers, ...

And for the ass hat to continue ot ignore it ,at least it's out there.

Re: New Study Links Youth Violence to Depression & Peers, ...

This should not be surprising.  It's too bad they couldn't find a sample more representative of the country as a whole, but you have to take what you can, and it was conducted in Texas.  Still a good bit of research.

Re: New Study Links Youth Violence to Depression & Peers, ...

Duh. My peers depressed me long before I found video games.

On an actually serious note I have suffered from depression and social issues for a good deal of my life, video games didn't even enter the picture until late second grade early third.

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
Matthew WilsonI updated to a clean instill of windows 10.07/29/2015 - 2:36am
Mattsworknameargue that it's wrong, but then please admit it's wrong on ALL Fronts07/29/2015 - 2:06am
MattsworknameTechnoGeek: It's actually NOT, but it is a method used all across the specturm. See Rush limbaugh, MSNBC, Shawn hannity, etc etc, how many compagns have been brought up to try and shut them down by going after there advertisers. It's fine if you wanna07/29/2015 - 2:05am
Mattsworknamediscussed, while not what I liked and not the methods I wanted to see used, were , in a sense, the effort of thsoe game consuming masses to hold what they felt was supposed to be there press accountable for what many of them felt was Betrayal07/29/2015 - 2:03am
MattsworknameAs we say, the gamers are dead article set of a firestorm among the game consuming populace, who, ideally, were the intended audiance for sites like Kotaku, Polygon, Et all. As such, the turn about on them and the attacking of them, via the metods07/29/2015 - 2:03am
MattsworknameAndrew: Thats kind fo the issue at hand, Accountable is a matter of context. For a media group, it means accountable to its reader. to a goverment, to it's voters and tax payer, to a company, to it's share holders.07/29/2015 - 2:02am
Andrew EisenAnd again, you keep saying "accountable." What exactly does that mean? How is Gamasutra not accounting for the editorial it published?07/28/2015 - 11:47pm
Andrew EisenMatt - I disagree with your 9:12 and 9:16 comment. There are myriad ways to address content you don't like. And they're far easier to execute in the online space.07/28/2015 - 11:47pm
Andrew EisenMatt - Banning in the legal sense? Not that I'm aware but there have certainly been groups of gamers who have worked towards getting content they don't like removed.07/28/2015 - 11:45pm
DanJAlexander's editorial was and continues to be grossly misrepresented by her opponents. And if you don't like a site, you stop reading it - same as not watching a tv show. They get your first click, but not your second.07/28/2015 - 11:40pm
TechnogeekYes, because actively trying to convince advertisers to influence the editorial content of media is a perfectly acceptable thing to do, especially for a movement that's ostensibly about journalistic ethics.07/28/2015 - 11:02pm
Mattsworknameanother07/28/2015 - 9:16pm
Mattsworknameyou HAVE TO click on it. So they get the click revenue weather you like what it says or not. as such, the targeting of advertisers most likely seemed like a good course of action to those who wanted to hold those media groups accountable for one reason07/28/2015 - 9:16pm
MattsworknameBut, when you look at online media, it's completely different, with far more options, but far few ways to address issues that the consumers may have. In tv, you don't like what they show, you don't watch. But in order to see if you like something online07/28/2015 - 9:12pm
MattsworknameIn tv, and radio, ratings are how it works. your ratings determine how well you do and how much money you an charge.07/28/2015 - 9:02pm
Mattsworknameexpect to do so without someone wanting to hold you to task for it07/28/2015 - 9:00pm
MattsworknameMecha: I don't think anyone was asking for Editoral changes, what they wanted was to show those media groups that if they were gonna bash there own audiance, the audiance was not gonna take it sitting down. you can write what you want, but you can't07/28/2015 - 8:56pm
MattsworknameAndrew, Im asking as a practical question, Have gamers, as a group, ever asked for a game, or other item, to be banned. Im trying to see if theres any cases anyone else remembers cause I cant find or remember any.07/28/2015 - 8:55pm
Andrew EisenAs mentioned, Gamasutra isn't a gaming site, it's a game industry site. I don't feel it's changed its focus at all. Also, I don't get the sense that the majority of the people who took issue with that one opinion piece were regular readers anyway.07/28/2015 - 8:43pm
MattsworknameDitto kotaku, Gawker, VOX, Polygon, ETC07/28/2015 - 8:41pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician