Another Study Eyes Games & Aggressive Behavior Correlation

Another Study Eyes Games & Aggressive Behavior Correlation

October 26, 2009

A new study undertaken by a group of Massachusetts General Hospital researchers attempts to further explore whether a link exists between playing violent videogames and aggressive behavior in adolescents.

“M-Rated Video Games and Aggressive or Problem Behavior Among Young Adolescents” surveyed 1,254 7th and 8th grade students in Pennsylvania and South Carolina in late 2004. Youths were asked which five games they had “played a lot” in the past six months and were asked to detail any “delinquent,” bullying or physically aggressive behaviors.

Among those who were current game players, 48.8% (67.9% boys and 29.2% girls) had at least one M-rated game on their most-played list. Cross tallying and crunching variables led the researchers to conclude:

M-rated games remained a strongly significant predictor of engaging in bullying and physical aggression However, we found no significant relationship between playing M-rated games and being a victim of bullies, or engaging in delinquent behaviors.

Boys were then split off from girls and their responses analyzed separately. With boys “M-rated game exposure ceased to be a significant predictor of bullying, and aggressive personality,” though “M-rated game play was still a significant, though weaker, predictor of fighting.”

With girls, “frequent M-rated game use became an even stronger predictor of bullying and fighting.”

The group concluded:

Overall, our hypothesis that heavy play of Mature-rated, violent games would predict a greater risk for common problem behaviors, even when controlling for potential confounders suggested by previous research, was partially supported.

The researchers pointed out a few limitations of their study, which included the fact that “Involvement in problem behaviors is common among adolescents.” Also, responses from the children indicating their top five games of the past six months were not independently verified.

Interestingly, in touching on legislation that seeks to ban children’s access to “violent” videogames, and asking “who would determine whether a game fits these critieria,” the study states, “Because of these complexities, it is unlikely that a narrow category of games could be clearly identified and supported by research as broadly harmful to young people.”

GP: We have an inquiry in with one of the researchers to make sure that's it's OK to post the whole study (PDF) on the website.

Update: Just a note that the research team included Dr. Cheryl Olson, co-author of Grand Theft Childhood.

Update 2: Here's a link to a PDF of the full study.

Comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Re: Another Study Eyes Games & Aggressive Behavior ...

"M-rated games remained a strongly significant predictor of engaging in bullying and physical aggression However, we found no significant relationship between playing M-rated games and... engaging in delinquent behaviors."

So, bullying and physical aggression are not considered delinquent behaviors or a strongly significant predictor of behavior does not qualify as a significant relationship?

Also, the results of this study are based entirely on the word of grade schoolers?  Not the best way to go about collecting data, folks.

Of course, this is just based on a summary.  I'll reserve judgment until I read the study itself.

 

Andrew Eisen

Re: Another Study Eyes Games & Aggressive Behavior ...

It sounds to me like the study is not making any claims of causation, only correlation.  I hope I'm reading that right.

Re: Another Study Eyes Games & Aggressive Behavior ...

That's what it seems like to me too.  Unfortunately it seems that the rule of Correlation =/= Causation is becoming increasingly overlooked in all "studies" these days.

"Go ahead and hate your neighbor, go ahead and cheat a friend. Do it in the name of Heaven, Jack Thompson'll justify it in the end." - nightwng2000

Re: Another Study Eyes Games & Aggressive Behavior ...

That's what I got out of this, too.  The way they phrased their findings, it seemed like they were looking at violent video games as a marker of aggressive behavior than any kind of causal link one way or the other.


Re: Another Study Eyes Games & Aggressive Behavior ...

Hmm... I wonder if bullies are more likely to want to play violent M-rated games. I guess not, since these fine scientists would obviously have pointed it out???

Re: Another Study Eyes Games & Aggressive Behavior ...

Isn't that exactly what the study is saying?

Re: Another Study Eyes Games & Aggressive Behavior ...

It is a good thing bullying never happened until video games came out. Oh wait.....

The more I see stuff like these, the more it reminds me of the whole 'heavy metal music is corrupting our youth' spill from back in the day.

Re: Another Study Eyes Games & Aggressive Behavior ...

Oh, for god's sake, did any of these 'researchers' ever think to just look at national data on violent crime over the past 50 years?  It's plummeted among 14-17 year-olds and gone down in every age group except people-over-50 (i.e. the ones claiming that video games are making kids more violent).

Re: Another Study Eyes Games & Aggressive Behavior ...

In fact, Cheryl Olsen mentions it several times in Grand Theft Childhood.  Besides, it doesn't automatically invalidate the data, or the study for that matter.

---
The Mammon Philosophy

Re: Another Study Eyes Games & Aggressive Behavior ...

Repeat after me, folks: Correlation does not equal causation. Correlation does not equal causation. Correlation does not equal causation. Correlation does not equal causation. Correlation does not equal causation. Correlation does not equal causation. Correlation does not equal causation. Correlation does not equal causation. Correlation does not equal causation. Correlation does not equal causation. Correlation does not equal causation. Correlation does not equal causation. Correlation does not equal causation. Correlation does not equal causation. Correlation does not equal causation.

 

....Am I getting through to them yet?

Re: Another Study Eyes Games & Aggressive Behavior ...

Sometimes you need to get angry, lighting a fire under ones' ass can actually be a good thing.

Re: Another Study Eyes Games & Aggressive Behavior ...

This is the problem I have, this study sounds responsible it sounds like they're saying they see a correlation between violent video game playing and aggression/violence.

I think that's probably accurate. I'd have to read the whole study but it doesn't sound like they make the claim of causation, which is responsible science.

The problem is that some politician is going to grab this study and say "This study says people who are violent tend to play more violent video games ergo violent video games CAUSE violence."

What these scientists SHOULD do is require every legitimate copy of this study whether in print or electronic format to carry the following statement printed on the top of every page exactly as I have posted it:

THIS STUDY DOES NOT ARGUE THAT VIOLENT VIDEO GAMES CAUSE VIOLENT BEHAVIOR!

ANYONE ARGUING THAT THIS STUDY STANDS FOR THAT IS EITHER IGNORANT  OR LYING!

Preferably in red

Re: Another Study Eyes Games & Aggressive Behavior ...

From this study, I gather that those that are violent play more violent video games. Not that violent video games cause people to be violent.

-If an apple a day keeps the doctor away....what happens when a doctor eats an apple?-

Re: Another Study Eyes Games & Aggressive Behavior ...

Games are exciting ,excitement=energy,energy=aggression. This study is saying games give you energy..... next...



Until lobbying is a hanging offense I choose anarchy! Stop supporting big media and furthering the criminalization of consumers!! http://zippydsmlee.wordpress.com/

Re: Another Study Eyes Games & Aggressive Behavior ...

Can't wait to read the whole study -- I find it interesting that heightened Mature gameplay is a predictor of increased violence for girls, but not boys.

---
The Mammon Philosophy

GamePolitics ShoutBox

Posted 02/09/10 at 11:23am
gellymatos: ...paranoid, as lawyers, that the language of the law may do so. But like I said, paranoid.
Posted 02/09/10 at 11:22am
Valdearg: They see this as the Government encouraging the "sinful sexual behavior." They don't want gays to score ANY political victory, even one that protects them from violent homophobic psychopaths.
Posted 02/09/10 at 11:22am
gellymatos: Oh, hell yes. And nothing annoys me more than that fact. They stray and make real catholics look bad. And yes, they could be...
Posted 02/09/10 at 11:21am
Valdearg: Also, you really think that people who are smart enough to practice law REALLY believe that this law will prevent them from expressing their religious beliefs? The fact is that these guys hate gays, and don't want them to be protected in any way.
Posted 02/09/10 at 11:20am
Valdearg: The catholic teachings, perhaps, but certainly, there are PLENTY of Catholics who condone violence and hate. Just like these guys.
Posted 02/09/10 at 11:19am
gellymatos: violence or hate against anyone.
Posted 02/09/10 at 11:18am
gellymatos: Like I said, paranoia that the law could make it illegal to voice an opinion on gay marriage. And catholics don't condon...
Posted 02/09/10 at 11:15am
Valdearg: Can you find a different reason behind the lawsuit, other than the fact that they want to protect their "right" to perpetrate violence against homosexuals, based on their religious beliefs?
Posted 02/09/10 at 11:14am
Valdearg: The fact is that this Law Center, which specializes in the defense of Catholic Beliefs, kind of like a Catholic ACLU, I suppose, is challenging a law that PROTECTS homosexuals from violent acts motivated by hatred of gay people.
Posted 02/09/10 at 11:13am
gellymatos: Again, sorry I jumped the gun like I did.
Posted 02/09/10 at 11:13am
Valdearg: @Gelly: It's a liberal blog. Its not designed to be balanced. Does that mean that everything there is completely false, and not worth investigating? Nope.
Posted 02/09/10 at 11:12am
Valdearg: To be completely honest, I would argue that that assessment is more biased and farther from reality than the Daily Kos assessment.
Posted 02/09/10 at 11:12am
gellymatos: I'm sure the story itself is true, it's just that the site seems to be biased. More so than Fox. And that takes effort.
Posted 02/09/10 at 11:11am
Valdearg: Would you rather I link straight to the horses mouth? Here's the story from the Law Center involved in the suit.
Posted 02/09/10 at 11:10am
Valdearg: @Gelly: I love how you jumped on the A_L train, and EVERYTHING that EVER comes from Daily Kos is questionable. Clearly, NONE of it could POSSIBLY merit a closer look.
Posted 02/09/10 at 11:09am
gellymatos: I'm sorry. I thought you were attacking the church due to your history of doing so. My bad.
Posted 02/09/10 at 11:08am
gellymatos: ...that these laws will make it illegal to voice an opinion against gay marriage. Third, Your source is questionable. And by...
Posted 02/09/10 at 11:07am
Valdearg: @Gelly: Wow, jumping right to the defense of the church, despite the fact that I never implicated the Catholic church?
Posted 02/09/10 at 11:06am
gellymatos: , not orders from the church. Second, the paranoia about these laws that SOME christians have is based off of the parnoid idea..
Posted 02/09/10 at 11:05am
gellymatos: Vald: Where to start. Oh yes. First, he doesn't seem to represent the whole church. His doing this out of his own conviction...
Login or register to post shouts