Shareholders Lose Court Battle Against Midway

Shareholders Lose Court Battle Against Midway

October 27, 2009

A United States District Court judge has dismissed a lawsuit brought against Midway Games by a group of shareholders who had alleged that the company artificially inflated its stock by deceiving the public.

Filed by Joseph Zerger, “on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated,” the suit targeted Midway Games’ Steven Allison, James R. Boyle, Miguel Iribarren, Thomas Powell and David Zucker.

In a filing dated October 19, 2009, Northern District Illinois Eastern Division Judge David Coar ruled against the plaintiffs, stating:

Plaintiffs have failed to show that Defendants said or did anything more than publicly adopt a hopeful posture that its strategic plans would pay off. Such preening for the financial press is classic puffery. Even if these statements were not puffery, Plaintiffs cannot establish that they were false when made.

The plaintiffs had alleged that:

While the executives rushed to sell their Midway stock at the trumped-up prices their “scheme” temporarily sustained, the lead plaintiffs and other putative class members purchased it—and lost millions when the market eventually learned the truth.

Midway declared bankruptcy in February of this year.
 

|Image Via icanhascheezburger|

Posted in

Comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Re: Shareholders Lose Court Battle Against Midway

"Puffery?"

Is that financial jargon?

Re: Shareholders Lose Court Battle Against Midway

It's actually legal jargon. It usually refers to a claim which inherently cannot be substantiated  (i.e., isn't either true or false). Most frequently encountered in advertising and trade law (e.g., "BMW. The Ultimate Driving Machine" or "Gillette. The Best a Man Can Get."). Because puffery generally isn't a verifiable claim, it can't be said that puffery is misleading and, therefore, it doesn't usually constitute a basis for liability. Unlike superlative claims, which can be verified (e.g., "Gillette Sensor. The Closest Shave a Man Can Get"). 

Re: Shareholders Lose Court Battle Against Midway

Regardless of whether the heads of Midway were pulling BS, it didnt take a rocket scientist to determine just how fucked the company was.  When a new MK game and a new IP (This is Vegas) are stated as the saviours of the company, its time to divest from the company.

Re: Shareholders Lose Court Battle Against Midway

But guys, wouldn't it be so much nicer to play the stock market if you knew that if you lost out, you could always sue and get your money back?  It's win-win!

Re: Shareholders Lose Court Battle Against Midway

But releasing false information to the shareholders is a big no no. Corruption lives on. :(


Re: Shareholders Lose Court Battle Against Midway

But releasing false information to the shareholders is a big no no. Corruption lives on. :(


GamePolitics ShoutBox

Posted 02/08/10 at 02:22pm
Valdearg: J/K, btw, with that last comment. Just in case anyone was confused.
Posted 02/08/10 at 02:21pm
Valdearg: This comes on the heels of Sarah Palin telling the Teaparty Convention to pray for Divine intervention to stop the Progressive tide. It seems she succeeded in recruiting the big man to offer some help. >.<
Posted 02/08/10 at 02:20pm
Valdearg: @A_L: I'm hearing that, as well.. It seems the dems aren't just losing seats via elections... :(
Posted 02/08/10 at 02:04pm
DarkSaber: Did he design Big Murtha Truckers 1 & 2?
Posted 02/08/10 at 01:50pm
Austin_Lewis: John Murtha reportedly deceased.
Posted 02/08/10 at 01:04pm
Shadow D. Darkman: DarkSaber: (EDIT) IDC really, it's just good to see some new stuff here.
Posted 02/08/10 at 01:02pm
DarkSaber: @Shadow If the on-going spat in China over WoW counts as "new" at least. Does anyone here REALLY give a shit about the state of chinas game industry anyway?
Posted 02/08/10 at 12:59pm
gellymatos: Oh, we pro-life advocates have our nutjuobs to (ie, guys who shoot up abortion clincs). We can have worse ones than yours.
Posted 02/08/10 at 12:58pm
Shadow D. Darkman: Finally, new articles!
Posted 02/08/10 at 12:57pm
Valdearg: @Gelly: As much as I hate to admit it, it's because so many of us on the Left are utterly predictable with our outrage, LOL.
Posted 02/08/10 at 12:57pm
gellymatos: Oh, and the boycotting didn't get that much attention to be a real blow to pro-choice advocates either.
Posted 02/08/10 at 12:52pm
gellymatos: ...predict such a bad move by what is not considered a stupid group.
Posted 02/08/10 at 12:50pm
gellymatos: How can you script someone boycotting the super bowl over such a trivial ad. An ad they must have seen before hand. You can't...
Posted 02/08/10 at 12:47pm
Valdearg: There are plenty of bright people in Marketing, and this struck me as too perfect, and too scripted to have been just a byproduct of some lucky stroke of luck on FotF's part.
Posted 02/08/10 at 12:46pm
Valdearg: You are so quick to disqualify the possibility that it was planned. I'm not saying that it necessarily WAS as I describe it, but I certainly believe it a very real possibility.
Posted 02/08/10 at 12:42pm
gellymatos: ...that. However, that doesn't strike me as something predictable. Was it a bonus? Yes. Was it planned to be so? No.
Posted 02/08/10 at 12:41pm
DarkSaber: Ah right here we go again, someone disagrees with Val therefore they don't know what they are talking about.
Posted 02/08/10 at 12:40pm
gellymatos: Ok, you're right there. It did make the pro-choice advocates look bad, specifically boycotting the Super Bowl. Forgot about...
Posted 02/08/10 at 12:36pm
Valdearg: You have to stop taking everything at face value. If you don't think there was someone thinking along the exact same lines that I am now, when they were developing this Marketing Campaign, you are sorely mistaken.
Posted 02/08/10 at 12:34pm
Valdearg: No offense, Gelly, but you are too disconnected from this topic to understand. The Pro-Choice people threw a FIT, and were going to boycott the SB because of it. The fact that it was so mild makes the Pro-Choice people look like idiots to those aware of i
Login or register to post shouts