FCC NOI Asks for Comments on Content Control

October 29, 2009 -

The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has released a Notice of Inquiry (NOI) seeking feedback and responses to the subject of the affect of electronic media on children and whether or not the Commission should have more power to wield authority.

Released on October 23, Empowering Parents and Protecting Children in an Evolving Media Landscape presents some of the influence (both pro and con) emerging media has on youngsters, before asking for additional data on these subjects. Specifically the FCC is seeking “information on the extent to which children are using electronic media today, the benefits and risks these technologies bring for children, and the ways in which parents, teachers, and children can help reap the benefits while minimizing the risks.”

The FCC also is asking commenters to “to discuss whether the Commission has the statutory authority to take any proposed actions and whether those actions would be consistent with the First Amendment.”

FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski included a statement with the NOI in which he noted that “twenty years ago, parents worried about one or two TV sets in the house,” while today, media choices are far more widespread for children, including videogames, which “have become a prevalent entertainment source in millions of homes and a daily reality for millions of kids.”

Genachowski continued:

This Notice of Inquiry recognizes the importance of undertaking a comprehensive approach to assessing how children can best be served in the digital media landscape. The vital role of government in this media environment is therefore to empower parents and protect children, while honoring and abiding by the First Amendment.

Thanks2 Sean


Comments

Re: FCC NOI Asks for Comments on Content Control

I read somewhere that Genachowski was one of the founding members of Common Sense Media.

Re: FCC NOI Asks for Comments on Content Control

Wait, wasn't the ECA praising the FCC just a few days ago? 

ECA, small hint:  You can't give some power to the government and expect them not to take everything they can.

GameDrunk - Celebrating our two greatest passions.

Re: FCC NOI Asks for Comments on Content Control

Oh behalf of the extra 10 dollars my parents have to spend due to the FCC giving Cablevision a slap on the wrist fine while not making sure they didn't fix what got them fined in the first place:

 

($%^ you FCC.  MOST USELESS ORGANIZATION EVER!

Re: FCC NOI Asks for Comments on Content Control

"The vital role of government in this media environment is therefore to empower parents and protect children, while honoring and abiding by the First Amendment."

Sorry, but the First Amendment needs to be first and foremost, not just an afterthought.  The children will be fine.

Re: FCC NOI Asks for Comments on Content Control

FCC will find limited success trying to wield the bleephammer on the internet. The  most they could ever hope to accomplish is making suggestions to big names like YouTube or Google.

I for one want our government to keep things free and open, then step aside. Excpet where regulation is necessary. Like energy and other public utils.

Re: FCC NOI Asks for Comments on Content Control

"Thanks2 Sean'"

Your welcome.... (j/k)

Re: FCC NOI Asks for Comments on Content Control

Let's say for the sake of argument that video game censorship is constitutional (yes I know how hard it is to swallow this). What authority would the FCC have to make the rules for game censorship?

Video games are not commuinication in much the same way as a movie or a book is not communication. Sure some of them involve the internet but the FCC has no authority there in terms of content control (at least not now). Let's take God of War 3, the game has no multiplayer and no online to speak of (it may have DLC though), how could the FCC possibly justify that the game would fall under their jurisdiction?

I used to cling to the hope that the FCC is not filled with censoring trash, and that they instead are just regular people obliged to censor the TV and respond to complaints as per the letter of the law. Now that's been shattered.

----------------------------------------------------

Debates are like merry go rounds. Two people take their positions then they go through the same points over and over and over again. Then when it's over they have the same positions they started in.

---------------------------------------------------- Debates are like merry go rounds. Two people take their positions then they go through the same points over and over and over again. Then when it's over they have the same positions they started in.

Re: FCC NOI Asks for Comments on Content Control

If I may be so bold...griping here may be satisfying in the short term but will get us nowhere long-term.

The FCC is calling for COMMENTS...this is our chance, as a group, to have our voices heard.  I would urge each of us to take 20 minutes to write a respectful, coherent comment on these issues and submit them to the FCC.  This will help us get some balance on this issue.

For those who know of information that contradictions the "traditional view"...that, in particular, would be a valuable contribution to this discussion.

And remember, keep it respectful, coherent and reasonably short. 

Ok, off my soapbox...

Re: FCC NOI Asks for Comments on Content Control

Didn't it say we have to wait 60 days to respond? I don't know how to contact them with comments they are requesting.

---------------------------------------------------- Debates are like merry go rounds. Two people take their positions then they go through the same points over and over and over again. Then when it's over they have the same positions they started in.

---------------------------------------------------- Debates are like merry go rounds. Two people take their positions then they go through the same points over and over and over again. Then when it's over they have the same positions they started in.

Re: FCC NOI Asks for Comments on Content Control

I see what you're referring to, but I believe it's "legaleze"...it says 60 days after publication in the federal register...I believe that has now happened.  At any rate they seem to be accepting comments at this time on their web-page (the web-page to deliver the comments is toward the end of the .pdf document in the link.  You have to write out a .doc file, and upload it).

Re: FCC NOI Asks for Comments on Content Control

Well, I no longer live in the Unites States so have fun guys. I suffer from chronic lazyness that prevents me from doing this, but I wish you guys the best of luck!

"God, is that you?"

"No! It's a me, Mario!"

"God, is that you?" "No! It's a me, Mario!"

Re: FCC NOI Asks for Comments on Content Control

Heh, if anything the FCC needs to be dissolved. It's outlived it's usefulness, and is only a bullying tool for the PTC

Re: FCC NOI Asks for Comments on Content Control

This seems like a potential hot-button issue coming up in a few years (as more people take notice).  Various government entities want control over media.  Hell, there is even that move the Senate took recently to give the president emergency control over the internet.  (naturally, nobody cared because a celebrity is currently in office)

Re: FCC NOI Asks for Comments on Content Control

"Please provide us with evidence that will allow us to have more control over your lives. For the sake of the children, naturally."

--------------------------------------------------

I LIKE the fence. I get 2 groups to laugh at then.

-------------------------------------------------- I LIKE the fence. I get 2 groups to laugh at then.

Re: FCC NOI Asks for Comments on Content Control

Government organization considering grab for more power.  Film at eleven.

In other breaking news, experts are quoted as saying the sun is "very likely" to rise tomorrow morning.

Re: FCC NOI Asks for Comments on Content Control

Recent surveys and studies have shown that kids use online media to watch porn *GASP* and because of the video games they play they become raving, raping madmen with no moral values and are most likely going to jail then they would not playing video games and not going online.

Here in the studio we have a qualified psychologist who has written several books totally unrelated to the matter to talk to you about this, more at 11.

 

- FOX NEWS

"God, is that you?"

"No! It's a me, Mario!"

"God, is that you?" "No! It's a me, Mario!"
 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
NeenekoHeh. PoliSci tends to ruin the news. Kinda like how being a gamer tends to ruin mainstream game stories, any actual knowledge in a field highlights how poorly it is reported.09/30/2014 - 8:30am
MechaTama31Heh. I don't think you need a master's in politics to see that... ;)09/30/2014 - 7:32am
Matthew WilsonTrust me i read the same sites.I have a Master's in Applied Politics. I get to see through the spin both Left and Right that tend to be put on news stories.09/30/2014 - 1:02am
WymorenceI also have an extremely hard time in listening to people who froth at the mouth when the POTUS does something almost identical to the previous POTUS, but for some reason is subhuman for it this time around09/30/2014 - 12:43am
WymorenceThe problem is that opposing views are a good thing, but sites like Brietbart and their ilk are the exact opposite. 9/10 times they tweak the news to benefit their own views instead of just giving their own side of it.09/30/2014 - 12:41am
james_fudgeIf I were in a cult I might try and shut myself away from opposing views...09/29/2014 - 11:48pm
james_fudgeoh and Nate Silver and Politico too.09/29/2014 - 11:48pm
james_fudgeI read a lot of sites every day, Drudge, Breitbart, Huffpo, DailKOS, Red State, Fox, MSNBC, CNN and i'm not infected. Time for people to get thicker skins.09/29/2014 - 11:46pm
james_fudgeNeo_DrKefka: you do know you visited "one of those sites" when you posted that article, right?09/29/2014 - 11:44pm
E. Zachary KnightOcarina of Time done up in the Link to the Past engine? You know I would buy this day one if it were official. http://kotaku.com/fans-are-remaking-ocarina-of-time-in-2d-164059481909/29/2014 - 11:14pm
MaskedPixelantehttps://twitter.com/raymond03155046/status/516735796754522113 "We're fundraising for the group who helped our pets out in their time of need." "lol ur just doing this for the money get over your cat."09/29/2014 - 9:26pm
MechaTama31https://www.humblebundle.com/store/p/dontmove_storefront <-- This looks like it might be the most incredible dollar I'll ever spend.09/29/2014 - 9:12pm
Matthew WilsonI agree. the same for MSNBC as well. both of them can go away, but like it or not its a free market and fox news make allot of money sadly.09/29/2014 - 7:46pm
quiknkoldI'm an independent voter. Vote Blue and Red. so I dont really visit any specific news sites(Though I know FoxNews can take a flying leap off a bridge)09/29/2014 - 7:02pm
quiknkoldFactcheck.org. there you go. neither left or right. straight down the center.09/29/2014 - 7:01pm
Craig R.When a website's tinfoil isn't enough, add your own!09/29/2014 - 6:32pm
Andrew EisenWe used to have a reader who constantly posted DailyKOS articles in the Shout box. I was amazed, not so much by the amazing and horrifically disingenuous spin the site put on these articles, but that our reader would add his own spin on top of it!09/29/2014 - 6:05pm
E. Zachary KnightYou do realize that DailyKOS is the Brietbart of the left wing agenda, right?09/29/2014 - 6:01pm
quiknkoldproblem with Breibart is, despite I totally agreeing with Nero's articles.....its freaking Breibart. Its not the best place int he world when it comes to trust. if DailyKos or think progress reported it....well...things would be better. but here we are.09/29/2014 - 6:00pm
Neo_DrKefkaAt this point I need to stop visiting certain sites. At least now I have a list of people and where they work where I need to avoid http://www.breitbart.com/Breitbart-London/2014/09/21/GameJournoPros-we-reveal-every-journalist-on-the-list09/29/2014 - 5:56pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician