FCC NOI Asks for Comments on Content Control

October 29, 2009 -

The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has released a Notice of Inquiry (NOI) seeking feedback and responses to the subject of the affect of electronic media on children and whether or not the Commission should have more power to wield authority.

Released on October 23, Empowering Parents and Protecting Children in an Evolving Media Landscape presents some of the influence (both pro and con) emerging media has on youngsters, before asking for additional data on these subjects. Specifically the FCC is seeking “information on the extent to which children are using electronic media today, the benefits and risks these technologies bring for children, and the ways in which parents, teachers, and children can help reap the benefits while minimizing the risks.”

The FCC also is asking commenters to “to discuss whether the Commission has the statutory authority to take any proposed actions and whether those actions would be consistent with the First Amendment.”

FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski included a statement with the NOI in which he noted that “twenty years ago, parents worried about one or two TV sets in the house,” while today, media choices are far more widespread for children, including videogames, which “have become a prevalent entertainment source in millions of homes and a daily reality for millions of kids.”

Genachowski continued:

This Notice of Inquiry recognizes the importance of undertaking a comprehensive approach to assessing how children can best be served in the digital media landscape. The vital role of government in this media environment is therefore to empower parents and protect children, while honoring and abiding by the First Amendment.

Thanks2 Sean


Comments

Re: FCC NOI Asks for Comments on Content Control

I read somewhere that Genachowski was one of the founding members of Common Sense Media.

Re: FCC NOI Asks for Comments on Content Control

Wait, wasn't the ECA praising the FCC just a few days ago? 

ECA, small hint:  You can't give some power to the government and expect them not to take everything they can.

GameDrunk - Celebrating our two greatest passions.

Re: FCC NOI Asks for Comments on Content Control

Oh behalf of the extra 10 dollars my parents have to spend due to the FCC giving Cablevision a slap on the wrist fine while not making sure they didn't fix what got them fined in the first place:

 

($%^ you FCC.  MOST USELESS ORGANIZATION EVER!

Re: FCC NOI Asks for Comments on Content Control

"The vital role of government in this media environment is therefore to empower parents and protect children, while honoring and abiding by the First Amendment."

Sorry, but the First Amendment needs to be first and foremost, not just an afterthought.  The children will be fine.

Re: FCC NOI Asks for Comments on Content Control

FCC will find limited success trying to wield the bleephammer on the internet. The  most they could ever hope to accomplish is making suggestions to big names like YouTube or Google.

I for one want our government to keep things free and open, then step aside. Excpet where regulation is necessary. Like energy and other public utils.

Re: FCC NOI Asks for Comments on Content Control

"Thanks2 Sean'"

Your welcome.... (j/k)

Re: FCC NOI Asks for Comments on Content Control

Let's say for the sake of argument that video game censorship is constitutional (yes I know how hard it is to swallow this). What authority would the FCC have to make the rules for game censorship?

Video games are not commuinication in much the same way as a movie or a book is not communication. Sure some of them involve the internet but the FCC has no authority there in terms of content control (at least not now). Let's take God of War 3, the game has no multiplayer and no online to speak of (it may have DLC though), how could the FCC possibly justify that the game would fall under their jurisdiction?

I used to cling to the hope that the FCC is not filled with censoring trash, and that they instead are just regular people obliged to censor the TV and respond to complaints as per the letter of the law. Now that's been shattered.

----------------------------------------------------

Debates are like merry go rounds. Two people take their positions then they go through the same points over and over and over again. Then when it's over they have the same positions they started in.

---------------------------------------------------- Debates are like merry go rounds. Two people take their positions then they go through the same points over and over and over again. Then when it's over they have the same positions they started in.

Re: FCC NOI Asks for Comments on Content Control

If I may be so bold...griping here may be satisfying in the short term but will get us nowhere long-term.

The FCC is calling for COMMENTS...this is our chance, as a group, to have our voices heard.  I would urge each of us to take 20 minutes to write a respectful, coherent comment on these issues and submit them to the FCC.  This will help us get some balance on this issue.

For those who know of information that contradictions the "traditional view"...that, in particular, would be a valuable contribution to this discussion.

And remember, keep it respectful, coherent and reasonably short. 

Ok, off my soapbox...

Re: FCC NOI Asks for Comments on Content Control

Didn't it say we have to wait 60 days to respond? I don't know how to contact them with comments they are requesting.

---------------------------------------------------- Debates are like merry go rounds. Two people take their positions then they go through the same points over and over and over again. Then when it's over they have the same positions they started in.

---------------------------------------------------- Debates are like merry go rounds. Two people take their positions then they go through the same points over and over and over again. Then when it's over they have the same positions they started in.

Re: FCC NOI Asks for Comments on Content Control

I see what you're referring to, but I believe it's "legaleze"...it says 60 days after publication in the federal register...I believe that has now happened.  At any rate they seem to be accepting comments at this time on their web-page (the web-page to deliver the comments is toward the end of the .pdf document in the link.  You have to write out a .doc file, and upload it).

Re: FCC NOI Asks for Comments on Content Control

Well, I no longer live in the Unites States so have fun guys. I suffer from chronic lazyness that prevents me from doing this, but I wish you guys the best of luck!

"God, is that you?"

"No! It's a me, Mario!"

"God, is that you?" "No! It's a me, Mario!"

Re: FCC NOI Asks for Comments on Content Control

Heh, if anything the FCC needs to be dissolved. It's outlived it's usefulness, and is only a bullying tool for the PTC

Re: FCC NOI Asks for Comments on Content Control

This seems like a potential hot-button issue coming up in a few years (as more people take notice).  Various government entities want control over media.  Hell, there is even that move the Senate took recently to give the president emergency control over the internet.  (naturally, nobody cared because a celebrity is currently in office)

Re: FCC NOI Asks for Comments on Content Control

"Please provide us with evidence that will allow us to have more control over your lives. For the sake of the children, naturally."

--------------------------------------------------

I LIKE the fence. I get 2 groups to laugh at then.

-------------------------------------------------- I LIKE the fence. I get 2 groups to laugh at then.

Re: FCC NOI Asks for Comments on Content Control

Government organization considering grab for more power.  Film at eleven.

In other breaking news, experts are quoted as saying the sun is "very likely" to rise tomorrow morning.

Re: FCC NOI Asks for Comments on Content Control

Recent surveys and studies have shown that kids use online media to watch porn *GASP* and because of the video games they play they become raving, raping madmen with no moral values and are most likely going to jail then they would not playing video games and not going online.

Here in the studio we have a qualified psychologist who has written several books totally unrelated to the matter to talk to you about this, more at 11.

 

- FOX NEWS

"God, is that you?"

"No! It's a me, Mario!"

"God, is that you?" "No! It's a me, Mario!"
 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

Did Microsoft pay too much ($2.5 billion) for Minecraft developer Mojang?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
Kronodebate. Becaus apparently people who only post on Reddit are supposed to police twitter before they're allowed to question anything about the people involved.09/18/2014 - 10:40pm
KronoI highly doubt many, if any are using journalistic integrity as a cover for harassment. The people harassing are essentially trolls. They aren't interested in subtle. More often it's othe other way around. People use "but X is being harassed" to shut down09/18/2014 - 10:38pm
Andrew EisenAnd exacerbating everything is the fact that all the cries of ethics violations have been obnoxious and easily proven false.09/18/2014 - 8:59pm
Andrew EisenProblem is, I would imagine, the sheer number of people who are using journalistic integrity as a cover for their harassing actions or only bringing it up on the false pretense of journalistic integrity.09/18/2014 - 8:47pm
Andrew EisenHaving said that, I can certainly see how one would be frustrated if they truly just wanted to talk about journalistic integrity and someone said they were one of the people harassing Sarkeesian, Quinn and others (though I've seen no examples of that).09/18/2014 - 8:44pm
KronoThat's been the common refrain, that talk of journalism ethics is just an excuse to harass people.09/18/2014 - 8:44pm
KronoLines like "like a partial compromise with the howling trolls who’ve latched onto ‘ethics’ as the latest flag in their onslaught against evolution and inclusion." are taring everyone questioning the ethics as a harasser.09/18/2014 - 8:43pm
Andrew EisenKrono - Except, none of the articles were talking about gamers complaining about journalist ethics, let alone called them white male misogynists. They were talking about the gamers who were harassing others.09/18/2014 - 8:36pm
Kronomakes plenty of sense. It's rather hard to dismiss someone as a white guy running a sock puppet when they've posted proof they're a woman, or black, or another minority.09/18/2014 - 8:32pm
Kronothat any critics of journalists were white guys that hated women, and could be dismissed as such. It seems to have helped some. It's kind of difficult to maintain the white guy narrative in the face of a bunch of women and non-white guys. So the tag09/18/2014 - 8:32pm
Kronothat, someone vented on a #gamergate 4chan thread about being dismissed like that. The suggestion they got in return was to organize their own hashtag in response, with #NotYourShield being suggested. Thus the tag came into use to combat the undercurrent09/18/2014 - 8:32pm
Kronomuch more general problem. And while several of the articles were fairly tame, they spured a bunch of people to dismiss any critics of the journalism involved as misogynistic men. Usually with insults aimed at the geek stereotype. After about a week of09/18/2014 - 8:32pm
Andrew EisenSleaker - Not sure what that has to do with anything but yeah, the gender percentages differ depending on how the study defines what a gamer is.09/18/2014 - 8:32pm
KronoThe rhetoric pushed by the spearheading articles that the "gamers" complaining about journalist ethics were just angry white male misogynists, insulted a lot of people that were previously fairly neutral. It made it go from a Kotaku problem, to a09/18/2014 - 8:31pm
Krono@Andrew I'm not surprised overlap exists. I expect much of it is a rush to jump on the bandwagon, either by reporting on the original articles, or rushing out their own. The point is that was a major flashpoint, much bigger than the reddit mass deletion.09/18/2014 - 8:31pm
Sleaker@AE - well the gamer trend was described with stats on Factual Femenist. Only 1 in 7 males plays games 20+ hrs going into college vs 1 in 40 females. So gaming is definitely still male dominated despite fake stats trying to say otherwise.09/18/2014 - 8:30pm
Craig R.Do conspiracies ever make sense? The fact that people are now having to defend themselves against nutjob websites like Breitbart.com shows how far down into the rabbit hole we've all been forcibly dragged.09/18/2014 - 7:05pm
Michael ChandraBut when the mountain obviously exists...09/18/2014 - 5:49pm
Michael ChandraMind you, if someone makes a mountain out of a molehill with a secret agenda as motive, it'd be fine.09/18/2014 - 5:48pm
Andrew EisenOkay, so I guess I'm not making sense of #notyourshield because it doesn't make any sense.09/18/2014 - 5:28pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician