Age Ratings, Anti-Piracy Subject of UK Digital Economy Bill

November 18, 2009 -

A few details regarding Britain’s Digital Economy Bill were touched on this morning as part of the Queen’s Speech to Parliament, in which the monarch outlines the coming legislative agenda.

Among the forthcoming actions will be a mandatory age rating on all videogames aimed at children ages 12 and above, reports the Guardian. The Bill calls for the adoption of the Pan-European Game Information (PEGI) system as the method of classifying games in the UK, replacing the current practice of using both PEGI and British Board of Film Classification (BBFC) ratings.

The Digital Economy Bill would also tackle piracy, proposing a tough policy much like France’s three-strike Hadopi Law. Those caught committing piracy will receive a warning letter, followed by a second, more stern letter that will caution the user that “technical measures” could be implemented in order to stop them from stealing files.

Failing the second warning, a pirate would be placed on a “serious infringers list” which would allow ISPs to disconnect them from the Internet. Those about to be disconnected will have 20 days to appeal their case before an independent body. They will also be able to appeal the case if they lose, again within 20 days. The Guardian has a flow chart that illustrates the full process (PDF).

First Secretary Lord Mandelson does not expect widespread disconnections as a result of the pending legislation:

Technical measures will be a last resort and I have no expectation of mass suspensions resulting. The British government's view is that taking people's work without due payment is wrong and that, as an economy based on creativity, we cannot sit back and do nothing as this happens.

The government hopes to cut piracy by 70% before April 2011.

The Open Rights Group believes the proposed disconnect laws to be illegal, adding that “Evidence cannot show who may have infringed copyright, only what connection was used.” They urge people to contact their MP to oppose “these draconian proposals.”

The Entertainment and Leisure Software Publishers Association (ELSPA) applauded the outline of the Bill, stating:

ELSPA believes the proposed UK adoption of the Pan-European Games Information (PEGI) classification system to be an important step in ensuring child safety when gaming. The video games industry offers its full support to the Government in this.

On the other side of the fence, while noting that the Digital Britain report was announced with “grand ambition,” the Guardian calls the Digital Economy Bill “more plumbing than poetry, in many places little more than a series of disconnected tweaks to existing legislation.”


Comments

Re: Age Ratings, Anti-Piracy Subject of UK Digital Economy ...

How the hell are they going to notice which people are pirating & which aren't through their ISP's?!?! I laugh at them! Do they realize there are softwares available to make sure there isa firewall or wall that no outside source is watching their keystrokes or what sites they are looking at or what they are downloading?!?!?!? O.o UGH!!! & even if they did find out, it would either be the wrong person & screw over whoever is the owner of the computer or do something else like hack into a computer & go through the backdoor w/out being caught. When I read what Britian would do, I thought of soooo many loop holes in their bill they might pass. & they are being very lenient on the people too. If the government wants to do something about it, then shit just give them a warning & then take the pirate to court. Sounds like sissies to me. On another topic, me & many of us on here I'm sure have pirated many files, music, movies & so on. It's not that hard. & it's free. Plus why pay for something that the original owner has already made tons of money on, when we can get it for free w/out no one knowing. So Britian passing this bill will only spend money on something that is wasteful spending. Oih! *eyes rolling*

 

 

"It's better to be hated for who you are, then be loved for who you are not." - Montgomery Gentry

"It's better to be hated for who you are, then be loved for who you are not." - Montgomery Gentry

Re: Age Ratings, Anti-Piracy Subject of UK Digital Economy ...

There is still a good possibility that this won't get passed in the Parliament.

The piracy laws were only beefed up after Mandelson was bribed by one of the top guys at Dreamworks.

Re: Age Ratings, Anti-Piracy Subject of UK Digital Economy ...

I suspect he has to be bribed to even get out of bed.

--------------------------------------------------

I LIKE the fence. I get 2 groups to laugh at then.

-------------------------------------------------- I LIKE the fence. I get 2 groups to laugh at then.

Re: Age Ratings, Anti-Piracy Subject of UK Digital Economy ...

Copyright should only be absolute in cases where its illicitly sold, any other case of it is part of the width and breath of not only technology but a natural part of how media discriminates throughout the people and the world, not to mention some of which is consumer rights based they are trying to toss out any and all options other than renting it from them and that is ahorrid .


Until lobbying is a hanging offense I choose anarchy! Stop supporting big media and furthering the criminalization of consumers!! http://zippydsmlee.wordpress.com/


Copyright infringement is nothing more than civil disobedience to a bad set of laws. Let's renegotiate them.

---

Patreon

Deviantart

Re: Age Ratings, Anti-Piracy Subject of UK Digital Economy ...

Reduce piracy by 70%? Who's ass did they pull that number out of?

Re: Age Ratings, Anti-Piracy Subject of UK Digital Economy ...

ACTA will probably force us to make more drastic changes than the country is doing here.

--------------------------------------------------

I LIKE the fence. I get 2 groups to laugh at then.

-------------------------------------------------- I LIKE the fence. I get 2 groups to laugh at then.
 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

Will Target Australia sell the next GTA game upon its release?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
Andrew EisenAs Luke Plunkett said in his "Gamers Are Dead" article (the fact that this one was included still makes no sense): "Note they're not talking about everyone who plays games, or who self-identifies as a "gamer", as being the worst..."07/31/2015 - 3:32pm
Big PermWhile I don't think it's very nice to provoke, the actions of the ones provoked rests with them. I also wouldn't say GG are the only ones who like to blow things out of proportion.07/31/2015 - 3:31pm
benohawkWriting an opinion piece wouldn't. Writing a provocative opinion piece in a situation like this? They should of considered the reaction they would get07/31/2015 - 3:31pm
Andrew EisenI still don't understand why anyone who is not one of those jerk faces would take offense.07/31/2015 - 3:30pm
Andrew EisenWell, the articles WERE a slight against the jerk faces responsible for the horrible harassment and abuse we'd seen at that point.07/31/2015 - 3:29pm
Andrew EisenThere was no real slight so the victim(s) in this case are not part of the problem.07/31/2015 - 3:29pm
benohawkThe majority of the blame is on the person overreacting, but if they're still reacting to a real slight then the victim was part of the problem07/31/2015 - 3:28pm
Andrew EisenSure but your analogy doesn't work because cutting someone off means you're in the wrong. Writing an opinion piece does not.07/31/2015 - 3:28pm
benohawkIm not disagreeing that it was an overreaction, I'm saying that if someone beats my ass for cutting them off doesn't mean that I was blameless despite my mistake07/31/2015 - 3:26pm
benohawkI doubt it would of helped goth. it seems a lot of the people who blew up were just waiting for any issue to let loose07/31/2015 - 3:25pm
Andrew EisenI disagree with blaming an overreaction on what people are overreacting to.07/31/2015 - 3:24pm
Goth_Skunkpositions and apologize for any confusion they may have caused. Unless their intent WAS to provoke a sleeping lion, in which case... here we are.07/31/2015 - 3:20pm
Goth_SkunkAn overreaction that probably would not have happened if Gamasutra's article was the only one ever written. And an overreaction that could have also been calmed had the authors all collectively retracted or written follow-up pieces to clarify their07/31/2015 - 3:20pm
benohawkAndrew, neither side is blameless there. Through poor planning or deliberate attempts to offend those articles did push a bad situation to the worse. and the people who blew up are guilty for their reaction07/31/2015 - 3:19pm
Andrew EisenGoth - And the blame for that rests solely on the ding bats who grossly overreacted to a handful of opinion pieces.07/31/2015 - 3:11pm
Andrew EisenHere's a fun fact: Only two of the authors of the "Gamers Are Dead" articles (of which there are about 12) were on the Game Journo Pros list.07/31/2015 - 3:10pm
Goth_SkunkNo! No! Of course not! Nothing wrong with that at all! Nevermind that those articles spawned a huge, almost year-long consumer revolt and culture war that no one in the industry can deny exists. :^)07/31/2015 - 3:10pm
Andrew EisenThere's also nothing wrong with publishing an opinion you know is going to be unpopular with some. So long as it's genuine, anyway.07/31/2015 - 3:08pm
Andrew EisenEh, could be laziness, lack of imagination, bandwagon hopping or maybe Alexander's article inspired them to publish their own takes. Nothing wrong with that.07/31/2015 - 3:06pm
Goth_SkunkIf laziness was indeed the reason other sites produced articles of a similar vein, the laziness must reach levels that would make a cat blush. How lazy does one have to be unable to stop and think "maybe this isn't a good idea...'07/31/2015 - 3:04pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician