China Loses WTO “Morals” Appeal

December 23, 2009 -

While it may never become a true open market for foreign media, China is being forced by the World Trade Organization (WTO) to at least take a small step or two in that direction.

In filing an appeal against a WTO ruling earlier this year, China had claimed that routing foreign media through its own distributors was a requirement in order to protect “public morals.” The WTO did not agree and has denied China’s appeal, reports the Wall Street Journal.

China now has one year to comply with the ruling and to open its country to more films, videogames and music, which could obviously be a financial windfall for Western companies eying global expansion. If China does not comply within the specified timeframe, the U.S. could rain down trade sanctions on China equivalent to revenue lost on media not allowed into the country. Such sanctions could total billions of dollars.

U.S. Trade Representative Ron Kirk stated:

U.S. companies and workers are at the cutting edge of these industries, and they deserve a full chance to compete under agreed WTO rules. We expect China to respond promptly to these findings and bring its measures into compliance.

China’s Yao Jian, a spokesman for the Ministry of Commerce, responded:

China has conscientiously carried out its obligations under WTO rules in terms of access to the publishing market since its entry into the WTO.

China currently allows only 20 foreign films a year to be released within its borders, a number that the Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA) does not see changing, even in light of the new ruling.

The Journal called the rejection of the appeal, “… one of China’s biggest-ever losses at the WTO.”

Posted in

Comments

Re: China Loses WTO “Morals” Appeal

President Obama has spent more then every other world leader combined, currently China owns the majority of U.S Bonds out there and holds a good deal of U.S debt. If China decides to cash out, it’s over for the United States of America just as the U.S.S.R (Soviet Union) collapsed for over spending.

Then your Liberal savior can finally make his own corrupt like South American Socialist Republic where he is President for life and his word is law.

The United States is not going to start a trade War with China, if it does obviously our Dear Leader is doing it for a reason. You can report me to flag@whitehouse.gov (http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/facts-are-stubborn-things/)

Re: China Loses WTO “Morals” Appeal

Only about half of US bonds are held by foreign countries ("Most of the government’s holdings are massive savings accounts for programs like Social Security and Medicare." - MSNBC), of which 22% is held by China (according to the US Treasury, as of Oct 2009), which means they hold about 11% of US bonds, and 11% is not a majority.  Yes, facts are stubborn things.

Besides, China can't "cash out" until the bond matures, like everyone else.  In the mean time, they can only sell the bond to someone else.

Re: China Loses WTO “Morals” Appeal

the chinese people want to be free FREE they have life size statue of optimus prime THATS PROOF ENOUGH RIGHT

Re: China Loses WTO “Morals” Appeal

Ah, China; the communists who aren't communists.

"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." -Albert Einstein

Re: China Loses WTO “Morals” Appeal

Actually China is the only communist country with any real powers left. Vietnam and North Korea are only surviving as communist countries thanks to China's support, and Cuba is all on it own.

http://www.magicinkgaming.com/

Re: China Loses WTO “Morals” Appeal

China: The totalitarianism of Stalin-style communism now featuring the corruption of capitalism!  

Re: China Loses WTO “Morals” Appeal

*smears blue paint over his face* *clears throat* *deep breath* FREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEDOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOM ahem Im not even scottish not a great movie but the quote kinda works here haha

Re: China Loses WTO “Morals” Appeal

About time this came back to bite them in the ass.

I wonder if they'll start eyeing Australia next.

Re: China Loses WTO “Morals” Appeal

I wish they would, then I would eventually be able to get all those great Japanese games that hardly ever come out in my own country down under.

Sad thing is, Australia has a healthy reputation of being huge on importing goods that I don't think the WTO would really consider Australia as being a problem.

I think China attracts allot of attention because of how big the country is in it's size of people/population.

Therefore if more people in China are able to buy their products, then it will be a better trade deal.

The moral part of their argument is really weak and if they ever cared about morality, they should look at themselves and how their government treats those who fight for human rights.

But there is one thing wrong with the WTO, they think that people in China are better off like the people living in Beijing. They should look at other areas of China and see that in reality most of the people in China are from poor families who are struggling to live and they may not be able to buy the things from other countries if they are going to be out of their price range.

TBoneTony

Re: China Loses WTO “Morals” Appeal

If one of those 20 films was "Transformers 2" I can see exactly where the WTO is coming from.  

Re: China Loses WTO “Morals” Appeal

Frankly I don;t think ANY culture should be polluted by Bays garbage.

--------------------------------------------------

I LIKE the fence. I get 2 groups to laugh at then.

-------------------------------------------------- I LIKE the fence. I get 2 groups to laugh at then.

Re: China Loses WTO “Morals” Appeal

IIRC those 20 movies are all heavily censored.

Re: China Loses WTO “Morals” Appeal

China currently allows only 20 foreign films a year to be released within its borders

Holy shit, seriously? That's peanuts.

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
quiknkoldso in a change of subject to something much lighter, who here is getting the Amiibos? I have 4 preordered.10/21/2014 - 7:02am
TechnogeekFor a change of pace, here's a story about death threats aimed at games industry employees via Twitter that has nothing whatsoever to do with Gamergate: http://kotaku.com/indie-dev-threatens-gabe-newell-has-game-removed-from-164867886910/21/2014 - 4:38am
MechaCrashThey aren't being held accountable because *this is what GamerGate is really about.* Hatred and harassment under a thin veneer of concern for ethics; it's a rotten movement right down to the core. Related: http://tinyurl.com/o5mamgn10/21/2014 - 1:53am
james_fudgeodd why would they delete pro vita comments?10/21/2014 - 12:50am
Neo_DrKefkaI am a little disturbed that members of #GamerGate are supporting and not holding its same members accountable when they say remarks that are unacceptable!10/20/2014 - 11:39pm
Neo_DrKefkaSome #GamerGate people are defending @kingofpol many are however lashing out at him but if we held Sam Biddle accountable and Gawker so must we hold @kingofpol and #GamerGate10/20/2014 - 11:30pm
Neo_DrKefkaA big name in the Gamergate movement Kingofpol uses a offensive term about autistic people and in turn the entire GamerGate community lashes out at him. We do not need false leaders who think they can say anything https://twitter.com/Kingofpol10/20/2014 - 11:07pm
Papa MidnightMP, honestly, I'm struggling to make heads or tales of the events being outlined in that reddit thread. I've never heard of Siliconera before, either.10/20/2014 - 10:48pm
MaskedPixelantehttp://www.reddit.com/r/vita/comments/2jbn6u/former_siliconera_moderator_leaks_screenshots_of/ Siliconera mods accused of deleting user comments that were pro Vita.10/20/2014 - 9:23pm
quiknkoldhttp://www.diamondbackonline.com/opinion/article_3fbc52ec-57eb-11e4-ba91-0017a43b2370.html10/20/2014 - 9:16pm
Neo_DrKefkaId love to see people come 2gether whether your 4 or against gamergate to gather 2gether and support an anti bullying charity and I would love to see a pro and anti gamegate debate on a neutral platform that promotes discussion and solutions10/20/2014 - 8:33pm
Neo_DrKefkaWhen someone was seriously hurt by a violent altercation. They have a prospective that people who have not had this experience lack. Bullying is a serious issue10/20/2014 - 8:30pm
Papa MidnightStraw Man to the fullest, but it gets the point across.10/20/2014 - 8:26pm
Papa Midnighthttp://i.imgur.com/dw0YPon.png10/20/2014 - 8:25pm
quiknkoldby doing something, Charitable Donations is an example.10/20/2014 - 8:06pm
quiknkoldAndrew : I dont accept any worded apology unless I can look the person in the eye when they say it. For me, he'd either have to make a video so I could read his bodylanguage, or actually do something. actions speak louder than words.10/20/2014 - 8:04pm
quiknkoldwell if they are looking for social pollution, Twitter is a great breeding ground for it. Its a breeding ground for deviance.10/20/2014 - 8:03pm
Andrew Eisenquiknkold - He had three tweets worth of apology the following day.10/20/2014 - 8:00pm
quiknkoldyou know, people keep saying Biddle's comment was sarcasm, but the thing is, Sarcasm doesnt translate well in Tweets. I took his words as really hateful, and unless I see an honest apology, I'm not going to be happy with him.10/20/2014 - 7:38pm
Matthew WilsonI doubt it will change much.10/20/2014 - 7:21pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician