Tiger Remains in the Game

January 5, 2010 -

In a blog on EASports.com, President Peter Moore announced that Tiger Woods would remain the face of its videogame golf franchise, ending a month of speculation.

Moore explained the company’s reasoning:

By his own admission, he’s made some mistakes off the course.  But regardless of what’s happening in his personal life, and regardless of his decision to take a personal leave from the sport, Tiger Woods is still one of the greatest athletes in history.

Of course the fact that Tiger Woods PGA Tour Online is nearing release may have played some part in EA’s decision. Removing him from the nearly completed game, never mind extracting itself from a contract with Woods, would no doubt have proven a formidable task.

EA’s decision to stay with Tiger comes in light of AT&T, Accenture Plc and Procter & Gamble (Gillette) all dropping the libido-laden golfer, while Nike, Upper Deck and now EA, have kept Tiger on board.

A Business Week opinion piece says it’s time for Tiger’s sponsors to forgive and forget:

When corporations attempt to set themselves up as moral arbiters, they just end up making themselves look out of touch.

The author argues that in standing by a spokesperson who is going through tough times, “sponsors would emerge with more respect,” adding:

… sponsors have misunderstood why they wanted celebrity endorsements in the first place. They need authenticity, not bland corporate perfection. If corporations aren’t willing to accept that their “ambassadors” are real people, with all the flaws and fallibilities that come with that package, there is no point in having them on the payroll.


Comments

Re: Tiger Remains in the Game

We are all human, we often make stupid mistakes like everyone else.

Also companies need to understand that too, because their next business venture is never going to be headlined by Mr or Miss perfect.

 

TBoneTony

Re: Tiger Remains in the Game

Ill admit I dont know much about any of whats going on in this story but Ill say something anyway (yay internet)

ahem according to what Ive gathered about whats been said here he "slept around" how does that count as a stupid mistake?.

if you bite your tongue while chewing thats a mistake if you lick a lampost in winter and get stuck thats just stupid. (not sure where I was going with that)

unless the guy tripped fell over and accidently stuck his **** in someone Im pretty sure he was doing it on purpose.

it wasnt a mistake it was on purpose the word your looking for is "wrong" regret is all well and good but untill you start making things "right" it doesnt do any good.

accidents can happen again. (Im going to get flamed arent I)

Re: Tiger Remains in the Game

Mistake: a wrong action attributable to bad judgment or ignorance or inattention

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&safe=off&defl=en&q=define:mistake&ei=dbNES93hPIiXtgffp7yACQ&sa=X&oi=glossary_definition&ct=title&ved=0CAcQkAE

The word mistake fits the bill quite nicely.

Re: Tiger Remains in the Game

I made a mistake how ironic heheh

Re: Tiger Remains in the Game

Isn't EA's entire business model based on screwing their customers anyway? If any, they should give him more money.

Re: Tiger Remains in the Game

Now perhaps EA could make a game showcasing Tiger's life off the field and perhaps restart the conversation on the Ao rating.

----------------------------------------------------

Debates are like merry go rounds. Two people take their positions then they go through the same points over and over and over again. Then when it's over they have the same positions they started in.

---------------------------------------------------- Debates are like merry go rounds. Two people take their positions then they go through the same points over and over and over again. Then when it's over they have the same positions they started in.

Re: Tiger Remains in the Game

Glad to hear someone got Tigers back. This whole ordeal was way overblown by the media.

http://www.magicinkgaming.com/

Re: Tiger Remains in the Game

This times a million. Acting like ****ing cartoon piranha all so their viewers could engorge themselves on the spectacle.

Re: Tiger Remains in the Game

Let the record show that I called this the first time this question was asked.  Again, if they let Randy Moss be on the cover of Madden AFTER getting busted running over a cop while playing PS2 in the drivers seat of his Mercedes while high, they wouldn't give up Tiger, a man who's only known transgression is sleeping around.

---

You KILL Vampires. You don't DATE them.

--- With the first link, the chain is forged.

Re: Tiger Remains in the Game

Yeah, and not to mention, from what i've seen, he has truly expressed regret for his actions.

The man knows what he has done, it's obvious he feels sorry for what he's done to his wife, especially after withdrawing from the sport, how many other athletes have done that by their own decision.

As far as i'm concerned, barring truly heinous actions like murder or rape, a single mistake should not forever ruin someone's life and forever condemn them to being labeled by their wrong action.

Re: Tiger Remains in the Game

Hell, among some circles, his only transgression was GETTING CAUGHT while sleeping around. I've got no problem with what the man does with his assets, personally, and I think it's pretty shitty that some companies dropped him because of it. The fact remains that he is one of the greatest golfers of all time, and is a pretty cool guy, for the most part.

In addition, I'm glad they kept him as the spokesperson for the golf games.. I mean, who else could they use? Vejay Singh's PGA Tour '10 doesn't roll off the tongue nearly as well.

Re: Tiger Remains in the Game

Phil Mickelson?  Naah.

---

You KILL Vampires. You don't DATE them.

--- With the first link, the chain is forged.
 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
Montewell thanks for the info Eisen; try that the next time i need something off the eshop09/23/2014 - 3:54pm
james_fudgere: MP, i've sent tech support a note - thank you :)09/23/2014 - 3:14pm
IanCNah that wasnt directed at you Andrew :)09/23/2014 - 3:00pm
Papa MidnightRe: SIEGE 2014 Keynote: oh dear...09/23/2014 - 2:44pm
MaskedPixelanteDear GP, something called "doubleverify" is causing some nasty browser issues on my end. Probably one of your ads.09/23/2014 - 2:36pm
Andrew EisenOh hell no. No, it took Nintendo a dog's age just to get to the point its competitors have been at for a while! (And it's still not there yet, in a lot of respects.)09/23/2014 - 2:26pm
IanCSame as PSN handles it, fi you are trying to say only nintendo do that.09/23/2014 - 2:23pm
Andrew EisenYou have to try to purchase something first. Pick a game, hit purchase and if your wallet doesn't have enough to cover it, you'll be given an option to "add exact funds" or something like that.09/23/2014 - 2:05pm
MonteI have seen no option for that on my 3DS; anytime i want to add funds it only gives me the option to add in denominations of $10, 20, 50 or 10009/23/2014 - 2:03pm
IanCWhat Andrew Wilson said. PSN is the same when you make a purchase over a certain price (£5 in the UK)09/23/2014 - 2:02pm
Andrew EisenNeither eShop charges sales tax either. At least in California.09/23/2014 - 2:00pm
Andrew EisenBoth Wii U and 3DS eShops allow you to add funds in the exact amount of whatever's in your shopping cart. If your game is $39.99, you can add exactly $39.99.09/23/2014 - 1:57pm
Infophile@Matthew Wilson: As I understand it, any regulations to force tax online would also set up an easy database for these stores to use, minimizing overhead.09/23/2014 - 1:30pm
MonteReally, the eshop just does next to nothing to make buying digitally advantagous for the customer. Its nice to have the game on my 3DS, but i can get more for less buying a physical copy at retail. And that's not even counting buying used09/23/2014 - 1:18pm
MonteIanC, The Eshop wallet system only lets you add funds in set denominations and the tax makes sure you no longer have round numbers so you ALWAYS loose money. A $39.99 game for instance requires you to add $50 instead of just $4009/23/2014 - 1:13pm
Matthew Wilsonbut thats just it those sites, even the small ones, sell all over the country.09/23/2014 - 11:12am
Neenekoeither that or it would follow the car model of today. big ticket items are taxed according to your residence, not where you buy them.09/23/2014 - 11:07am
NeenekoI doubt it would be the retailer that handles the tax in the first place. If it goes through it would probably be folded in as a service on the processor end or via 'turbotax' style applications.09/23/2014 - 11:05am
Matthew Wilsonsimple there are over 10k tax areas in the us for sales tax. it would be impossible for small online retailers to handle that.09/23/2014 - 10:55am
IanCWhats wrong with charging tax in an online shop?09/23/2014 - 10:47am
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician