NFL Case Could Impact Sports Game Licenses

January 7, 2010 -

The U.S. Supreme Court is scheduled to hear the case of American Needle v. NFL next week and perhaps give the NFL broader protection against antitrust lawsuits.

At the heart of the case is an exclusive deal that the NFL has with Reebok as the official seller of hats,. jerseys and clothes using team insignias. American Needle lost its right to sell those items when the league reached the deal with Reebok in 2000.

Where this impacts the videogame industry is the exclusive license that Electronic Arts has with the NFL as the sole purveyor of an NFL-branded videogame with the Madden NFL series. According to a Reuters article:

A broad ruling could insulate professional sports leagues from antitrust claims over video-game licenses, television rights, franchise relocation and even player salaries. Only Major League Baseball is exempt from antitrust laws now.

In the past, the court has kept a tight rein on antitrust suits, and legal analysts say that the mere fact that the court has agreed to hear the case means it could be sympathetic to the NFL's claims for broader protection.

The case for the NFL, according to brief it filed:

“A sports league produces a single entertainment product, a structured series of athletic competitions leading to a championship, that no member club could produce on its own."

However, American Needle countered with:

“The teams are separately owned and controlled profit- making enterprises. They are actual and potential competitors in numerous areas, including the licensing of intellectual property.”

Electronic Arts has come out on the side of the NFL for obvious reasons, and the antitrust protection for the NFL could ensure EA's deal from outside interference as long as the NFL sees fit to continue the contract.

Posted in

Comments

Re: NFL Case Could Impact Sports Game Licenses

The only thing I have to say about any possibility of something messing up a license for EA:

 

Good fucking riddance.

Yes I have a WIP. Just wait and see.

Re: NFL Case Could Impact Sports Game Licenses

Tghe teams need to ban togather and bully the NFL to allow them more rights over thier copy right, it should work both ways.... the teams should be allowed to do what they want(that dose not tarnish the brand) and give the NFL a 30% cut of profits....


Until lobbying is a hanging offense I choose anarchy! CP/IP laws should not effect the daily life of common people! http://zippydsmlee.wordpress.com/


Copyright infringement is nothing more than civil disobedience to a bad set of laws. Let's renegotiate them.

---

Patreon

Deviantart

Re: NFL Case Could Impact Sports Game Licenses

Did you read and understand the article, Zippy? If you did, why are you still coming up with this dumb crap? The teams are the NFL. It's the teams, in the form of their larger parent organization, the NFL, who are raping America Needle. The NFL raping the teams has nothing to do with what's going here.

You should try harder to follow the actual plot. And quit making up your own plot as a substitute.

Re: NFL Case Could Impact Sports Game Licenses

Here's a thought EA,Reebok, and the NFL never went to Congress or The President and begged to be bailed out so the government has no say in any private business matters.

 

And if the courts do decide against the NFL on the I hope the very next hour MLB has to follow the same rules.

 

Fact is Madden did drop in quality but Take 2K Games MLB2K series also dropped when they secured an exclusive contract.

Re: NFL Case Could Impact Sports Game Licenses

You mean that laws don't apply to business that doesn't get any money from the state? Because the laws are the only part of the government involved in this matter.

Re: NFL Case Could Impact Sports Game Licenses

I didn't know about MLB's exemption from antitrust regulations, but I think it's outrageous. No single organization or business type should get to enjoy such a privilege, nor should antitrust rules be dropped altogether. If your business model is incompatible with antitrust laws then you shouldn't be in business.

Re: NFL Case Could Impact Sports Game Licenses

Exempting a business from antitrust regulation isn't usually rationalized on the premise that its business model is incompatible with the regulatory effort. Rather, the more common rationale is that the business, as a matter of fact, can never have any natural competitors and, therefore, subjecting it to anitcompetitive regulation not only serves no useful purpose but also could indeed harm consumers (e.g., passed-down costs resulting from having the business satisfy a purposeless regulatory scheme). I'm not saying that the NFL satisfies the requirement of being without competitors. I'm just saying. 

Re: NFL Case Could Impact Sports Game Licenses

Which is exactly what's been happening with the health-don't-care industry. They were granted this status, and people are suffering for it. I mean, Baseball is one thing, as you won't risk dying if you can't afford a baseball game trip.

Re: NFL Case Could Impact Sports Game Licenses

Be it NFL merchandise, games, or any other exclusive rights deals for merchandise of any type, i have only one comment. If you don't like it, excersize your right as a consumer by NOT BUYING IT.

Re: NFL Case Could Impact Sports Game Licenses

The ruling in this case, if in favor of the NFL and other sports leagues (MLB, NCAA) could have very large and very severe affects well beyond just exclusives for video games.

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

Will Target Australia sell the next GTA game upon its release?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
Andrew EisenAnd I still don't see how articles like Polygon's "An awful week to care about video games" can be construed as an attack.07/31/2015 - 4:25pm
Andrew Eisen18 total? I've seen several lists and the total has never been above 14. The most popular collection seems to be 9 on Aug. 28 then three more on Aug. 29, Sep. 2 and Sep. 3.07/31/2015 - 4:24pm
Infophile@Goth_Skunk: Your distaste for TMS is noted and given exactly the respect it deserves. The fact that you don't like a site doesn't mean they can't be right. In the linked article, they are.07/31/2015 - 4:06pm
Goth_SkunkAnd the worst volleys are the ones being fired by the kind of people who should be standing up and saying 'Hey! This isn't cool! Stop that!'07/31/2015 - 4:05pm
Goth_SkunkNow let's come full circle: One such confrontationally titled article is easy to dismiss. Within a day, nine similarly titled articles are written. Within 4 more days, nine more articles are written. This can't be ignored. This is a blatant attack.07/31/2015 - 4:04pm
Andrew EisenAnd that's totally fine. I too often skip articles and videos based solely on an unappealing title.07/31/2015 - 3:56pm
Goth_SkunkPersonally, I would not waste time reading an article with such a blatantly confrontational title.07/31/2015 - 3:52pm
Andrew EisenGoth - Depends on how the article was written and what it actually said.07/31/2015 - 3:49pm
Goth_SkunkThis is like going fishing and castign a HUGE net that captures tuna, dolphins, sharks, cod, and salmon when all you really want to capture are clownfish.07/31/2015 - 3:48pm
Andrew EisenPerm - If the specific make and model are made clear, I have no problem with the article saving space by refering to them as "these cars" or whatever.07/31/2015 - 3:47pm
Goth_Skunk... Hasbro's widening horizons..." would it not make sense that some would object there is no distinction being made between a reactionary brony and a stable-minded brony?07/31/2015 - 3:47pm
Big PermCars are being recalled because they explode. Editors Note at the end: Not all cars, only this specific make and model07/31/2015 - 3:46pm
Andrew EisenI still feel it was clear that they were admonishing a particular and very specific type of gamer. It's why I had no problem with any of the articles (especially since about half of them weren't really about "gamers" anyway).07/31/2015 - 3:45pm
Goth_Skunk@Andrew: If a columnist had written a "Bronies Are Dead" article, but in the article stated: "Note: I'm not talking about every guy who watches MLP or who self-identifies as a brony, just the type of reactionary holdouts that feel so threatened by..."07/31/2015 - 3:45pm
benohawkYou would if you didn't care.07/31/2015 - 3:43pm
Big PermIf you're referring to a certain subset of gamers, you wouldn't refer to that subset under the umbrella term of gamer. Or at least I wouldn't, because I think that's ridiculous.07/31/2015 - 3:42pm
benohawkI buy it, I think they honestly have no problem with most gamers. But it was more important to get links and page views, so gamers were a whipping boy for the media again.07/31/2015 - 3:41pm
Big PermI won't defend people going too far with harassment or email campaigns, but I also won't say they're in the wrong for feeling hostility towards their identity.07/31/2015 - 3:41pm
Andrew EisenI do. I felt the articles made it very clear who specifically the authors were referring to.07/31/2015 - 3:41pm
Big PermIt's an attack on an identity. I don't buy "but we're not talking about you, we swear" for a moment.07/31/2015 - 3:40pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician