Judge: Chicago Transit Authority Cannot Ban VG Ads

January 8, 2010 -

The Entertainment Software Association (ESA) has won a preliminary injunction in its lawsuit against the Chicago Transit Authority (CTA) over the banning of advertisements for adult-rated videogames.

An ordinance (008-147) that took effect in January of 2009 prohibited any advertisement that “markets or identifies a video or computer game rated ‘Mature 17+’ (M) or ‘Adults Only 18+’ (AO).”  The ESA argued that such a ban unconstitutionally “restricts speech in a public forum that is otherwise open to all speakers without a compelling interest for doing so.”

The United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois granted the ESA an injunction, with Judge Rebecca R. Pallmeyer stating:

…the advertisements the CTA wishes to ban promote expression that has constitutional value and implicates core First Amendment concerns.

The ESA further challenged that the CTA ordinance is redundant since videogame-related marketing is already regulated by the Entertainment Software Rating Board’s (ESRB) Advertising Review Council.

ESA President Michael Gallagher was obviously pleased:

This ruling is a win for Chicago's citizens, the video game industry and, above all, the First Amendment. It is our hope that the CTA sees the futility of pursuing this case further. To do so will waste taxpayer money and government resources.


Comments

Re: Judge: Chicago Transit Authority Cannot Ban VG Ads

This is not suprising but it should be known that unlike restriction of game sales or censorship of games in general Advertisments are commercial Speech and only an intermediate level of scrutiny is needed to justify a ban or restriction rather then strict scrutiny. So cases like this could be easier for the nanny-state to win but I still think they would fail.

 "No law means no law" - Supreme Court Justice Hugo Black on the First Amendment

"No law means no law" - Supreme Court Justice Hugo Black on the First Amendment

Re: Judge: Chicago Transit Authority Cannot Ban VG Ads

Jack who? (heh)

Re: Judge: Chicago Transit Authority Cannot Ban VG Ads

Wonder what Jack will have to say about this?

He'll probably do to Judge Pallmeyer what he tried to do to Judge Tunis. What's the betting on how bad his FAIL will be?

-----------------------------



"A Chrono Trigger is anything that unleashes its will or desire to change history!" -Gaspar

-----------------------------



"A Chrono Trigger is anything that unleashes its will or desire to change history!" -Gaspar

Re: Judge: Chicago Transit Authority Cannot Ban VG Ads

Is he doing anything lately other than pretending he was never disbarred?

Re: Judge: Chicago Transit Authority Cannot Ban VG Ads

Heh, who cares?

Hunting the shadows of the troubled dreams.

Hunting the shadows of the troubled dreams.

Re: Judge: Chicago Transit Authority Cannot Ban VG Ads

Meh, who knows?

-----------------------------



"A Chrono Trigger is anything that unleashes its will or desire to change history!" -Gaspar

-----------------------------



"A Chrono Trigger is anything that unleashes its will or desire to change history!" -Gaspar

Re: Judge: Chicago Transit Authority Cannot Ban VG Ads

Hooray for free speech!   Yay!


Sortableturnip's Law: As an online discussion of video game violence grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Jack Thompson approaches 1

Re: Judge: Chicago Transit Authority Cannot Ban VG Ads

Meanwhile, somewhere in Miami...

My DeviantArt Page (aka DeviantCensorship): http://www.darkknightstrikes.deviantart.com

Re: Judge: Chicago Transit Authority Cannot Ban VG Ads


 

 

the First Amendment triumph once again.  But I'm not sure if JT is going to be apying attention to what's going on. 

 

Re: Judge: Chicago Transit Authority Cannot Ban VG Ads

I remembered how I did it.

EDIT: In hindsight, I realize I should have used Wolf's pic to do the joke right.

-----------------------------



"A Chrono Trigger is anything that unleashes its will or desire to change history!" -Gaspar

 

-----------------------------



"A Chrono Trigger is anything that unleashes its will or desire to change history!" -Gaspar

Re: Judge: Chicago Transit Authority Cannot Ban VG Ads

This avacado adds nothing to the conversation.

http://i778.photobucket.com/albums/yy64/eriksspambox/avacado.jpg

-Ultimately what will do in mankind is a person's fear of their own freedom-

 

Re: Judge: Chicago Transit Authority Cannot Ban VG Ads

BRILLIANT!

Also,

1220590702013bv4.jpg image by leanmeatfourfingers

Re: Judge: Chicago Transit Authority Cannot Ban VG Ads

BRILLIANT use of Darth Vader! This is a victory for the gaming industry for sure.

http://www.magicinkgaming.com/

Re: Judge: Chicago Transit Authority Cannot Ban VG Ads

Sure they can if they ban ALL M/R rated ads(or ads for adults only procudts can consume)


Until lobbying is a hanging offense I choose anarchy! CP/IP laws should not effect the daily life of common people! http://zippydsmlee.wordpress.com/


Copyright infringement is nothing more than civil disobedience to a bad set of laws. Let's renegotiate them.

---

http://zippydsm.deviantart.com/

Re: Judge: Chicago Transit Authority Cannot Ban VG Ads

I guess some conservative out there is penning the obligatory "activist judges" response with the now-required "the Founding Fathers never intended this filth to be thrust upon children" lines.

 

Re: Judge: Chicago Transit Authority Cannot Ban VG Ads

...If this was in Chicago...wouldn't it have probably been some batshit-insane Democrat/liberal that wanted the ads banned?

Note that I'm not trying to imply that conservatives don't, just that in this case it probably would've been people of the "Hillary Clinton" persuasion that want to "protect teh childrenz."

-Optimum est pati quod emendare non possis-It is best to endure what you cannot change-

-Optimum est pati quod emendare non possis-It is best to endure what you cannot change-

Re: Judge: Chicago Transit Authority Cannot Ban VG Ads

Excellent.  Who gets to break the news to our friend Jack?  (I call dibsies if no one else already has!)

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

Should 'Hatred' have been removed from Steam Greenlight?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
PHX Corp@Adam802 We'll break out the popcorn in June12/19/2014 - 9:23pm
ZippyDSMleeMaskedPixelante: I'm itching to start it too but I will wait till the patch goes live. >>12/19/2014 - 7:52pm
Adam802Leland Yee and Jackson get trial date: http://sfbay.ca/2014/12/18/leland-yee-keith-jackson-get-trial-date/12/19/2014 - 5:24pm
MaskedPixelanteNevermind. Turns out when they said "the patch is now live", they meant "it's still in beta".12/19/2014 - 5:07pm
MaskedPixelanteSo I bought Dark Souls PC, and it's forcing me to log into GFWL. Did I miss something?12/19/2014 - 5:00pm
Matthew Wilsonhttp://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2014/12/republicans-may-have-plan-to-save-internet-providers-from-utility-rules/ this is intreasting. congress may put net nutrality in to law to avoid title 2 classification12/19/2014 - 2:45pm
Matthew Wilsonhttp://www.polygon.com/2014/12/19/7421953/bullshit-cards-against-humanity-donated-250k-sunlight-foundation I have to admit I like the choice o organization. congrats to CAH.12/19/2014 - 1:51pm
E. Zachary KnightIf you are downloading a copy in order to bypass the DRM, then you are legally in the wrong. Ethically, if you bought the game, it doesn't matter where you download it in the future.12/19/2014 - 12:06pm
InfophileEZK: Certainly better that way, though not foolproof. Makes me think though: does it count as piracy if you download a game you already paid for, just not from the place you paid for it at? Ethically, I'd say no, but legally, probably yes.12/19/2014 - 11:20am
ZippyDSMleeAnd I still spent 200$ in the last month on steam/GOG stuff sales get me nearly every time ><12/19/2014 - 10:55am
ZippyDSMleeMaskedPixelante:And this is why I'm a one legged bandit.12/19/2014 - 10:51am
ZippyDSMleeE. Zachary Knight: I buy what I can as long as I can get cracks for it...then again it I could have gotton Lords of the Fallen for 30 with DLC I would have ><12/19/2014 - 10:50am
MaskedPixelantehttp://www.joystiq.com/2014/12/19/marvel-vs-capcom-origins-leaving-online-storefronts-soon/ Speaking of "last chance to buy", Marvel vs. Capcom Origins is getting delisted from all major storefronts. Behold the wonders of the all digital future.12/19/2014 - 9:59am
MaskedPixelanteSeriously, the so-called "Last Chance" sale was up to 80% off, while this one time only return sale goes for a flat 85% off with a 90% off upgrade if you buy the whole catalogue.12/19/2014 - 9:37am
E. Zachary KnightInfophile, Tha is why I buy only DRM-free games.12/19/2014 - 9:37am
MaskedPixelanteNordic is back on GOG for one weekend only. And at 85% off no less, which is kind of a slap in the face to people who paid more during the "NORDIC IS LEAVING FOREVER BUY NOW OR FOREVER HOLD YOUR PEACE" sale, but whatever...12/19/2014 - 9:28am
InfophileRe PHX's link: This is one of the reasons the digital revolution isn't all it's cracked up to be. There's also the flip side where Sony can block access to games you've bought if they ban your account for unrelated reasons. All power is theirs.12/19/2014 - 8:52am
MaskedPixelantehttp://uplay.ubi.com/#!/en-US/events/uplay-15-days You can win FREE GAMES FOR A YEAR! Unfortunately, they're Ubisoft games.12/18/2014 - 6:29pm
Papa MidnightAh, so it was downtime. I've been seeing post appear in my RSS feed, but I was unable to access GamePolitics today across several ISPs.12/18/2014 - 6:06pm
james_fudgeSorry for the downtime today, folks.12/18/2014 - 5:54pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician