Guest Column: On TSA Laptop Searches

January 19, 2010 -

Sooner or later, most gamers will face the dreaded scenario of having to leave their desktop PC's and consoles behind and suffer through the misery of modern air travel.

Domestic travelers have become familiar with intrusions and searches at Transportation Security Administration security checkpoints. But as the ACLU has recently discovered, international travelers are not only having their laptops seized and searched by Customs and Border Protection, but agents are making copies of files and giving them to third-party agencies. The ACLU filed a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit against the government, which turned over hundreds of pages of documents revealing startling information about how much access—and how little oversight—agents have to your gaming laptops when you travel.

For instance, over a period of nine months, CBP agents searched over 1,500 devices, including laptops, thumb drives, cell phones, and DVDs. Last year, agents transferred 282 files from these devices to third-parties. Under current policy, CBP is not required to justify the searches. Interestingly, of those files, only four were justified under "national security" concerns, and apparently encrypted files were sent to unknown agencies for "translation/decryption".

Several spreadsheets containing summaries of the data (as well as detailed information on each incident, if you're so inclined) are available from the ACLU; a further list of documents and correspondence released from CBP can be found here.

Dan Rosenthal is a legal analyst for the games industry.

GP: Dan offers a unique vantage point to a lot of the topics we talk about here and it's our hope that he'll contribute more pieces going forward. Please welcome him aboard!


Comments

Re: Guest Column: On TSA Laptop Searches

Welcome Dan! :)

 

 

"It's better to be hated for who you are, then be loved for who you are not." - Montgomery Gentry

"It's better to be hated for who you are, then be loved for who you are not." - Montgomery Gentry

Re: Guest Column: On TSA Laptop Searches

There hasn't been a single terrorist caught from this TSA web as far as I know. They have caught a couple of people who have had child pornography on their computers. So this enactment really has nothing to do with terrorism. It's really an excuse for illegal search and siezure.

Re: Guest Column: On TSA Laptop Searches

I'd prefer the conents of my private hard drive remain that, private.

Re: Guest Column: On TSA Laptop Searches

This is what whole disc encryption is for. Encrypt the disc, then also encrypt your important files, no one anywhere is getting into them anytime soon.

Re: Guest Column: On TSA Laptop Searches

But the government has specialists and there doesn't seem to be any time limit to how long they can hold your stuff, so encryption isn't going to help you.

Re: Guest Column: On TSA Laptop Searches

That and you can be charged for not handing over your encryption keys.

Encrypting your stuff in such a way that the authorities can not recover it is a seperate crime.

Re: Guest Column: On TSA Laptop Searches

and isn't commercial encryption limited specifically so law enforcement can break it?

Re: Guest Column: On TSA Laptop Searches

http://www.aclu.org/files/pdfs/natsec/cbp_20100114_000001-000010.pdf

I think I'm reading this right, and if I am, that means I can no longer bring my iPod and laptop to the States 'coz I have copyrighted materials which have been shared electronically.

Guess that means I'm going to have to go back to CDs again. That or reformatting my hard drive.

Re: Guest Column: On TSA Laptop Searches

They aren't going to prosecute you for having copyright songs on your ipod. They can't prove if you are entitled to the songs or not simply from seeing them on your ipod. People who get too alarmist about things make others take the real concerns less seriously.

Re: Guest Column: On TSA Laptop Searches

Pay attention to the ACTA treaty leaks. This is EXACTLY what they are doing and they want other countries to do the same. They want full access to your info and they want to go after you if they so much as THINK it MIGHT be illegal. You get no recourse. Don't go simply on a gut feeling, do some research.

Re: Guest Column: On TSA Laptop Searches

How can they not prosecute if it is the thing they're looking for? It says so on the first page.

Re: Guest Column: On TSA Laptop Searches

http://www.lectlaw.com/def/f081.htm

I don't like it.  It seems wrong.  However, if the people being searched are non-permenant residents of the US (aka, not a citizen and aren't living here long term), then constitutionally it seems like they don't have constitutional protection in this case.  This is how it's been ruled, but I think it's crap and inconsistent.  Non-permenant residences still have the right to due process, the 5th ammendment, etc.  Saying that they have benefits of some parts of the Constitution but not others is inconsistent.  If they have constitutional rights, then they have rights.  If not, then they don't and we become a country of xenophobes, shut off from the world.

If citizens are also being searched (which I have a feeling is the case), then the TSA is violating constitutional law (surprise, surprise...nothing new).  Blanket searches are ok.  Non-justified search and seizure is unlawful.

Re: Guest Column: On TSA Laptop Searches

Although the Declaration of Independence isn't an official legal document, it very clearly states that ALL men are created equal, and ALL men are endowed with certain *unalienable* rights. Constitutionally, there is nothing that implies that non-citizens have less rights than citizens in regards to the 1st, 4th, 5th, and 6th amendments.

-Optimum est pati quod emendare non possis-It is best to endure what you cannot change-

-Optimum est pati quod emendare non possis-It is best to endure what you cannot change-

Re: Guest Column: On TSA Laptop Searches

The problem with quoting the Declaration of Independence is that it's not a leagally binding document.  It was written 12 years before the USA was the USA.

Also, the ammendments use the term "the People" (no real reason why capitals are used so often at the start of words in the constitution, it was just a style used at the time.  Much the same way Nouns in German have their first letter capitalized.) as short for "the People of the United States."  So while there is no explicit distinction between citizen and non-citizen written out, it's clear that the written documents of the US and the rights of its people can be interpreted to be only for its people.

It's something I don't agree with in practice, but the SCotUS has ruled on it in that fashion.  Check my link from the first post, and it will show in a few rulings that non-citizens don't have the same protection under the 4th as citizens.  Doesn't mean that it's set in stone (the constitution is meant to be open for interpretation and elbow room), but that's just the current definintion used right now based on precedent.

Re: Guest Column: On TSA Laptop Searches

I bet its google that is one of those thrid parties, DAMN YOU GOOGLE you and your advertising

Re: Guest Column: On TSA Laptop Searches

Thanks guys!

Situations like this are why I use programs like dropbox or google docs to keep sensitive data off my laptop and safely in the cloud where CBP can't get to it. For things I need to store locally, I invested in an Ironkey memory stick, which features military grade encryption, as well as automatic memory-wiping in case CBP tries to break in (it won't mount until the password is entered, and after a very short number of incorrect attempts it will wipe the memory), as well as being nearly impossible to physically break into without destroying it.

--Dan Rosenthal

-- Dan Rosenthal

Re: Guest Column: On TSA Laptop Searches

"Safely" and "in the cloud" are terms that should not go together. Unless you mean that your data is safe from this one specific violation

Like "My child is safe from paedophiles because I just killed him". Aside from it defeating the purpose, it only exposes the poor kid to necrophiliacs. THINK OF THE CHILDREN!

Re: Guest Column: On TSA Laptop Searches

"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."

Seriously, fuck airline travel. I'm never traveling with electronic equipment again. (Actually, I might just never use a "public" airline again).

-Optimum est pati quod emendare non possis-It is best to endure what you cannot change-

-Optimum est pati quod emendare non possis-It is best to endure what you cannot change-

Re: Guest Column: On TSA Laptop Searches

Welcome to the crew Dan.

 

As to the article itself, well, as said ,those who sacrifice a little bit of freedom for a little bit of safety deserve neither

Re: Guest Column: On TSA Laptop Searches

If you go anywhere...just UPS your sht there befor you leave...it might even cost less than paying to take it with you....


Until lobbying is a hanging offense I choose anarchy! CP/IP laws should not effect the daily life of common people! http://zippydsmlee.wordpress.com/


Copyright infringement is nothing more than civil disobedience to a bad set of laws. Let's renegotiate them.

---

Patreon

Deviantart

Re: Guest Column: On TSA Laptop Searches

Dan, welcome to GP!

"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." -Albert Einstein

Re: Guest Column: On TSA Laptop Searches

I recall stories about this when it was happening. At the time, it seemed to be targeting foreigners who were coming into the US, more than anything else.

I had not heard that this information was then also being handed out on a whim to unknown third-parties.

This whole thing is completely disgusting.

Re: Guest Column: On TSA Laptop Searches

Glad to have another contributer!

With that out of the way -- holy hell! I may have to ensure I never fly through the USA; or that I take the time to completely encrypt my data before I go. I work and develop from my laptop -- I have confidential files and various sensitive information on it. It's all locked up, I'm not worried about anyone getting it, but I'm *NOT* comfortable with any government agencies taking a hold of my data, encrypted or otherwise.

The USA needs to get over it's ridiculous terrorphobia.

Re: Guest Column: On TSA Laptop Searches

Hey, cut us some slack. While some of the tactics we have used are terrible, it's not like the fear of terrorists isn't somewhat justified.

"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." -Albert Einstein

Re: Guest Column: On TSA Laptop Searches

*shrug* I have more reason to fear drivers on cell phones then terrorists.

Phobia is an irrational fear.  The US is gripped in a fear far disproportional to the actual danger presented.

Re: Guest Column: On TSA Laptop Searches

Yeah but here's the thing. It is not justified, even somewhat. When's the last time there was a terrorist car bombing, shooting, hostage taking, or anything even remotely like that on US soil? 

The 9/11 attacks were years ago, and they cannot possibly be used to justify the years of terror suffered at the hands of the US government. Speaking as a foreigner who has tried to get into the US since then, it's absolute madness. The United states, or north America in general, is one of the safest places in the world to be, and that's not going to change unless the government keeps on its path of tyranny.

Sure, something bad happened. I don't mean to be insensitive to the people that were lost, but do you honestly think they would want to see their tragedy used as a fear mongering tactic just so that people will give up their civil liberties?

Re: Guest Column: On TSA Laptop Searches

So you're okay with any potentially sensitive data being turned over to "unknown 3rd parties?"  So you're okay with what officially amounts to a lack of due process and an illegal search and seizure?  Do files stored on a laptop computer or a portable data device constitute an immediate threat to the safety of the flight and those on board?

While it's one thing to be vigilant to prevent terrorism, we have given up too much under the guise of protecting ourselves.

I can't wait for a terrorist to try smuggling a bomb aboard in his rectum.  Will you approve of the full cavity searches that get implemented as yet another overreaction?

Re: Guest Column: On TSA Laptop Searches

I can't wait for a terrorist to try smuggling a bomb aboard in his rectum.


Well now the U.S.A. in 18 airports has full-body x-rays that take pictures of you w/your clothes on & saves that picture & files it. A lot of people are upset about that b/c of their privacy being invaded.

 

"It's better to be hated for who you are, then be loved for who you are not." - Montgomery Gentry

"It's better to be hated for who you are, then be loved for who you are not." - Montgomery Gentry

Re: Guest Column: On TSA Laptop Searches

So it's official now?

Either way, welcome aboard, Dan!

-----------------------------



"A Chrono Trigger is anything that unleashes its will or desire to change history!" -Gaspar
-----------------------------



"A Chrono Trigger is anything that unleashes its will or desire to change history!" -Gaspar

Re: Guest Column: On TSA Laptop Searches

Welcome aboard, Dan!

Say, nice shoes.

 

Andrew Eisen

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

Which group is more ethically challenged?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
E. Zachary KnightThe Daily WTF has a nice run down of some of the impact to software that the US Supreme Court ruling on gay marriage has. http://thedailywtf.com/articles/i-m-not-married-to-the-idea07/02/2015 - 7:45am
MechaCrashGee, how did people ever get the idea Gaters are morons who argue in bad faith? It's such a mystery.07/02/2015 - 7:03am
E. Zachary KnightGoth, again, no one is saying that we shouldn't be writig uncomfortable subject matter. What people are saying is that chances are you are going to write it poorly so it would be better to not have done it at all.07/02/2015 - 7:00am
Goth_Skunkdiscussed or portrayed in an expressive medium. Such an opinion only serves to stifle discussion. And as I said before, the only thing not worth talking about is what shouldn't be talked about.07/02/2015 - 6:50am
Goth_Skunk@Info: The same reason why I would entertain the notion that the Wired article writer could be right: Curiosity. Except in this case, I'm not curious at all. I'm not interested in hearing anyone's opinion on why uncomfortable subject matter shouldn't be07/02/2015 - 6:49am
IvresseI think the problem with the Batmobile is that they made it a core aspect of the game that you have to do continuously. If it was basically a couple of side games that were needed for secret stuff or a couple of times in the main game, it would be fine.07/02/2015 - 5:38am
Infophile@Goth: If you're not willing to entertain the idea you might be wrong, fine. That's your right. But why should anyone else entertain the idea that you might be right? If they go by the same logic, they already know you're wrong, so why listen to you?07/02/2015 - 3:53am
MattsworknameEh, I love the new batmobile personally, it's a blast to mess aroudn with. Plus, the game is set in a situation that mroe or less leaves batman with no choice but to go full force. And even then, it still shows him doing all he can to limit casualties.07/01/2015 - 11:38pm
Andrew EisenAgreed. Luckily, we don't seem to be in danger of that of late. No one's suggesting, for example, that tanks shouldn't be in video games, only that the tank in Arkham Knight is poorly implemented and out of place from a characterization standpoint.07/01/2015 - 11:27pm
MattsworknameConfederate flag, Relgious organizations, etc etc. Andrew isnt[ wrong, just remember not to let that mentality lead to censorship.07/01/2015 - 11:20pm
Mattsworknamefind offensive or disturbing, and that mindset leads to censorship. It's all well and good to say "This would be better IF", just so long as we remember not to let it slide into "This is offensive, REMOVE IT". IE , the current issues surroundign the07/01/2015 - 11:19pm
MattsworknameAndrew and goth both have points, and to that point, I'll say. Saying somethign is improved by changing something isn't a problem, on that I agree with , but at the same time, on of the issues we have in our society is that we want to simply remove things07/01/2015 - 11:18pm
Andrew EisenSee? Suggestions for improvements that involve taking things away do not mean the work is garbage or performing poorly, critically or commercially.07/01/2015 - 9:29pm
Andrew EisenSkyward Sword is spiff-a-rific but it would be an improved experience if the game didn't explain what each item and rupee was every single time you picked them up!07/01/2015 - 9:27pm
Andrew EisenHere's another: De Blob is a ton of fun but it would be improved without motion controls. Incidentally, THQ heard our cries, removed motion controls for the sequel and it was a better game for it!07/01/2015 - 9:24pm
Andrew EisenI'll give you an example: Arkham Knight is a ton of fun but the tank sucks and the game would be even better without it.07/01/2015 - 9:23pm
Goth_SkunkWell clearly we're diametrically opposed about that.07/01/2015 - 9:03pm
Andrew EisenNot even remotely true.07/01/2015 - 8:59pm
Goth_SkunkIt is, if the suggestion involves taking something away from a product in order to make it better.07/01/2015 - 8:49pm
Andrew EisenOffering suggestions for improvement does not mean that the work in question is garbage or not doing fine.07/01/2015 - 8:21pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician