Bad Company 2 & French Army Ads Square Off

February 25, 2010 -

As part of a campaign designed to boost recruitment, the French Army introduced a new campaign that uses the slogan “Devenez vous-même” or “Be Yourself,” and directs interested parties to visit the website DevenezVousMeme.com.

The French Army ad appears to have caught the eye of Electronic Arts, as an article on LusoGamer (translated) points out that an ad for Battlefield: Bad Company 2 appears to have somewhat appropriated the French Army slogan. The similarities were not very difficult to notice as the giant ads appeared right next to each other (picture) in a French subway station. EA’s ad directed users towards the (inactive) website DevenezPlusQueVous-meme.com, which translates to “Be More Than Yourself.”

Army General Philippe Pontiès didn’t find much humor in the matter, telling French website Ecrans (translated) that:

We are clearly in a situation of abuse of slogan. So far, our campaign is working very well, we have very good returns.

The General also noted that the army has been advertising in videogames, with good results, and, ironically enough, has advertised in select EA game, such as NHL 10, NBA Live 10 and Need For Speed Pro Street. The General made it clear that the Army advertises only in racing or sports games, never army or military-themed games.

The ad appropriation issue has apparently been resolved through dialog between the Army’s agency and Electronic Arts.


Thanks Emanuel!


Comments

Re: Bad Company 2 & French Army Ads Square Off

Why is this even an issue?  Are we to hold slogans sacred against any type of reference, wordplay, or silliness?  It's not like the French army is the only "victim" of this, either.  "Army of Two" clearly riffs on "Army of One".  ZOMG, scandal!  Puh-lease...  If anything, it's simply an indicator of how the original slogan has penetrated the public consciousness, sort of like having Weird Al spoof your song.  It means you've made it.

Re: Bad Company 2 & French Army Ads Square Off

The translation of “Devenez vous-même” is more like "Become yourself" in a sort of self-discovery kind of way. EA's version translates into "Become more than yourself". But tiny issue there.

Point is, EA really shouldn't have done that. I can imagine french soldiers would have been pretty insulted if it made big news.

Re: Bad Company 2 & French Army Ads Square Off

I'm sure the British Government and the SAS is also totally pissed that Fallout used the motto "Who Dares Wins." As one of their quest titles.

Seriously, I don't know why everyone is worked up about this, probably some anti EA attitudes going on and using any excuse necessary to kick and scream about the company.

I thought this was a pretty tounge and cheek ad that you would see on the street and go like "oh, that's pretty funny seeing both of those next together." In no way shape or form do I think that your going to have someone see the French army ad going "Yeah I'll be myself!" and then see the Bad Company ad and go like "Screw joining the army." It's just not going to happen.

Re: Bad Company 2 & French Army Ads Square Off

EA, you already messed up Dante's Inferno with one act of stupidity. Don't you dare ruin Bad Company 2.

"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." -Albert Einstein

Re: Bad Company 2 & French Army Ads Square Off

I don't see how making an ad with a play on the French Army's recruitment slogan is "Ruining" Bad Company 2. It's not like the marketing department has any effect on gameplay, whatsoever. Same goes for Dante's Inferno. (Though, TBH, Dante's Inferno doesn't interest me in the slightest.)

 

Re: Bad Company 2 & French Army Ads Square Off

I'm a fan of Bad Company. I would rather EA doesn't do anything stupid that would give the game a bad rep.

"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." -Albert Einstein

Re: Bad Company 2 & French Army Ads Square Off

Meh. As far as I'm concerned, the game's marketing "rep" has nothing to do with whether or not I will buy the game. Yeah, some of EA's marketing ploys have been pretty stupid, but, frankly, I don't care.

For me: 

if(game.Quality >= GOOD && me.AvailibleMoney >= game.Cost){ me.BuyGame();}

Yes, I just did that. Sue me. :P

Re: Bad Company 2 & French Army Ads Square Off

It's made by EA. Too late.

--------------------------------------------------

I LIKE the fence. I get 2 groups to laugh at then.

-------------------------------------------------- I LIKE the fence. I get 2 groups to laugh at then.

Re: Bad Company 2 & French Army Ads Square Off

Clearly, the only way to resolve this is WAR.

Whether virtually or in real terms, I don't know.

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

Is King right? Should all games adopt the free-to-play model?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
MaskedPixelanteNumber 3: Night Dive was brought to the attention of the public by a massive game recovery, and yet most of their released catalogue consists of games that other people did the hard work of getting re-released.04/17/2014 - 8:46pm
MaskedPixelanteNumber 2: If Humongous Entertainment wanted their stuff on Steam, why didn't they talk to their parent company, which does have a number of games published on Steam?04/17/2014 - 8:45pm
MaskedPixelanteNumber 1: When Night Dive spent the better part of a year teasing the return of true classics, having their big content dump be edutainment is kind of a kick in the stomach.04/17/2014 - 8:44pm
Matthew Wilsonhttp://www.giantbomb.com/articles/jeff-gerstmann-heads-to-new-york-takes-questions/1100-4900/ He talks about the future games press and the games industry. It is worth your time even though it is a bit long, and stay for the QA. There are some good QA04/17/2014 - 5:28pm
IanCErm so they shouldn't sell edutainment at all? Why?04/17/2014 - 4:42pm
MaskedPixelanteNot that linkable, go onto Steam and there's stuff like Pajama Sam on the front-page, courtesy of Night Dive.04/17/2014 - 4:13pm
Andrew EisenOkay, again, please, please, PLEASE get in a habit of linking to whatever you're talking about.04/17/2014 - 4:05pm
MaskedPixelanteAnother round of Night Dive teasing and promising turns out to be stupid edutainment games. Thanks for wasting all our time, guys. See you never.04/17/2014 - 3:44pm
Matthew WilsonAgain the consequences were not only foreseeable, but very likely. anyone who understood supply demand curvs knew that was going to happen. SF has been a econ/trade hub for the last hundred years.04/17/2014 - 2:45pm
Andrew EisenMixedPixelante - Would you like to expand on that?04/17/2014 - 2:43pm
MaskedPixelanteWell, I am officially done with Night Dive Studios. Unless they can bring something worthwhile back, I'm never buying another game from them.04/17/2014 - 2:29pm
PHX Corphttp://www.msnbc.com/ronan-farrow/watch/video-games-continue-to-break-the-mold-229561923638 Ronan Farrow Daily on Video games breaking the mold04/17/2014 - 2:13pm
NeenekoAh yes, because by building something nice they were just asking for people to come push them out. Consequences are protested all the time when other people are implementing them.04/17/2014 - 2:06pm
Matthew Wilsonok than they should not protest when the consequences of that choice occur.04/17/2014 - 1:06pm
NeenekoIf people want tall buildings, plenty of other cities with them. Part of freedom and markets is communities deciding what they do and do not want built in their collective space.04/17/2014 - 12:55pm
Sora-ChanI realize that they have ways getting around it, but one reason might be due to earthquakes.04/17/2014 - 4:42am
Matthew WilsonSF is a tech/ economic/ trade center it should be mostly tail building. this whole problem is because of the lack of tail buildings. How would having tail apartment buildings destroy SF? having tail buildings has not runed other cities around the US/world04/16/2014 - 10:51pm
Matthew WilsonAgain the issue is you can not build upwards anywhere in SF at the moment, and no you would not. You would bring prices to where they should have been before the market distortion. those prices are not economic or socially healthy.04/16/2014 - 10:46pm
ZippyDSMleeYou still wind up pushing people out of the non high rise aeras but tis least damage you can do all things considered.04/16/2014 - 10:26pm
ZippyDSMleeANd by mindlessly building upward you make it like every place else hurting property prices,ect,ect. You'll have to slowly segment the region into aeras where you will never build upward then alow some aeras to build upward.04/16/2014 - 10:25pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician