Unlikely Pair Come Out Against RI Adult Game Bill

March 12, 2010 -

While Rhode Island Bill S.2156 drew backing from the Parents Television Council, an unlikely pair has come out against the Bill, which proposes fines and possible jail time for retailers that sell “M” or “AO” rated games to underage patrons.

You might expect that the Entertainment Software Association (ESA) is against the Ocean State legislation. The organization offered us this statement from Rich Taylor, ESA Senior Vice President of Communications & Industry Affairs:

The ESA is opposed to this bill and we are educating those involved about the strong work of the ESRB and the self-regulatory successes that recently were lauded by the Federal Trade Commission. This bill is the same as all the other legislative proposals found unconstitutional by numerous federal courts. We are ensuring legislators understand and appreciate the fundamental problems that arise when trying to circumvent the first amendment rights of gamers and our industry's innovative storytellers and creators.

The Bill’s other detractor? None other than Jack Thompson, who called it, “clearly unconstitutional.”  Asked to clarify his comment, JT told us:

Since 1930, it has been unconstitutional to restrict the sale of entertainment products to anyone based upon a private sector standard, which the ESRB ratings are.  There has to be a definition, description of the material and why it is offensive in the statute itself, so that a jury can apply a state/governmental standard, not a private sector rating.  The Bill
won't survive a court challenge, nor should it.

I actually have litigated these issues.  Seems to me you should report the fact that even Jack Thompson knows this one won't fly.  Think I'm not going to help the legislature get it right?

Thompson did indicate, however, that he is attempting to advise Rhode Island legislators on how to amend the Bill in order to make it passable.


Comments

Re: Unlikely Pair Come Out Against RI Adult Game Bill

Thompson has, in the past, shown an ability to spot an unconstitutional bill, unfortunately, he's also tried to push a few, but he usually knows when he's playing the roll of the dice, and this bill isn't even close, which is why I never bothered to comment on the original story, the moment I read the details of the bill, I knew it was a non-starter.

Re: Unlikely Pair Come Out Against RI Adult Game Bill

This However Just Raised GP Holy S(Foghorn) Quotient by 1 Today

If you don't know what it means Here it is

http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/HolyShitQuotient

 

Watching JT on GP is just like watching an episode of Jerry springer only as funny as the fights

America has just became its own version of the Jerry Springer Show after a bizarre moment in Florida involving a carnival worker.

Re: Unlikely Pair Come Out Against RI Adult Game Bill

and thank you for yet ANOTHER 3 hour wiki-walk PHX.

Hunting the shadows of the troubled dreams.

Hunting the shadows of the troubled dreams.

Re: Unlikely Pair Come Out Against RI Adult Game Bill

Then, there's nothing to fear. The bill as it is had very little chances of passing, but if Thompson gets involved, it will certainly not pass.

Each time Thompson publicly says that he's helping someone, I can almost hear the other moral guardians whispering through their teeth "You're NOT helping."

Re: Unlikely Pair Come Out Against RI Adult Game Bill

Same old song and dance. Thompson failed miserably beforehand and there's nothing anybody(let alone the Metropolitian Moron of Miami) can do to make a pile of garbage like this pass constitutional muster.

Geaux Saints, Geaux Tigers, Geaux Hornets, Jack Thompson can geaux chase a chupacabra. Hell will stay frozen over for quite a while since the Saints won the Super Bowl.

Geaux Saints, Geaux Tigers, Geaux Pelicans. Solidarity for the Saints = No retreat, no surrender. 2013 = Saints' revenge on the NFL. Even through the darkest days, this fire burns always.

Re: Unlikely Pair Come Out Against RI Adult Game Bill

 

I don't know how to make of this story.  Did JT really change or is this some sort of trick?  I better keep watching this story. 
 

 

Re: Unlikely Pair Come Out Against RI Adult Game Bill

There's really nothing to it.  This isn't new for JT; he's done it before (Leland Yee's California video game bill comes to mind).  Thompson knows stuff like this isn't going to work.  If he's not involved, he'll say so and offer his "expertise."  If he is involved, he'll claim it's foolproof until it inevitably fails and then blame everyone else (as with his failed Louisiana bill).

 

Andrew Eisen

Re: Unlikely Pair Come Out Against RI Adult Game Bill


True, I also remember when people ask JT about the sex scene in Mass Effect.  Everybody was shocked on JT response and felt like they were in Twilight Zone or ended up in another universe where the bad guy are the good guy or something like that.  After reading this article and your message.  I still don't know what to say, it's like seeing a Lex Luthor as a superhero from a alternate universe like in this movie:

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Justice_League:_Crisis_on_Two_Earths 

 

Know what I mean?

 

Re: Unlikely Pair Come Out Against RI Adult Game Bill

I know what you mean I just don't understand why you or anyone else would react to this news in that way.  If you're familiar with Thompson, this news story should not be at all surprising.  Thompson is acting exactly like he always does.  This behavior is not at all new for him.

And no, he's not a good guy (or rather, he's not on our side).  All he's saying is that this particular legislation won't work (which is true although it may get signed into law) and that he's going to offer his expertise (ha ha ha) to make sure the RI legislature gets it right.  So, Thompson is still all about passing a law to criminalize the sale of mature video games to minors, he just wants to be damn sure he's a part of it.

"Think I'm not going to help the legislature get it right?" -Jack Thompson

 

Andrew Eisen

Re: Unlikely Pair Come Out Against RI Adult Game Bill


Well, I don't know much about JT as much as you do.  I just know his usual attack,  but I wasn't aware of his other side.  But yeah, I guess this is not familiar to you but to me it's weird. 

 

 

Re: Unlikely Pair Come Out Against RI Adult Game Bill

Even a broken clock...

Re: Unlikely Pair Come Out Against RI Adult Game Bill

*spits out a jet of cola from his chair and hits the wall*

Jack said what? I think I will buy a lottery ticket today and walk on water.

Holy hell, I mean, if he is saying this bill is DOOMED...then those folks in the Parent Trash Council and their stooge puppets, err I mean their "allies" better look at alternatives real quick!

Re: Unlikely Pair Come Out Against RI Adult Game Bill

I wonder if hell got frozen over this fact....

Satan: WHY IS MY DOMAIN COVER IN ICE????

Minion: Master, Jack Thompson sided with the gaming industry on an anti-gaming bill.

Satan: Really? I would have expected the world to end before that happen.

http://www.magicinkgaming.com/

Re: Unlikely Pair Come Out Against RI Adult Game Bill

Jack didn't side with the industry, he's jsut assuming that if he helps them it'll pass.

Re: Unlikely Pair Come Out Against RI Adult Game Bill

I wonder if he's using his prior exploits with the Utah legislature to help him gain the ear of the Rhode Island legislature?

"You may recall that it was I, Jack Thompson, who was threatened with legal action by several members of the Utah legislature if I didn't knock off sending them a constant barrage of my trademarked and patented emails filled with my crazy-ass, nonsensical rantings."

And I wonder if they'll fall for it? It's not impossible. That fool in Louisiana fell for it. After all, we're talking elected officials. The apex of the Fool Pyramid. 

Re: Unlikely Pair Come Out Against RI Adult Game Bill

someone better go check the temperature in Hell.

Re: Unlikely Pair Come Out Against RI Adult Game Bill

Judas Iscariot isn't ice skating with Hussein yet. JT only dislikes it because HE didn't have a say in it.

Hunting the shadows of the troubled dreams.

Hunting the shadows of the troubled dreams.

Re: Unlikely Pair Come Out Against RI Adult Game Bill

which one? the one in Arizona, California, Michigan, Grand Cayman, or Norway?

岩「…Where do masochists go when they die?」

岩「…I can see why Hasselbeck's worried about fake guns killing fake people. afterall, she's a fake journalist on a fake news channel」

Re: Unlikely Pair Come Out Against RI Adult Game Bill

Basically, he wants them to "do it right" the first time so it can't be struck down in court. Whether or not that can be done is doubtful, but he can dream...

Re: Unlikely Pair Come Out Against RI Adult Game Bill

^that

Jack isn't against the law at all; in fact, he WANTS it to succeed. It can't do that if it's an unconstitutional law, so he's trying to make the law eligable to be passed. Whether or not RI will pass it is another matter.

At least he's taking logical and procedural steps towards a goal instead of being a crazy media hog. Now if only he found a more constructive goal...

Re: Unlikely Pair Come Out Against RI Adult Game Bill

Jack is against this? I thought Jack wanted stuff like this. I am confused. Jack wrote a letter to Obama calling for a nation wide banning of violent video games to anyone of any age. If he wanted video games to be banned nation wide and illegal to sell, possess, import and such why would he be against this bill? 

Re: Unlikely Pair Come Out Against RI Adult Game Bill

He isn't, he's just assuming he knows how to get it to pass.

Re: Unlikely Pair Come Out Against RI Adult Game Bill

I don't doubt he can get it to pass (or that it may pass with or without his help)

Surviving the legal challenges is something else entirely.

Re: Unlikely Pair Come Out Against RI Adult Game Bill

Giving he's never even survived his own legal challenges.

Re: Unlikely Pair Come Out Against RI Adult Game Bill

Which, given his track record, will result in the following:

1. Thompson will get out there saying "let me make it and it will pass"

2. They let him make it

3. It doesn't even pass the house vote.

4. Thompson blames the nominator for "being an incompetent <insert slam here>" and the house for being a "murder loving <insert insult here> gamer sympathizer" and that if he was allowed to present it it would have passed, all the while running back to his house in Florida.

Re: Unlikely Pair Come Out Against RI Adult Game Bill

Maybe he is realizing the errors of his ways? (I am trying not to laugh when typing that)

I think the whole Utah and Louisiana fiasco's he brought on, were rather damaging to him and to others. In many aspects, this law he is warning them on, it is almost identical to his doomed bills he had authored.

Personally just sounds like he is telling them, "I attacked head on and it was bloody. You should try flanking from the left...never tried that myself". I don't think he is against the bill, but he is warning them that it already has failed before it has seen the light of day.

 

Re: Unlikely Pair Come Out Against RI Adult Game Bill

Good to know Jack's still kickin' around!  Drinking Guinness in his honour just wouldn't be as much fun if he gave up the ghost.

---
Fangamer

---
Fangamer

Re: Unlikely Pair Come Out Against RI Adult Game Bill

Good job Gamepolitics, you just fell for the Narcissistic Personality Disorder-fueled trick by Mr. Thompson to get his name mentioned in a desperate attempt at mastabatory relevance.  Yes, you had his name mentioned only after a jump, but still- this is a non-story.

Obviously, he is as likely to be advising the RI legislators on passing this bill as he has been "working with law enforcement" every time someone under 30 goes on a killing spree. 

His credibility and relevance died over a year ago.  Let the dead stay dead.

Re: Unlikely Pair Come Out Against RI Adult Game Bill

He had credibility?

Re: Unlikely Pair Come Out Against RI Adult Game Bill

Point taken. Just thought it was interesting because he demonstrated a tiny bit of flexibility.

Re: Unlikely Pair Come Out Against RI Adult Game Bill

He won´t change, Peter. He just want to take a part of it in someway.

------------------------------------------------------------ My DeviantArt Page (aka DeviantCensorship): http://www.darkknightstrikes.deviantart.com

Re: Unlikely Pair Come Out Against RI Adult Game Bill

That's not "flexibility," Pete. That's just Jack-O's way of saying that if he and his legal genius aren't involved, the effort's doomed. You can call that "flexibility," if you want. I'll call it "the insane ramblings of a crazy person."

Re: Unlikely Pair Come Out Against RI Adult Game Bill

I've just realized, this bill isn't real. It's part of an off-season ARG to keep interest in White Collar going. Look at the pairing, it's right out of the show.

Re: Unlikely Pair Come Out Against RI Adult Game Bill

A stuck clock is right twice a day.

Re: Unlikely Pair Come Out Against RI Adult Game Bill

But those are more reliable.

Re: Unlikely Pair Come Out Against RI Adult Game Bill

"I actually have litigated these issues [and actually have had my ass handed to me every time I tried it]." - Jack Thompson

Re: Unlikely Pair Come Out Against RI Adult Game Bill

Hey, Jack Thompson got it right, it IS unconstitutional. Naturally, I was surprised that he agrees with us in this regard, but meh.

-Optimum est pati quod emendare non possis-It is best to endure what you cannot change-

-Optimum est pati quod emendare non possis-It is best to endure what you cannot change-

Re: Unlikely Pair Come Out Against RI Adult Game Bill

Meh. he said the same thing about the California bill. Its nothing new.

He learned his lesson hard in Louisiana and is now trying to save face. He has no idea how to constitutionally regulate the sale of video games. If he did, he would have done so long ago.

E. Zachary Knight
Oklahoma City Chapter of the ECA
http://www.theeca.com/chapters_oklahoma

Re: Unlikely Pair Come Out Against RI Adult Game Bill

Keep the comments clean please; personal attacks on JT will not be tolerated.

 

Re: Unlikely Pair Come Out Against RI Adult Game Bill

Soooo... no mentioning of Jack at all then?  Because you can't mention any of Jack's antics/failures without it coming across as a personal attack.  From failing to arrest two webcomig nerds who ponied up some charity cash he wussed out of to submitting gay porn to a court of law thinking that somehow in his bizzaro universe that it would get another lawyer and not himself in trouble.

-Ultimately what will do in mankind is a person's fear of their own freedom-

Re: Unlikely Pair Come Out Against RI Adult Game Bill

Define "personal attack", please. Saying "I´m not agree with Jack Thompson" puts you in the same place as "Jack is a lying &*%$$!". The man just doesn´t tolerate anything.

And what influence does his opinion have on this new episode of "Let´s create a totally new and anti-constitutional law against violent gamez for children´s sake let´s hope the supreme court let us win this time we don´t care if is tax money think of the childrenz plz?"

I don´t think that anyone on Rhode Island even know he exist.

Thompson did indicate, however, that he is attempting to advise Rhode Island legislators on how to amend the Bill in order to make it passable.

Yes, because that one in Louisiana just did very fine.

------------------------------------------------------------ My DeviantArt Page (aka DeviantCensorship): http://www.darkknightstrikes.deviantart.com

Re: Unlikely Pair Come Out Against RI Adult Game Bill

And the one in Utah before that. The one where the bill's sponser(?) had to come out and apologize to the court over Thompson's actions. It did super.

 - W

Consumer responsibility is just as important as Corporate responsibility.

Re: Unlikely Pair Come Out Against RI Adult Game Bill

Speech-policing, Pete?

Re: Unlikely Pair Come Out Against RI Adult Game Bill

It’s not my thing, but it’s necessary in this case. Question his ideology all you want.

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

How do you usually divide up your Humble Bundle payments?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
Matthew Wilsonthe lose of nn would not be good for us, but it will not be good for verizion/comcast/att in the long run ether.04/24/2014 - 2:16pm
Matthew Wilsonsadly yes. it would take another sopa day to achieve it.04/24/2014 - 2:13pm
NeenekoI am also confused. Are you saying NN would only become law if Google/Netflix pushed the issue (against their own interests)?04/24/2014 - 2:10pm
E. Zachary KnightMatthew, you are saying a lot of things but I am still unclear on your point. Are you saying that the loss of Net Neutrality will be good in the long run?04/24/2014 - 2:06pm
Matthew WilsonOfcourse it does I never said it did not.though over time the death of NN will make backbone providers like Google, level3 and others stronger becouse most isps including the big ones can not provid internet without them. they can peer with smaller isps04/24/2014 - 1:54pm
E. Zachary KnightMatthew, and that still plays in Google's favor over their smaller rivals who don't have the muscle to stand up to ISPs.04/24/2014 - 1:45pm
Matthew Wilsongoogle wont pay becouse they control a large part of the backbone that all isps depend on. if verizon blocks their data, google does the same. the effect is Verizon loses access to 40% of the internet, and can not serve some areas at all.04/24/2014 - 1:14pm
Neenekolack of NN is in google and netflix interest. It is another tool for squeezing out smaller companies since they can afford to 'play'04/24/2014 - 12:57pm
Matthew WilsonI have said it before net nutrality will not be made in to law until Google or Netflix is blocked, or they do what they did for sopa and pull their sites down in protest.04/23/2014 - 8:02pm
Andrew EisenGee, I guess putting a former cable industry lobbyist as the Chairman of the FCC wasn't that great of an idea. http://www.nytimes.com/2014/04/24/technology/fcc-new-net-neutrality-rules.html?_r=204/23/2014 - 7:26pm
Andrew EisenIanC - I assume what he's getting at is the fact that once PS3/360 development ceases, there will be no more "For Everything But Wii U" games.04/23/2014 - 5:49pm
Andrew EisenMatthew - Yes, obviously developers will eventually move on from the PS3 and 360 but the phrase will continue to mean exactly what it means.04/23/2014 - 5:45pm
IanCAnd how does that equal his annoying phrase being meaningless?04/23/2014 - 5:09pm
Matthew Wilson@Andrew Eisen the phrase everything but wiiu will be meaningless afer this year becouse devs will drop 360/ps3 support.04/23/2014 - 4:43pm
Andrew EisenFor Everything But... 360? Huh, not many games can claim that title. Only three others that I know of.04/23/2014 - 3:45pm
MaskedPixelantehttp://www.joystiq.com/2014/04/23/another-world-rated-for-current-consoles-handhelds-in-germany/ Another World fulfills legal obligations of being on every gaming system under the sun.04/23/2014 - 12:34pm
Matthew Wilsonhttp://arstechnica.com/gaming/2014/04/steam-gauge-do-strong-reviews-lead-to-stronger-sales-on-steam/?comments=1 Here is another data driven article using sales data from steam to figure out if reviews effect sales. It is stats heavy like the last one.04/23/2014 - 11:33am
Andrew EisenI love RPGs but I didn't much care for Tales of Symphonia. I didn't bother with its sequel.04/23/2014 - 11:21am
InfophileIt had great RPGs because MS wanted to use them to break into Japan. (Which had the side-effect of screwing NA PS3 owners out of Tales of Vesperia. No, I'm not bitter, why do you ask?)04/23/2014 - 10:52am
RedMageI'm still disappointed the 360 never broke into Japan either. It had a bevy of great RPGs in the late 2000s.04/23/2014 - 9:48am
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician