U.S. Military Eying Larger Role for Games in Troop Training

March 15, 2010 -

The U.S. Military, already a big practitioner of videogame-based training for its members, plans to spend even more on the technology in the future.

In a bid to cut battlefield casualties the Pentagon has approved an “unspecified” amount of funding towards research on how to further take advantage of the latest videogame technology reports AFP.

General James Mattis, Commander, U.S. Joint Forces Command, said the initiative would put soldiers through, “as many tactical and ethical challenges as we can before they go into their first firefight.”

He continued, “…I'm convinced, both ethically and casualties-wise, we can reduce the missteps that we are taking on the battlefield, and reduce them significantly.”

Videogame-based training would provide trainees a chance to come up with multiple reactions to a single scenario, as Mattis stated, “If we can put people through simulation, it's not so they know one way to take down an enemy stronghold, but so they know five different ways to do it.”

The General said that live-fire training will still need to be utilized.


Comments

Re: U.S. Military Eying Larger Role for Games in Troop ...

Best thing we've got going with video games, is that I assume we can change the playing field at anytime we want, we can add new buildings, locations and things that we just don't or can't have access to in a real training environment here at home.

Austin talked a bit about MILES, it's a great training tool, but we are finding more and more that using it causes a certain percentage of soldiers to mistake concealment for cover, due to the laser rounds used.  I assume that we could in a video game environment show that bullets do infact travel through small bushes and smoke, possibly even walls.

All in all, I'll be interested to see if anything else comes up about it.

-Idiots, the lot of them - SSGT -Yeah, but they're our idiots - ME On the topic of congress

Re: U.S. Military Eying Larger Role for Games in Troop ...

Wouldn't paintball be a better way to do large-scale and intense training scenarios? Not that video games are useless, just that it seems to me that paintball would be an easier, more effective (and cheaper) option.

-Optimum est pati quod emendare non possis-It is best to endure what you cannot change-

-Optimum est pati quod emendare non possis-It is best to endure what you cannot change-

Re: U.S. Military Eying Larger Role for Games in Troop ...

Not that I disagree, but I can see one counterpoint to your suggestion:

With VG simulation, you have complete control over the training regiment.  This means uniform training on all troops that use it.  If you were to do paint ball training, then it'd be different every time as you put in more variables (being people).

Of course the counter point to this statement would be that the paintball option would teach adaptability to the soldiers, but the game could teach that as well, and it wouldn't take up as much land space.

Re: U.S. Military Eying Larger Role for Games in Troop ...

Paintball is crap.  It lacks any semblance of realism for military purposes.

Now, there is SIMUNITIONS, which basically means that you have two opposing teams firing rifle rounds (5.56NATO) that are basically paintballs, which hurts like fuck.  This is also expensive as all hell, and destroys rifles.

There is also MILES, which is far more effective, but also destroys rifles.  Basically, you take your average M16, M249, and M4s, and put a block on the end so that the bolt will continue to cycle even though you're firing blanks (which, of course, are highly corrosive).  Then you put a small laser emmitter on the end of the handguard of the rifle.  When the trigger is pulled, you fire a blank, and the MILES system renders a hit on the target dependent on what laser receptor is nearest.  This is the current standard for simulated training (and is also a shit ton of fun).  However, this also destroys rifle barrels.

Re: U.S. Military Eying Larger Role for Games in Troop ...

I'm surprised they wouldn't have come up with some type of training barrel that could take the corrosion.  Replace the metal with ceramic or something like that.

Re: U.S. Military Eying Larger Role for Games in Troop ...

And why would the contractors responsible for making the weapons want to do that when they can keep selling spare barrels?

--------------------------------------------------

I LIKE the fence. I get 2 groups to laugh at then.

-------------------------------------------------- I LIKE the fence. I get 2 groups to laugh at then.
 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

Is King right? Should all games adopt the free-to-play model?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
Matthew Wilsonit is a game worth playing if you have a pc/360/ps304/20/2014 - 9:34pm
MaskedPixelantehttps://twitter.com/IGLevine/status/457552538343325696 The Lutece Twins show up in some of the most unlikely of places.04/20/2014 - 2:44pm
Andrew EisenAs it happens, Chinatown Wars is the only GTA game I've played.04/19/2014 - 10:43am
Papa MidnightWith GTA5 (to date) failing to even provide indication of a PC release, I'm realising that this might be the first GTA game that I have not played (outside of Chinatown Wars) since the series inception.04/19/2014 - 8:14am
IanCSo im guessing a bunch of edutainment games, which a lot of people elsewhere are going gaga over, dot count as classics? Okay. If you don't mind me, i have a sudden urge to play Putt Putt....04/19/2014 - 6:15am
MaskedPixelantehttp://www.joystiq.com/2014/04/18/playstation-99-cent-sale-discounts-tokyo-jungle-super-stardust/ Weekend long PSN flash sale. So much stuff is 99 cents for the rest of the weekend.04/18/2014 - 5:59pm
Adam802http://www.polygon.com/2014/4/18/5627928/newtown-video-game-addiction-forum04/18/2014 - 4:14pm
Matthew Wilsonit is a video talking about why certain games/products/consoles do well, and others do not. he back it up with solid research.04/18/2014 - 3:56pm
Andrew EisenI'm not keen on blind links. What is it?04/18/2014 - 3:45pm
Matthew Wilsonthis is worth a whatch https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MyXcr6sDRtw&list=PL35FE5C4B157509C904/18/2014 - 3:43pm
MaskedPixelanteNumber 3: Night Dive was brought to the attention of the public by a massive game recovery, and yet most of their released catalogue consists of games that other people did the hard work of getting re-released.04/17/2014 - 8:46pm
MaskedPixelanteNumber 2: If Humongous Entertainment wanted their stuff on Steam, why didn't they talk to their parent company, which does have a number of games published on Steam?04/17/2014 - 8:45pm
MaskedPixelanteNumber 1: When Night Dive spent the better part of a year teasing the return of true classics, having their big content dump be edutainment is kind of a kick in the stomach.04/17/2014 - 8:44pm
Matthew Wilsonhttp://www.giantbomb.com/articles/jeff-gerstmann-heads-to-new-york-takes-questions/1100-4900/ He talks about the future games press and the games industry. It is worth your time even though it is a bit long, and stay for the QA. There are some good QA04/17/2014 - 5:28pm
IanCErm so they shouldn't sell edutainment at all? Why?04/17/2014 - 4:42pm
MaskedPixelanteNot that linkable, go onto Steam and there's stuff like Pajama Sam on the front-page, courtesy of Night Dive.04/17/2014 - 4:13pm
Andrew EisenOkay, again, please, please, PLEASE get in a habit of linking to whatever you're talking about.04/17/2014 - 4:05pm
MaskedPixelanteAnother round of Night Dive teasing and promising turns out to be stupid edutainment games. Thanks for wasting all our time, guys. See you never.04/17/2014 - 3:44pm
Matthew WilsonAgain the consequences were not only foreseeable, but very likely. anyone who understood supply demand curvs knew that was going to happen. SF has been a econ/trade hub for the last hundred years.04/17/2014 - 2:45pm
Andrew EisenMixedPixelante - Would you like to expand on that?04/17/2014 - 2:43pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician