FCC Unveils National Broadband Plan

March 16, 2010 -

The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has released its National Broadband Plan to Congress.

FCC Chair Julius Genachowski called the document an “action plan” for a “21st century roadmap to spur economic growth and investment, create jobs, educate our children, protect our citizens, and engage in our democracy.”

An Executive Summary of the Plan (PDF) stated that nearly 200 million Americans possessed a broadband Internet connection as of last year, up from 8 million in 2000. 100 million citizens are still without broadband at home however and perhaps more importantly, “nearly a decade after 9/11, our first responders still lack a nationwide public safety mobile broadband communications network.”

The plant details four ways in which the government can hold sway over the broadband “ecosystem,” which included: designing policies to ensure competition, ensuring efficient allocation and management of assets, ensuring that low-income citizens can afford broadband and reforming laws, policies, standards and incentives to maximize benefits for thepublic education, health care and government sectors.

Specific recommendations included:

•  Developing disclosure requirements fir broadband service providers
•  Changing rules to ensure a competitive and innovative video set-top box market
•  Making 500MHz of spectrum available for broadband within 10 years (The FCC says it only
   has 50MHz in inventory at the moment)
•  Creating the Connect America Fund in order to offer affordable broadband and voice
    services with at least 4 Mbps download speeds.
•  Launching a National Digital Literacy Corps

The report also issued six goals that should serve “as a compass” over the next decade:

1. 100 million homes should have affordable access to download speeds of at least 100
    Mbps and upload speeds of 50 Mbps.
2. The U.S. should lead the world in mobile innovation.
3. Every American should have affordable access to robust broadband service.
4. Every American community should have access to at least 1 Gbps broadband service to
    anchor schools, hospitals and government buildings.
5. First responders should have access to a nationwide wireless public safety network.
6. Ensure that America leads in the clean energy economy.

Stealing a page from Google, the report stated that “the plan is in beta, and will always be,” as it will “always be changing.”

It’s estimated that the plan, if enacted, could cost anywhere between $20 and $350 billion dollars. Some also wonder if the plan would actually raise the price of Internet connections, despite the use of the word “affordable” throughout the document.

A PDF of the full plan can be downloaded here (it's a rather large 12MB file).


Comments

Re: FCC Unveils National Broadband Plan

Yeah, because high speed internet access is a right now, right?  I mean, you shouldn't HAVE to pay for it.  Unless you actually earn money, in which case you have to help pay for those too lazy to.

Re: FCC Unveils National Broadband Plan

Did I miss something?  I gathered that this wasn't about "free internet," so much as getting physical access to broadband to places that don't have it, i.e. rural areas of the US.  As I live in an area where access to broadband is limited, I can tell you that people will pay for it, if it was physically accessible.

If I'm wrong, I'm wrong, but I'm pretty sure this is more about laying the necessary cable than it is about subsidizing broadband internet.

---

You KILL Vampires. You don't DATE them.

--- With the first link, the chain is forged.

Re: FCC Unveils National Broadband Plan

It also allows the government to control aspects of internet pricing, performance, etc., which is bullshit.

Re: FCC Unveils National Broadband Plan

Meh we'd be better off if they nationalized land lines..... or at least made it so that they can not monoplize them like they do now if they use them they must maintain them.


Until lobbying is a hanging offense I choose anarchy! CP/IP laws should not effect the daily life of common people! http://zippydsmlee.wordpress.com/


Copyright infringement is nothing more than civil disobedience to a bad set of laws. Let's renegotiate them.

---

http://zippydsm.deviantart.com/

Re: FCC Unveils National Broadband Plan

I don't know about anywhere else, but here in Minnesota, telecommunications companies do have to do the maintenance.

Also, yeah, let's nationalize landlines.  They'll be in just as super of a condition as roadways!  We'll never have any downtime, and they'll always be perfect!*

 

[anyone who knows the two seasons in Minnesota know what I'm getting at here, winter and road construction.]

---

You KILL Vampires. You don't DATE them.

--- With the first link, the chain is forged.

Re: FCC Unveils National Broadband Plan

Bullshit, but completely expected, since it can be argued that it counts as interstate commerce, which would be controlled in such a fashion by the federal government.

---

You KILL Vampires. You don't DATE them.

--- With the first link, the chain is forged.

Re: FCC Unveils National Broadband Plan

Heh, then telecom companies will see justification for rate hikes I guess.

None of this will mean anything as long as corporations aren't willing to spend the little bit of extra cash upgrading ot keep long term costs down.

Re: FCC Unveils National Broadband Plan

So basically they are hedging their bets that the 500MHZ spectrum will get everyone cheap broadband instead of taking the gdamn landlines from the gdamn bastard corporations? *le sigh*

Until lobbying is a hanging offense I choose anarchy! CP/IP laws should not effect the daily life of common people! http://zippydsmlee.wordpress.com/

Copyright infringement is nothing more than civil disobedience to a bad set of laws. Let's renegotiate them.

---

http://zippydsm.deviantart.com/

Re: FCC Unveils National Broadband Plan

?

Re: FCC Unveils National Broadband Plan

Nationalize the land lines and rent them fairly to everyone (well business's anyway) they will either be forced to play nice while they start putting real money into infrastructure (which they blew millions of tax payer dollars on btw) or do something more with cell to compete with it, it's win/win either way.

Until lobbying is a hanging offense I choose anarchy! CP/IP laws should not effect the daily life of common people! http://zippydsmlee.wordpress.com/

Copyright infringement is nothing more than civil disobedience to a bad set of laws. Let's renegotiate them.

---

http://zippydsm.deviantart.com/

Re: FCC Unveils National Broadband Plan

I'm all for this unless the government tries to sneak in loopholes that can lead to internet filtering.  It seems to be the hot new trend 'round the "free" world.  And in this age of Patriot Acts and ever-growing Stateism, I wouldn't put it past a single US poltitician...

Re: FCC Unveils National Broadband Plan

Well...from what I've read so far...it doesn't seem intrusive, and it certainly isn't as wasteful as some of the other things passed/done in the past 9 years...

While I disagree with these types of policies, I don't see a problem with this bill, constitutionally.

Also, I believe that there's a typo at the beginning of paragraph 4. "The plant"?

-Optimum est pati quod emendare non possis-It is best to endure what you cannot change-

-Optimum est pati quod emendare non possis-It is best to endure what you cannot change-

Re: FCC Unveils National Broadband Plan

I saw tibits of this on the news this morning, I just hope the coperations find a way to hijack the plans for brodband.

http://www.magicinkgaming.com/

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

Did Microsoft pay too much ($2.5 billion) for Minecraft developer Mojang?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
Craig R.Do conspiracies ever make sense? The fact that people are now having to defend themselves against nutjob websites like Breitbart.com shows how far down into the rabbit hole we've all been forcibly dragged.09/18/2014 - 7:05pm
Michael ChandraBut when the mountain obviously exists...09/18/2014 - 5:49pm
Michael ChandraMind you, if someone makes a mountain out of a molehill with a secret agenda as motive, it'd be fine.09/18/2014 - 5:48pm
Andrew EisenOkay, so I guess I'm not making sense of #notyourshield because it doesn't make any sense.09/18/2014 - 5:28pm
Andrew EisenI'd really only count three as being "death of gamer" articles and only one as arguably going a bit far with "gamers are young white dudes" stuff.09/18/2014 - 5:17pm
Andrew EisenMost are really just a look at the crap that happened the previous day when Sarkeesian's new video came out and almost all are exceedingly clear that they're talking about the specific gamers who are being obnoxious.09/18/2014 - 5:17pm
Andrew EisenKrono - Yep, I had only seen two. I looked at the 12 you sent and while I had seen a few of them, I didn't think to count them. Some aren't about gamers at all. One's just highlighting two others. One is a Gamasutra community member blog post.09/18/2014 - 5:15pm
Michael Chandrawould clearly not apply, since they weren't used as shield. It's more "hey, just because I don't agree with you doesn't mean I'm CISWASP."09/18/2014 - 5:08pm
Michael ChandraIn comparison though, the more extreme views would be fairly countered with "you don't speak for me". But the batshit crazy people tend not to even use others as the shield to defend their batshit crazy ideas and insults, so at that point #notyourshield09/18/2014 - 5:06pm
Michael ChandraWhich is of course real silly because when there are so many horrible stories and statistics too, it's utterly irrelevant whether some don't mind.09/18/2014 - 5:00pm
Michael ChandraIn this context it would be women claiming they don't see a problem with the stuff, so stop claiming women don't like it!09/18/2014 - 5:00pm
Michael Chandra"You don't speak for me. I am not your shield. You cannot use me to defend your own opinion."09/18/2014 - 4:59pm
Michael ChandraAE, if we leave aside the falsehoods some use with the term, the idea is regarding minorities and such.09/18/2014 - 4:58pm
Michael ChandraKrono did just a bit earlier in the shoutbox prh99.09/18/2014 - 4:56pm
Andrew EisenI still don't get the what #notyourshield is supposed to mean. Who is unfairly using who as a shield for what?09/18/2014 - 4:43pm
prh99Didn't said anything about #notyourshield or it's origins. Assuming your comment was directed at me.09/18/2014 - 4:28pm
prh99Leigh Alexander is right though, no one has to cater to them (trolls). I think a lot of them would likely continue playing even if scantily clad women were omitted or protagonist was female.09/18/2014 - 4:21pm
Michael ChandraSo no, normal gamers feeling attacked was not what sparked #notyourshield and only a fool would suggest otherwise.09/18/2014 - 4:21pm
Michael Chandra#NotYourShield was kickstarted by 4chan people, so don't go and make nonsense claims about that.09/18/2014 - 4:20pm
prh99those toxic individuals conduct their trolling under. It could have easily been under the Men Rights banner etc, they are just generally unpleasant and angry people who can't stand people disagreeing with them. 09/18/2014 - 4:00pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician