Swiss Game Ban May Feature Only a Little Censorship

April 5, 2010 -

According to the politician behind the law, a recently-ratified, but not yet enacted, Swiss violent game ban would not blindly outlaw all violent games.

Swiss Social Democrat Evi Allemann (pictured) was recently interviewed by the Swiss publication 20 Minutes Online (translated) and indicated that the ban would apply only to “individual games.” She estimated that, “like in Germany,” only 12 or so games would wind up being banned, including titles such as Mortal Kombat and Manhunt (which are banned in Germany), but not the likes of Counter-Strike.

It appears Allemann would specifically focus on games which display “cruel acts of violence” that a player contributes to.

Allemann, apparently, does not put much faith into the Pan European Game Information (PEGI) rating system, saying that PEGI is “not enough” and intimating that Switzerland and/or Europe needs an independent federal agency to rate games, one that is free of any ties to the gaming industry.

The 20 Minutes article also points to a petition (translation) against the two motions passed by the Swiss National Council (the other measure would make it illegal to sell 16 or 18-rated PEGI games to minors). The petition currently has 3612 signatures.


Thanks to Eragon for the head's up!

Comments

Re: Swiss Game Ban May Feature Only a Little Censorship

Mortal Combat is full of ninja kicking ass people w/ some special powers and extra limbs. They are banning that game?!?!?! But not CS even though it features weapons killing people.

 

 

"It's better to be hated for who you are, then be loved for who you are not." - Montgomery Gentry

"It's better to be hated for who you are, then be loved for who you are not." - Montgomery Gentry

Re: Swiss Game Ban May Feature Only a Little Censorship

Oh good lord..... banning it from adults dose nothing positive for society......


Until lobbying is a hanging offense I choose anarchy! CP/IP laws should not effect the daily life of common people! http://zippydsmlee.wordpress.com/


Copyright infringement is nothing more than civil disobedience to a bad set of laws. Let's renegotiate them.

---

Patreon

Deviantart

Re: Swiss Game Ban May Feature Only a Little Censorship

Why is the great country that has a fully automatic rifle in each home (and has double digit gun crimes for it) working on censorship? Damn it Switzerland, you used to be cool.

Re: Swiss Game Ban May Feature Only a Little Censorship

To me this is like saying "you only have a little bit of disease." Even if it doesn't spread you should still get rid of it.

----------------------------------------------------

Debates are like merry go rounds. Two people take their positions then they go through the same points over and over and over again. Then when it's over they have the same positions they started in.

---------------------------------------------------- Debates are like merry go rounds. Two people take their positions then they go through the same points over and over and over again. Then when it's over they have the same positions they started in.

Re: Swiss Game Ban May Feature Only a Little Censorship

Even 1 game being banned is too much. The nanny-state should stay the hell out of your lives unless we're likely to harm other people with our actions/conduct or steal or destory their property. If an individual finds a video game too violent or gruesome, then they have a choice not to play it and if a parent finds a video game too violent or gruesome, then it's their sole responsibility to make sure their children aren't playing it. Period.

 "No law means no law" - Supreme Court Justice Hugo Black on the First Amendment

"No law means no law" - Supreme Court Justice Hugo Black on the First Amendment

Re: Swiss Game Ban May Feature Only a Little Censorship

Oh Ok so instead banning hundreds of games that no one has proven to be harmful, you're only going to ban a few. Well that's just swell and is totally fine /sarcasm.

---------------------------------------------------- Debates are like merry go rounds. Two people take their positions then they go through the same points over and over and over again. Then when it's over they have the same positions they started in.

---------------------------------------------------- Debates are like merry go rounds. Two people take their positions then they go through the same points over and over and over again. Then when it's over they have the same positions they started in.

Re: Swiss Game Ban May Feature Only a Little Censorship

I love how these scumbag pols act like there is some kind of magical number of things they can ban beneath which its perfectly okay.  Censorship is censorship- regardless of quantity. 

Re: Swiss Game Ban May Feature Only a Little Censorship

I was about to post, sarcastically: "Well, as long as it's only some games being banned, I guess it's okay."

Re: Swiss Game Ban May Feature Only a Little Censorship

Yeah really. "We're only banning 5 things for no good reason so why are you complaining, it's only 5.".

----------------------------------------------------

Debates are like merry go rounds. Two people take their positions then they go through the same points over and over and over again. Then when it's over they have the same positions they started in.

---------------------------------------------------- Debates are like merry go rounds. Two people take their positions then they go through the same points over and over and over again. Then when it's over they have the same positions they started in.

Re: Swiss Game Ban May Feature Only a Little Censorship

Don't forget the whole "it's a total ban but we'll only apply it to a few games!"

Re: Swiss Game Ban May Feature Only a Little Censorship

Is there anybody who would like me to try to give more details about the original article? My German isn't that good, but it's good enough to read about everything she's saying, due to the language being similar. As you can see, I reacted to the contents of the article, rather than just what GP has.

Re: Swiss Game Ban May Feature Only a Little Censorship

What we've been told so far, however, means this ban can be applied to nearly every computer game, and you thus risk abuse by fanatics against everything including Counter Strike. You CAN'T have an Absolute Ban that only applies to a few games, then it isn't an absolute ban. A full ban on anything is NOT the way to start a discussion about regulation, pretending that's the right way to do it is political nonsense.

Also, why does she think american versions are more brutal than european versions? Are games for the general European market (so apart from the censoring countries) really less brutal than USA releases?

And she pulls in child pornography and racism to illustrate the web can and will be regulated by law. Seriously, what? That is NOT the example you should be using if you want critics to listen to you, comparing video games to child pornography isn't going to get you many friends.

Let's see... She considers it logical that players of killing games become violent, I think (not entirely sure about a few words), but she's pretty sure that excessive usage will make you more agressive, but that if you don't have other negative factors you'll turn out alright.

No actual explanation on WHY she'd want to fully ban the games, rather than just for minors. Just some political nonsense about not wanting to take away games, but that some games go past the limit of acceptable entertainment. In other words, she DOES decide what other adults should find acceptable.

Re: Swiss Game Ban May Feature Only a Little Censorship

“Cruel acts of violence”? They could ban Mario Kart for that.

Banning Mortal Kombat (which one(s)?) and Manhunt, but not Counter Strike? That doesn´t make any sense. So, is better to shot people instead of decapitate them?

 

------------------------------------------------------------ My DeviantArt Page (aka DeviantCensorship): http://www.darkknightstrikes.deviantart.com

Re: Swiss Game Ban May Feature Only a Little Censorship

She basically blindly follows the German example, while pretending to be neutral about things. We've seen that attitude before from that country.

Re: Swiss Game Ban May Feature Only a Little Censorship

Wait...Mortal Kombat is controversial?

Quick: who's President?  What year is this?  I never should have gotten in that hot tub!

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

Which group is more ethically challenged?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
Matthew Wilson@info depends on the sector. for example, have you looked at how powerful unions are in the public sector? I will make the argument they have too much power in that sector.07/07/2015 - 12:39pm
InfophileIt's easy to worry about unions having too much power and causing harm. The odd thing is, why do people seem to worry about that more than the fact that business-owners can have too much power and do harm, particularly at a time when unions have no power?07/07/2015 - 12:31pm
Matthew Wilsonthe thing is unions earned their bad reputation in the US. the way unions oparate the better at your job you are, the likely you want to be in a union.07/07/2015 - 11:33am
InfophilePut that way, "right to work" seems to have BLEEP-all to do with gay rights. Thing is, union-negotiated contracts used to be one of the key ways to prevent employers from firing at will. Without union protection, nothing stops at-will firing.07/07/2015 - 11:06am
Infophilehas an incentive to pay dues if they're represented either way, so the union is starved for funds and dies, unless things are bad enough that people will pay dues anyway.07/07/2015 - 11:02am
InfophileFor those who don't know, "right to work" laws mean that it can't be a condition of an employment contract that you pay union dues. That is, the right to work without having to pay dues. Catch is, unions have to represent non-members as well, so no one...07/07/2015 - 11:01am
MechaCrashUnexpected? Seriously?07/07/2015 - 10:55am
Mattsworknamejob they wanted without the unions getting involved. The problem is, it has some unexpected side effects, like the ones Info mentioned07/07/2015 - 8:49am
MattsworknameThe problem being, right to work states exsist specificly as a counter to Unions, as the last 20 or so years have shown, the unions have been doing this countries economoy NO favors. The right to work states came into being to allow people to work any07/07/2015 - 8:49am
Infophile(cont'd) discriminatory. This can only be done for protected classes which are outlined in law (race, sex, religion, ethnicity everywhere, sexual orientation in some states). So, a gay person could be fired because they're gay and have no recourse there.07/07/2015 - 7:27am
Infophile@Goth: See here: http://www.snopes.com/politics/sexuality/firedforbeinggay.asp for a good discussion on it. Basically, the problem is that in the US, most states allow at will firing, and it's the burden of the fired person to prove the firing was ...07/07/2015 - 7:25am
Goth_SkunkAssuming that's true, then that is a fight worth fighting for.07/07/2015 - 6:58am
Yuuri@ Goth_Skunk, in many states being gay is not a protected status akin to say race or religion. It's also in the "Right to work" states. Those are the states where one can be fired for any reason (provided it isn't a "protected" one.)07/07/2015 - 6:07am
Goth_Skunkregarded as a beacon of liberty and freedom that is the envy of the world, would not have across-the-board Human Rights laws that don't at the very least equal those of my own country.07/07/2015 - 5:47am
Goth_SkunkI find that hard to believe, Infophile. I have difficulty believing employers can *still* fire people for being gay. I would need to see some evidence that this is fact, because as a Canadian, I can't believe that the United States,07/07/2015 - 5:46am
InfophileFor that matter, even women don't yet have full legal equality with men. The US government still places limits on the positions women can serve in the military. And that's just the legal side of things - the "culture wars" are more than just laws.07/07/2015 - 5:43am
InfophileAnd that's just LGB issues. Get ready for an incoming battle on rights for trans* people. And then after that, a battle for poly people.07/07/2015 - 5:41am
InfophileA battle's been won. In many states employers can still fire people for being gay. And in many states, parents can force their children into reparative therapy to try to "fix" being gay. Those battles still need to be fought.07/07/2015 - 5:40am
Goth_Skunkand now they've switched to battles that don't need to be fought.07/07/2015 - 5:37am
Goth_SkunkIn my opinion, it was the final legal hurdle denying homosexual couples final and recognized statuses as eligible spouses. But even though this war's been won, some people are still too keen to keep fighting battles,07/07/2015 - 5:28am
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician