AU Pol: Liberty Doesn’t Include R18+ Rating Category

April 7, 2010 -

An Australian Politician has come out against Internet filtering in the country, while simultaneously indicating he is against the addition of an R18+ rating category for videogames.

Shadow Treasurer and Liberal Party member Joe Hockey (pictured) let his opinions be known in a speech entitled “In Defence of Liberty,” which he gave to the Grattan Institute, an Australian public policy think tank.

Hockey called Australia's plans for Internet censorship an over-reach, reports IT Wire, and then added:

What we have in the government's Internet filtering proposals is a scheme that is likely to be unworkable in practice. But more perniciously it is a scheme that will create the infrastructure for government censorship on a broader scale.
 

Protecting liberty is about protecting freedoms against both known and future threats. Some may argue that we can surely trust a democratically-elected government in Australia to never try to introduce more wide-spread censorship. I am not so sure!

The Shadow Treasurer called Michael Atkinson’s unsuccessful attempt to censor bloggers and online comments earlier this year “ham-fisted and unsuccessful,” before offering his take on an R18+ rating category for games.

Hockey, who IT Wire called “the most senior Coalition parliamentarian to address the issue directly,” expressed concerns over a link between violent games and violence in society before stating:

What concerns me about these games is that they, at the most benign end, make us immune to violence or, worse still, encourage us to think of violence as a legitimate tool.

Fundamentally, the loss of respect for human life and dignity that these games encourage becomes a threat to the respect we have for individual liberty.


Thanks Ryan!


Comments

Re: AU Pol: Liberty Doesn’t Include R18+ Rating Category

What concerns me about these games is that they, at the most benign end, make us immune to violence or, worse still, encourage us to think of violence as a legitimate tool.

So when this politician gets angry & becomes violent but he does play video games, does that mean that he will blame himself and the video games he has played on violence. Or blame it on something else? Does that mean it is diff. for him and diff for people that get violent? B/c video games do link to aggression but NOT violence. It has not been proven & if it has, then why haven't I seen so many kids playing video games go out & kill someone or hurt someone. I haven't & if I have or hear on the news that people have killed or hurt someone, it has nothing to do w/video games. It means something is mentally wrong in their heads & they need help.

Fundamentally, the loss of respect for human life and dignity that these games encourage becomes a threat to the respect we have for individual liberty.

You have no clue what you are talking about in this sentence.

 

 

"It's better to be hated for who you are, then be loved for who you are not." - Montgomery Gentry

"It's better to be hated for who you are, then be loved for who you are not." - Montgomery Gentry

Re: AU Pol: Liberty Doesn’t Include R18+ Rating Category

 What concerns me about these games is that they, at the most benign end, they don't have any real effects on our pyche and our individual perception of reality or, worse still, encourage an extreme few who likely have other more worrisome mental/social problems and pre-exsisting violent personalities to think of violence as a legitimate tool. (based on the incomplete evidence that has so far been unable to tells us anything conclusive about the relationship between violence and video games)

There fixed it for a bit more accuracy

Re: AU Pol: Liberty Doesn’t Include R18+ Rating Category

Accuracy is irrelevant when it comes to politics.

Re: AU Pol: Liberty Doesn’t Include R18+ Rating Category

Korea has an 18 rating for games. :D

Re: AU Pol: Liberty Doesn’t Include R18+ Rating Category

Firstly, you misspelt his name 'Jockey' earlier on in the article, just a heads up.

Secondly, the elected parliament has no direct control over the addition of an R18 category, this would be solely up to the state and possibly federal attorney generals.

 

Personally I think he's just double dipping, trying to get support for his party by vocally speaking out against the filter, but appealing towards the non game educated people by touting the whole "game violence will destroy society, rah rah rah, no 18+ games in this country!" line.

 

Problem is, his party leader is a religious nutjob. Frankly I'm considering moving to South Korea. I'd rather be under impending nuclear threat then deal with censorship and religious policy in my country, ugh.

Re: AU Pol: Liberty Doesn’t Include R18+ Rating Category

First Atkinson doesn't want the rating, now one of his asskissers doesn't want it.

Re: AU Pol: Liberty Doesn’t Include R18+ Rating Category

It seems like too many people these days don't understand what freedom really entails anymore.  Hell, there are folks who think Chavez and Putin are doing great things.  Anything is possible.

Re: AU Pol: Liberty Doesn’t Include R18+ Rating Category

I like how he uses "us" to refer to the people affected games.

It's like: "Oh? So ,you've played games before, have you?"

 

 

Re: AU Pol: Liberty Doesn’t Include R18+ Rating Category

"And here we go..." again.

And I thought we could let rest Australia from videogames news for a reasonable time. Also, Gamepolitics should be preparing a new tag at the name of Mr. Jockey. It looks like he will became quite popular on the next few months. 

 

------------------------------------------------------------ My DeviantArt Page (aka DeviantCensorship): http://www.darkknightstrikes.deviantart.com

Re: AU Pol: Liberty Doesn’t Include R18+ Rating Category

Well, there goes any hope for the R18 in that country, since for soem ass backwards reason absolute unanimity is required to get anything done there.

Re: AU Pol: Liberty Doesn’t Include R18+ Rating Category

I thought it was just the AGs that had to agree.

Re: AU Pol: Liberty Doesn’t Include R18+ Rating Category

 That is indeed correct, only the Attorney Generals need to agree

Re: AU Pol: Liberty Doesn’t Include R18+ Rating Category

WAR IS PEACE

FREEDOM IS SLAVERY

IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH

Re: AU Pol: Liberty Doesn’t Include R18+ Rating Category

*hands Thad an internets*

Marvelous. =D

Re: AU Pol: Liberty Doesn’t Include R18+ Rating Category

I LOVE BIG BROTHER (especially his awesome mustache)!

Re: AU Pol: Liberty Doesn’t Include R18+ Rating Category

Don't forget liberty is totalitarian.


Until lobbying is a hanging offense I choose anarchy! CP/IP laws should not effect the daily life of common people! http://zippydsmlee.wordpress.com/


Copyright infringement is nothing more than civil disobedience to a bad set of laws. Let's renegotiate them.

---

http://zippydsm.deviantart.com/

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

Who's responsible for crappy Netflix performance on Verizon?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
IanCWelp, twitch is going to suck now. Thanks google.07/25/2014 - 6:30am
Sleaker@MP - Looked up hitbox, thanks.07/24/2014 - 9:40pm
Matthew WilsonI agree, but to me given other known alternatives google seems to the the best option.07/24/2014 - 6:30pm
Andrew EisenTo be clear, I have no problem with Google buying it, I'm just concerned it will make a slew of objectively, quantifiably bad changes to Twitch just as it's done with YouTube over the years.07/24/2014 - 6:28pm
Matthew WilsonI doubt yahoo has the resources to pull it off, and I not just talking about money.07/24/2014 - 6:15pm
SleakerI wouldn't have minded a Yahoo purchase, probably would have been a better deal than Tumblr seeing as they paid the same for it...07/24/2014 - 6:13pm
MaskedPixelanteIt's the golden age of Hitbox, I guess.07/24/2014 - 6:08pm
Matthew Wilsonagain twitch was going to get bought. It was just who was going to buy it . Twitch was not even being able to handle the demand, so hey needed a company with allot of infrastructure to help them. I can understand why you would not want Google to buy it .07/24/2014 - 5:49pm
Andrew Eisen"Google is better than MS or Amazon" Wow. Google, as I mentioned earlier, progressively makes almost everything worse and yet there are still two lesser options. Again, wow!07/24/2014 - 5:43pm
Andrew EisenI don't know. MS, in my experience, is about 50/50 on its products. It's either fine or it's unusable crap. Amazon, well... I've never had a problem buying anything from them but I don't use any of their products or services so I couldn't really say.07/24/2014 - 5:42pm
Matthew WilsonGoogle is better than MS or Amazon.07/24/2014 - 5:33pm
Sleaker@AE - I've never seen youtube as a great portal to interact with people from a comment perspective. like ever. The whole interface doesn't really promote that.07/24/2014 - 5:28pm
Andrew EisenNor I. From a content producer's perspective, almost every change Google implements makes the service more cumbersome to use. It's why I set up a Facebook fan page in the first place; it was becoming too difficult to connect with my viewers on YouTube.07/24/2014 - 4:50pm
Sleakerwonder if anyone is going to try and compete with google, I'm not a huge fan of the way they manage their video services.07/24/2014 - 4:41pm
Andrew EisenIt happened. Google bought Twitch. http://venturebeat.com/2014/07/24/googles-1b-purchase-of-twitch-confirmed-joins-youtube-for-new-video-empire/07/24/2014 - 4:28pm
MaskedPixelanteI hope Nintendo actually follows through with the DS Virtual Console, that sounds like it could be cool.07/24/2014 - 2:15pm
james_fudgePeople don't deny it persay, they bristle at the idea that it's a "problem" that nneds to be "fixed."07/24/2014 - 2:15pm
Papa MidnightRacism and Misogny are heavily prevalent in the gaming and online arena. Getting people to actually admit that, however...07/24/2014 - 11:42am
Papa MidnightThat very thing is somthing that anyone who has been subjected to racial-based targeting online could actually state that they've experienced.07/24/2014 - 11:41am
Papa MidnightPerfect example: "I have yet to talk to a man who has had to call a police officer due to a stalker, only to be told nothing can be done until they are physically assaulted."07/24/2014 - 11:40am
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician