Latest U.S. Military Interactive Training Methods Detailed

April 8, 2010 -

As the U.S. Military continues to implement interactive training as a means to prepare its members for combat, the Future Immersive Training Environment (FITE) team hosted a conference call today in order to discuss a pair of new training initiatives.

Clark Lethin, of the Office of Naval Research, began by noting that FITE’s focus was on training small units, or “squads of 10-13 soldiers, marines, sailors or airmen,” with an emphasis on improving team unity, unit cohesion, unit decision making and communication skills. The first new training initiative, which has been completed, revolves around a personal virtually reality system.

Lethin explained, “An individually worn virtual reality system with helmet-mounted display and a weapon with a toggle switch on it that allows you to locomote through the virtual world… then we have sounds tied into that system, as well as a shock device that will receive shock if these men are hit or wounded by any kind of connectict event.”

The second cutting-edge training method, which is still under development, is billed as a “mixed-reality facility-based system.” Lethin described it further, “The infantry immersive trainer at Camp Pendleton is a prototype system that’s basically inside an abandoned warehouse with a set that’s now creating an Afghan scenario and is populated with role-players, special effects, avatar projections on the wall… that’s its current state.”

The group is exploring improvements to the current setup, such as implementing voice recognition, replacing role-players with animatronics (to reduce costs) and developing a state of the art infantry After Action Review (AAR) system.

The mixed-reality facility-based system offers new challenges for trainees explained Lethin, “This mixed reality environment takes into account the complexity of the battlefield and gets away from a single task training methodology to a multitask complex training methodology.”

Ensuring that the training environments are safe and productive is extremely important to its creators. To that end, cognitive psychologists, human behaviorists and training experts are constantly involved, offering feedback. The training methods are also subject to independent assessment by the Joint Testing Assessment Agency (JTAA).

Feedback from returning combat veterans was also “critically important,” to the success of the program said Lethin.

Jay Reist, of the United States Joint Forces Command (USJFCOM), on how today’s young soldiers take to the new training methods:

Because of the generation that these young men come from, they adapt very quickly to this technology, they understand it and they are very comfortable in using it, not as a game, but as a training system.

Do the training methods feel real to trainees? Reist stated, “We also added a layer to do some measurement within stress inoculation, through heart-beat measurement. The system proves out to be very effective in creating a realistic immersion environment and that was validated through the stress inoculation piece that we put in play."

The mixed-reality facility-based system is expected to be ready for demonstration this September.


Comments

Re: Latest U.S. Military Interactive Training Methods ...

This will get more men & women involved in joining the military definitely. This sounds like fun! :D

 

 

"It's better to be hated for who you are, then be loved for who you are not." - Montgomery Gentry

"It's better to be hated for who you are, then be loved for who you are not." - Montgomery Gentry

Re: Latest U.S. Military Interactive Training Methods ...

"… then we have sounds tied into that system, as well as a shock device that will receive shock if these men are hit or wounded by any kind of connectict event.”

Um...did you by chance mean, "kinetic?"

"HEY! LISTEN!"

"HEY! LISTEN!"

Re: Latest U.S. Military Interactive Training Methods ...

Maybe I am bais, but I find the fun part of this project to be less the mixed reality part, and more the back end AI ^_^

Re: Latest U.S. Military Interactive Training Methods ...

Same here, but that's because a friend of mine works on this project on the AI.

 

~~All Knowledge is Worth Having~~

~~All Knowledge is Worth Having~~

Re: Latest U.S. Military Interactive Training Methods ...

Oh?  Which group?

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

Will an M rating hurt Batman: Arkham Knight's sales?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
ZippyDSMleeAndrew Eisen: I would not go as far to say she’s like the 6 o’clock news but hard news she is not.02/27/2015 - 4:42pm
Andrew EisenYes, Sarkeesian talks about feminist issues through the lens of pop culture media.02/27/2015 - 4:36pm
ZippyDSMleeE. Zachary Knight: Yes but only to the extent that her issues also dwell in reality most of talk radio is 24/7 BS with a hint of pseudo realism. She talks about real issues and uses the games medium as a launching point into the discussion.02/27/2015 - 4:34pm
Andrew EisenWe've been over this again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again. Sarkeeisan is not bending the truth.02/27/2015 - 4:31pm
ZippyDSMleeAndrew Eisen: Going to skip on how they like to bend the truth aren't you? I just might one take you up on finding each instance one day… whenever I have energy…and a brain. LOL02/27/2015 - 4:30pm
E. Zachary KnightZippy, Are you accusing Anita of simply complaining about games in order to make money rather than to actually improve the representation of women in games?02/27/2015 - 4:28pm
Andrew EisenIn the sense that they're both people who talk about things they're passionate about, sure.02/27/2015 - 4:24pm
Andrew EisenThe reasoning for criticism on how female characters are generally portrayed in video games is the same as any other criticism: generally, this is not being done as well as it could.02/27/2015 - 4:23pm
ZippyDSMleeAndrew Eisen:... so you see absolutely no similarity’s in between Rush and Sarkeesian?02/27/2015 - 4:22pm
Andrew EisenI'm familiar with both Limbaugh and talk radio. What the hell does that have to do with anything?02/27/2015 - 4:19pm
ZippyDSMleeWhat is the reasoning for the criticisms against how fictional characters are portrayed?02/27/2015 - 4:13pm
ZippyDSMleeAndrew Eisen: Reply to what industries. “The I can make money by A milking a niche base and or B saying crazy things industry.“ You’ve never listened to talk radio or heard of Rush Limbaugh have you?02/27/2015 - 4:13pm
Andrew EisenWhat the hell are you talking about?02/27/2015 - 4:05pm
ZippyDSMleeAndrew Eisen: The I can make money by A milking a niche base and or B saying crazy things industry. Then what is the reasoning for the criticisms?02/27/2015 - 4:04pm
Andrew EisenAgain, nothing you say makes a lick of sense.02/27/2015 - 3:54pm
Andrew EisenNo one is saying the sexual objectification of female characters is causing people to be mean in real life.02/27/2015 - 3:53pm
Andrew EisenIndustries build around what? No one is confusing fiction and reality. No one is claiming fictional characters have feelings or rights or are they themselves speaking against their own objectification.02/27/2015 - 3:52pm
ZippyDSMleeresponsibility kick in to not treat others poorly and have enough self-worth to not be discouraged by the smallest of things?02/27/2015 - 3:42pm
ZippyDSMleeOne could stretch things pretty far and claim that mindsets shaped by fiction shape the real world treatment of real people but my question is which came first the chicken(mistreatment) or the egg(fiction) and where and when dose individual personal respo02/27/2015 - 3:42pm
ZippyDSMleeFrankly it looks more like people are getting fiction and reality confused, fictional characters have no feelings or rights thus to claim they can be objectified and treated poorly make for a somewhat disingenuous argument.02/27/2015 - 3:42pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician