AU Inquiry into Booze-Fueled Violence Mentions… Games?

April 16, 2010 -

Budweiser-branded version of TapperA report from The Queensland Legislative Assembly of Australia on Alcohol-Related Violence inexplicably suggests that expanding research into the effects of violent videogames on youth might somehow provide more insight into the impact drinking has on people.

The inquiry (PDF), released last month, was drafted by the Law, Justice and Safety Committee and focuses on “alcohol related violence around licensed premises.” The report begins by asking, “What has happened to Australia’s drinking culture?” and claims that “Vomiting, falling over, and creating a nuisance in public are not seen as shameful but to some are badges of honour.”

In looking for reasons why this prevailing attitude has become the norm, the report suggests examining the background of offenders, for, “It might be that the offenders tend to come from a background of domestic violence, or from childhoods in which they were exposed to domestic violence or family violence, or were babysat by violent interactive video games or were by some other means inured to violence.”

The report continues:

The Committee is aware of research implicating violent interactive video games in youth violence. Making a choice to brutally stab and dismember a moving image is a different experience from simply watching such an event on a screen. The Committee believes that the hypothesis that violent video games are involved in the escalation of youth violence needs further exploration.

Among the report’s 68 recommendations for dealing with alcohol-related violence, the second recommendation is “That the Government consider strategies for determining the effect of violent video games on youth violence, including literature reviews, case studies and investigation.


|Via
AceGamez|


Comments

Re: AU Inquiry into Booze-Fueled Violence Mentions… Games?

It won't be funny when someone gets alcohol poisoning & goes too far & dies from it.

 

 

"It's better to be hated for who you are, then be loved for who you are not." - Montgomery Gentry

"It's better to be hated for who you are, then be loved for who you are not." - Montgomery Gentry

Re: AU Inquiry into Booze-Fueled Violence Mentions… Games?

“Vomiting, falling over, and creating a nuisance in public are not seen as shameful but to some are badges of honour.”

I believe this has been a mainstay of ALL drinking cultures since the discovery of alcohol.

Re: AU Inquiry into Booze-Fueled Violence Mentions… Games?

As a Queensland native and current resident, I can tell you that violent video games has zero to do with Australia's culture of drinking.  I can also tell you that Qld is a big nanny state, very big on government intervention in every aspect of our lives.

I've worked security in Qld clubs and violence is because people are effing drunk...  I've seen a woman sever all the tendons in her hand by smashing a glass in to another girls face because, and I quote "She bumped me and I spilled my drink"...  I've seen guys that afterward claim to be best friends beat each other to a pulp.  I've been attacked by a guy that after I wrestled him out of the club and settled him down (literally, not a euphemism for 'beat him up'), he broke down crying and told me his wife had just left him for his best friend and he was really sorry for the trouble he had caused... \= |

Pointing to violent video games is just an easy catchcry and it carries more credence with politicians and legislators because it's flashy/attention grabbing and easy to sell to an ignorant populace.  It doesn't deal with actual root causes but more often that not pollies prefer a quick vote grab over any long term hard work.

 

 

Re: AU Inquiry into Booze-Fueled Violence Mentions… Games?

Essentially putting ducttape on one hole of a leaky boat.

Re: AU Inquiry into Booze-Fueled Violence Mentions… Games?

Only a fool would think it's as simple as one single thing (like drinking or video games) causing society to fall apart.

You could say that playing too much video games and drinking too much and not sleeping enough and missing work and being lazy etc. etc. have to do with a general lack of responsibility, but even that would be over-simplfying the problem. I mean, to discuss this issue would mean we'd have to examine the effects that the media, the education system, immigration, women's rights, and so many other things have had on our societies that it likely will not be constructively debated until most of the planet is dead.

Re: AU Inquiry into Booze-Fueled Violence Mentions… Games?

Since when did 'drinking culture' NOT involve “Vomiting, falling over, and creating a nuisance in public"? It was certainly happening in the 1970s in England where I grew up, and videogames had yet to become a cultural factor.

Somehow I think the Queensland Legislative Assembly of Australia on Alcohol-Related Violence is looking at the past with rose-coloured glasses. Vomiting, falling over, and creating a nuisance in public have always been a part of drinking culture. I'm sure they were a part of it right back to the date alcohol first found its way into beverages. And even before that I'm sure people found ways to make themself vomit, fall over and create a nuisance in public, because alcohol is merely one tool for achieving the detached and inhibition-free effect on the mind that some people crave.

Re: AU Inquiry into Booze-Fueled Violence Mentions… Games?

Interesting that this connection should be suggested only a few weeks after a video game themed bar opened in Brisbane's (Queensland's capitol city) major nightlife district. Every night since it's opened there has been a line to get into the venue, where people spend all night drinking and playing video games - everything from Guitar Hero and Mario Cart to violent games like CoD and Gears of War.

And with so many people getting drunk and playing games, and so many people having to wait in a line (sometimes over an hour) to get in, how many incidents of violence have there been?

Zero (the owners are very proud of this fact, and mention it often)

I think it just goes to show how mature, friendly and responsible gamers really are, and that when you have a fun, friendly environment people don't generally want to get violent.

When other Brisbane bars are having to go so far as to ban glasses for fear of drunken idiots 'glassing' people, perhaps this inquiry should look elsewhere than games for the source of these problems.

Re: AU Inquiry into Booze-Fueled Violence Mentions… Games?

Is there something in the water down in Australia that encourages this kind of free form thinking thats more similar to synaptic misfire than anything drugs or alcohol can induce? I mean seriously, what are they going to try to tie to games next? Can they somehow tie games to kangaroo over population? Or somehow blame games for great white shark attacks? Ooooh! I know! Drought! Yes they can blame computer games for their drought problems.

Re: AU Inquiry into Booze-Fueled Violence Mentions… Games?

That's easy...

People play games.  Lots of people.  Those game systems suck up lots of power.  The AC in their homes has to work harder to compensate for the generated heat.  More power is used.  Requiring more power to be generated.  Non-renewable resources are expended.  Global warming is accelerated.  There's a drought.

Thus playing video games causes droughts.

===============

Chris Kimberley

===============

Chris Kimberley

Re: AU Inquiry into Booze-Fueled Violence Mentions… Games?

Well done sir! Your shadenfrude-fu is strong. You should apply for upper management! ;-)

Re: AU Inquiry into Booze-Fueled Violence Mentions… Games?

Vomiting, falling over, and creating a nuisance in public are not seen as shameful but to some are badges of honour

These kinds of people are probably my single greatest annoyance in the world. I hear someone talking all excited about how they got smashed the night before like it was some kind of achievement and i think "great, you got so drunk you don't even remember the supposedly good time you had, nearly killed yourself with alcohol poisoning, and got to spend the next day in misery with a hang over...yeah good job you fucking idiot"

Of course i am extreamly biased against alcohol. My dad is probably my favorite person in the world, and he was a full on alcoholic. he wasn't a mean drunk or anything, it's just he became annoying, drove with me in the car while i was too young to understand, made my mom forbid me from going and spending the weekends with him (at a time when seeing him was the highpoint of my days), and lost his license, and was in general unreliable. I hate alcohol and what it did to him.

Re: AU Inquiry into Booze-Fueled Violence Mentions… Games?

Why do I get the feeling some people are just trying to damage R18 rating effrots there?

Re: AU Inquiry into Booze-Fueled Violence Mentions… Games?

Australia trying to... discourage drinking?

No, sorry, don't understand.

/b

 

Re: AU Inquiry into Booze-Fueled Violence Mentions… Games?

“That the Government consider strategies for determining the effect of violent video games on youth violence, including literature reviews, case studies and investigation."
 

These organizations are just chasing windmills. They can justify their mission agaisnt alchool induced violence, so now they have to resort videogames to justify their pathetic agenda. Basically, they gave up. Fail.

------------------------------------------------------------ My DeviantArt Page (aka DeviantCensorship): http://www.darkknightstrikes.deviantart.com

Re: AU Inquiry into Booze-Fueled Violence Mentions… Games?

I don't drink with alcohol, but that kind of thinking can leave you dizzy as well.

Re: AU Inquiry into Booze-Fueled Violence Mentions… Games?

I've heard this argument that the interactive nature of games make them more harmful many many times.  I think it's bunk.  Here's why:

Scott McCloud in his excellent Understanding Comics book has an example of how the reader of a comic is involved in the story.  The example goes something like this...

In one panel is shown a man grabbing an axe and getting ready to attack someone.  The next panel is a night time city shot with the words "AHHH!" printed over it.  McCloud then goes on to explain that we all know what happened next (i.e. the man was attacked with the axe) but that we all have different interpretations of how it happened.  Where the axe stuck, was the man killed, where on the body, how bloody was it, etc.  These are all ways that the viewer is emotionally engaged and "creates" the violence in their mind.  In this way, I would argue that books and movies that don't depict graphic violence but have implied violence can be WORSE than media that shows it graphically.  Particularly in violent videogames, the actual animations cannot be changed and are thus only the vision of the creators.  The player doesn't actually "create" any of the violence that occurs.

This in particular, is why I find the Blair Witch Project to be the scariest movie I've ever seen.  No one can illustrate on screen what would scare me more than what I can create in my head.

Another example of this is when they bleep out swear words on television.  I find myself trying to figure out what the word was that they censored.  Bring more attention to it and thus making it worse than if they hadn't done it at all.

Just my two cents. 

------- Morality has always been in decline. As you get older, you notice it. When you were younger, you enjoyed it.

Re: AU Inquiry into Booze-Fueled Violence Mentions… Games?

” The report begins by asking, “What has happened to Australia’s drinking culture?” and claims that “Vomiting, falling over, and creating a nuisance in public are not seen as shameful but to some are badges of honour.”

Blame the frat boys of colleges not videogames.

http://www.magicinkgaming.com/

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

Did Microsoft pay too much ($2.5 billion) for Minecraft developer Mojang?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
Andrew EisenWell this is unique! A musical critique of the Factual Feminist's "Are Video Games Sexist?" video. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-K4s7cV4Us409/20/2014 - 2:41am
Andrew EisenSome locked threads. Some let them be. So, no, I'm not seeing a problem here. No corruption. No collusion. No ethical problem with privately discussing ethics.09/20/2014 - 12:48am
Andrew EisenAnd still, in the end, Tito made up his own mind on how to handle his site. All 150 or so members went off to handle their own sites in their own ways. Some talked about it. Some didn't. Some changed disclosure policies. Some didn't.09/20/2014 - 12:40am
Andrew EisenThere were two comments other than Kochera and Tito's. One pointed out the Escapist Code of Conduct, another comment was in support of Tito.09/20/2014 - 12:40am
Andrew EisenKochera privately expressed his disagreement on how Tito decided to do something. No, I don't consider that crossing a line nor do I consider the exchange an example of the group pressuring him.09/20/2014 - 12:36am
Kronotechnical reasons. Anyways, I need to get to sleep as well.09/20/2014 - 12:29am
KronoAnd he wasn't the only one pushing Tito to censor the thread. If Tito had bowed to peer pressure, we likely wouldn't have gotten this http://goo.gl/vKiYtR which grew out of that thread. Said thread also lasted until a new one needed to be made for09/20/2014 - 12:28am
Krono@Andrew So it's an example of Kuchera crossing the line from reporter to advocate. And an example of the group pressuring for censorship.09/20/2014 - 12:21am
E. Zachary KnightAnyway, I am off to bed. I will probably wake up to all of this being knocked off the shout box.09/20/2014 - 12:20am
E. Zachary KnightKrono, that is the type of reading too much into things that bugs me. Ben did no such thing. Greg had the last word in that part of the exchange. The rest was about how to approach the story and Quinn.09/20/2014 - 12:19am
Andrew EisenSo?09/20/2014 - 12:13am
KronoExcept that the forum thread wasn't harassment, and Kuchera continued to push for the thread's removal after Tito made it clear he didn't consider it harassment.09/20/2014 - 12:12am
Andrew EisenPersonally, I see nothing wrong with someone offering their opinion or the other person making up their own mind on how to run their site.09/20/2014 - 12:06am
E. Zachary KnightKrono, I read nothing of the sort in that email chain. I read Ben giving advice on what to do when a forum thread is used to harass someone and spread falshoods about them and others.09/20/2014 - 12:05am
KronoThat's exactly what Ben Kuchera was doing to Greg Tito.09/19/2014 - 11:58pm
Krono@EZK So you see nothing wrong with one journalist pressuring a journalist from a different organization to not only not run a story, but to censor a civil discussion already taking place?09/19/2014 - 11:56pm
E. Zachary KnightI write for a number of blogs and talk to people who write similar blogs all the time for tips and advice. I see nothing wrong with that.09/19/2014 - 11:50pm
E. Zachary KnightI read that comment now and frankly, I think that guy is reading too much into this. The press talk to each other. It happens. There is nothing that can be done to stop it from happening.09/19/2014 - 11:49pm
KronoUnfortunately it seems unlikely to be resolved anytime soon.09/19/2014 - 11:45pm
Krono@EZK No that's not the comment. As for wanting nothing do with any of it, that's perfectly understandable.09/19/2014 - 11:44pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician