NYT: Beer Pong Critic No Vietnam Vet

May 18, 2010 -

Current Connecticut Attorney General (and current senatorial candidate), Richard Blumenthal, has more to worry about than Beer Pong for the Wii and the way the ESRB classifies alcohol use in videogames this morning. According to a New York Times story, Blumenthal has been lying about his service in Vietnam. "Lying" is a strong term for a politician to face, and though he has acknowledged in the past that he didn't actually serve in Vietnam, he certainly has never gone out of his way to correct the record; in many speaking engagements across the state of Connecticut and in front of Veterans groups, he has gone as far as he could to give the impression that he was in fact a Vietnam veteran. He also never corrected the record on being on the Harvard swim team, a widely circulated biographical note that turns out to be false as well.

The New York Times report, which World Wrestling Entertainment co-founder and Republican senatorial candidate Linda McMahon is taking credit for, also reveals that Richard Blumenthal had as many as 5 deferments to avoid having to serve in Vietnam. Instead he served with a unit that did drills, helped with the Toys of Tots program and did a myriad of activities that didn't involve actual combat.

It will be interesting to see if he survives this scandal. Richard Blumenthal was running to replace Connecticut senator Chris Dodd, who is retiring at the end of this year.


Comments

Re: NYT: Beer Pong Critic No Vietnam Vet

Wow!

I love Karma and this couldn't come at a better time since Pong Toss Pro will be released June 28.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Iyj4LGiG6Bg

 

Re: NYT: Beer Pong Critic No Vietnam Vet

Po-lie-tician.

The english language keeps being rewritten.  I say that should be the next word to be altered.

Nightwng2000

NW2K Software

http://www.facebook.com/nightwing2000

Nightwng2000 is now admin to the group "Parents For Education, Not Legislation" on MySpace as http://groups.myspace.com/pfenl

Nightwng2000 NW2K Software http://www.facebook.com/nightwing2000 Nightwng2000 is now admin to the group "Parents For Education, Not Legislation" on MySpace as http://groups.myspace.com/pfenl

Re: NYT: Beer Pong Critic No Vietnam Vet

And yet another person who adds to the stereo-type of politicians are liars.

Maybe it shouldn't even be called a stereo-type anymore, it's just the simple truth?

Re: NYT: Beer Pong Critic No Vietnam Vet


Saw this on the news.  As I learned in my communication class, politics are professional liars.

 

Re: NYT: Beer Pong Critic No Vietnam Vet

Yup. The easiest way to tell is to see if their lips are moving.

Re: NYT: Beer Pong Critic No Vietnam Vet

That guy is a retard. He shouldn´t be on politics if he is gonna be a shitty lyer.

------------------------------------------------------------ My DeviantArt Page (aka DeviantCensorship): http://www.darkknightstrikes.deviantart.com

Re: NYT: Beer Pong Critic No Vietnam Vet

They're all shitty liars.  Where the fuck have you been?

"I did not have sexual relations with that woman."  Ring any bells?

---

With the first link, the chain is forged.

--- With the first link, the chain is forged.

Re: NYT: Beer Pong Critic No Vietnam Vet

Whether or not that rings any bells "...depends on what your definition of 'is' is."

 

"That's not ironic. That's justice."

"That's not ironic. That's justice."

Re: NYT: Beer Pong Critic No Vietnam Vet

Thanks for the backup.

---

With the first link, the chain is forged.

--- With the first link, the chain is forged.

Re: NYT: Beer Pong Critic No Vietnam Vet

It's telling that moral crusaders are often immoral themselves. Like it applies to everyone but them.

Re: NYT: Beer Pong Critic No Vietnam Vet

 They had toys for tots drives during the Vietnam War?

On a 100% related note, do soldiers get paid to work those drives? Do they get paid out of my tax money? More importantly, was my parents hard earned and frankly insubstantial money given to other little kids for a holiday I wasn't allowed to celebrate!?

... I'm kinda pissed.

Re: NYT: Beer Pong Critic No Vietnam Vet

Members of the military are paid salary, so yes, he was paid during toys for tots.

---

With the first link, the chain is forged.

--- With the first link, the chain is forged.

Re: NYT: Beer Pong Critic No Vietnam Vet

What??? It can't be! A politician who lied to get sympathy votes? What has this world come to?

E. Zachary Knight
Oklahoma City Chapter of the ECA
http://www.theeca.com/chapters_oklahoma

Re: NYT: Beer Pong Critic No Vietnam Vet

Perception is a lovely thing, its "good" to be seen as a fighter against inane yet "bad" things (guns ,abortion ,games ,media ,rap ,books ,ect ,ect). The appearance of doing "good" outweighs any reality otherwise.... this works well for both political correctness and politics....


Until lobbying is a hanging offense I choose anarchy! CP/IP laws should not effect the daily life of common people! http://zippydsmlee.wordpress.com/


Copyright infringement is nothing more than civil disobedience to a bad set of laws. Let's renegotiate them.

---

http://zippydsm.deviantart.com/

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

Did Microsoft pay too much ($2.5 billion) for Minecraft developer Mojang?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
Sleaker@Technogeek - How do you call someone out that anonymously calls in a SWAT team, or sends threats to people?09/20/2014 - 7:04pm
Technogeek"It also doesn't mean you're obligated to stop harassment from all gamers that are doing so." I'd say you're certainly obligated to call them out when you see it happening.09/20/2014 - 5:17pm
SleakerNow if you disagree with anything in my last 2 posts then we obviously have a difference in world view, and wont come to any sort of agreement. I'm fine with that, maybe some people aren't?09/20/2014 - 5:09pm
SleakerIt also doesn't mean that just because a news outlet says that Gamers are the problem and you self-identify as a Gamer, you're immediately the problem. It also doesn't mean you're obligated to stop harassment from all gamers that are doing so.09/20/2014 - 4:59pm
SleakerJust to re-iterate: People getting harassed is wrong. Just because someone is harassed by so called 'gamers' doesn't mean that all gamers are bad. nor does it mean that you need to pass laws or judgement on all gamers.09/20/2014 - 4:56pm
SleakerAnd furthermore just because someone doesn't 'crusade against the evil' that doesn't make them the problem. You can have discussion with those around you. There's a thing called sphere of influence.09/20/2014 - 4:54pm
Sleaker@Conster - one person getting harassed is a 'problem' only so far as the harassee's are doing it. Just because a select few people choose to act like this doesn't make it widespread. Nor does it immediately make everyone responsible to put an end to it.09/20/2014 - 4:54pm
james_fudgeno worries09/20/2014 - 4:15pm
TechnogeekI misread james' comment as "we can't have a debate without threatening" there at first. Actually wound up posting a shout about death threats and "kill yourself" not technically being the same thing before I realized.09/20/2014 - 3:59pm
james_fudgeDon't hit me *cowers behind Andrew*09/20/2014 - 3:20pm
ConsterYou take that back right now, james, or else. *shakes fist menacingly*09/20/2014 - 3:00pm
james_fudgeOur community is awesome. We can have a debate without threatening to kill each other.09/20/2014 - 2:50pm
Andrew EisenNo one's crossed a line but I just want to remind you all to keep discussions civil.09/20/2014 - 1:54pm
Craig R.tldr: I'm a gamer, and imo those who support GamerGate should feel free to take a flying leap off a cliff.09/20/2014 - 1:27pm
Craig R.Not only that, I'm pretty sure that if actual studies were done, you'd still deny them, Sleaker. After all, it's not what you'd want to hear to support your rose-colored view of GamerGate.09/20/2014 - 1:18pm
Craig R.There IS an issue. Nor do we need a study to show that if you deny it then you're part of the problem.09/20/2014 - 1:17pm
Sleakersimply oust people that do harass others.09/20/2014 - 11:34am
Sleaker@Conster - I can say the same thing if you think there's been more than a handful. Until there's an actual study on rates no one can claim to know how widespread the incidence of harassment is. Thus the best we can do is 'there might be an issue' and...09/20/2014 - 11:33am
ConsterSleaker: if you think there's only been "a handful of" incidents, you have your head stuck *somewhere* - I'm assuming it's sand.09/20/2014 - 5:38am
prh99Most of it's agitprop clickbait anyway.09/20/2014 - 5:27am
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician