Rasmussen: Americans Hate FTC Plan to Save Newspapers

June 8, 2010 -

You may recall this story on the Federal Trade Commission's plan to save the floundering newspaper industry with taxes on consumer goods. A poll conducted by Rasmussen finds that Americans wholeheartedly reject such a move by a striking margin. The national telephone poll found that 84 percent of those surveyed oppose a 3 percent tax on monthly cell phone bills, while ten percent support it; 76 percent of Americans oppose a 5 percent tax on consumer electronics like computers, iPads, and other electronic devices to support newspapers, while 16 percent support it.

The survey also found that 74 percent of Americans do not like the idea of taxing Internet web sites like the Drudge Report, Reddit or Digg (news aggregators) to support the newspapers they "get their news from." Finally, 71 percent oppose the creation of a taxpayer funded program to hire young reporters for newspapers around the country.

The survey took place June 6 - 7 and polled 1,000 Adults. The margin of error is +/- 3 percentage points with a 95% level of confidence. Field work was conducted by Pulse Opinion Research. Dig into the particulars here.

Source: Rasmussen, Image Credit: Salon

Posted in

Comments

Re: Rasmussen: Americans Hate FTC Plan to Save Newspapers

Delete me

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

"The most difficult pain a man can suffer is to have knowledge of much and power over little" - Herodotus

--------------------------------------------------------------------------- "The most difficult pain a man can suffer is to have knowledge of much and power over little" - Herodotus

Re: Rasmussen: Americans Hate FTC Plan to Save Newspapers

WTF? What happened to free market enterprise ideology? Survival of the fittest? If the world changes and old industry can adapt forget it.

Wait I understand now!!! This is really about the music companies and to a lessor degree the movie ones as well - you wait and see...

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

"The most difficult pain a man can suffer is to have knowledge of much and power over little" - Herodotus

--------------------------------------------------------------------------- "The most difficult pain a man can suffer is to have knowledge of much and power over little" - Herodotus

Re: Rasmussen: Americans Hate FTC Plan to Save Newspapers

This is also about creating a press that is more beholden to the government- lest they withold funding.  This is the same political establishment that has tried to shut out and diminish outlets that do not drink the proverbial Kool-Ade.  Unfortunately, most news organizations are lock-step in love with the establishment now, and have no problem having government breathing down their neck.  Too bad these fools don't seem to understand that one day they will be beholden to the "other" party as well if these controls are put in place.

Re: Rasmussen: Americans Hate FTC Plan to Save Newspapers

That is part of it but all one needs to do to see my point very clearly is to look at the Performance Rights Act being considered right now. It will surely force many stations out of business all providing a valuable news service like papers but the point is to pay the record companies. The "beholding to the government" part is only a collateral benefit that likely made the whole thing an easy sell in Congress.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

"The most difficult pain a man can suffer is to have knowledge of much and power over little" - Herodotus

--------------------------------------------------------------------------- "The most difficult pain a man can suffer is to have knowledge of much and power over little" - Herodotus

Re: Rasmussen: Americans Hate FTC Plan to Save Newspapers

 I love how there is now mention of Craigslist or anything similar, despite the fact that such services put a large dent in Paper's classifieds revenue.

P.S. I'm not suggesting we tax Craigslist, just pointing out the ridiculousness of singling out consumer electronics/media.

Re: Rasmussen: Americans Hate FTC Plan to Save Newspapers

Too right!

If Newspapers want the benefits of capitalism, they can live by its rules, and if they can't keep up, they go the way of the Dinosaur. That's how the system is supposed to work.

Re: Rasmussen: Americans Hate FTC Plan to Save Newspapers

I don't want tax money to go toward another payment on Murdoch's jet. We saw how thesei diots spend bailout money before, making sure the higher ups are well off and leavign anyone below them to their own devices.

Re: Rasmussen: Americans Hate FTC Plan to Save Newspapers

I would gladly pay for a newspaper that wrote articles on stuff that was interesting to me and wasn't just full of garbage articles that I have little interest in or sell me stuff that I have no want for. Right now I am even looking at canceling my subscriptions to a number of magazines because I don't see why I should pay for something with so many ads.

~Weatherlight~

~Weatherlight~

Re: Rasmussen: Americans Hate FTC Plan to Save Newspapers

Many newspapers are fine, those that aren't tend to be larger papers that took on a lot of debt to expand, and have been resistant to any change in today's changing world.  There is no reason to save these larger papers by taxing other industries, especially because they still are trying to ignore reality and stick with their old methods that were profitable in the pre internet age.  In the past they made their money as gate keepers, being the only companies in a position to report the news, but this position is no longer maintainable.  Their sense of entitlement, their resistance to change, and their belief that they still are the gate keepers are bringing them down, not news aggregators or other internet websites. 

Re: Rasmussen: Americans Hate FTC Plan to Save Newspapers

Of course we don't want to bail out newspapers.  

You could argue the early bailouts were justified because the businesses being bailed out were affected by government regulations, but there is no way in hell you can justify bailing out newspapers.  

Pwnage of Empires

Re: Rasmussen: Americans Hate FTC Plan to Save Newspapers

Of course there is.  A free press is necessary for a functional society.

Again, I oppose the bailout, but it's actually quite easy to see how people might justify it.

Re: Rasmussen: Americans Hate FTC Plan to Save Newspapers

"Of course there is.  A free press is necessary for a functional society.

Again, I oppose the bailout, but it's actually quite easy to see how people might justify it."

A free press is the last thing putting the newspaper industry and the journalism profession on the government payroll would create.

Check out my video game humor and commentary blog, Pointless Side Quest!

Check out my video game humor and commentary blog, Pointless Side Quest! http://pointlesssidequest.blogspot.com/

Re: Rasmussen: Americans Hate FTC Plan to Save Newspapers

"A free press is necessary for a functional society."

I'm afraid that's not true.  It's quite possible to have functional societies that have no free press, no press at all for that matter.  It has happened and is happening all over the world.  I agree that a free press is preferable.  But the issue here isn't limiting the freedoms/protections afforded to the press.  Just whether or not tax payers should have to keep these businesses afloat.  If the newspapers want to continue to be in business they need to adapt to new media.

===============

Chris Kimberley

===============

Chris Kimberley

Re: Rasmussen: Americans Hate FTC Plan to Save Newspapers

"The survey also found that 74 percent of Americans do not like the idea of taxing Internet web sites like the Drudge Report, Reddit or Digg (news aggregators) to support the newspapers they "get their news from.""

Fair enough, but the aggregators might want to consider giving something back if they want to continue to have sources to link to.

It's a quandary.  I don't care much for the MSM, and I think they've largely been complacent, abdicated their responsibilities, and failed to keep up with modern technology.  That said, it's going to be pretty tough for a random blogger to break a story like Walter Reed or Abu Ghraib; there NEED to be media organizations that have the resources to investigate stories like that.

Re: Rasmussen: Americans Hate FTC Plan to Save Newspapers

 Even without papers the wire services have reporters in every major city.

Re: Rasmussen: Americans Hate FTC Plan to Save Newspapers

There is, it's called Television.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hookers and Ice Cream aren't free. http://www.escapistmagazine.com/articles/view/comics/stolen-pixels/5137-...

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hookers and Ice Cream aren't free. http://www.escapistmagazine.com/articles/view/comics/stolen-pixels/5137-...

Re: Rasmussen: Americans Hate FTC Plan to Save Newspapers

TV's next.

And do you really want the cable news networks to have more control of public knowledge and opinion than they already do?

Re: Rasmussen: Americans Hate FTC Plan to Save Newspapers

Not surprised in the least bit about these numbers.  Newspapers are going out of business because people don't care about them anymore.  So why would these people who don't care about newspapers willingly be taxed to keep them around?

Re: Rasmussen: Americans Hate FTC Plan to Save Newspapers

I'm surprised by these numbers. A lot more are accepting than I expected.

 

Re: Rasmussen: Americans Hate FTC Plan to Save Newspapers

I'm against the bailout too, but you're oversimplifying.  People who don't care about newspapers because they get their news from aggregators aren't going to have any place to get their news if there's nothing to aggregate.

Re: Rasmussen: Americans Hate FTC Plan to Save Newspapers

 Now you're oversimplifying. Newspapers steal from TV, TV steal from internet blogs, internet blogs steal from newspapers, etc. Besides, most news in papers comes from AP, Reuters or other wire services, all of which are available to ANYONE willing to pay the subscription fee, not just newspapers.

Newspapers have to either learn how to integrate themselves into the current landscape or just hurry up and die, bailouts aren't good for anyone in the long run.

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
Andrew EisenSleaker - Who the heck are you reading that is claiming "all gamers are bad," we "need to pass laws or judgement on all gamers," that if "you self-identify as a Gamer, you're immediately the problem," or that gamers are "obligated to stop harassment"?09/20/2014 - 9:44pm
erthwjimhe swatted more than just krebs, I think he swatted 30 people http://krebsonsecurity.com/2014/05/teen-arrested-for-30-swattings-bomb-threats/09/20/2014 - 9:31pm
Craig R.Btw, the guy who swatted security expert Brian Krebs? He got picked up recently. It can be done.09/20/2014 - 8:55pm
Craig R.Such things are not done in a vacuum... hence why the 4chan and other logs show what fools you've all been, tricked into doing the trolls' work09/20/2014 - 8:49pm
Sleaker@Technogeek - How do you call someone out that anonymously calls in a SWAT team, or sends threats to people?09/20/2014 - 7:04pm
Technogeek"It also doesn't mean you're obligated to stop harassment from all gamers that are doing so." I'd say you're certainly obligated to call them out when you see it happening.09/20/2014 - 5:17pm
SleakerNow if you disagree with anything in my last 2 posts then we obviously have a difference in world view, and wont come to any sort of agreement. I'm fine with that, maybe some people aren't?09/20/2014 - 5:09pm
SleakerIt also doesn't mean that just because a news outlet says that Gamers are the problem and you self-identify as a Gamer, you're immediately the problem. It also doesn't mean you're obligated to stop harassment from all gamers that are doing so.09/20/2014 - 4:59pm
SleakerJust to re-iterate: People getting harassed is wrong. Just because someone is harassed by so called 'gamers' doesn't mean that all gamers are bad. nor does it mean that you need to pass laws or judgement on all gamers.09/20/2014 - 4:56pm
SleakerAnd furthermore just because someone doesn't 'crusade against the evil' that doesn't make them the problem. You can have discussion with those around you. There's a thing called sphere of influence.09/20/2014 - 4:54pm
Sleaker@Conster - one person getting harassed is a 'problem' only so far as the harassee's are doing it. Just because a select few people choose to act like this doesn't make it widespread. Nor does it immediately make everyone responsible to put an end to it.09/20/2014 - 4:54pm
james_fudgeno worries09/20/2014 - 4:15pm
TechnogeekI misread james' comment as "we can't have a debate without threatening" there at first. Actually wound up posting a shout about death threats and "kill yourself" not technically being the same thing before I realized.09/20/2014 - 3:59pm
james_fudgeDon't hit me *cowers behind Andrew*09/20/2014 - 3:20pm
ConsterYou take that back right now, james, or else. *shakes fist menacingly*09/20/2014 - 3:00pm
james_fudgeOur community is awesome. We can have a debate without threatening to kill each other.09/20/2014 - 2:50pm
Andrew EisenNo one's crossed a line but I just want to remind you all to keep discussions civil.09/20/2014 - 1:54pm
Craig R.tldr: I'm a gamer, and imo those who support GamerGate should feel free to take a flying leap off a cliff.09/20/2014 - 1:27pm
Craig R.Not only that, I'm pretty sure that if actual studies were done, you'd still deny them, Sleaker. After all, it's not what you'd want to hear to support your rose-colored view of GamerGate.09/20/2014 - 1:18pm
Craig R.There IS an issue. Nor do we need a study to show that if you deny it then you're part of the problem.09/20/2014 - 1:17pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician