Reggie Fils-Aime: Nintendo 3DS Not for Very Young Children

June 18, 2010 -

Speaking to Kotaku, Nintendo of America president Reggie Fils-Aime said that the upcoming Nintendo 3DS hand-held is not meant for "very young children." Fils-Aime said they are in line with guidelines followed by most 3-D content creators.

"We will recommend that very young children not look at 3-D images," Fils-Aime told Kotaku. "That's because, [in] young children, the muscles for the eyes are not fully formed... This is the same messaging that the industry is putting out with 3D movies, so it is a standard protocol. We have the same type of messaging for the Virtual Boy, as an example."

So what is the appropriate age for the 3DS? According to Fils-Aime, seven years old or older. It will be interesting to see how Nintendo markets this on TV and in magazines in a way that doesn’t entice younger children. It seems to me like an impossibility.


Comments

Re: Reggie Fils-Aime: Nintendo 3DS Not for Very Young ...

While you guys were sniping at each other, I Googled it.

There was a short New York Times article in February that dealt with this.  The money link -- to a 2008 article from Journal of Vision -- is broken now, but I believe I found the abstract.  There's also a still-working link to a study called On a Qualitative Method to Evaluate Motion Sickness Induced by Stereoscopic Images on Liquid Crystal Displays.

Neither of the articles appears to deal specifically with children, and indeed it appears at this point that a lot of this is speculation -- 3D is only now entering the mainstream, and it'll be years before there's reliable data on children who consumed it.  (A causal study would, of course, be unethical; you can't go into a study saying "I think this is going to damage children's vision; let's get some children and test that hypothesis.")

CrunchGear has a pretty good article on the subject as well; it goes into a basic explanation of 3D, and briefly covers the question of child development.  It takes the tack that prolonged exposure COULD harm the development of children's vision, but moderate exposure probably won't -- which sounds pretty reasonable to me.

Re: Reggie Fils-Aime: Nintendo 3DS Not for Very Young ...

"[in] young children, the muscles for the eyes are not fully formed..."

And this means that children shouldn't play 3D hand-held games... why?

This sounds like pseudo science to me. The idea that eyes will be damaged by resting or focusing on one spot is also an argument against non-REM sleep, which we all engage in for hours while we're asleep, for Heaven's sake!

Modern treatments for amblyopia involve video gaming, because it IMPROVES focus and muscle control. The idea that focusing on one spot is bad for the eye is nonsense. The notion that focusing on an artificial 3D image is harmful is similarly flawed - the eye is still focusing normally, but the muscles are getting more of a workout - which is GOOD.

As with anything else, sustained periods spent playing a 3DS is probably not a good idea. The same can be said of any activity, but that shouldn't mean that such activities should be demonized.

This is yet another case of people in the industry allowing themselves to be brainwashed by the anti-gaming witch hunt environment that we live in.

Re: Reggie Fils-Aime: Nintendo 3DS Not for Very Young ...

Can you show me where using your eyes more(on montiors and such) is good for you? *rolls eyes*


I have a dream, break the chains of copy right oppression! http://zippydsmlee.wordpress.com/2010/05/21/cigital-disobedience/


Copyright infringement is nothing more than civil disobedience to a bad set of laws. Let's renegotiate them.

---

http://zippydsm.deviantart.com/

Re: Reggie Fils-Aime: Nintendo 3DS Not for Very Young ...

http://www.eyeseerichards.com/eye-problems/Amblyopia.html

"Amblyopia: The Lazy Eye

The best activities while wearing a patch are those involving the greatest visual stimulation with the greatest attention to detail. Video games by far give the most improvement in vision with the least amount of time for patching. However, any visually stimulating activity your child finds pleasurable will be helpful."

Rolleyes right back at you. I love it when people are so quick to attack based on their uncritical acceptance of the 'common wisdom' (which is often very common but also very un-wise).

I guess you'd also go into attack mode if I were to tell you that there's very little actual science backing up the commonly accepted notion that computer monitors cause eye strain. The fact is, if you stare for too long at anything, it can cause eye strain. People go on about monitor flicker and brightness, but what really causes eye strain is looking for too long at anything without taking breaks to blink, adjust focus, and yes, even to roll your eyes, LOL.

Re: Reggie Fils-Aime: Nintendo 3DS Not for Very Young ...

Well, unless you're an optometrist, and have studied the effects of shutter-glass-produced 3D images on the eyes of a young child over the course of at least three years, I'd rather play it safe, than trust the pseudo-science you use to counter what you claim to be pseudo-science.

---

With the first link, the chain is forged.

--- With the first link, the chain is forged.

Re: Reggie Fils-Aime: Nintendo 3DS Not for Very Young ...

 Okay, but will it impair my ability to see the color red?  

Re: Reggie Fils-Aime: Nintendo 3DS Not for Very Young ...

 At least he's warning people about the downside of 3D. Now when some parent says that the 3DS messed up there kids eyes we can all say that Riggie told you that it's not for the very young.

Re: Reggie Fils-Aime: Nintendo 3DS Not for Very Young ...

The difference is that no one should look at a virtual boy at any age XP

Seriously I'm surprised that he even brought the VB up, I thought that it was something Ninty would rather pretend never happened.

Re: Reggie Fils-Aime: Nintendo 3DS Not for Very Young ...

If I remember right that thing got Gunpei Yokoi turned into just a desk jockey working on busy work.

Re: Reggie Fils-Aime: Nintendo 3DS Not for Very Young ...

actually he left Nintendo mad made the Wonderswan for Bandi. Sadly he could not to see it release to the public.

http://www.magicinkgaming.com/

Re: Reggie Fils-Aime: Nintendo 3DS Not for Very Young ...

Yup, the japanese equivilent of the walk of shame XD

Re: Reggie Fils-Aime: Nintendo 3DS Not for Very Young ...

The 3D effect can be turned all the way off so very young children should still be able to enjoy the product without damaging their eyes.

 

Andrew Eisen

Re: Reggie Fils-Aime: Nintendo 3DS Not for Very Young ...

It still hurts my eyes I want TV out.......damnit....


I have a dream, break the chains of copy right oppression! http://zippydsmlee.wordpress.com/2010/05/21/cigital-disobedience/


Copyright infringement is nothing more than civil disobedience to a bad set of laws. Let's renegotiate them.

---

http://zippydsm.deviantart.com/

Re: Reggie Fils-Aime: Nintendo 3DS Not for Very Young ...

..... How would that work with the DS

Re: Reggie Fils-Aime: Nintendo 3DS Not for Very Young ...

TV out? You plug it into the TV hit a button to change screens or put both on the TV, you use the "DS" itself as a controler most of the time you will be looking at the TV not the DS.


I have a dream, break the chains of copy right oppression! http://zippydsmlee.wordpress.com/2010/05/21/cigital-disobedience/


Copyright infringement is nothing more than civil disobedience to a bad set of laws. Let's renegotiate them.

---

http://zippydsm.deviantart.com/

Re: Reggie Fils-Aime: Nintendo 3DS Not for Very Young ...

I can't help but respect this man for going out of his way to say this. He didn't have to. He could have just had it stuffed in the instruction manual for people to ignore, but he didn't- he actively went out and said it for people to hear.

Re: Reggie Fils-Aime: Nintendo 3DS Not for Very Young ...

I didn't get my first Gameboy until I was eight, so, this makes sense to me.

The problem will come from parents who can'tr say no to their screaming little 4 year olds.

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

Which Feminist Frequency video are you looking forward to most?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
WonderkarpI have a GBA. I dont need to buy virtual console gba games.01/28/2015 - 3:11pm
MonteI wouldn't care about running emulators on the 3DS if nintendo would just release more virtual console games. There are so many titles they could have up but don't. Seriously, its ridiclous that after 3 years they STILL haven't released GBA titles.01/28/2015 - 3:06pm
Wonderkarphttp://www.gamerevolution.com/news/game-boy-color-games-3ds-browser-exploit-30905 Play Gameboy Color Games on the 3ds using a browser exploit01/28/2015 - 2:39pm
prh99http://io9.com/one-of-our-most-popular-special-effects-originally-came-1682151657 Looks like the 1988 anime, Akira and anime in general has effecting popular culture, at least when it comes to special effects.01/28/2015 - 12:26pm
Wonderkarpyeah. some people are salty over it. but that wiki article was filled with vitriol01/28/2015 - 12:06pm
prh99Yeah, I saw people complaining about that, claiming Wales was a hypocrite cause he supposedly removed some feminist editors.01/28/2015 - 11:57am
WonderkarpCivility, Wikipedia, and the Conversation on Gamergate https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/01/27/civility-wikipedia-gamergate/01/28/2015 - 11:45am
Wonderkarpone thing that surprised me...theres a lot of expanded universe books for star wars, star trek, alien, even videogames like resident evil....why not ghostbusters? There's a comic series and cartoon but thats it01/28/2015 - 11:37am
prh99Well it is Hollywood, remakes are the one thing they can be relied on for.01/28/2015 - 11:34am
E. Zachary KnightSo you want a sequel and not a reboot. Fair enough. I think either could work as you have said yourself.01/28/2015 - 11:32am
Wonderkarpotherwise, let it lie. Next thing you know they'll remake/reboot Alien or Godfather01/28/2015 - 11:28am
Wonderkarpand Ghostbusters is my favorite movie and its aged well. it doesnt need a remake. Just like Psycho didnt need one. If they threw in Dan Aykroyd, kept the original tech, and acknowledged the old films without crappy easter eggs, I'd be on board.01/28/2015 - 11:27am
WonderkarpI dont like Reboots/Remakes. For every Batman begins or Invasion of the Body Snatchers, there's a million Robocops, King Kongs, Star Treks, Amazing Spidermans, Taxis, Clash of teh titans, planet of the apes, footloose.01/28/2015 - 11:26am
prh99Wonderkarp, what more do you need? It's been ~26 years, and Harold Ramis died last year. If they can make something decent, who cares?01/28/2015 - 11:19am
prh99I wonder if they will fall into the trap of making those items more scarce in game in order to get people to pay.01/28/2015 - 11:14am
Wonderkarpso its not even ghostbusters then. just in name and concept only. you could call it ghost chasers or spook snatchers01/28/2015 - 11:09am
Andrew EisenKarp - According to the creative team, the new Ghostbusters is a new story, not a gender swapped rehash.01/28/2015 - 10:36am
WonderkarpMan. Resident Evil has fallen hard. I was a Huge fan in the late 90s. I think its time for a reboot. I was playing the hd remaster of the gamecube remake and the dialogue still sucks. Chris asking Rachel if she knows how to use a gun. SHE'S A COP!!01/28/2015 - 10:33am
E. Zachary KnightThe whole point of early Resident Evil games was to beat the game using only those weapons and ammo you could scavenge and use save files sparingly.01/28/2015 - 10:08am
E. Zachary KnightDoesn't the ability to buy health and weapons defeat the whole point of survival horror games?01/28/2015 - 10:07am
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician