Reggie Fils-Aime: Nintendo 3DS Not for Very Young Children

June 18, 2010 -

Speaking to Kotaku, Nintendo of America president Reggie Fils-Aime said that the upcoming Nintendo 3DS hand-held is not meant for "very young children." Fils-Aime said they are in line with guidelines followed by most 3-D content creators.

"We will recommend that very young children not look at 3-D images," Fils-Aime told Kotaku. "That's because, [in] young children, the muscles for the eyes are not fully formed... This is the same messaging that the industry is putting out with 3D movies, so it is a standard protocol. We have the same type of messaging for the Virtual Boy, as an example."

So what is the appropriate age for the 3DS? According to Fils-Aime, seven years old or older. It will be interesting to see how Nintendo markets this on TV and in magazines in a way that doesn’t entice younger children. It seems to me like an impossibility.


Comments

Re: Reggie Fils-Aime: Nintendo 3DS Not for Very Young ...

While you guys were sniping at each other, I Googled it.

There was a short New York Times article in February that dealt with this.  The money link -- to a 2008 article from Journal of Vision -- is broken now, but I believe I found the abstract.  There's also a still-working link to a study called On a Qualitative Method to Evaluate Motion Sickness Induced by Stereoscopic Images on Liquid Crystal Displays.

Neither of the articles appears to deal specifically with children, and indeed it appears at this point that a lot of this is speculation -- 3D is only now entering the mainstream, and it'll be years before there's reliable data on children who consumed it.  (A causal study would, of course, be unethical; you can't go into a study saying "I think this is going to damage children's vision; let's get some children and test that hypothesis.")

CrunchGear has a pretty good article on the subject as well; it goes into a basic explanation of 3D, and briefly covers the question of child development.  It takes the tack that prolonged exposure COULD harm the development of children's vision, but moderate exposure probably won't -- which sounds pretty reasonable to me.

Re: Reggie Fils-Aime: Nintendo 3DS Not for Very Young ...

"[in] young children, the muscles for the eyes are not fully formed..."

And this means that children shouldn't play 3D hand-held games... why?

This sounds like pseudo science to me. The idea that eyes will be damaged by resting or focusing on one spot is also an argument against non-REM sleep, which we all engage in for hours while we're asleep, for Heaven's sake!

Modern treatments for amblyopia involve video gaming, because it IMPROVES focus and muscle control. The idea that focusing on one spot is bad for the eye is nonsense. The notion that focusing on an artificial 3D image is harmful is similarly flawed - the eye is still focusing normally, but the muscles are getting more of a workout - which is GOOD.

As with anything else, sustained periods spent playing a 3DS is probably not a good idea. The same can be said of any activity, but that shouldn't mean that such activities should be demonized.

This is yet another case of people in the industry allowing themselves to be brainwashed by the anti-gaming witch hunt environment that we live in.

Re: Reggie Fils-Aime: Nintendo 3DS Not for Very Young ...

Can you show me where using your eyes more(on montiors and such) is good for you? *rolls eyes*


I have a dream, break the chains of copy right oppression! http://zippydsmlee.wordpress.com/2010/05/21/cigital-disobedience/


Copyright infringement is nothing more than civil disobedience to a bad set of laws. Let's renegotiate them.

---

http://zippydsm.deviantart.com/

Re: Reggie Fils-Aime: Nintendo 3DS Not for Very Young ...

http://www.eyeseerichards.com/eye-problems/Amblyopia.html

"Amblyopia: The Lazy Eye

The best activities while wearing a patch are those involving the greatest visual stimulation with the greatest attention to detail. Video games by far give the most improvement in vision with the least amount of time for patching. However, any visually stimulating activity your child finds pleasurable will be helpful."

Rolleyes right back at you. I love it when people are so quick to attack based on their uncritical acceptance of the 'common wisdom' (which is often very common but also very un-wise).

I guess you'd also go into attack mode if I were to tell you that there's very little actual science backing up the commonly accepted notion that computer monitors cause eye strain. The fact is, if you stare for too long at anything, it can cause eye strain. People go on about monitor flicker and brightness, but what really causes eye strain is looking for too long at anything without taking breaks to blink, adjust focus, and yes, even to roll your eyes, LOL.

Re: Reggie Fils-Aime: Nintendo 3DS Not for Very Young ...

Well, unless you're an optometrist, and have studied the effects of shutter-glass-produced 3D images on the eyes of a young child over the course of at least three years, I'd rather play it safe, than trust the pseudo-science you use to counter what you claim to be pseudo-science.

---

With the first link, the chain is forged.

--- With the first link, the chain is forged.

Re: Reggie Fils-Aime: Nintendo 3DS Not for Very Young ...

 Okay, but will it impair my ability to see the color red?  

Re: Reggie Fils-Aime: Nintendo 3DS Not for Very Young ...

 At least he's warning people about the downside of 3D. Now when some parent says that the 3DS messed up there kids eyes we can all say that Riggie told you that it's not for the very young.

Re: Reggie Fils-Aime: Nintendo 3DS Not for Very Young ...

The difference is that no one should look at a virtual boy at any age XP

Seriously I'm surprised that he even brought the VB up, I thought that it was something Ninty would rather pretend never happened.

Re: Reggie Fils-Aime: Nintendo 3DS Not for Very Young ...

If I remember right that thing got Gunpei Yokoi turned into just a desk jockey working on busy work.

Re: Reggie Fils-Aime: Nintendo 3DS Not for Very Young ...

actually he left Nintendo mad made the Wonderswan for Bandi. Sadly he could not to see it release to the public.

http://www.magicinkgaming.com/

Re: Reggie Fils-Aime: Nintendo 3DS Not for Very Young ...

Yup, the japanese equivilent of the walk of shame XD

Re: Reggie Fils-Aime: Nintendo 3DS Not for Very Young ...

The 3D effect can be turned all the way off so very young children should still be able to enjoy the product without damaging their eyes.

 

Andrew Eisen

Re: Reggie Fils-Aime: Nintendo 3DS Not for Very Young ...

It still hurts my eyes I want TV out.......damnit....


I have a dream, break the chains of copy right oppression! http://zippydsmlee.wordpress.com/2010/05/21/cigital-disobedience/


Copyright infringement is nothing more than civil disobedience to a bad set of laws. Let's renegotiate them.

---

http://zippydsm.deviantart.com/

Re: Reggie Fils-Aime: Nintendo 3DS Not for Very Young ...

..... How would that work with the DS

Re: Reggie Fils-Aime: Nintendo 3DS Not for Very Young ...

TV out? You plug it into the TV hit a button to change screens or put both on the TV, you use the "DS" itself as a controler most of the time you will be looking at the TV not the DS.


I have a dream, break the chains of copy right oppression! http://zippydsmlee.wordpress.com/2010/05/21/cigital-disobedience/


Copyright infringement is nothing more than civil disobedience to a bad set of laws. Let's renegotiate them.

---

http://zippydsm.deviantart.com/

Re: Reggie Fils-Aime: Nintendo 3DS Not for Very Young ...

I can't help but respect this man for going out of his way to say this. He didn't have to. He could have just had it stuffed in the instruction manual for people to ignore, but he didn't- he actively went out and said it for people to hear.

Re: Reggie Fils-Aime: Nintendo 3DS Not for Very Young ...

I didn't get my first Gameboy until I was eight, so, this makes sense to me.

The problem will come from parents who can'tr say no to their screaming little 4 year olds.

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

Is King right? Should all games adopt the free-to-play model?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
MaskedPixelanteNumber 3: Night Dive was brought to the attention of the public by a massive game recovery, and yet most of their released catalogue consists of games that other people did the hard work of getting re-released.04/17/2014 - 8:46pm
MaskedPixelanteNumber 2: If Humongous Entertainment wanted their stuff on Steam, why didn't they talk to their parent company, which does have a number of games published on Steam?04/17/2014 - 8:45pm
MaskedPixelanteNumber 1: When Night Dive spent the better part of a year teasing the return of true classics, having their big content dump be edutainment is kind of a kick in the stomach.04/17/2014 - 8:44pm
Matthew Wilsonhttp://www.giantbomb.com/articles/jeff-gerstmann-heads-to-new-york-takes-questions/1100-4900/ He talks about the future games press and the games industry. It is worth your time even though it is a bit long, and stay for the QA. There are some good QA04/17/2014 - 5:28pm
IanCErm so they shouldn't sell edutainment at all? Why?04/17/2014 - 4:42pm
MaskedPixelanteNot that linkable, go onto Steam and there's stuff like Pajama Sam on the front-page, courtesy of Night Dive.04/17/2014 - 4:13pm
Andrew EisenOkay, again, please, please, PLEASE get in a habit of linking to whatever you're talking about.04/17/2014 - 4:05pm
MaskedPixelanteAnother round of Night Dive teasing and promising turns out to be stupid edutainment games. Thanks for wasting all our time, guys. See you never.04/17/2014 - 3:44pm
Matthew WilsonAgain the consequences were not only foreseeable, but very likely. anyone who understood supply demand curvs knew that was going to happen. SF has been a econ/trade hub for the last hundred years.04/17/2014 - 2:45pm
Andrew EisenMixedPixelante - Would you like to expand on that?04/17/2014 - 2:43pm
MaskedPixelanteWell, I am officially done with Night Dive Studios. Unless they can bring something worthwhile back, I'm never buying another game from them.04/17/2014 - 2:29pm
PHX Corphttp://www.msnbc.com/ronan-farrow/watch/video-games-continue-to-break-the-mold-229561923638 Ronan Farrow Daily on Video games breaking the mold04/17/2014 - 2:13pm
NeenekoAh yes, because by building something nice they were just asking for people to come push them out. Consequences are protested all the time when other people are implementing them.04/17/2014 - 2:06pm
Matthew Wilsonok than they should not protest when the consequences of that choice occur.04/17/2014 - 1:06pm
NeenekoIf people want tall buildings, plenty of other cities with them. Part of freedom and markets is communities deciding what they do and do not want built in their collective space.04/17/2014 - 12:55pm
Sora-ChanI realize that they have ways getting around it, but one reason might be due to earthquakes.04/17/2014 - 4:42am
Matthew WilsonSF is a tech/ economic/ trade center it should be mostly tail building. this whole problem is because of the lack of tail buildings. How would having tail apartment buildings destroy SF? having tail buildings has not runed other cities around the US/world04/16/2014 - 10:51pm
Matthew WilsonAgain the issue is you can not build upwards anywhere in SF at the moment, and no you would not. You would bring prices to where they should have been before the market distortion. those prices are not economic or socially healthy.04/16/2014 - 10:46pm
ZippyDSMleeYou still wind up pushing people out of the non high rise aeras but tis least damage you can do all things considered.04/16/2014 - 10:26pm
ZippyDSMleeANd by mindlessly building upward you make it like every place else hurting property prices,ect,ect. You'll have to slowly segment the region into aeras where you will never build upward then alow some aeras to build upward.04/16/2014 - 10:25pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician