ICE Seizes Website Domains as Part of Copyright Crackdown

July 1, 2010 -

As part of its “Operation In Our Sites” initiative, which targets illegal items distributed via the Internet that “threaten public safety and health,” U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) has seized a series of websites for criminal copyright violations.

In conjunction with the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York, ICE executed nine seizure warrants against websites, seized domain names, detained assets from 15 banking and associated accounts and enacted four residential search warrants in North Carolina, New Jersey, New York and Washington.

Downloading movies in an “undercover capacity,” led ICE officials to seize the following websites: TVShack.net, Movies-Links.tv, FilesPump.com, Now-Movies.com, PlanetMoviez.com, ThePirateCity.org, ZML.com, NinjaVideo.net and NinjaThis.net. Sites taken over are now decorated with a seizure notice, as illustrated here.

To trumpet the seizures, ICE Assistant Secretary John Morton held a press conference, in which he was joined on stage by “by senior representatives from major movie studios, entertainment unions and the Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA).”

Mike Robinson, the MPAA’s Chief of Operations, Content Protection said, “We are committed to working with law enforcement to get the illegal choices out of the marketplace and instead focus on continuing to offer more innovative and flexible legal options to consumers to enjoy the movies and TV shows that we all love.”

U.S Attorney for the Southern District of New York Preet Bharara, offered that, “Criminal copyright infringement occurs on a massive scale over the Internet, reportedly resulting in billions of dollars in losses to the U.S. economy. Bharara did not reveal the statistical source of the “billions of dollars” claim.

Operation In Our Sites is ongoing and targets the illegal distribution of films, music counterfeit pharmaceuticals, software, electronics and games.


Comments

Re: ICE Seizes Website Domains as Part of Copyright ...

Movies-Links.tv is where I watch my movies, but now that site doesn't host movies anymore. It's on a diff. site & I'm not telling. I save money & it is healthy for me to NOT spend my money.

 

 

"It's better to be hated for who you are, then be loved for who you are not." - Montgomery Gentry

"It's better to be hated for who you are, then be loved for who you are not." - Montgomery Gentry

Re: ICE Seizes Website Domains as Part of Copyright ...

WTF does copyright have to do with the ICE?

Re: ICE Seizes Website Domains as Part of Copyright ...

 Wait, how does ICE have the authority to seize a .tv site?

Re: ICE Seizes Website Domains as Part of Copyright ...

I think it's probably because .tv is administrated by VeriSign, but I'm not 100% on that.

Re: ICE Seizes Website Domains as Part of Copyright ...

The .tv domain is currently leased (through 2012) to the American company, Verisign, which is likely how the U.S. gained the authority to seize the site.

Re: ICE Seizes Website Domains as Part of Copyright ...

The best stuff comes from private torrent sites, most of which are hosted where they can never be taken down.

And it's not illegal to download from such sites where I live.

Re: ICE Seizes Website Domains as Part of Copyright ...

They certainly have the right to shut down sites engaging in copyright violations, but saying they "threaten public safety and health" is...well, I was going to say it's a pretty big stretch, but the fact is it's an outright lie.

That claptrap about "offer[ing] more innovative and flexible legal options to consumers to enjoy the movies and TV shows" is absurd too.  If that's what they're doing, how come I can't access Hulu from XBMC?

It would be trivial for a company with the TV networks' resources to provide a service that works like sabnzbd+ -- automatic, commercial-free, DRM-free downloads of all your shows -- but without sabnzbd's pain-in-the-ass configuration and reliance on often-flaky external sites that provide episodes of inconsistent quality and RSS feeds that often result in downloading the same ep multiple times.  I would happily pay a monthly fee to use a legal service like that.

But they won't offer one, because they're still laboring under the misconception that DRM works, and trying to protect the cable TV business model, which is no longer sustainable in the long term.  What, I have to pay for Fox News to get Comedy Central?  AND sit through ads when I've already paid a subscription fee?  Yeah, good luck with that -- the only thing that allowed that model to work was a lack of alternatives.

Re: ICE Seizes Website Domains as Part of Copyright ...

I think that the "public safety and health" thing refers to the organization's work in the area of counterfeit products.  Given that counterfeit products are often inferior to the genuine article, and often those products are replacement parts that, if they fail, can create a safety hazard, I think that the statement is technically correct.

With regard to movies though...yeah, I don't remember any case where copying a video resulted in bodily injury.

***Homicide-free video gaming since 1972!***

***Homicide-free video gaming since 1972!***

Re: ICE Seizes Website Domains as Part of Copyright ...

Maybe.  I'm curious as to the source of the "threaten public safety and health" quote, as a search for that coupled with the phrase "in our sites" only comes up with this article and others linking to it.

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

Will an M rating hurt Batman: Arkham Knight's sales?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
ZippyDSMleeEh still rather subjective… the haters would be better off going after teen and beauty rags and magazines than fiction, fiction follows reality and going after fiction tends to turn into a bullying fest’s… plus its fiction its unrealistic to start with….02/27/2015 - 1:10am
MechaTama31That's a pretty difficult anatomy to break.02/26/2015 - 11:09pm
MechaTama31"the way her animations repeatedly break her anatomy" <-- I'm sorry, but we are talking here about the woman who can roll up into a little ball and live to tell the tale, yes? ;)02/26/2015 - 11:09pm
Andrew EisenAs far as examples that could be culled from female game characters though, that one's pretty mild.02/26/2015 - 9:11pm
Andrew EisenNot as much the heels or the suit in and of themselves but certainly the way her animations repeatedly break her anatomy to show off her lady bits.02/26/2015 - 9:10pm
E. Zachary KnightWell, Samus's heels are certainly impracticable, but I wouldn't really call her Zero suit objectified. I don't really feel that the new Lara Croft is objectified either, but that is my subjective opinion.02/26/2015 - 9:08pm
Andrew EisenTomb Raider: No but we haven't seen much of anything yet. Samus: Yes.02/26/2015 - 9:07pm
ZippyDSMleeWould you call the new tomb raider objectified? WOuld Samus Aran from the new Smash bros be objectified?02/26/2015 - 9:02pm
WonderkarpI'm hoping they put the rest of the comic book ghostbusters in there. Ortiz and Rookie(From GB the game)02/26/2015 - 8:38pm
Wonderkarpghostbusters board game is doing great. getting close too a 3rd extra playable Character. Ron Alexander.02/26/2015 - 8:37pm
Andrew EisenSmurfette is not subjective. If there's more than one female character, it's not Smurfette. Anyway, as with everything on the list, Smurfette is, in and of itself, not necessarily a bad thing.02/26/2015 - 8:32pm
Andrew EisenI think there's 5 women (out of 15, I think) but other than one being a bit more "hippy" than the others, they pretty much all have the same body type. Especially when compaired to the huge variety of male body types.02/26/2015 - 8:31pm
Wonderkarpso I dont see Smurfette as a bad thing. Unless like all your female characters are Smurfette. remember the Smurfs also had Sassette02/26/2015 - 8:29pm
E. Zachary KnightOne good example of the larger issues is one Anita used in the presentation, Blizzard's Overwatch game. There are a dozen men in the game with a dozen body types. But there are only 4 women with 2 body types, but 3 of them have the same one.02/26/2015 - 8:28pm
Wonderkarpthe smurfette thing is subjective to how many female characters you have. Take Sonic for example. You have Amy, who is obvious smurfette, but there's several other female characters now without that. Including the original animated seriescomics with Sally02/26/2015 - 8:28pm
E. Zachary KnightAE. Very true. I think that is where I was going, but it didn't come out right. Jack Harkness is sexy but not objectified. Whereas, a women would have to be objectified in order to be "sexy" in most games.02/26/2015 - 8:26pm
E. Zachary KnightAnd as Andrew pointed out, there is a big difference between a sexualized man, and an idealized man. But for some reason, there is no distinction between women in games. For the most part.02/26/2015 - 8:25pm
Andrew EisenI think one of the issues we run into repeatedly with these conversations is the confusion over "sexy" and "sexually objectified."02/26/2015 - 8:24pm
E. Zachary KnightYet, for some reason, in orde rto have a sexualized women, she must be wearing lingerie or a bikini. Can't women be sexual and still dress for the job at hand?02/26/2015 - 8:24pm
E. Zachary KnightThe problem I have with complaints of "sexualized men" is that men don't have to wear speedos to be sexualized. Captain Jack Harkness from Torchwood/Doctor Who, was one sexy man, but he spent 99% of his time in a WW2 soldier's trenchcoat.02/26/2015 - 8:23pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician