Study Indicates Gaming (and TV Viewing) Could Lead to Something

July 6, 2010 -

Playing videogames and watching television are linked with attention problems in kids, at least according to a study authored by Edward Swing, David Walsh, former head of the National Institute on Media and Family, and Iowa State University’s Craig Anderson and Douglas Gentile.

Television and Video Game Exposure and the Development of Attention Problems (PDF) is published in the latest edition of Pediatrics and sampled 1,323 “middle childhood participants” across a 13-month session. A second sample of 210 adolescent and early adult participants was utilized as well.

The study began by offering, “Many video games seem to share many features (eg, high excitement, rapid changes in focus) that have been identified as potentially relevant to the television association with attention problems, making a similar association between video game playing and attention problems plausible.”

The results did find a correlation between playing videogames and “greater attention problems,” and the researchers noted that the attention problems emerging from games were “similar in magnitude to the television association.”

It was also cautioned that “it is possible that certain types of television programs and video games are associated with attention problems whereas others are not.” The researchers went out of their way to note that “there is some evidence that educational television is not associated with increased attention problems,” but did not make a similar case for videogames.

The academics also threw another statement against the wall in the hopes that it would stick, stating, “… there are theoretical reasons to believe that slower paced educational, nonviolent content is less likely to cause attention problems, but more studies on this issue are especially needed.”

Given the inclusion of Gentile and Anderson, a pair whose research constantly seeks to vilify or belittle videogames, one has to wonder: if the results of this study somehow did not implicate games (or television) as a factor in later attention problems, would the study have been published at all? Were the results shaped from the beginning?


Thanks HarmlessBunny, SimonBob and Wai Yen Tang!


Comments

Re: Study Indicates Gaming (and TV Viewing) Could Lead to ...

 Um, there's one major difference though: Games are interactive. You kind of have to keep your attention on them for a game to work, unlike TV.

Re: Study Indicates Gaming (and TV Viewing) Could Lead to ...

Given the inclusion of Gentile and Anderson, a pair whose research constantly seeks to vilify or belittle videogames

I have to strongly disagree here. It's true that Anderson and Gentile specialized in the negative effects of "violent" video games, but it's not fair at all to imply that their "research constantly seeks to vilify or belittle videogames" as a whole. Gentile in particular published a lot of studies on the positive effects of some video games (e.g. games making better surgeons, "prosocial" games leading to prosocial behavior, etc...). Furthermore, he systematically warns people in his speeches and articles and letters that his purpose is NOT to say that video games are bad. It's sometimes the first thing he reminds to his audience.

They actually consider that video games are excellent and powerful teachers, which means they can teach good and bad things. I personnally don't care much about their teaching potential, but we're very far from vilification. It's one thing to question their research, their methods, their results, etc... but it's another thing to consider them as "anti-games" when they're not.

This being said, I know that most game haters cite Anderson's studies (along with Dave Grossman's rants), but while they parrot his and Gentile's statements on "violent" games, they conveniently forget to mention what they have to say about video games as a whole. To me, the biggest problem isn't Anderson's and Gentile's research, at least not directly. Instead, the biggest problem is the way their research is (mis-)interpreted and recycled for ideological reasons.

 

Re: Study Indicates Gaming (and TV Viewing) Could Lead to ...

I'm sorry but I've read Anderson and Gentile's work very carefully.  They are quite clearly supportive of the "media effects" model and villify video games on a regular basis (this study here has nothing to do with violence, nor does Gentile's work on "pathological gaming).  Both authors have made hard-core positition statements, have repeated refuted statements such as those linking media violence effects sizes to those for important medical effects (a statement debunked several times), and regularly fail to cite any studies which are non-supportive of their view.  They published a book chapter with a set of criteria in which they attempt to link "true experts" on media effects essentially only to those who agree with "media effects" theory.  To the extent that they support "positive" video games, to me this appears to be little more than an effort to convince people not to play violent games, nothing like the kind of cultural support for video games you see in the comments of someone like Henry Jenkins.  Anderson used to (although less so now) regularly invoke school shooting incidents in his papers, despite that reviews by the Secret Service and others have refuted any such link with video games.  In a past study of video games and "attention" Anderson's group's press release made references to ADHD despite that their study never measured ADHD!

The idea that Anderson and Gentile are poor victims of a media or politicians that "misrepresent" their work is nonsense (and I mean no disrespect to you).  Gentile, Anderson and Saleem (2007) the authors clearly egg on other scientists to make more blatantly causal statements to the media.  It is they, Anderson and Gentile themselves, who misrepresent much of their own work.

Re: Study Indicates Gaming (and TV Viewing) Could Lead to ...

I've never see Anderson find a form of media he didn't think was bad.  No he doesn't want things banned but he does argue that there is a causal link between media and aggression.

 

 

http://www.popularculturegaming.com

Re: Study Indicates Gaming (and TV Viewing) Could Lead to ...

If you actually read the study the effects are actually very weak.  For children the beta values for television and video games on attention are all less than .10.  That means video games or television use predicts less than 1% of the variance in attention.

For adults the numbers were a little higher, but mostly less than r = .2 (so around 4% of the variance).

Pretty weak findings that, as usual for this groups of researchers, are blown way out of proportion.

Junk science.

Re: Study Indicates Gaming (and TV Viewing) Could Lead to ...

Exactly how are videogames fraught with rapid changes in focus?  Last time I checked, a level or action encounter in games tend to last for a good amount of time- and lets not forget strategy games.  Are they talking about minigame collections?

Re: Study Indicates Gaming (and TV Viewing) Could Lead to ...

I wonder how many of these 'attention problems' are actually older teachers who are used to slow absorbtion and singletasking not knowing what to make of kids used to a much more rapid flow of information.

I wonder what would happen if they simply spead up the teaching?

I can recall when I was back in HS, I would actually sit and read the textbook in class because I found the lecture frustratingly slow.. it always felt like it was taking forever to get to the point while not actually conveighing any additional information on the topic.

Re: Study Indicates Gaming (and TV Viewing) Could Lead to ...

Teacvhing methods change? Surely you jest! /sarcasm

But seriously yes, our system is far, FAR Too steeped in tradition.

Re: Study Indicates Gaming (and TV Viewing) Could Lead to ...

People say I have A.D.D., they just don't under.. ooh look a chicken!

Re: Study Indicates Gaming (and TV Viewing) Could Lead to ...

"there are theoretical reasons to believe that slower paced educational, nonviolent content is less likely to cause attention problems"

What are these reasons?  Because I happen to think the opposite is true... the number one cause of attention problems is boredom.

------- Morality has always been in decline. As you get older, you notice it. When you were younger, you enjoyed it.
 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
Andrew EisenHuh?04/01/2015 - 2:42am
Matthew Wilson@AE I think the first dragon age did it the best. the person you played was treated differently based class,race, and gender. if the npc are going to act like 2015, you should just set the game in 2015 and add magic and dragons.04/01/2015 - 1:23am
E. Zachary KnightYeah, the PS3. My son paid for the Steampunk Texture Pack and it would not work at all. No matter what I did, it wouldn't allow us to save.03/31/2015 - 10:56pm
Sora-ChanConsole version?03/31/2015 - 10:40pm
E. Zachary KnightSo, Mojang has been selling a broken texture pack for Minecraft since at least Dec. 2014 and it hasn't been fixed yet.03/31/2015 - 10:30pm
Andrew EisenI think TT Games gets away with multiple LEGO games a year because they're all based on different franchises. If there were two or three LEGO Star Wars games every year, I think people would feel the same fatigue as they do with Assassin's Creed.03/31/2015 - 6:40pm
Andrew EisenIn other words, a hero is male because that's the default. A hero is female because of a gender-related reason. So, male heroes are for everyone. Female heroes are for women.03/31/2015 - 5:32pm
Andrew EisenHer point is that "When archetypal fantasy heroes in games are overwhelmingly portrayed as men, it reinforces the idea that... women should be able to empathize with male characters but that men needn’t be able to identify with women’s stories."03/31/2015 - 5:30pm
Andrew EisenDaniel - She doesn't say that in any of the TvW videos and I doubt she's said elsewhere that all games with male protagonists are male power fantasies. Anyway, you seem to be conflating two different ideas.03/31/2015 - 5:30pm
MaskedPixelantehttps://twitter.com/Yuriofwind/status/583028257890635776 Oh snap!03/31/2015 - 5:14pm
WymorenceFor me it just boils down to the fact that, even at a giant company, when a game comes out annually it just gives it a vibe of being rushed out the door. And god knows Unity sucked some major lemur with all its bugs...03/31/2015 - 4:22pm
PHX CorpI launched my spotify account today, and I kinda went a little overboard with adding music03/31/2015 - 3:59pm
Sora-ChanCon't. Games like AC are a pain to someone like me who likes to play games in order. So when a game gets too many releases too quickly, it puts me off. Only exceptions are games that have no interconnected underlying stories like the FF games.03/31/2015 - 2:53pm
Sora-ChanWikipedia has rarely let me down on matters like this. But yeah... AC needs a break.. like two.. or three... or eight years.03/31/2015 - 2:51pm
ConsterThere's 9 already?! I think I played 1, 2, and the ones inbetween 2 and 3.03/31/2015 - 2:23pm
Sora-ChanCon't There are now Nine... of just the main entries into the series. There are 13 more in the "other games" department.03/31/2015 - 2:15pm
Sora-ChanI tried to get into AC. Was having a decent time with the first one, at which point they had already released three titles. Then a fourth came out... then a fifth... the wall kept growing before I could finish the first.03/31/2015 - 2:14pm
Daniel LewisI think ubisoft should give AC a break before it's milked to death,and i'm a big fan of the games03/31/2015 - 1:15pm
PHX Corphttp://www.polygon.com/2015/3/31/8320017/assassins-creed-chronicles-china-india-russia Assassin's Creed Chronicles is now a trilogy, goes to China, India and Russia03/31/2015 - 1:11pm
Daniel LewisThe only thing said i disagree with is the final quote on Men's experiences are seen to be universal but women are gendered,though doesn't anita say that games with male protagonists are male power fantasies,so in turn both are gendered03/31/2015 - 1:08pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician