Columbine Book Downplays Videogame Link

July 7, 2010 -

Dave Cullen’s comprehensive recounting of the April 20, 1999 school shooting in Littleton, Colorado is built upon innumerable interviews, police files and media reports, along with videotapes and writings made by the killers— Dylan Klebold and Eric Harris—themselves.

The shootings, which played out on live television over the better part of a day, impacted Americans and other people around the world intensely, as was the attackers intent. It also caused society to scramble to look for reasons why this tragedy happened, and some were quick to point the finger at various elements of culture, including violent videogames.

While it’s true that both Harris and Klebold were fans of the game DOOM, Cullen’s reconstruction absolves games, and violent movies and music as well, of any direct blame. The book cites data from research done by both the FBI, 2000’s The School Shooter:  A Threat Assessment Perspective (PDF), and the Secret Service’s 2002 study, The Final Report and Findings of the Safe School Imitative (PDF), to assist in dispelling popular myths about school shooters.

The Secret Service’s document studied every school attack between December 1974 and May 2000, covering 41 attackers across 37 incidents. 59 percent of the attackers expressed “some interest” in violence, whether it be games, book, movies or other media. Only one-eighth exhibited an express interest in violent videogames.

The Secret Service document also helped to dispel the myth that such shooters are loners. Only one-third of the attackers were characterized by others as loners.

In Columbine’s case it boiled down to Harris being termed a psychopath by FBI Agent Dwayne Fuselier (whose son was a Columbine student at the time of the shooting), while Klebold was labeled a depressive. The combination of the two personalities, explained Cullen, helped to form a murderous dyad, similar to Leopold and Loeb, Bonnie and Clyde and the Beltway snipers of 2002.

All in all the book is a fascinating story of not only the shooters, the victims and the aftermath for both the survivors and the community, but also a look into how the shuffling feet (corruption is probably too strong a word) of bureaucracy delayed the release of information after the shooting, while also burying data on and complaints against Klebold and Harris that could have put them in jail before the tragedy.


Comments

Re: Columbine Book Downplays Videogame Link

Nice to see the book will help refute and downplay the video game link.  But it's not going to stop the "video game cause school shooting" trend.

 

 

Re: Columbine Book Downplays Videogame Link

BTW, OT, but...I know I kvetched the other week about off-topic stories on GP, and I don't want to be one of those guys who just gripes and never praises.  You guys are really kicking ass right now; you've posted something like twenty great stories just these past two days.

You're doing a great job, and your efforts are appreciated.

Re: Columbine Book Downplays Videogame Link

I thunbed through anotehr Columbine book a couple of years ago looking for references to video games. The book was 500+ pages long and mentions video games twice. Both in a list of other interests of the shooters. Neither time put any emphasis on the game play.

It really is only people with agendas who emphasize the gameplay.

E. Zachary Knight
Oklahoma City Chapter of the ECA
http://www.theeca.com/chapters_oklahoma

Re: Columbine Book Downplays Videogame Link

I think "downplays" is the wrong word; it implies that there WAS a video game link and it's being swept under the rug.  I think "refutes" is a better word.

Re: Columbine Book Downplays Videogame Link

We're all going to have a different interpretation of the semantics, but I, myself, prefer "put into a more reasonable perspective".

Nightwng2000

NW2K Software

http://www.facebook.com/nightwing2000

Nightwng2000 is now admin to the group "Parents For Education, Not Legislation" on MySpace as http://groups.myspace.com/pfenl

Nightwng2000 NW2K Software http://www.facebook.com/nightwing2000 Nightwng2000 is now admin to the group "Parents For Education, Not Legislation" on MySpace as http://groups.myspace.com/pfenl

Re: Columbine Book Downplays Videogame Link

When your talking about something like this semantics are important. What you say can and will be used against everyone by those agaisnt video games. Remember these are politicians and lawyers that we are dealing with so we must consider the correct terminology or provide them with ammunition.

Re: Columbine Book Downplays Videogame Link

But the semantics are important.  "Downplays" suggests the opposite of "puts into a more reasonable perspective".

Re: Columbine Book Downplays Videogame Link

This book has been out for quite awhile.  No offense, but I expected this story a few months ago.

By pointing this out, I kinda set myself up for the "Then why didn't YOU run this story?" speech, don't I?  ^^;

"HEY! LISTEN!"

"HEY! LISTEN!"

Re: Columbine Book Downplays Videogame Link

quite nice to know,m unfortunately it won't silence people who fervently bleieve violent media was the one sole cause.

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

Will Target Australia sell the next GTA game upon its release?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
MechaCrashI am reminded of the saying about playing chess with a pigeon.08/01/2015 - 11:13am
Andrew EisenThis is supported by, well, what actually happened, but also the text of the actual leaks. That was Tito's question and what he and a few (four total, I think) were discussing.08/01/2015 - 11:11am
Andrew EisenNo, it's not. What was generally prohibited was not discussion of journalistic ethics or other GamerGate topics, but threads that were, for example, discussing the sex life of an indie developer. THOSE are what were locked and removed.08/01/2015 - 11:10am
Goth_SkunkI don't believe you. Not for a second. Every major site with the exception of the Escapist prohibited discussion of GamerGate in its early stages. That is a fact.08/01/2015 - 11:04am
Andrew EisenNo, that's a fact. Don't believe me, read 'em yourself. No one was trying to censor discussion of GamerGate.08/01/2015 - 11:02am
Goth_Skunk@Andrew: That's your opinion.08/01/2015 - 10:57am
Goth_Skunkfuture? I'd compensate you for your time, of course.08/01/2015 - 10:57am
Goth_Skunk@IronPatriot: Congratulations on a sweeping statement to remove the agency of people supporting GamerGate for their own individual reasons. Since you're so good at painting in such broad strokes, are you free to paint my apartment sometime in the near08/01/2015 - 10:57am
Andrew EisenWhich, as you can tell by actually reading the snippets that were leaked, is a shamefully disingenuous telling of what was actually said.08/01/2015 - 10:56am
Goth_SkunkAdditionally, to quote William Usher, "[s]ome of the members on that list actively used their platform to support and propagate a wide-sweeping media narrative based on lies and factual inaccuracies."08/01/2015 - 10:54am
Goth_Skunkthe forums of The Escapist. Thankfully, they were both unsuccessful.08/01/2015 - 10:53am
Goth_SkunkOf the "Gamers Are Dead" articles specifically, no. But the list was used to try and censor discussion about GamerGate in its early stages. Ben Kuchera and our own James Fudge used it to solicit to Escapist then EiC Greg Tito to prevent discussion on08/01/2015 - 10:53am
IronPatriotCraig, you are right that gamergate is utter hypocrisy. Any story about it which lacks the context of gamergate's harassment origins FAILS ethics in journalism. LOL.08/01/2015 - 10:49am
IronPatriot@Goth_Skunk "citation needed"? Citation provided! Gamergate was created by 4chan harassers and ethics #ISyourShield08/01/2015 - 10:48am
Craig R.IP: Plenty of irony to go around with GG. But really, it's complete hypocrisy.08/01/2015 - 10:48am
Andrew EisenIf that assertion were true, it's nigh unfathomable that that conversation was not one of the ones leaked and published on Breitbart. Plus, as I pointed out earlier, only TWO of the Gamers Are Dead authors were on the Game Journo Pros list anyway.08/01/2015 - 10:48am
Craig R.Looks like he is, Andrew. Tinfoil wonders never cease.08/01/2015 - 10:45am
Non-entityAndrew: that's exactly what GamerGate has been claiming, yes. Private discussion groups apparently equal conspiracy.08/01/2015 - 10:44am
Andrew EisenGoth - Wait, wait, wait. Are you suggesting that the Gamers Are Dead articles are the result of a coordinated effort organized on the Game Journo Pros group?08/01/2015 - 10:38am
IronPatriotGamergate's private "interest" is harassing women. Their public lie is about "ethics"08/01/2015 - 10:36am
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician