TSA Rescinds Controversial Employee Web Site Access Policy

July 7, 2010 -

Just days after it was revealed that the Transportation Security Administration planned to block employee access to web sites with "controversial opinions," the federal agency rescinded the new policy. The ban on "controversial opinion" sites, issued late last week was part of a more general TSA Internet-usage policy blocking employee access to gambling (they called them "gaming" sites) and chat sites, as well as sites that dealt with extreme violence or criminal activity.

But as bloggers - including many conservative blogs that picked up the story from Drudge Report - a small handful or privacy advocates and the American Civil Liberties Union questioned the loose language of the policy, the TSA reconsidered its messaging and withdrew.

"There's always a danger that threats are used to justify over-broad restrictions on speech and other freedoms," said Jay Stanley, an American Civil Liberties Union privacy expert, before the TSA announced it was dropping the idea. "But it's disturbing to see the TSA get the balance all wrong on that."

According to a Washington Post report, TSA spokeswoman Lauren Gaches said that the agency's revised "acceptable use" policy for Internet access on the agency's network was designed to block sites "that promote destructive behavior to one's self or others."

"After further review, TSA determined the 'controversial opinion' category may contain some sites that do not violate TSA's policy and therefore has concluded that the category is no longer being considered for implementation," she said in an e-mail to The Washington Times.

But before rescinding the guideline, agency officials noted that the policy changes were "intended to address evolving cyberthreats," but did not do a very good job of explaining exactly what "controversial opinions" they were talking about and whether Internet sites with viewpoints contrary to the Administration’s would be targeted under the new guidelines.

 

Source: Washington Times

Posted in

Comments

Re: TSA Rescinds Controversial Employee Web Site Access ...

I don't get how this is a controversial issue. TSA as an employer has every right to restrict internet access from their computers at their workplace however they like. Why should they have to allow any kind of freedom to surf the web to their employees? Do you want your tax dollars being spent allowing these guys to surf the web, find some hot topic then spend an hour arguing with other employees if they agree with it or not when it has nothing to do with their job to begin with?

Re: TSA Rescinds Controversial Employee Web Site Access ...

You are correct, but the issue at hand with the "controversial sites" restriction was that nobody knew exactly what sites they were.

---

With the first link, the chain is forged.

--- With the first link, the chain is forged.

Re: TSA Rescinds Controversial Employee Web Site Access ...

So the company is supposed to release a list of controversial URLs that employees can review and not visit?

No, it's called green screen where I work. If you try to go to a restricted site, a green screen comes up instead. We don't have a resource somewhere to find out what sites are blocked, and there is no recourse to unblock a site. It's the company's right to say what their employees should and should not be doing on the internet on company computers and company time.

No controversy here that I can see.

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

Which Feminist Frequency video are you looking forward to most?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
Andrew EisenGood on 'em.01/31/2015 - 6:04pm
Matthew WilsonWhat do you guys think of the exploding kittens kickstarter raising over 5 mil? there original goal 10k01/31/2015 - 5:56pm
Andrew EisenKarp - Another mind-numbingly awful, willfully disingenuous and poorly constructed video. At least he has a pleasant speaking voice. And the music is nice.01/31/2015 - 5:43pm
Matthew WilsonI hope some company buys sega's ips. creative assembly, and Atlas. the rest of sega can bugger off.01/31/2015 - 4:03pm
WonderkarpTropes VS Women Refund : An Open Letter to Feminist Frequency https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UoucuL1jazI Guy trying to get refund from the kickstarter01/31/2015 - 3:50pm
Goth_SkunkPrototype was all right. I had way more fun running around in the open world, scaling buildings, gliding in the air, and pulling off insane helicopter-capturing maneuvers than I did with the actual story, though. Eventually the novelty wore off.01/31/2015 - 3:31pm
Andrew EisenI don't know about Joystiq, we may mention it but I don't know that there's that much to really discuss but yeah, Nintendo's YouTube Creator's Program is on the agenda.01/31/2015 - 2:45pm
MonteMatt: they have articles on both Joystiq and nintendo's youtube BS.01/31/2015 - 2:30pm
prh99http://blog.us.playstation.com/2014/12/31/playstation-plus-januarys-free-games/01/31/2015 - 1:56pm
Matthew Wilsonyou guys going to talk about the Joystiq closing, and Nintendo losing its mind?01/31/2015 - 1:11pm
Andrew EisenNeo - Do you have any evidence of that? Please link.01/31/2015 - 11:43am
Papa MidnightI enjoyed the first Prototype... even if the PC Port was horribly done. Prototype 2, however, far exceeds it. It's actually a decent game in my opinion.01/31/2015 - 11:24am
Wonderkarpreally? I didnt play it because the first one sucked. I didnt even know the main characters black01/31/2015 - 10:38am
Neo_DrKefkaFor those who don't know Prototype 2 is free for the PS3 on PS PLUS! It's a great game that failed due to collusion with activist bloggers before the game was released that people would hate it because the main characters black.01/31/2015 - 9:53am
Wonderkarpalso heard Techraptor is working on a big news piece on indiecade01/31/2015 - 9:47am
WonderkarpAndrew : All I know is he was critical of the block list and said the coding was bad.01/31/2015 - 9:42am
prh99Devolvers response to Nintendo's creator program https://mobile.twitter.com/devolverdigital/status/56082061398444851301/31/2015 - 3:24am
Andrew EisenI only know of him being annoyed that IGDA mistakenly hosted on its anti-harassment tools page a blocklist he was on. What else was he critical of?01/31/2015 - 2:19am
Goth_Skunk@WonderKarp: Given Rosario's outspoken criticisms of the conduct of the IGDA, I would not be one bit surprised if he's being strong-armed into silence in closed-door meetings. He's not towing the party line, after all.01/30/2015 - 11:38pm
MechaTama31EZK: Thank you! (And I was able to see that you did it, only because you did it. How appropriate! :)01/30/2015 - 11:37pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician