Forget Violent Games, What About Violent Theme Park Attractions?

July 13, 2010 -

After the Supreme Court rules on Schwarzenegger v. EMA later (presumably) this year, if the law is upheld, what could that mean for the regulation of other types of media, such as violent theme park attractions for example?

This is the tack a Technology Liberation Front story takes, applying the argument to, funny enough, a Universal Studios attraction based on Terminator 2, which author took his eight and five year old on. He describes the entertainment:

... it was a surprisingly intense and seriously violent experience. The show features cinematic action combined with real-life actors who run throughout the arena firing shotguns at cybernetic robots that come out of the walls or floors.  During some segments of the show, water sprays the audience, smoke fills the chamber, and the seats and floors vibrate violently as battles take place on stage and on-screen. The actor hosting the show is also choked to death by a cyborg!

The Governator himself filmed scenes for Terminator 2: 3D, to which kids are admitted “without restriction,” causing the author to ask:

If Gov. Schwarzenegger — or any other lawmaker for that matter — would regulate “violent” video games on the grounds that the experience is too intense and damaging for kids psychologically, then why not regulate theme park attractions on similar grounds?

He sums up:

In my opinion, it is up to parents — not the government — to determine what games, movies, music, books, magazines, and theme park attractions that kids get to see, hear, and experience.

The author's kids “loved” the Terminator 2: 3D experience by the way, and he reports that they have yet to become “murderous thugs or social degenerates” after the experience.


Comments

Re: Forget Violent Games, What About Violent Theme Park ...

Its amazing how Californians and Americans in general are blaming the Dems for bankrupting the state. I'm not very familiar with the situation so I will not elaborate further. HOWEVER The GOP governor, who has made a career off R rated movies as someone has pointed out earlier is wasting tax dollars to have this unconstitutional law approved when the state is supposedly broke. Nobody has anything to say about that. Typical. Also this fool shows what is wrong with America: He brings his 5 an 8yo kids to a ride/show based on a R rated film and complains that its inappropriate for children. Sadly this has become the rule, not the exception.

"With free speech either all of it is ok or none of it is." Kyle Broflovski

Re: Forget Violent Games, What About Violent Theme Park ...

Exactly. He's the Republican Party gov, not the conservitive gov.

Re: Forget Violent Games, What About Violent Theme Park ...

Did you RTFA?

Did you read the part where it says "The author's kids “loved” the Terminator 2: 3D experience by the way, and he reports that they have yet to become “murderous thugs or social degenerates” after the experience."?

It's right above the part where you clicked the Post New Comment button.

Re: Forget Violent Games, What About Violent Theme Park ...

As I've said before, if a Porn Star made enough money to run for Governor, and then, once in power, went on a rampage against porn that wasn't making their 'mates' any money, no-one would struggle to see the double-standards.

Re: Forget Violent Games, What About Violent Theme Park ...

Yet not too many people are giving hell to a current Governor who made a living off of making R-Rated violent Action films, who is fighting for a law against violent video games.... who is funnily enough featured in the mentioned 3D ride in the article :D

(EDIT: Nevermind, looks like EA is railing against Governator  )

Re: Forget Violent Games, What About Violent Theme Park ...

Arnold would argue that its based on a movie so its ok and its not based on an evil devilish video game.

Re: Forget Violent Games, What About Violent Theme Park ...

Maybe someone should tell Arnold how 2 movies could've cause real-life incident like:

 

-Ronald Reagan assasination attempt: John Hinckley jr after he tried to kill Reagan because he claim that Taxi Driver made him do it.  Hinckley had obesseion with Jody Foster.   Yet, I don't hear people want this movie ban or I didn't see Martin Scorcese getting arrested for reckless endangerment and facilitating a murder involving a person with high political power.

-Three Mile Island incident: This was a event when there was a nuclear meltdown at a nuclear power plant at Three Mile Island.  Did you know a movie came out 12 day before this happen, the movie called The China Syndrome showed what would happen if nuclear meltdown happened and my goodness the film is very much what happen at TMI.  Was this a coincidence or did one worker became obssessed with the movie that he "trained" on it and wanted to imitate art.  Even a physicist says that the China Syndrome would render "an area the size of Pennsylvania" (where Three Mile Island incident happened) permanently uninhabitable.  After this incident happened, I didn't see any criminal charges brought upon the crew and the cast of the movie (neither did the movie production team). No terrorism charges has ever brought upon on the cast or crew to this day.

 

So you see if we're going to start regulating video game, we have to do the same thing to movies because you saw what 2 movie did to 2 real-life incident (if this was to be true).      

 

 

 

Re: Forget Violent Games, What About Violent Theme Park ...

The Three Mile Island connection has a whiff of conspiracy theory to it, but Taxi Driver has always been a favorite example of mine when people bring up game censorship.  The movie is a brilliant piece of art and an American classic, and you won't find a whole lot of people seriously claiming that movies like that shouldn't be made just because one crazy person saw it and did something crazy.

Re: Forget Violent Games, What About Violent Theme Park ...

Based off a movie that Arnold starred in...

Re: Forget Violent Games, What About Violent Theme Park ...

I'm just amazed he thought it was a good idea to take a five-year-old to a theme park attraction based on a violent, R-rated action movie and was then shocked, shocked to find violence.

Re: Forget Violent Games, What About Violent Theme Park ...

I don't think he is saying he was shocked at the content of the ride, but at the idea that people are in an uproar about game content but nothing else.

E. Zachary Knight
Oklahoma City Chapter of the ECA
http://www.theeca.com/chapters_oklahoma

Re: Forget Violent Games, What About Violent Theme Park ...

Hrmmm interesting.

I agree with the author on quite a few notes there. You can't just regulate one media and leave the others alone. That is why the US 1st Ammendment is worded the way it is. 

" In my opinion, it is up to parents — not the government — to determine what games, movies, music, books, magazines, and theme park attractions that kids get to see, hear, and experience "

Best damned common sense quote I have heard in awhile from a parent in the media :)

Re: Forget Violent Games, What About Violent Theme Park ...

What the author isn't taking into account is that the age of responsibility, parental or otherwise, has come to an end.  One could argue that the people are giving up their responsibility and the government is simply moving in to take up the "slack". 

I'm no fan of government control over content for anything from TV to themeparks, but if more and more people refuse to take responsibility for their own (and their children) media consumption, who steps in to do it for them?

Re: Forget Violent Games, What About Violent Theme Park ...

If we're talking about criminal negligence, then CPS should step in and take their kids away.

If, however, we're talking about letting a 6-year-old play GTA, then I might frown on that, but it's not my business, it's not yours, and it's not Yee's.

To borrow what Frank Zappa said about music 25 years ago: 6-year-olds aren't just going into the store and throwing down $60 for a game all by themselves.  If they're playing it, it's because an adult bought it.  (Or at least somebody who has a job and some degree of autonomy.  Around these parts, you typically have to be 16 to get full-time employment -- and M-rated games are recommended for people 17 and older, so it's hard for me to believe that one year makes a world of difference.)

It's not the state's job to make that kind of decision for a parent, even if it's a decision you and I wouldn't make in the same situation.

Re: Forget Violent Games, What About Violent Theme Park ...

Simple.  No one.

 

Andrew Eisen

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

Will Code Avarice's Paranautical Activity make its way back onto Steam?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
Papa MidnightNeo_DrKefka: Till outlets such as IGN and GameSpot so much as even acknowledge the mere existence of "GamerGate", I highly doubt it will affect their modus operandi anytime in the future - near or otherwise.10/23/2014 - 12:26pm
Neo_DrKefkaWhat GamerGate is essentially doing whether people like it or not its going to change the gamingmedia but inturn its also going to replace some outlets & practice the same wrongs they claim they fought against. Its happening already look at TheRalphRetort10/23/2014 - 12:18pm
Neo_DrKefkaIf a company claims it supports the Klan or another offensive organization than the advertiser needs to make sure they're brand is not tainted so they pull they're ads. One side does not determine the right to determine what is universally offensive.10/23/2014 - 12:14pm
Neo_DrKefkaActions have consequences however. If you do a Bioware and insult EA's customers would you be suprised if they lost advertisers and customers? Advertisers are not giving money to charity to they putting ads to make money.10/23/2014 - 12:13pm
Matthew Wilsonwhile I disagree with people pushing pressure on advertisers, consumers do not have many other options to show there disagreements with a article or writer. if people are going to do it, it should be for somthing much worse then that guy did.10/23/2014 - 12:10pm
Neo_DrKefkaNow they are about KingofPol & InternetAristocrat making streams that are bait and switch Streams that claims they are about GG but are about them getting drunk and them making fun of Autistic people10/23/2014 - 12:09pm
Neo_DrKefkahttp://tinyurl.com/nhlbgq8 These people some of them are using GamerGate to prop there careers up. GamerGate streams used to be about ideas of change and solutions to problems.10/23/2014 - 12:09pm
Neo_DrKefkaI believe the message of #GamerGate but I do not believe in the Cult of Personality that has formed. Where sites like TechRaptor gained exposure and they are a great site. Sites like TheRalphReport are using this movement for there own personal gain.10/23/2014 - 12:05pm
ZippyDSMleeSo has the whole GG thing become toxic to the point its time to move on yet?10/23/2014 - 11:54am
prh99As for GG, I am surprised they haven't pulled out every 4chan spawned mob and script kiddie's favorite tool, LOIC to DDoS their foes. Or maybe they did and I missed it.10/23/2014 - 11:38am
BillIn his article Max says "I've been told that we've lost thousands of dollars already, and could potentially lose thousands more, if not millions."10/23/2014 - 11:25am
BillJames, do you think new advertisers won't bring this up when negotiating Ad rates? From a business standpoint, if I were to advertise on Gawker I would point to this and be pretty firm on lower rates.10/23/2014 - 11:21am
prh99Had my say, what they do after that is their business. Though calling your current advertisers "craven idiots" and "pusillanimous morons" probably isn't all that smart if you are going to complain about lost revenue from pulled ads.10/23/2014 - 11:18am
james_fudgeand when they do they will innoculate themselves from this stuff before the deal is even signed10/23/2014 - 11:02am
james_fudgewhen you do that much traffic you can always replace advertisers, guys10/23/2014 - 11:02am
prh99I helped him out and emailed Gawkers advertisers with the message "This is how Gawker covers you when they disagree with you". Not necessarily as support for GG but he is just down right insulting. 10/23/2014 - 10:48am
BillI think he got rolled twice. They made him mad enough to insult a possible advertiser. Other advertisers are going to notice this. It may be cathartic for him, but it's not good business.10/23/2014 - 9:17am
Billhttp://gawker.com/how-we-got-rolled-by-the-dishonest-fascists-of-gamergat-164949657910/23/2014 - 9:14am
Andrew EisenMarvel also shows it understands that once it leaks, it's out there and went ahead and officially released the trailer. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tmeOjFno6Do10/22/2014 - 9:36pm
E. Zachary KnightMarvel's response is the best.10/22/2014 - 9:31pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician