ESA Responds to Schwarzenegger v. EMA California Brief

July 14, 2010 -

While the Entertainment Software Association (ESA) has until September 10 to file its own brief with the U.S. Supreme Court in regards to Schwarzenegger v. EMA, the organization issued a statement in reaction to a brief filed by the state of California on Monday.

Trumpeting the ESA's dominating string of victories in such cases, and perhaps attempting to take some of the wind out of the sails of California State Senator Leland Yee, ESA President and CEO Michael Gallagher stated:

Computer and video games are First Amendment protected speech. There is an unbroken chain of more than a dozen previous court rulings agreeing. Courts across the country recognize that computer and video games, like other protected expression such as movies, books, and music, have an artistic viewpoint, and use sounds and images to create an experience and immerse the player in art. That is why other courts have unanimously affirmed that video games are entitled to the same constitutional protection as movies, music, books, and other forms of art.

California’s law is no different than others before it. It is clearly unconstitutional under First Amendment principles. We look forward to presenting our arguments in the Supreme Court of the United States and vigorously defending the works of our industry’s creators, storytellers and innovators.


Comments

Re: ESA Responds to Schwarzenegger v. EMA California Brief

I hope for this law to fail just to see Mr. Yee and the governator cry like babies.

http://www.magicinkgaming.com/

Re: ESA Responds to Schwarzenegger v. EMA California Brief

How about because it's a bad law?

Seriously, guys, let's be adults here.

Re: ESA Responds to Schwarzenegger v. EMA California Brief

"California’s law is no different than others before it. It is clearly unconstitutional under First Amendment principles."

Forget constitutionality.  Hell, forget the niggling detail that there's no harm to protect children from in the first place.

This law, flat-out, would not work.  It would do nothing to prevent children from playing violent games (even if they did cause harm).  I think that's enough to shoot it down right there.

 

Andrew Eisen

Re: ESA Responds to Schwarzenegger v. EMA California Brief

Hasn't exactly stopped the drinking age or the drug war.

Re: ESA Responds to Schwarzenegger v. EMA California Brief

Yes, the CA law certainly isn't alone in that regard.  Plenty laws that any 6-year-old could tell you wouldn't work make it on the books.

 

Andrew Eisen

Re: ESA Responds to Schwarzenegger v. EMA California Brief

It's been my experience that most 6 year olds have a lot more sense than many adults.

===============

Chris Kimberley

===============

Chris Kimberley

Re: ESA Responds to Schwarzenegger v. EMA California Brief

I just realized there has been no mention of the ESRB ratings (a private organization) being given the force of law.  I take it then that the law is looking for alternative methods of determining which games are "offensive"?

Re: ESA Responds to Schwarzenegger v. EMA California Brief

Yeah. The law is not based on the ESRB ratings or anything like that. It is based on a definition of "excessive violence" that is put in place by whom ever is the elected official in the city in which the complaint is raised or the state Attorney General.

E. Zachary Knight
Oklahoma City Chapter of the ECA
http://www.theeca.com/chapters_oklahoma

Re: ESA Responds to Schwarzenegger v. EMA California Brief

I call california's Brief The equiviant of Jack thompson's bizzare Commentary on his Lawsuits

Watching JT on GP is just like watching an episode of Jerry springer only as funny as the fights

America has just became its own version of the Jerry Springer Show after a bizarre moment in Florida involving a carnival worker.

Re: ESA Responds to Schwarzenegger v. EMA California Brief

I don't think it's quite on the same level as JT's bizarre rantings.  It's dead wrong, of course, but it's not completely insane.

I think that's the main difference between Thompson and Yee.  Yee's basically a good guy, he's polite and he engages the video game community with respect.  I disagree, fundamentally, with his stance, and I believe, strongly, that he's wasting the time and money of a state that's already in dire financial straits in order to attempt to curtail freedoms guaranteed by the First Amendment.  But at least he's not a raving lunatic.

Re: ESA Responds to Schwarzenegger v. EMA California Brief

I think that Yee is a douche and he just is educated enough to deguise it behind a polite attitude, but when everything this fail (and it will) we will see his real face, not very far of what Jack Thompson was some years ago.

No one can claim that an entire industry and its users are a danger for society and being 100% polite.

------------------------------------------------------------ My DeviantArt Page (aka DeviantCensorship): http://www.darkknightstrikes.deviantart.com

Re: ESA Responds to Schwarzenegger v. EMA California Brief

Now see, calling someone childish names because he disagrees with you IS the sort of thing JT's famous for.  This is the exact point I'm making -- we can disagree with people like Yee without stooping to JT's level, and Yee can show the same respect to us.

I don't agree with the guy, I think his position is utterly wrongheaded and misguided, and I think his crusade is a spectacularly bad idea.  But he doesn't go around calling people douches.

Re: ESA Responds to Schwarzenegger v. EMA California Brief

Call you names? He threatens to sue every other person.

Re: ESA Responds to Schwarzenegger v. EMA California Brief

Er, you know he's a state senator, not a practicing lawyer, right?

Re: ESA Responds to Schwarzenegger v. EMA California Brief

You mean how he was extremely sure he would come out victorious but all he was doing was taking someone's pencil and going "Haha, now you can't write!!!"

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
IvresseJust finished with Coxcon 2015 last night (convention in the UK organised by Youtube Jesse Cox). Was a damn good weekend meeting Jesse, Totalbiscuit, Dodger etc. and getting to ask them questions and stuff.08/03/2015 - 6:15am
InfophileReference for my comment earlier about Dan Aykroyd in the new Ghostbusters: http://www.theguardian.com/film/2015/jul/15/ghostbusters-call-dan-aykroyd-for-cameo08/03/2015 - 6:00am
benohawkI hope the new ghostbusters is good regardless, but I also expect it to have to surpass the orignal for people to acknowledge that.08/03/2015 - 1:37am
benohawkMecha, those changes are also some of the bigger complaints I've heard about the Abrams Star Trek movie.08/03/2015 - 1:35am
MechaTama31https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vU_D96AdK0M <-- Letterman interview with Bill Murray, he seems to have a similar opinion to mine about the pink-slime movie.08/02/2015 - 11:27pm
MechaTama31I don't think it's as big a deal as you think, matts. After all, JJ Abrams' Star Trek removed the original cast (mostly) and changed the formula significantly. If the movie is enjoyable, people will enjoy it.08/02/2015 - 11:23pm
MattsworknameDoc: Hope he recovers soon.08/02/2015 - 7:49pm
Matthew Wilsonhttp://www.pcgamer.com/what-directx-12-means-for-gamers-and-developers/#page-1 by Peter Thoman, and better known by the name Durante. he talks about dx12 in detail08/02/2015 - 7:45pm
DocMelonheadIGF's Chairman resigns due to cancer: http://igf.com/2015/07/letter_from_the_chairman_so_lo.html08/02/2015 - 6:46pm
Matthew Wilsonit wont let me update it, so the title is Tifa's Breasts Too Big for the FF7 Remake?08/02/2015 - 6:14pm
Andrew EisenRemember, when linking videos, please tell us what it is (title usually words) in addition to who it's from.08/02/2015 - 6:05pm
Matthew Wilsonhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HxVv7pbqXvY a interesting video video by Gaijin Goombah08/02/2015 - 4:54pm
MattsworknameInfo: Well thats something at least08/02/2015 - 3:04pm
Infophile@Matt: Apparently Dan Aykroyd actually is involved. We don't know how yet, though, but he's apparently going to be in the movie in some way.08/02/2015 - 4:17am
MattsworknameI still hold that not having the origonal cast invovled in any way hurts this movie, and unless the 4 actresses in the lead roles can some how measure up to the comic timing of the origonal cast, i just don't see it being a success08/02/2015 - 12:46am
MattsworknameMecha: regardless of what you think of it, GB 2 was a finanical success and for it time did well with audiances ,even if it wasnt as popular as the first08/02/2015 - 12:45am
MechaTama31I think they're better off trying to do something different, than trying to be exactly the same and having every little difference held up as a shortcoming. Uncanny valley.08/01/2015 - 11:57pm
MechaTama31Having the original cast didn't do much for... that pink-slimed atrocity which we must never speak of.08/01/2015 - 11:56pm
MattsworknameAndrew: If the new ghostbusters bombs, I cant help but feel it'll be cause it removed the origonal cast and changed the formula to much08/01/2015 - 8:31pm
Andrew EisenNot the best look but that appears to be a PKE meter hanging from McCarthy's belt.08/01/2015 - 7:34pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician