Government Backed Chinese Game Con Boasts "Columns of Girls"

August 4, 2010 -

While a ban that outlaws titillating Internet-based ads for online games went into effect in China on August 1, the edict had no impact on sexy promotions at a recently completed Chinese game expo.

The China Digital Entertainment Expo & Conference, known as ChinaJoy, ran from July 29 through August 1 and is backed by a slew of Chinese government agencies, including the General Administration of Press and Publication (GAPP), the Ministry of Science and Technology, the Ministry of Industrial and Information Technology and the National Copyright Bureau.

The involvement of so many government entities did little to hinder the employment of “columns of Chinese girls in white boots and miniskirts,” at the show, according to a story on Canada.com. The website described some of the action:

Throughout the exhibition hall, the same scene played out again and again -- packs of men of various ages with cameras call out to girls who smile, pout and lean against oversized models of video game characters.

A 21-year old girl named Sheril Ma was working as a booth beauty at ChinaJoy. She thinks regulators will soon target the abundance of sex at such events, stating, “This is growing and maybe in the future when this exhibition attracts more people, the Chinese government will play a part in this if it has too many bad effects on teenagers.” She wondered though, “…if it really works, maybe many other cultures will adopt this way of selling.”

Jay Jiang, a Marketing Planning Director for Shanda Games, was quoted as saying, “I've been to shows in Japan and Korea before, they don't have as many show girls.”

One woman who attended the show with her two kids wasn’t worried about the impact the models could have on her children, saying they were too young to understand. She added, “So long as their father's not here, it's fine.”


Image taken at ChinaJoy 2009 from MMOSite.com


Comments

Re: Government Backed Chinese Game Con Boasts "Columns of ...

Finally something me and China can agree on; Booth girls makes conventions even better!

http://www.magicinkgaming.com/

Re: Government Backed Chinese Game Con Boasts "Columns of ...

Maybe there is hope, after all.

------------------------------------------------------------ My DeviantArt Page (aka DeviantCensorship): http://www.darkknightstrikes.deviantart.com

Re: Government Backed Chinese Game Con Boasts "Columns of ...

Out of pure curiosity, does anyone find that the presence of attractive women makes the product itself more appealing?  At all?

 

Andrew Eisen

Re: Government Backed Chinese Game Con Boasts "Columns of ...

if a product is crap its still gonna be crap no matter who or what is next to or on it.

Re: Government Backed Chinese Game Con Boasts "Columns of ...

I believe it's more about getting attention. Even if the product is rubbish, at least people are examining it, so there's a chance they'll buy it, as opposed to not noticing it and there being no chance of them buying it.

If I remember my business classes correctly, there's something about ... I can't remember it clearly - something along the lines of how you can't have a woman in a bikini on top of a car to try and sell it, but one at the side of it in a dress is fine, as long as the focus is on the product.

Re: Government Backed Chinese Game Con Boasts "Columns of ...

Generally it has been found to have little to no effect on actual consumers.

Stuff like this is more about posturing between companies, which effects access to suppliers, distribution channels, and employment pools.

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

Who's responsible for crappy Netflix performance on Verizon?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
MaskedPixelanteIf by "distance themselves from Google Plus" you mean "forcing Google Plus integration in everything", then yes, they are distancing themselves from Google Plus.07/26/2014 - 12:20pm
MechaTama31I wish they would distance G+ from the Play Store, so I could leave reviews and comments again.07/26/2014 - 11:03am
Matthew Wilson@pm I doubt it. Google seems to be distancing themselves from G+07/25/2014 - 9:31pm
Papa MidnightGoogle+ Integration is coming to Twitch!07/25/2014 - 8:41pm
MaskedPixelanteThis whole Twitch thing just reeks of Google saying "You thought you could get away from us and our policies. That's adorable."07/25/2014 - 2:52pm
Sleaker@james_fudge - hopefully that's the case, but I wont hold my breath for it to happen.07/25/2014 - 1:08pm
SleakerUpdate on crytek situation is a bit ambiguous, but I'm glad they finally said something: http://www.gamesindustry.biz/articles/2014-07-25-crytek-addresses-financial-situation07/25/2014 - 1:07pm
E. Zachary KnightMan Atlas, Why do you not want me to have any money? Why? http://www.atlus.com/tears2/07/25/2014 - 12:06pm
Matthew WilsonI agree with that07/25/2014 - 10:45am
james_fudgeI think Twitch will have more of an impact on how YouTube/Google Plus work than the other way around.07/25/2014 - 10:22am
IanCWelp, twitch is going to suck now. Thanks google.07/25/2014 - 6:30am
Sleaker@MP - Looked up hitbox, thanks.07/24/2014 - 9:40pm
Matthew WilsonI agree, but to me given other known alternatives google seems to the the best option.07/24/2014 - 6:30pm
Andrew EisenTo be clear, I have no problem with Google buying it, I'm just concerned it will make a slew of objectively, quantifiably bad changes to Twitch just as it's done with YouTube over the years.07/24/2014 - 6:28pm
Matthew WilsonI doubt yahoo has the resources to pull it off, and I not just talking about money.07/24/2014 - 6:15pm
SleakerI wouldn't have minded a Yahoo purchase, probably would have been a better deal than Tumblr seeing as they paid the same for it...07/24/2014 - 6:13pm
MaskedPixelanteIt's the golden age of Hitbox, I guess.07/24/2014 - 6:08pm
Matthew Wilsonagain twitch was going to get bought. It was just who was going to buy it . Twitch was not even being able to handle the demand, so hey needed a company with allot of infrastructure to help them. I can understand why you would not want Google to buy it .07/24/2014 - 5:49pm
Andrew Eisen"Google is better than MS or Amazon" Wow. Google, as I mentioned earlier, progressively makes almost everything worse and yet there are still two lesser options. Again, wow!07/24/2014 - 5:43pm
Andrew EisenI don't know. MS, in my experience, is about 50/50 on its products. It's either fine or it's unusable crap. Amazon, well... I've never had a problem buying anything from them but I don't use any of their products or services so I couldn't really say.07/24/2014 - 5:42pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician