Carnival Games Let Populace Target Obama

August 9, 2010 -

While they aren’t electronic, these interactive games sure feature a political bent.

A game that allowed carnival goers to shoot an apparent likeness of President Barack Obama made news last week, before the President of the amusement company behind the attraction pulled the game.

Goodtime Amusements had used an effigy of the President—easily identified by the “Health Bill” he was holding and the Presidential Seal on his beltbuckle—in a game called “Alien Attack,” in which users fired foam darts at targets. One lady was appalled, saying, “You got a stuffed animal for becoming a sniper.”

Following complaints and an investigation into the game by the Secret Service, Goodtime Amusements head Irvin Good shut down the game, stating, “I guess we made an error in judgment and we apologize for that.”

He added, “I voted for the man. It wasn't meant to be him. If they took it that way, we apologize.”

Meanwhile, one videographer who read about the game recalled seeing a similar offering in Seaside Heights, New Jersey and (thanks Gawker) brought his video camera to document the action. This game features patrons throwing baseballs at likenesses of Obama, who appears alongside representations of the Burger King, the Joker, Stewie from Family Guy and a member of the Boston Red Sox.

The man being filmed playing the game hurls profanity at Obama’s likeness before walking away with his prize—a funnel. Snooki would be proud.


Comments

Re: Carnival Games Let Populace Target Obama

I think it was a bit in poor taste but I don't see why it shouldn't be allowed. Of course I don't think anyone claimed the owner did anything illegal, he pulled it b/c of the controversy. I voted for Obama btw. Satire is satire and America is America where you are free to do anything short of harming another's person or property no matter how stupid.

Re: Carnival Games Let Populace Target Obama

The video shows a person throwing balls at plates the characters are holding. I don't see a problem with that either.

But the video is not showing the actual game that caused the uproar, just another game that featured Obama. The actual game from the article was a shooting gallery, where people shooting the president.

While it is certainly in bad taste, I don't think we can say it shouldn't be allowed as free speech, escpecially when we gamers are argueing that games aren't murder simulators.

Re: Carnival Games Let Populace Target Obama

Trying to think of which is more exciting, the game or the funnel the guy won.   Tough call. 

Re: Carnival Games Let Populace Target Obama

Do you get a copy of Catcher In The Rye, and Taxi Driver on Blu Ray as prizes?

Re: Carnival Games Let Populace Target Obama

 Why would it???   Inbred red-necks can't read!

Re: Carnival Games Let Populace Target Obama

Meh, Seaside has had those types of games every year I can remember- and I've lived there for nearly 30 years.  When George W was president, he was a staple of the attractions.  Saddam Hussein, Osama Bin Laden, Bill Clinton, OJ Simpson, and a plethora of others have been featured. 


Of course, this time it's racist because it's impossible to have any discussion, political satire, or ANYTHING revolving the president in a non-flattering light without it being racist.  Which is why I think a race war will break out if he isn't re-elected (and hence why he has my vote in 2012).

Re: Carnival Games Let Populace Target Obama

I don't see any mention about racism in either articles

Re: Carnival Games Let Populace Target Obama

There's also the fact that so many seem to want bad things to happen to Obama. Wasn't long ago people were beinging loaded assault weapons within range.

Re: Carnival Games Let Populace Target Obama

I think there was just as much animosity towards George W, who was even more hated than Obama.  Hell, Hollywood even made a movie about him being assassinated.

Re: Carnival Games Let Populace Target Obama

There was a strong dislike of Bush, sure.

 

But I don't recall people showing up with signs saying "We came unarmed THIS TIME", or Democratic politicians talking about how people might consider "2nd ammendment remedies" to the "problem" of George W. Bush.

Yes, there was the one movie, but it also presented the idea of assassinating Bush as a BAD ONE that would lead to pretty much everything people hated about his Presidency getting WORSE.

It was more a "Look, even if you hate the guy, killing him is a horrible idea" movie.

 

 

Re: Carnival Games Let Populace Target Obama

Yeah, because none of the people camped out AT HIS HOUSE ever did anything untoward, right?

And no, that movie outright advocated Bush's death.  You're an idiot if you took it otherwise.

---

With the first link, the chain is forged.

--- With the first link, the chain is forged.

Re: Carnival Games Let Populace Target Obama

I don't recall the folks camping at his house, I may have been distracted with other issues at the time.

Although I must ask if any of those camping out were toting assault rifles?

 

As to the movie, from what I've read the movie has Cheney as President passing an even MORE extreme version fo the Patriot Act after Bush died.

Considering the Patriot Act was pretty much the go to "This is why Bush is a horrible president" for most 'liberals' I'd say showing that the assassination of Bush could cause an even more extreme version of it to be passed would be considered a NEGATIVE to most who disliked Bush.

If the movie had some "Yeah, things get better" ending, I could buy it as advocating assassination, but it doesn't, the assassination makes things worse (from a left-wing perspective anyway).

If the concept is "Things get worse if this happens" it's not advocation of the "this"

It's like saying that god-awful "C.S.A: Confederate States of America" is somehow a PRO Confederate movie.

Re: Carnival Games Let Populace Target Obama

Which is why I am surprised this is getting much press.

Though I imagine one element is that there is so much rhetoric out there about actually killing obama that some people are a bit more uncomfortable with a 'shooting' game.   While Bush was lampooned, there was much less talk about violently taking him out, and Clinton while there was some it was not nearly as pronounced.

And looking at the picture, another problem might be that figuring out how to characture obama in a way that does not resemble the exagerations and general art styles that were part of racist movements over the last century or two.   It does bare some resemblence to the old artwork that was part of the 'black people are really monkeys, a lower form of human' meme from years back.

Re: Carnival Games Let Populace Target Obama

Actually, there was less talk about taking out GW. But that's because most Dems have fewer radical extremists at the moment.

Re: Carnival Games Let Populace Target Obama

You really think there were less people who wanted George W. Bush dead?

Are you just ignorant or completely stupid?

---

With the first link, the chain is forged.

--- With the first link, the chain is forged.
 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
Craig R.Btw, the guy who swatted security expert Brian Krebs? He got picked up recently. It can be done.09/20/2014 - 8:55pm
Craig R.Such things are not done in a vacuum... hence why the 4chan and other logs show what fools you've all been, tricked into doing the trolls' work09/20/2014 - 8:49pm
Sleaker@Technogeek - How do you call someone out that anonymously calls in a SWAT team, or sends threats to people?09/20/2014 - 7:04pm
Technogeek"It also doesn't mean you're obligated to stop harassment from all gamers that are doing so." I'd say you're certainly obligated to call them out when you see it happening.09/20/2014 - 5:17pm
SleakerNow if you disagree with anything in my last 2 posts then we obviously have a difference in world view, and wont come to any sort of agreement. I'm fine with that, maybe some people aren't?09/20/2014 - 5:09pm
SleakerIt also doesn't mean that just because a news outlet says that Gamers are the problem and you self-identify as a Gamer, you're immediately the problem. It also doesn't mean you're obligated to stop harassment from all gamers that are doing so.09/20/2014 - 4:59pm
SleakerJust to re-iterate: People getting harassed is wrong. Just because someone is harassed by so called 'gamers' doesn't mean that all gamers are bad. nor does it mean that you need to pass laws or judgement on all gamers.09/20/2014 - 4:56pm
SleakerAnd furthermore just because someone doesn't 'crusade against the evil' that doesn't make them the problem. You can have discussion with those around you. There's a thing called sphere of influence.09/20/2014 - 4:54pm
Sleaker@Conster - one person getting harassed is a 'problem' only so far as the harassee's are doing it. Just because a select few people choose to act like this doesn't make it widespread. Nor does it immediately make everyone responsible to put an end to it.09/20/2014 - 4:54pm
james_fudgeno worries09/20/2014 - 4:15pm
TechnogeekI misread james' comment as "we can't have a debate without threatening" there at first. Actually wound up posting a shout about death threats and "kill yourself" not technically being the same thing before I realized.09/20/2014 - 3:59pm
james_fudgeDon't hit me *cowers behind Andrew*09/20/2014 - 3:20pm
ConsterYou take that back right now, james, or else. *shakes fist menacingly*09/20/2014 - 3:00pm
james_fudgeOur community is awesome. We can have a debate without threatening to kill each other.09/20/2014 - 2:50pm
Andrew EisenNo one's crossed a line but I just want to remind you all to keep discussions civil.09/20/2014 - 1:54pm
Craig R.tldr: I'm a gamer, and imo those who support GamerGate should feel free to take a flying leap off a cliff.09/20/2014 - 1:27pm
Craig R.Not only that, I'm pretty sure that if actual studies were done, you'd still deny them, Sleaker. After all, it's not what you'd want to hear to support your rose-colored view of GamerGate.09/20/2014 - 1:18pm
Craig R.There IS an issue. Nor do we need a study to show that if you deny it then you're part of the problem.09/20/2014 - 1:17pm
Sleakersimply oust people that do harass others.09/20/2014 - 11:34am
Sleaker@Conster - I can say the same thing if you think there's been more than a handful. Until there's an actual study on rates no one can claim to know how widespread the incidence of harassment is. Thus the best we can do is 'there might be an issue' and...09/20/2014 - 11:33am
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician