Carnival Games Let Populace Target Obama

August 9, 2010 -

While they aren’t electronic, these interactive games sure feature a political bent.

A game that allowed carnival goers to shoot an apparent likeness of President Barack Obama made news last week, before the President of the amusement company behind the attraction pulled the game.

Goodtime Amusements had used an effigy of the President—easily identified by the “Health Bill” he was holding and the Presidential Seal on his beltbuckle—in a game called “Alien Attack,” in which users fired foam darts at targets. One lady was appalled, saying, “You got a stuffed animal for becoming a sniper.”

Following complaints and an investigation into the game by the Secret Service, Goodtime Amusements head Irvin Good shut down the game, stating, “I guess we made an error in judgment and we apologize for that.”

He added, “I voted for the man. It wasn't meant to be him. If they took it that way, we apologize.”

Meanwhile, one videographer who read about the game recalled seeing a similar offering in Seaside Heights, New Jersey and (thanks Gawker) brought his video camera to document the action. This game features patrons throwing baseballs at likenesses of Obama, who appears alongside representations of the Burger King, the Joker, Stewie from Family Guy and a member of the Boston Red Sox.

The man being filmed playing the game hurls profanity at Obama’s likeness before walking away with his prize—a funnel. Snooki would be proud.


Comments

Re: Carnival Games Let Populace Target Obama

I think it was a bit in poor taste but I don't see why it shouldn't be allowed. Of course I don't think anyone claimed the owner did anything illegal, he pulled it b/c of the controversy. I voted for Obama btw. Satire is satire and America is America where you are free to do anything short of harming another's person or property no matter how stupid.

Re: Carnival Games Let Populace Target Obama

The video shows a person throwing balls at plates the characters are holding. I don't see a problem with that either.

But the video is not showing the actual game that caused the uproar, just another game that featured Obama. The actual game from the article was a shooting gallery, where people shooting the president.

While it is certainly in bad taste, I don't think we can say it shouldn't be allowed as free speech, escpecially when we gamers are argueing that games aren't murder simulators.

Re: Carnival Games Let Populace Target Obama

Trying to think of which is more exciting, the game or the funnel the guy won.   Tough call. 

Re: Carnival Games Let Populace Target Obama

Do you get a copy of Catcher In The Rye, and Taxi Driver on Blu Ray as prizes?

Re: Carnival Games Let Populace Target Obama

 Why would it???   Inbred red-necks can't read!

Re: Carnival Games Let Populace Target Obama

Meh, Seaside has had those types of games every year I can remember- and I've lived there for nearly 30 years.  When George W was president, he was a staple of the attractions.  Saddam Hussein, Osama Bin Laden, Bill Clinton, OJ Simpson, and a plethora of others have been featured. 


Of course, this time it's racist because it's impossible to have any discussion, political satire, or ANYTHING revolving the president in a non-flattering light without it being racist.  Which is why I think a race war will break out if he isn't re-elected (and hence why he has my vote in 2012).

Re: Carnival Games Let Populace Target Obama

I don't see any mention about racism in either articles

Re: Carnival Games Let Populace Target Obama

There's also the fact that so many seem to want bad things to happen to Obama. Wasn't long ago people were beinging loaded assault weapons within range.

Re: Carnival Games Let Populace Target Obama

I think there was just as much animosity towards George W, who was even more hated than Obama.  Hell, Hollywood even made a movie about him being assassinated.

Re: Carnival Games Let Populace Target Obama

There was a strong dislike of Bush, sure.

 

But I don't recall people showing up with signs saying "We came unarmed THIS TIME", or Democratic politicians talking about how people might consider "2nd ammendment remedies" to the "problem" of George W. Bush.

Yes, there was the one movie, but it also presented the idea of assassinating Bush as a BAD ONE that would lead to pretty much everything people hated about his Presidency getting WORSE.

It was more a "Look, even if you hate the guy, killing him is a horrible idea" movie.

 

 

Re: Carnival Games Let Populace Target Obama

Yeah, because none of the people camped out AT HIS HOUSE ever did anything untoward, right?

And no, that movie outright advocated Bush's death.  You're an idiot if you took it otherwise.

---

With the first link, the chain is forged.

--- With the first link, the chain is forged.

Re: Carnival Games Let Populace Target Obama

I don't recall the folks camping at his house, I may have been distracted with other issues at the time.

Although I must ask if any of those camping out were toting assault rifles?

 

As to the movie, from what I've read the movie has Cheney as President passing an even MORE extreme version fo the Patriot Act after Bush died.

Considering the Patriot Act was pretty much the go to "This is why Bush is a horrible president" for most 'liberals' I'd say showing that the assassination of Bush could cause an even more extreme version of it to be passed would be considered a NEGATIVE to most who disliked Bush.

If the movie had some "Yeah, things get better" ending, I could buy it as advocating assassination, but it doesn't, the assassination makes things worse (from a left-wing perspective anyway).

If the concept is "Things get worse if this happens" it's not advocation of the "this"

It's like saying that god-awful "C.S.A: Confederate States of America" is somehow a PRO Confederate movie.

Re: Carnival Games Let Populace Target Obama

Which is why I am surprised this is getting much press.

Though I imagine one element is that there is so much rhetoric out there about actually killing obama that some people are a bit more uncomfortable with a 'shooting' game.   While Bush was lampooned, there was much less talk about violently taking him out, and Clinton while there was some it was not nearly as pronounced.

And looking at the picture, another problem might be that figuring out how to characture obama in a way that does not resemble the exagerations and general art styles that were part of racist movements over the last century or two.   It does bare some resemblence to the old artwork that was part of the 'black people are really monkeys, a lower form of human' meme from years back.

Re: Carnival Games Let Populace Target Obama

Actually, there was less talk about taking out GW. But that's because most Dems have fewer radical extremists at the moment.

Re: Carnival Games Let Populace Target Obama

You really think there were less people who wanted George W. Bush dead?

Are you just ignorant or completely stupid?

---

With the first link, the chain is forged.

--- With the first link, the chain is forged.
 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

Which group is more ethically challenged?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
E. Zachary KnightThe Daily WTF has a nice run down of some of the impact to software that the US Supreme Court ruling on gay marriage has. http://thedailywtf.com/articles/i-m-not-married-to-the-idea07/02/2015 - 7:45am
MechaCrashGee, how did people ever get the idea Gaters are morons who argue in bad faith? It's such a mystery.07/02/2015 - 7:03am
E. Zachary KnightGoth, again, no one is saying that we shouldn't be writig uncomfortable subject matter. What people are saying is that chances are you are going to write it poorly so it would be better to not have done it at all.07/02/2015 - 7:00am
Goth_Skunkdiscussed or portrayed in an expressive medium. Such an opinion only serves to stifle discussion. And as I said before, the only thing not worth talking about is what shouldn't be talked about.07/02/2015 - 6:50am
Goth_Skunk@Info: The same reason why I would entertain the notion that the Wired article writer could be right: Curiosity. Except in this case, I'm not curious at all. I'm not interested in hearing anyone's opinion on why uncomfortable subject matter shouldn't be07/02/2015 - 6:49am
IvresseI think the problem with the Batmobile is that they made it a core aspect of the game that you have to do continuously. If it was basically a couple of side games that were needed for secret stuff or a couple of times in the main game, it would be fine.07/02/2015 - 5:38am
Infophile@Goth: If you're not willing to entertain the idea you might be wrong, fine. That's your right. But why should anyone else entertain the idea that you might be right? If they go by the same logic, they already know you're wrong, so why listen to you?07/02/2015 - 3:53am
MattsworknameEh, I love the new batmobile personally, it's a blast to mess aroudn with. Plus, the game is set in a situation that mroe or less leaves batman with no choice but to go full force. And even then, it still shows him doing all he can to limit casualties.07/01/2015 - 11:38pm
Andrew EisenAgreed. Luckily, we don't seem to be in danger of that of late. No one's suggesting, for example, that tanks shouldn't be in video games, only that the tank in Arkham Knight is poorly implemented and out of place from a characterization standpoint.07/01/2015 - 11:27pm
MattsworknameConfederate flag, Relgious organizations, etc etc. Andrew isnt[ wrong, just remember not to let that mentality lead to censorship.07/01/2015 - 11:20pm
Mattsworknamefind offensive or disturbing, and that mindset leads to censorship. It's all well and good to say "This would be better IF", just so long as we remember not to let it slide into "This is offensive, REMOVE IT". IE , the current issues surroundign the07/01/2015 - 11:19pm
MattsworknameAndrew and goth both have points, and to that point, I'll say. Saying somethign is improved by changing something isn't a problem, on that I agree with , but at the same time, on of the issues we have in our society is that we want to simply remove things07/01/2015 - 11:18pm
Andrew EisenSee? Suggestions for improvements that involve taking things away do not mean the work is garbage or performing poorly, critically or commercially.07/01/2015 - 9:29pm
Andrew EisenSkyward Sword is spiff-a-rific but it would be an improved experience if the game didn't explain what each item and rupee was every single time you picked them up!07/01/2015 - 9:27pm
Andrew EisenHere's another: De Blob is a ton of fun but it would be improved without motion controls. Incidentally, THQ heard our cries, removed motion controls for the sequel and it was a better game for it!07/01/2015 - 9:24pm
Andrew EisenI'll give you an example: Arkham Knight is a ton of fun but the tank sucks and the game would be even better without it.07/01/2015 - 9:23pm
Goth_SkunkWell clearly we're diametrically opposed about that.07/01/2015 - 9:03pm
Andrew EisenNot even remotely true.07/01/2015 - 8:59pm
Goth_SkunkIt is, if the suggestion involves taking something away from a product in order to make it better.07/01/2015 - 8:49pm
Andrew EisenOffering suggestions for improvement does not mean that the work in question is garbage or not doing fine.07/01/2015 - 8:21pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician