Loopholes Abound in Google Verizon Plan

August 10, 2010

Those that support net neutrality are not too keen on Google and Verizon's internet proposals for congress, mainly because of the number of loopholes the companies put in place to protect various interests. Groups that have been the most vocal include MoveOn.org and Public Knowledge, who called the new proposals a package that "does almost nothing to preserve an open Internet."

While the press release the two companies released yesterday promises one course of action - stopping broadband providers from discriminating against or prioritizing "lawful Internet content" - it's the legislative language that scares many open internet rights groups. Here are a few choice excerpts from the legislative language Google and Verizon provided to lawmakers:

"..In providing broadband Internet access service, a provider would be prohibited from engaging in undue discrimination against any lawful Internet content, application, or service in a manner that causes meaningful harm to competition or to users."

But who decides what "lawful internet content" is? Here's the answer to that question:

"..Parties would be encouraged to use nongovernmental dispute resolution processes established by independent, widely-recognized Internet community governance initiatives," the proposal continues, "and the FCC would be directed to give appropriate deference to decisions or advisory opinions of such groups."

So companies like Google, Verizon or whoever else they decide needs a voice on the subject will decide? And the FCC will support them? That sounds like a great idea.. There's a more in-depth report on this whole thing over at Ars, but the most interesting loophole is that Google and Verizon want to keep net neutrality rules as far away from wireless as possbile. I leave you with the following statement from the proposal:

"Because of the unique technical and operational characteristics of wireless networks, and the competitive and still-developing nature of wireless broadband services, only the transparency principle would apply to wireless broadband at this time."

All bases covered.. if you are a broadband provider or a wireless carrier, but not so great for consumers.

Posted in

Comments

Re: Loopholes Abound in Google Verizon Plan

Watch as the republic slowly dies one nation under $ with no liberty and no justice except for $.

Re: Loopholes Abound in Google Verizon Plan

Companies that are trying to get rules passed that benefit themselves and not the consumers. That's a shocker. Probably the first time that that's ever happened.

Re: Loopholes Abound in Google Verizon Plan

Not quite what the NY Times originally reported, but not the innocent agreement that Verizon and Google proclaimed it to be.

Damn corporate whores.

Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
DorthLousActually, nop, I did miss the emoticon for some reason (getting used to pics?) and I didn't know you changed it since (since I posted previous to my shout and it was still there.) Anyhow, thanks for taking it out!05/23/2012 - 6:01pm
james_fudgeWell we were just testing it. but it is still on the submission to fight $pam.05/23/2012 - 5:48pm
E. Zachary KnightJames, No I don't have it. I was just wondering who does and why. More curiosity than anything.05/23/2012 - 5:38pm
james_fudgeDid you not see the emoticon and did you not see that it has already been changed back?05/23/2012 - 5:10pm
james_fudgeLOL05/23/2012 - 5:07pm
DorthLousWhy? Not shocked that people are barking to an additional hoop to jump through when posting from their already logged in account or just mentionning this to try to paint me as one always complaining?05/23/2012 - 4:45pm
james_fudgebig shock there ;)05/23/2012 - 4:30pm
DorthLousI'll add my voice to those wanting it gone :S I'm already logged in, I don't need a captch'a. That's for those registering.05/23/2012 - 3:54pm
james_fudgeEt tu EZK?!?05/23/2012 - 3:51pm
Craig R.I'm a One Man Quorum! And it's working for me now, thanks. :)05/23/2012 - 3:48pm
E. Zachary KnightHow do we determine who get's the game/captcha thingy? Is there a certain posting threshhold users have to meet before it is turned off?05/23/2012 - 2:25pm
james_fudgeGive it a chance, we're still adjusting it ;)05/23/2012 - 11:20am
james_fudgeOne does not a Quorum make Craig.05/23/2012 - 11:16am
Craig R.If I complete the stupid game, and it just deletes my comment, what's the point?05/23/2012 - 11:15am
Craig R.Ok, the little captcha game? You can get rid of it already.05/23/2012 - 11:13am
Craig R.FCC boss is giving the thumbs up to usage-based pricing for Internet access05/23/2012 - 11:08am
Andrew Eisenbeemoh - Yeah, Miyamoto was awarded the Spanish prize for Communication and Humanities.05/23/2012 - 10:36am
beemohUK READERS: Sky Arts to broadcast complete Video Games Live concert this Friday at 9PM. Repeat 7AM the day after.05/23/2012 - 10:09am
beemohMiyamoto seems to have been awardsed something- he was just trending worldwide on Twitter, and all the tweets were in what looked like Spanish.05/23/2012 - 7:07am
Michael ChandraThink so yes, since the judge didn't allow them to add ips at will. :P05/23/2012 - 6:23am

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician