Net Neutrality Groups Take Aim at Google HQ with Protests

August 13, 2010 -

Several consumer and political groups are taking aim at Google with plans to protest the number one search engine company's headquarters in Mountain View, California. The protests are in response to Google's and Verizon's recent proposals for "net neutrality," which many critics point out, is so riddled with loopholes for ISP and mobile phone companies that it is almost embarrassing.

Groups lining up to protest include MoveOn.org Civic Action, ColorofChange.org, Credo Action, the Progressive Change Campaign Committee and Free Press, among others. The groups say that this protest is to "urge the search-engine giant to live up to its corporate motto: 'Don't Be Evil,'" according to a statement distributed by Free Press. The rally will take place at 3:00 PM EST today in front of Google Headquarters, located at Amphitheatre Parkway and Charleston Road in Mountain View, California.

The proposal, which Google defended today, calls for net neutrality principles to be applied to broadband but not wireless services. It also offers some proposals that many see as loopholes for service providers that basically takes the regulatory power away from the FCC and allows interested parties to monitor traffic based on behavior deemed inappropriate..

But consumers and other agitated parties want Google to abandon this proposal, which they believe "threatens to destroy Network Neutrality - the fundamental principle that keeps the Internet open and free from discrimination."

Free Press and SavetheInternet.com, are also circulating an online petition that asks FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski to denounce the plan. Free Press said Thursday that more than 300,000 people have signed it. Meanwhile, The FCC has not made any public statements about the Google-Verizon proposal. Google was also criticized by Facebook for its proposal today. Pile on.

Source: Gearlog


Comments

Re: Net Neutrality Groups Take Aim at Google HQ with ...

So I can access my sites freely on my 3G phone but not my broadband wi fi laptop?

Re: Net Neutrality Groups Take Aim at Google HQ with ...

Google should just start their own wireless network then.

Re: Net Neutrality Groups Take Aim at Google HQ with ...

Google should have never made the deal with Verizon, and I hope they relise this soon. 

http://www.magicinkgaming.com/

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

Has a video game ever made you so mad you broke the controller?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
MechaTama31to be done, and some people really need jobs.07/11/2014 - 5:41pm
MechaTama31Info, I think you don't really understand just how crappy a lot of the jobs are that provide the "basics" that you assume will just continue to be produced under such a system. There's very little pride or prestige to be had from such jobs, but they need07/11/2014 - 5:40pm
Andrew EisenMaskedPixelante - That's probably because it's now available on the Wii U eShop for $8.07/11/2014 - 5:18pm
InfophileThat's not how human psychology works. It's all about "Keeping up with the Joneses." When everyone around you has a new fancy smartphone and is talking about that cool HBO series, do you want to be the one left out?07/11/2014 - 4:05pm
Matthew WilsonThe issue is most people would settle for the basics and not work. That is why we would need very heavy automation to make a system like that work. Almost all labor intensive tasks would have to be done by robot.07/11/2014 - 2:32pm
InfophileOf course, that's a gross oversimplification. The idea, have a basic safety net that pays for what's needed to live. If people can find a job and are willing to work, they get more money which can be spent on comfort and perks.07/11/2014 - 11:33am
InfophileIt's quite possible to get an economy to work with a basic minimum standard of living. You just need perks for the people who do work. Everyone gets food and a home. Everyone who works also gets an iPhone.07/11/2014 - 11:32am
MaskedPixelanteIn the continuing adventures of "Stuff I figured would be overpriced on eBay but isn't", 15 bucks for a copy of Mario and Luigi: Superstar Saga.07/11/2014 - 10:04am
SleakerI didn't gather the same conclusion.. Seems like they are focusing on devices & services still, just not calling it 'devices and services'07/11/2014 - 8:57am
PHX CorpMicrosoft CEO readies big shakeup, drops devices and services focus http://www.theverge.com/2014/7/10/5887143/satya-nadella-microsoft-ceo-employee-email07/11/2014 - 8:45am
MechaTama31declared that everybody should have them. Somebody still has to produce them.07/11/2014 - 7:44am
MechaTama31I do mean the developers/governmet. And money is not the only thing of value. I am including the food, housing, etc that everybody is supposed to get for free under this system. In the real world, those things don't exist merely because an authority has07/11/2014 - 7:43am
InfophileAs automation gets better and better, the number of jobs absolutely required keeps diminishing. How many people these days do you think are actually needed to keep everyone alive? Most people just make our lives more convenient and entertaining.07/11/2014 - 4:43am
Matthew Wilsonthat kind of system only works when most people (around 70 to 80 percent ) do not need to work.07/11/2014 - 1:21am
TechnogeekConjured up by who, though? If by the players, then it's not really "on a whim" since they're kind of putting work into it. If you mean the developers/government, then hello and welcome to monetary sovereignty.07/11/2014 - 12:34am
MechaTama31I'm just saying, when everything of value can be conjured up at a whim, that's not an economy. That's a fantasy.07/11/2014 - 12:15am
TechnogeekHonestly, though, what I find most thought-provoking about the article isn't the guaranteed minimum income aspect at all, but a more fundamental point: that we treat poverty as a moral failing on the individual, rather than a design flaw in the system.07/10/2014 - 11:53pm
TechnogeekOr, if your concern is that people won't even bother to work at all if their basic needs are met...well, let me put it this way: do you really want people like that in the workforce anyway?07/10/2014 - 11:51pm
TechnogeekAlso, you raise a valid question, but I'd argue that as things stand we're artificially limiting the amount of "gold/silver" that could be produced. The whole "work a job you hate to pay the bills" thing meshes poorly with the entreprenurial spirit.07/10/2014 - 11:49pm
TechnogeekSeriously, though, it looks at how in-game economies work and what lessons can be applied to reality, focusing primarily on multiple currency systems. Such systems do exist in real life (food stamps, for example), although generally aren't seen as such.07/10/2014 - 11:43pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician