Fun with ESRB Stats

September 16, 2010 -

Who doesn’t love stats?

The ESRB has compiled a slew of video game industry statistics into a swank infographic entitled, appropriately enough, Video Game Industry Statistics.

Here are a few fun facts guaranteed to impress your sweetheart:

-The average age of a gamer is 34

-Only 25 percent of gamers are under 18

-93 percent of the time, parents are present when games are purchased or rented

-86 percent of the time, children receive their parents’ permission to rent or buy a game

-64 percent of parents believe games are a positive part of their children’s lives

-48 percent of parents play video games with their children every week

-Parents report always or sometimes monitoring their children’s gameplay habits 97 percent of the time

 

Check out the rest of the numbery goodness here.

-Reporting from San Diego, GamePolitics Special Correspondent Andrew Eisen

Posted in

Comments

Re: Fun with ESRB Stats

You sir are a liar....

 

You said it would impress my sweetheart...

Re: Fun with ESRB Stats

These are really interesting, especially the 93% figure; I had been wondering about that apparent epidemic of kids buying game with no parents in sight.

Though, how can we defend a ESRB-made study on its own success any more than that poll made by Common Sense Media that said 72% of people were in favor of the California law?

Re: Fun with ESRB Stats

It's not an ESRB-made study.  It's just a collection of data.  The data comes from many sources including the ESA, FTC, and NPD.

 

Andrew Eisen

Re: Fun with ESRB Stats

Ah yes, I had missed the fine print. Thanks much.

Re: Fun with ESRB Stats

"-93 percent of the time, parents are present when games are purchased or rented"

"-86 percent of the time, children receive their parents’ permission to rent or buy a game"

How is this possible? How can parents be present, not give permission, and still have the game be purchased? WHY AREN'T THEY PARENTING!?

Re: Fun with ESRB Stats

Maybe what's meant is this:

-93 percent of the time, parents are present when games are purchased or rented

-in the 7% they're not, 86 percent of the time, children received their parents’ permission to rent or buy the games

Re: Fun with ESRB Stats

It most likely means something of the sort, or else this is puzzling me as well:

 

-Only 25 percent of gamers are under 18

-93 percent of the time, parents are present when games are purchased or rented

Re: Fun with ESRB Stats

I think you are making these results out to be more intertwined than they are.

What usually happens is a survey company will phone random households and ask a series of questions on a given topic and then compile the results to each individual question.

So every percentage you see above is the result of a single question asked.

E. Zachary Knight
Oklahoma City Chapter of the ECA
http://www.theeca.com/chapters_oklahoma

Re: Fun with ESRB Stats

I still don't know how the Hell "D" was rated Teen.

Re: Fun with ESRB Stats

theres a phrase my father uses a lot in situations like this.

"someones lieing through their teeth"

if this were so than why is there even a foothold for these new attempts at laws, such as the californian one that would not only ban, but punish the sale to a minor.

IIRC doesn't that law also include GIVING the game to the minor? tbh it sounds like a straight copy of the tobacco and alchohol laws regarding sales around and to minors.

Re: Fun with ESRB Stats

The foothold is unknown as it is fully a SCOTUS decision to hear the case, but these facts point to the redundency that the law would create. Leaving aside the the chilling effect of the law, the retailers do most of this law's requirements on their own already.

Plus, statistics are fun.

Re: Fun with ESRB Stats

You do realize many of those people have yet to realize that adults actually play games?

Re: Fun with ESRB Stats

yes, and yet they themselves will look at the evidence saying so and shrug it off.

as i said though, its odd that the stats show parents are actively involved (to which i still call BS, either that or there need to be more boundries set on language still in youngens) yet the politicians still push to do something by law thats done for free, and should be personal decision not forced.

then again the books are loaded with laws to protect us from ourselves vs from actual dangers.

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
ZippyDSMleeShout box sttasahhppppp!!05/22/2015 - 10:47am
Andrew EisenOh, here it is. I thought it was gone. Yeah, I'm experiencing the same issue. Sent a note to tech.05/22/2015 - 10:43am
E. Zachary KnightAnyone else have the shout box pushed down to the bottom of the site?05/22/2015 - 10:38am
MattsworknameAndrew and EZK help me pull back a bit , still working on it05/22/2015 - 7:06am
ConsterI think IP is the only person here who doesn't think IP needs to dial it back several levels.05/22/2015 - 6:14am
Mattsworknamehttp://www.foxnews.com/politics/2015/05/22/fec-backs-off-flirtation-with-regulating-internet/05/22/2015 - 1:34am
MattsworknameWell, on another subject, Saw this, and while I know it's fox news, thuoght I should share it05/22/2015 - 1:34am
MechaCrashYeah, even I think IP needs to dial it back.05/22/2015 - 12:35am
Mattsworknamesays05/21/2015 - 11:17pm
MattsworknameRE doc, everyone has a tendancy to let emotion get ahead of them, especially in an annoymous forum like the web. We have have those moments. Ip however has nothing but those moments. it's why I stopped responding to him, regardless of what he thinks or05/21/2015 - 11:17pm
DocMelonheadNo offense, but I see your behaviors in the comment sections uncalled for.05/21/2015 - 8:51pm
DocMelonheadHell, I could use both Goth_Skunk and IronPatriot as an example of such behavior between the two.05/21/2015 - 8:43pm
Andrew EisenMock? Ridicule? No, we're talking about serious threats and abuse, not people being cheeky or mean. Big difference.05/21/2015 - 8:42pm
DocMelonheadIn fact I see both mocks and ridicule between both the GamerGate Supporters and GamerGate Critics.05/21/2015 - 8:41pm
DocMelonheadAs for the Harassment, well, this is the internet; people will mock and ridicule whoever they want, whenever they want, at all times.05/21/2015 - 8:40pm
Mattsworknamegoth I think all media news outlets have that disclaimer05/21/2015 - 8:39pm
Andrew EisenThat's an... interesting way to interpret that.05/21/2015 - 8:36pm
Goth_SkunkAnd re BBC vs Rockstar: Ahh. I missed that. Woops!05/21/2015 - 8:33pm
Goth_SkunkAE: The entire disclaimer is a valid reason why I don't take it seriously. Particularly the part where they say "the information contained herein may not be necessarily accurate or current." Because fact-checking, like math, is haaaaaaaaard!05/21/2015 - 8:32pm
MattsworknameI take all media reporting with huge skepticism. the Mary sue Included. that said, there not as bad Jezebel.05/21/2015 - 8:27pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician