GOG.com's Awkward Apology

September 22, 2010 -

Good Old Games sure pulled a fast one on journalists and all of its members. While the publicity stunt - that they were shutting gog.com down because it couldn’t go on the way it was - was clever and generated a lot buzz, I wonder if there will be some ill feelings from subscribers who were saddened and scared at the prospect of losing all their games.. You can watch the awkward video the site's owners posted today.

The silver lining - if there is one here - is that when the site re-launches on Thursday it will be vastly improved, and Baldur's Gate will soon be available for sale DRM-free. That's something.


Comments

Re: GOG.com's Awkward Apology

I wish them the best. GoG is a great service. I still hope it is acquired by Amazon but otherwise it rocks!

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

"The most difficult pain a man can suffer is to have knowledge of much and power over little" - Herodotus

--------------------------------------------------------------------------- "The most difficult pain a man can suffer is to have knowledge of much and power over little" - Herodotus

you hope it is aquired by

you hope it is aquired by amazon? commercialized, hiked pricing, over populated, and eventually losing licenses faster than it'll gain'em?

 

tbh only used amazon once, and its so over commercialized i can't find anything i actually want from them, not to mention it took 6 months just to get my stuff shipped, forbid they even tell me theres a holdup without a chain of phone calls and e-mails.

tbh i'm more afraid they'd make it subscription based and allow DRM.

 

tis my experience anyways :)

Re: GOG.com's Awkward Apology

This marketing stunt was inexcusably stupid. I'm only willing to overlook it this time because the service has been excellent, and they realized that, yes, what they did was colossaly ill-advised. Yes, you can joke with your fans and have fun with them, but faking your own death is not a joke. It's just a gigantic dick move.

Re: GOG.com's Awkward Apology

There new website design is better be worth it with the stunt they pulled.

http://www.magicinkgaming.com/

Re: GOG.com's Awkward Apology

looks the same to me tbh..

Re: GOG.com's Awkward Apology

wasn't the old GoG openly referred to as "beta" anyways?

on one hand i was irked at the risk i'd lose my stuff, on the other things didn't add up to the story being right because of the beta bit and sales/newsletter info that was posted barely a day before the supposed death of the site.

Re: GOG.com's Awkward Apology

Eh, I admit I fell for it, but I have no ill will toward them.

Re: GOG.com's Awkward Apology

You know, might not have been the best way to handle this, but to be honest, Thats fine, Im not sore about it cause GOG gave me the change to get my hands on some classics that I still loved.

Any group that gave me the change to get Freespace 2 again, has my support.

Now if they could get Mechwarrior 2 and One must Fall 2097, I'd be a fan for life!

 

"My name is Lenerd Church, and you will fear my LASER FACE"

"My name is Lenerd Church, and you will fear my LASER FACE"

Re: GOG.com's Awkward Apology

Well, they would have needed to take the site down for massive maintenance anyway, so they may as well be theatrical about it. Now, this was the STUPIDEST way be theatrical, and it's making people face the fact that digital distribution has a lifespan, but I can't blame them for trying.

---You are likely to be eaten by a Grue.

---You are likely to be eaten by a Grue.

Re: GOG.com's Awkward Apology

I'm confused by this whole thing because I went to gog.com yesterday, when the update was there and I would have sworn (and I wish someone had a screenshot of the page, with updates, from yesterday as proof) that they DID say that, at some point, gog.com WOULD be coming back, different, but coming back.  I know they said a longer explaination would be coming on Wednesday, and that by Thursday you would have access to your games.  But I'm sure the message also said that gog.com would change and come back different, though they didn't say when.

Anyone have the screenshot with the last update from yesterday?

Nightwng2000

NW2K Software

http://www.facebook.com/nightwing2000

Nightwng2000 is now admin to the group "Parents For Education, Not Legislation" on MySpace as http://groups.myspace.com/pfenl

Nightwng2000 NW2K Software http://www.facebook.com/nightwing2000 Nightwng2000 is now admin to the group "Parents For Education, Not Legislation" on MySpace as http://groups.myspace.com/pfenl

Re: GOG.com's Awkward Apology

Re: GOG.com's Awkward Apology

Yeah, the first message, the first paragraph:

"We have recently had to give serious thought to whether we could really keep GOG.com the way it is. We've debated on it for quite some time and, unfortunately, we've decided that GOG.com simply cannot remain in its current form. "

"... keep GOG.com the way it is."  "... cannot remain in its current form."

To me, that wasn't saying they were closing and not returning but rather a change was coming.

Nightwng2000

NW2K Software

http://www.facebook.com/nightwing2000

Nightwng2000 is now admin to the group "Parents For Education, Not Legislation" on MySpace as http://groups.myspace.com/pfenl

Nightwng2000 NW2K Software http://www.facebook.com/nightwing2000 Nightwng2000 is now admin to the group "Parents For Education, Not Legislation" on MySpace as http://groups.myspace.com/pfenl

Re: GOG.com's Awkward Apology

To me it suggested a large change (not a minor one as happened) .The whole episode has put me off using GOGs removing services promised (the redownloading of games) as a marketing stunt just rubs me the wrong way. It does not matter how short the time was, or how big the hints were they still took away services to save a few pounds on marketing.

That is not to say I will never use them, but they would not be my first choice.

--
A house is not a home unless it contains food and fire for the mind as well as the body. Benjamin Franklin

--
A house is not a home unless it contains food and fire for the mind as well as the body. Benjamin Franklin

Re: GOG.com's Awkward Apology

To me, the video comes off as less of an apology and more of an admonition to users who didn't realize it was a joke.  After all, there were "plenty of hints."

Classy, guys.

 

Andrew Eisen

Re: GOG.com's Awkward Apology

Yeah, kinda dumb.  But not entirely unexpected, as I saw people in the comments section here say they thought it was a hoax.

Still -- kinda dumb.

Re: GOG.com's Awkward Apology

Yeah there were plenty of hints, like the gog.com newsletters showing up in my inbox announcing new games available on their service during this whole stunt.

Re: GOG.com's Awkward Apology

I didn't get one so I have to assume I'm not alone on that front.  But it doesn't matter, whatever you think of this stunt in the first place, making fun of those that obviously have a lot of love for the service and care deeply about it continuing is not, by my estimation, a very wise choice.  It just doesn't strike me as good business sense to patronize those that patronize you.

 

Andrew Eisen

Re: GOG.com's Awkward Apology

Oh I didn't intend for my statement to be a shot at others at all and I apologize if it came across that way.  I thought you meant you had gotten "plenty of hints" :P I remember seeing the message on gog.com on sunday then a newsletter popped into my inbox on monday advertising some games on sale.

Re: GOG.com's Awkward Apology

...
I can forgive them. Fact is, I'm not sore about this at all. :D

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
Matthew Wilsonyes it help a sub section of the poor, but hurt both the middle and upper class. in the end way more people were hurt than helped. also, it hurt most poor people as well.04/16/2014 - 12:13am
SeanBJust goes to show what I have said for years. Your ability to have sex does not qualify you for parenthood.04/15/2014 - 9:21pm
NeenekoSo "worked" vs "failed" really comes down to who you think is more important and deserving04/15/2014 - 7:04pm
NeenekoThough I am also not sure we can say NYC failed. Rent control helped the people it was intended for and is considered a failure by the people it was designed to protect them from.04/15/2014 - 7:04pm
NeenekoIf they change the rules, demand will plummet. Though yeah, rent control probably would not help much in the SF case. I doubt anything will.04/15/2014 - 1:35pm
TheSmokeyOnline gamer accused of murdering son to keep playing - http://cnews.canoe.ca/CNEWS/Crime/2014/04/15/21604921.html04/15/2014 - 11:50am
Matthew Wilsonyup, but curent city rules do not allow for that.04/15/2014 - 11:00am
ZippyDSMleeIf SF dose not start building upwards then they will price people out of the aera.04/15/2014 - 10:59am
Matthew Wilsonthe issue rent control has it reduces supply, and in SF case they already has a supply problem. rent control ofen puts rent below cost, or below profit of selling it. rent control would not fix this issue.04/15/2014 - 10:56am
NeenekoRent control is useful in moderation, NYC took it way to far and tends to be held up as an example of them not working, but in most cases they are more subtle and positive.04/15/2014 - 10:24am
PHX CorpBeating Cancer with Video Games http://mashable.com/2014/04/14/steven-gonzalez-survivor-games/04/15/2014 - 9:21am
Matthew Wilsonwhat are you saying SF should do rent control, that has never worked every time it has been tried. the issue here is a self inflicted supply problem imposed by stupid laws.04/15/2014 - 8:52am
E. Zachary KnightNeeneko, Government created price controls don't work though. They may keep prices down for the current inhabitants, but they are the primary cause of recently vacated residences having astronomical costs. Look at New York City as a prime example.04/15/2014 - 8:50am
NeenekoI think free markets are important, but believe in balance. Too much of any force and things get unstable.04/15/2014 - 7:25am
NeenekoWell, the traditional way of keeping prices down is what they are doing, controls on lease termination and tax code, but it will not be enough in this case.04/15/2014 - 7:24am
Matthew WilsonI said that already04/14/2014 - 4:22pm
E. Zachary KnightMatthew, The could also lower prices by increasing supply. Allow high rise apartment buildings to be built to fulfill demand and prices will drop.04/14/2014 - 3:48pm
Matthew Wilsonthe only way they could keep the price's down, would be to kick out google, apple, amazon, and other tech companies, but that would do a ton of economic damage to SF, but I am a major proponent of free markets04/14/2014 - 2:54pm
NeenekoThe community people are seeking gets destroyed in the process, and the new people are not able to build on themselves. Generally these situations result in local cultural death in a decade or so, and no one wins.04/14/2014 - 2:09pm
NeenekoWell yes, that is the 'free market', but the market is only a small piece of a much larger system. The market does not always do the constructive thing.04/14/2014 - 2:06pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician