GOG.com's Awkward Apology

September 22, 2010 -

Good Old Games sure pulled a fast one on journalists and all of its members. While the publicity stunt - that they were shutting gog.com down because it couldn’t go on the way it was - was clever and generated a lot buzz, I wonder if there will be some ill feelings from subscribers who were saddened and scared at the prospect of losing all their games.. You can watch the awkward video the site's owners posted today.

The silver lining - if there is one here - is that when the site re-launches on Thursday it will be vastly improved, and Baldur's Gate will soon be available for sale DRM-free. That's something.


Comments

Re: GOG.com's Awkward Apology

I wish them the best. GoG is a great service. I still hope it is acquired by Amazon but otherwise it rocks!

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

"The most difficult pain a man can suffer is to have knowledge of much and power over little" - Herodotus

--------------------------------------------------------------------------- "The most difficult pain a man can suffer is to have knowledge of much and power over little" - Herodotus

you hope it is aquired by

you hope it is aquired by amazon? commercialized, hiked pricing, over populated, and eventually losing licenses faster than it'll gain'em?

 

tbh only used amazon once, and its so over commercialized i can't find anything i actually want from them, not to mention it took 6 months just to get my stuff shipped, forbid they even tell me theres a holdup without a chain of phone calls and e-mails.

tbh i'm more afraid they'd make it subscription based and allow DRM.

 

tis my experience anyways :)

Re: GOG.com's Awkward Apology

This marketing stunt was inexcusably stupid. I'm only willing to overlook it this time because the service has been excellent, and they realized that, yes, what they did was colossaly ill-advised. Yes, you can joke with your fans and have fun with them, but faking your own death is not a joke. It's just a gigantic dick move.

Re: GOG.com's Awkward Apology

There new website design is better be worth it with the stunt they pulled.

http://www.magicinkgaming.com/

Re: GOG.com's Awkward Apology

looks the same to me tbh..

Re: GOG.com's Awkward Apology

wasn't the old GoG openly referred to as "beta" anyways?

on one hand i was irked at the risk i'd lose my stuff, on the other things didn't add up to the story being right because of the beta bit and sales/newsletter info that was posted barely a day before the supposed death of the site.

Re: GOG.com's Awkward Apology

Eh, I admit I fell for it, but I have no ill will toward them.

Re: GOG.com's Awkward Apology

You know, might not have been the best way to handle this, but to be honest, Thats fine, Im not sore about it cause GOG gave me the change to get my hands on some classics that I still loved.

Any group that gave me the change to get Freespace 2 again, has my support.

Now if they could get Mechwarrior 2 and One must Fall 2097, I'd be a fan for life!

 

"My name is Lenerd Church, and you will fear my LASER FACE"

"I AM THE HYPE"

Re: GOG.com's Awkward Apology

Well, they would have needed to take the site down for massive maintenance anyway, so they may as well be theatrical about it. Now, this was the STUPIDEST way be theatrical, and it's making people face the fact that digital distribution has a lifespan, but I can't blame them for trying.

---You are likely to be eaten by a Grue.

---You are likely to be eaten by a Grue.

Re: GOG.com's Awkward Apology

I'm confused by this whole thing because I went to gog.com yesterday, when the update was there and I would have sworn (and I wish someone had a screenshot of the page, with updates, from yesterday as proof) that they DID say that, at some point, gog.com WOULD be coming back, different, but coming back.  I know they said a longer explaination would be coming on Wednesday, and that by Thursday you would have access to your games.  But I'm sure the message also said that gog.com would change and come back different, though they didn't say when.

Anyone have the screenshot with the last update from yesterday?

Nightwng2000

NW2K Software

http://www.facebook.com/nightwing2000

Nightwng2000 is now admin to the group "Parents For Education, Not Legislation" on MySpace as http://groups.myspace.com/pfenl

Nightwng2000 NW2K Software http://www.facebook.com/nightwing2000 Nightwng2000 is now admin to the group "Parents For Education, Not Legislation" on MySpace as http://groups.myspace.com/pfenl

Re: GOG.com's Awkward Apology

Re: GOG.com's Awkward Apology

Yeah, the first message, the first paragraph:

"We have recently had to give serious thought to whether we could really keep GOG.com the way it is. We've debated on it for quite some time and, unfortunately, we've decided that GOG.com simply cannot remain in its current form. "

"... keep GOG.com the way it is."  "... cannot remain in its current form."

To me, that wasn't saying they were closing and not returning but rather a change was coming.

Nightwng2000

NW2K Software

http://www.facebook.com/nightwing2000

Nightwng2000 is now admin to the group "Parents For Education, Not Legislation" on MySpace as http://groups.myspace.com/pfenl

Nightwng2000 NW2K Software http://www.facebook.com/nightwing2000 Nightwng2000 is now admin to the group "Parents For Education, Not Legislation" on MySpace as http://groups.myspace.com/pfenl

Re: GOG.com's Awkward Apology

To me it suggested a large change (not a minor one as happened) .The whole episode has put me off using GOGs removing services promised (the redownloading of games) as a marketing stunt just rubs me the wrong way. It does not matter how short the time was, or how big the hints were they still took away services to save a few pounds on marketing.

That is not to say I will never use them, but they would not be my first choice.

--
A house is not a home unless it contains food and fire for the mind as well as the body. Benjamin Franklin

--
A house is not a home unless it contains food and fire for the mind as well as the body. Benjamin Franklin

Re: GOG.com's Awkward Apology

To me, the video comes off as less of an apology and more of an admonition to users who didn't realize it was a joke.  After all, there were "plenty of hints."

Classy, guys.

 

Andrew Eisen

Re: GOG.com's Awkward Apology

Yeah, kinda dumb.  But not entirely unexpected, as I saw people in the comments section here say they thought it was a hoax.

Still -- kinda dumb.

Re: GOG.com's Awkward Apology

Yeah there were plenty of hints, like the gog.com newsletters showing up in my inbox announcing new games available on their service during this whole stunt.

Re: GOG.com's Awkward Apology

I didn't get one so I have to assume I'm not alone on that front.  But it doesn't matter, whatever you think of this stunt in the first place, making fun of those that obviously have a lot of love for the service and care deeply about it continuing is not, by my estimation, a very wise choice.  It just doesn't strike me as good business sense to patronize those that patronize you.

 

Andrew Eisen

Re: GOG.com's Awkward Apology

Oh I didn't intend for my statement to be a shot at others at all and I apologize if it came across that way.  I thought you meant you had gotten "plenty of hints" :P I remember seeing the message on gog.com on sunday then a newsletter popped into my inbox on monday advertising some games on sale.

Re: GOG.com's Awkward Apology

...
I can forgive them. Fact is, I'm not sore about this at all. :D

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

Which group is more ethically challenged?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
E. Zachary KnightThe Daily WTF has a nice run down of some of the impact to software that the US Supreme Court ruling on gay marriage has. http://thedailywtf.com/articles/i-m-not-married-to-the-idea07/02/2015 - 7:45am
MechaCrashGee, how did people ever get the idea Gaters are morons who argue in bad faith? It's such a mystery.07/02/2015 - 7:03am
E. Zachary KnightGoth, again, no one is saying that we shouldn't be writig uncomfortable subject matter. What people are saying is that chances are you are going to write it poorly so it would be better to not have done it at all.07/02/2015 - 7:00am
Goth_Skunkdiscussed or portrayed in an expressive medium. Such an opinion only serves to stifle discussion. And as I said before, the only thing not worth talking about is what shouldn't be talked about.07/02/2015 - 6:50am
Goth_Skunk@Info: The same reason why I would entertain the notion that the Wired article writer could be right: Curiosity. Except in this case, I'm not curious at all. I'm not interested in hearing anyone's opinion on why uncomfortable subject matter shouldn't be07/02/2015 - 6:49am
IvresseI think the problem with the Batmobile is that they made it a core aspect of the game that you have to do continuously. If it was basically a couple of side games that were needed for secret stuff or a couple of times in the main game, it would be fine.07/02/2015 - 5:38am
Infophile@Goth: If you're not willing to entertain the idea you might be wrong, fine. That's your right. But why should anyone else entertain the idea that you might be right? If they go by the same logic, they already know you're wrong, so why listen to you?07/02/2015 - 3:53am
MattsworknameEh, I love the new batmobile personally, it's a blast to mess aroudn with. Plus, the game is set in a situation that mroe or less leaves batman with no choice but to go full force. And even then, it still shows him doing all he can to limit casualties.07/01/2015 - 11:38pm
Andrew EisenAgreed. Luckily, we don't seem to be in danger of that of late. No one's suggesting, for example, that tanks shouldn't be in video games, only that the tank in Arkham Knight is poorly implemented and out of place from a characterization standpoint.07/01/2015 - 11:27pm
MattsworknameConfederate flag, Relgious organizations, etc etc. Andrew isnt[ wrong, just remember not to let that mentality lead to censorship.07/01/2015 - 11:20pm
Mattsworknamefind offensive or disturbing, and that mindset leads to censorship. It's all well and good to say "This would be better IF", just so long as we remember not to let it slide into "This is offensive, REMOVE IT". IE , the current issues surroundign the07/01/2015 - 11:19pm
MattsworknameAndrew and goth both have points, and to that point, I'll say. Saying somethign is improved by changing something isn't a problem, on that I agree with , but at the same time, on of the issues we have in our society is that we want to simply remove things07/01/2015 - 11:18pm
Andrew EisenSee? Suggestions for improvements that involve taking things away do not mean the work is garbage or performing poorly, critically or commercially.07/01/2015 - 9:29pm
Andrew EisenSkyward Sword is spiff-a-rific but it would be an improved experience if the game didn't explain what each item and rupee was every single time you picked them up!07/01/2015 - 9:27pm
Andrew EisenHere's another: De Blob is a ton of fun but it would be improved without motion controls. Incidentally, THQ heard our cries, removed motion controls for the sequel and it was a better game for it!07/01/2015 - 9:24pm
Andrew EisenI'll give you an example: Arkham Knight is a ton of fun but the tank sucks and the game would be even better without it.07/01/2015 - 9:23pm
Goth_SkunkWell clearly we're diametrically opposed about that.07/01/2015 - 9:03pm
Andrew EisenNot even remotely true.07/01/2015 - 8:59pm
Goth_SkunkIt is, if the suggestion involves taking something away from a product in order to make it better.07/01/2015 - 8:49pm
Andrew EisenOffering suggestions for improvement does not mean that the work in question is garbage or not doing fine.07/01/2015 - 8:21pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician