U.S. ISP Disconnects User after Three-Strikes

September 27, 2010 -

While it sounds like something that might emerge from France’s Hadopi law, a suspected copyright infringer had his account suspended for six months by his Internet service provider in the United States.

According to TorrentFreak, a customer of the ISP Suddenlink had his account deactivated after a trio of Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) notices of copyright violations. In a chat log posted on the site the affected customer is arguing with a Suddenlink representative, who implied that the DMCA forces such a disconnection, though that comment was quickly amended to, “It may be the DMCA policy or it may be the way we go about following the DMCA guidelines.”

As TorrentFreak notes, “The DMCA does not and never has required ISPs to disconnect users.” A phrase used in Suddenlink’s Terms of Service agreement does not mention a three-strike policy per se, but alludes to what might happen if copyright laws were broached:

If you continue to transfer Copyrighted Material illegally, you are violating Suddenlink’s policies and Suddenlink may take further action, including limiting your Internet download capacity, suspending or terminating your account, or a range of other measures.

Suddenlink claimed that they were “within their rights” to take such measures, which TorrentFreak labeled “an extreme measure.”


Comments

Re: U.S. ISP Disconnects User after Three-Strikes

I find it funny an ISP is turning away a paying customer.... here's a thought have a policy as so anyone who uses to much of the service move up a plan because they use to much bandwidth or something....


I have a dream, break the chains of copy right oppression! http://zippydsmlee.wordpress.com/2010/05/21/cigital-disobedience/


Copyright infringement is nothing more than civil disobedience to a bad set of laws. Let's renegotiate them.

---

http://zippydsm.deviantart.com/

Re: U.S. ISP Disconnects User after Three-Strikes

 Right because the person using high amounts of bandwith is always going to be an illegal downloader.  Unless there is a clause in the agreement that sets a cap on bandwith then there is no reason the ISP can go against one heavy user over another.  In this case, the heavy user could also be a netflix streaming movie addict who streams 5-10 movies a week or someone who enjoys buying video games over digital download services such as Steam or downloading demos on PS3 to try out every game available.  It is simply not practical to distinguish between infringing activity and non-infringing activity because to do so you would have to monitor individual use.  

Re: U.S. ISP Disconnects User after Three-Strikes

First of all, an infringment notice means nothing legally. It is simply a document stating that a content owner believes a given user has infringed upon the content owner's intellectual property. It has to be proven in a court before you can say that the user actually infringed. There is no infringment without conviction. That is the first thing wrong with what Suddenlink did.

Second issue is that Suddenlink is opening themselves up to legal attack, by directly intervening they may be implicitly giving up their safe harbor provision protections. Once they start policing their user's copyright infringment the content owners can sue THEM for not doing a better job or for allowing it to happen.

Third, Suddenlink should be protecting the people who pay them, i.e. that customer who shells out money every month to recieve internet service. Why should they lose business over a DMCA notice? They are shooting themselves in the foot here, not only losing business, not only engendering customer ill will, but all to service a content owner who provides them with nothing but the cost of forwarding a DMCA notice. To add insult to injury a DMCA notice does NOT mean that actual infringement has taken place.

It saddens me when I read these types of articles. I don't know why some businesses feel obligated to act against their own best interests in cases like this. Are you a Suddenlink customer? Then I would start looking for a new ISP.

Re: U.S. ISP Disconnects User after Three-Strikes

I think this is a case of both sides being in the wrong. The customer should have been illegally downloading copyrighted materials, but the isp did not gad the right to disconnect the user like that (with regards to what the DMCA states).

http://www.magicinkgaming.com/

Re: U.S. ISP Disconnects User after Three-Strikes

Again, you're assuming, without any evidence to back it up, that the copyright holders' allegations are correct and the user actually WAS illegally downloading copyrighted materials.

Where's the proof?  Innocent until proven guilty.

Re: U.S. ISP Disconnects User after Three-Strikes

Well what I read in the original artical on torrent freak the person in question wasn't making any counter clams to the DMCA notices.

http://www.magicinkgaming.com/

Re: U.S. ISP Disconnects User after Three-Strikes

Makes no difference. Burden of proof lies with the accuser.

Why would you continue to download after receiving notices?

I do not support the position of the ISP that it is somehow OK to shut off a user after sending a specified number of DMCA notices.  However, I think any prudent downloader would seriously get shaken up by receiving one notice, let alone two.  While the DMCA may not require the ISP to cut off a user, at a certain point the user should use the notices as confirmation that he is no longer an anonymous user in the sea of downloaders.  Instead, you are now a watched user who some large company knows is engaging in illegal downloading.  

When you continue to download after receiving such notices, it sends the message that you don't care about the consequences.  I have known people who terminated downloading completely after receiving one notice directly from the copyright holder of material they like to post online.  Once you receive that notice, you may as well terminate all copyright infringement or at the very least switch ISPs.   

Re: Why would you continue to download after receiving ...

You're operating under the assumption that the user actually WAS engaging in copyright infringement.  Maybe he was, but there have been plenty of examples of DMCA takedown notices and RIAA lawsuits against people who were innocent.

On the other hand, you've indirectly pointed out how this is going to escalate: as ISP's start disconnecting pirates, pirates will start using encryption and proxies.

Re: Why would you continue to download after receiving ...

So basically if your download activity is a little high or you, gasp, when to a torrent site, they label you as guilty and try to have yoru srvice shut off, or make you pay more than you make in a year.

Re: Why would you continue to download after receiving ...

Pretty much, yeah.  Until somebody actually takes it to court instead of settling.

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

Which Feminist Frequency video are you looking forward to most?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
WonderkarpI found this neat. Shows the different ways different websites tell the same story. Not VG Related, but its neat https://i.imgur.com/3m6xOfE.jpg01/29/2015 - 2:12pm
Matthew Wilsonnp I am still suprised that the fcc did it, but I still do not trust the chairman yet.01/29/2015 - 2:11pm
Andrew EisenYeah, what I mean is I'm fortunate enough to live in an area where I have the option of up to 50Mbps if I want to pay for it. Meant that as an anecdote; didn't mean it to come across as a "you're wrong!" Sorry 'bout that!01/29/2015 - 2:06pm
Matthew WilsonThat is why I said "every market". for example totalbescuit has TWC, and the best he can get atm is 10/10.01/29/2015 - 1:58pm
Andrew EisenTWC offers speeds that high, at least in my area. (Standard is 15Mpbs)01/29/2015 - 1:54pm
Matthew Wilson@prh I still have my doubts. if anything the big winner is Comcast. they are the only isp in the us that can provide that speed in every market they serve. att, verizon, and twc cant or at least dont.01/29/2015 - 1:50pm
Andrew EisenTrailer for Ted 2 and it looks like it won't simply be a rehash of the first. That's encouraging! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S3AVcCggRnU01/29/2015 - 1:49pm
prh99It's nice to see an FCC chair who isn't just there to facilitate monopoly building for cable and telecom. Basically not a dingo.01/29/2015 - 1:46pm
Wonderkarpmine was grandia 201/29/2015 - 1:39pm
Matthew Wilsonoh btw only about 5.6 percent of the us has broadband now.01/29/2015 - 1:21pm
Matthew Wilsonhttp://www.theverge.com/2015/1/29/7932653/fcc-changed-definition-broadband-25mbps did not think the fcc would go through with it.01/29/2015 - 1:16pm
Andrew EisenI know, right? Don't you dare think the fact that I buy all your games makes this sort of behavior okay, TT Games!01/29/2015 - 12:57pm
IanCHow dare thy release games that do well both commercially and critically. How dare they. (refer to the Lego games)01/29/2015 - 12:55pm
Infophile@Wonderkarp: Tales of Innocence. Was in the final dungeon, when I accidentally left my 3DS on an airplane and couldn't get it back. Lost both the game and the system. Got a new system, but not the game (not fun enough to be worth replaying)01/29/2015 - 12:10pm
Andrew EisenOh, thank goodness. There will be at least two console LEGO games this year. For a moment I was worried there! (LEGO Jurassic World, LEGO Marvel's Avengers plus LEGO Ninjago for handheld.)01/29/2015 - 12:08pm
prh99Cminer: It's the only way to monetize Nintendo game videos. Otherwise Nintendo content IDs them and take all the AD revenue. Also it's only covers a small portion of their catalog.01/29/2015 - 12:06pm
ematuskeyWonderkarp: Pretty much every Elder Scrolls game. :p01/29/2015 - 11:53am
CMinerMaybe I missed something; is Nintendo actually going to try and force people to join their program? Or did they just create a program, and people are speculating?01/29/2015 - 10:53am
prh99I wonder if I can craft an AdBlock filter that only blocks ads on Nintendo videos. (not serious)01/29/2015 - 10:46am
WonderkarpI'm still going to do nintendo videos when I start my lets plays. I'm just going to make sure I'm uploading nonnintendo videos more.01/29/2015 - 10:40am
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician