Democrats Give Up on Net Neutrality Bill

September 30, 2010 -

Net Neutrality is stalled until further notice in the House of Representatives. A bill sponsored by House Commerce Committee Chairman Henry Waxman (D-Ca.) was shelved late last night after Democrats realized that the bill would not have enough bipartisan support to pass. With this bill now off the table, and not likely to be brought up in the lame duck session following mid-term elections, the onus to implement net neutrality rules falls back on the FCC.

But time may not be on the side of proponents of net neutrality - especially if power shifts back to Republicans in the House and Senate. It is possible that Republicans would propose a bill that implicitly forbids the FCC from reclassifying broadband service providers under Title II of the Telecommunications Act.

Oddly enough, Waxman put the responsibility back on the FCC - even after Congress told them to back off a few months ago.

"If Congress can't act, the FCC must," Waxman said in a statement. He added that "this development is a loss for consumers."

Of course, sink or swim, Waxman should have brought the bill up for a discussion and a vote on the floor, but many pols just want to get the hell out of Washington and back on the campaign trail.

Interest group Public Knowledge issued the following statement, which sums up the feelings of ardent net neutrality supporters across the country:

"The FCC must act now to protect consumers by reinstating its authority over broadband," Gigi Sohn, president of the public interest group Public Knowledge said. "We expect the FCC to do so to carry out one of the fundamental promises of the Obama administration."

Source: Associated Press


Comments

Re: Democrats Give Up on Net Neutrality Bill

Congress and the FCC are way too busy working on the Commercial Advertisement Loudness Mitigation Act (which passed the Senate yesterday and will require broadcasters to turn down those annoyingly loud commercials) to spend time working on something as trivial as net neutrality. They do have to prioritize their work.

Re: Democrats Give Up on Net Neutrality Bill

In fairness, that sounds like a pretty effing great bill.

Re: Democrats Give Up on Net Neutrality Bill

Agreed, pisses me the hell off when I turn my TV up to hear a movie, only to get raped in the ear by how loud the commercials are.

Re: Democrats Give Up on Net Neutrality Bill

Hear hear! I would seriously love to meet the sound engineers and their bosses that do this crap and teach them how to use their equalization equipment properly with a clue-by-four present.

Re: Democrats Give Up on Net Neutrality Bill

They know exactly how to use the equipment they have.  They use it to get the loudest apparent volume they can without breaking the laws already in place.  And they use it very effectively towards that end.

===============

Chris Kimberley

===============

Chris Kimberley

Re: Democrats Give Up on Net Neutrality Bill

Not to quibble, but an equalizer adjusts frequencies. Compressor/limiters adjust relative volume.

Re: Democrats Give Up on Net Neutrality Bill

Of course they do as they can wait and sneak in something more industry friendly later....


I have a dream, break the chains of copy right oppression! http://zippydsmlee.wordpress.com/2010/05/21/cigital-disobedience/


Copyright infringement is nothing more than civil disobedience to a bad set of laws. Let's renegotiate them.

---

http://zippydsm.deviantart.com/

Re: Democrats Give Up on Net Neutrality Bill

Even if it made it ot the floor abusing the filibuster has bee na favorite tactic lately.

I'd love for it to go away with how much it's been abused lately.

Re: Democrats Give Up on Net Neutrality Bill

Remember back in '05 when the Republicans wanted to declare the filibuster unconstitutional?  I commented at the time that the Democrats should let them, because it would be in their best interest in the long term -- the filibuster is, after all, inherently conservative, as it allows a minority to preserve the status quo.

Of course, politicians aren't really known for thinking past the next election.

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

Which Feminist Frequency video are you looking forward to most?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
Matthew WilsonI hope some company buys sega's ips. creative assembly, and Atlas. the rest of sega can bugger off.01/31/2015 - 4:03pm
WonderkarpTropes VS Women Refund : An Open Letter to Feminist Frequency https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UoucuL1jazI Guy trying to get refund from the kickstarter01/31/2015 - 3:50pm
Goth_SkunkPrototype was all right. I had way more fun running around in the open world, scaling buildings, gliding in the air, and pulling off insane helicopter-capturing maneuvers than I did with the actual story, though. Eventually the novelty wore off.01/31/2015 - 3:31pm
Andrew EisenI don't know about Joystiq, we may mention it but I don't know that there's that much to really discuss but yeah, Nintendo's YouTube Creator's Program is on the agenda.01/31/2015 - 2:45pm
MonteMatt: they have articles on both Joystiq and nintendo's youtube BS.01/31/2015 - 2:30pm
prh99http://blog.us.playstation.com/2014/12/31/playstation-plus-januarys-free-games/01/31/2015 - 1:56pm
Matthew Wilsonyou guys going to talk about the Joystiq closing, and Nintendo losing its mind?01/31/2015 - 1:11pm
Andrew EisenNeo - Do you have any evidence of that? Please link.01/31/2015 - 11:43am
Papa MidnightI enjoyed the first Prototype... even if the PC Port was horribly done. Prototype 2, however, far exceeds it. It's actually a decent game in my opinion.01/31/2015 - 11:24am
Wonderkarpreally? I didnt play it because the first one sucked. I didnt even know the main characters black01/31/2015 - 10:38am
Neo_DrKefkaFor those who don't know Prototype 2 is free for the PS3 on PS PLUS! It's a great game that failed due to collusion with activist bloggers before the game was released that people would hate it because the main characters black.01/31/2015 - 9:53am
Wonderkarpalso heard Techraptor is working on a big news piece on indiecade01/31/2015 - 9:47am
WonderkarpAndrew : All I know is he was critical of the block list and said the coding was bad.01/31/2015 - 9:42am
prh99Devolvers response to Nintendo's creator program https://mobile.twitter.com/devolverdigital/status/56082061398444851301/31/2015 - 3:24am
Andrew EisenI only know of him being annoyed that IGDA mistakenly hosted on its anti-harassment tools page a blocklist he was on. What else was he critical of?01/31/2015 - 2:19am
Goth_Skunk@WonderKarp: Given Rosario's outspoken criticisms of the conduct of the IGDA, I would not be one bit surprised if he's being strong-armed into silence in closed-door meetings. He's not towing the party line, after all.01/30/2015 - 11:38pm
MechaTama31EZK: Thank you! (And I was able to see that you did it, only because you did it. How appropriate! :)01/30/2015 - 11:37pm
Matthew Wilson@Monte Nintendo is a Japanese company though. consoles are dead in japan. ps sony is a international company, so they do not much care about Japanese sales much.01/30/2015 - 10:11pm
MonteOnly one generation ago nintnedo had the best selling console. They know their games are still popular and can move their hardware. They just need to focus on better gaming hardware and advertising (their youtube policy not helping)01/30/2015 - 9:58pm
MonteI'd expect Nintendo to keep making consoles, much like the gamecube i doubt nintendo will see the Wii U as a sign of the end for consoles. There are multiple reason why the Wii U failed a big one being marketting.01/30/2015 - 9:55pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician