Wal-Mart Backs Rise of the Antichrist Across U.S.

September 30, 2010 -

Looks like an experimental pilot program that had around 100 Texas Wal-Mart stores carry the Christian-themed titles of Left Behind Games went well, as the publisher announced that two of its newer offerings will be sold at locations of the world’s largest retailer throughout the U.S.

Left Behind 3: Rise of the Antichrist and Charlie Church Mouse: Superpack will show up in Wal-Mart stores before the end of October.

LBG CEO Troy Lyndon stated, "We are delighted to offer healthy alternatives into the PC game marketplace and pleased to see these games get the exposure they deserve by becoming available in Walmart nationally.

Left Behind 3: Rise of the Antichrist is a real-time strategy game based on the book series of the same name.


Comments

Re: Wal-Mart Backs Rise of the Antichrist Across U.S.

"We are delighted to offer healthy alternatives into the PC game marketplace and pleased to see these games get the exposure they deserve by becoming available in Walmart nationally".

These people are in denial believing that anything that comes out from the bible is somehow harmless, and like they are the only harmless option in the market.

What I´m very interesed is if this game is gonna be reviewed by somebody and know what it is about. I don´t think I can get this game except for downloading it from a torrent.

I think the only question is "is this game good?" If not, it doesn´t matter at all.

------------------------------------------------------------ My DeviantArt Page (aka DeviantCensorship): http://www.darkknightstrikes.deviantart.com

Re: Wal-Mart Backs Rise of the Antichrist Across U.S.

Well, it's neither more nor less healthy than any other game (excepting perhaps exergames).  Interesting that there's a slew of negative comments here when (I'm assuming) none of the commenters have played the game.  I also expect none of you have read the books (I'm referring to the Left Behind series not the Bible).  As such there's not really any basis for saying anything about the content of the game or the views it represents.

A lot of the comments here are more along the lines of what we tend to hear about violent games.  I'd like to be able to expect better from most of the commenters on GP.

If you don't want to play it, don't buy it.  But don't trash it simply because it was produced by a Christian group.

===============

Chris Kimberley

===============

Chris Kimberley

Re: Wal-Mart Backs Rise of the Antichrist Across U.S.

It's description, along with the descriptions of the books, as well as the many descriptions of the actual religious source material are in great numbers to the point of being familiar enough with the subject matter to make sufficient comment on the material.

The same is true of the content of the material for a game like Ethnic Cleansing as well as the source material that the game is based on, making criticism of the content quite feasible.

In both these cases, the games have real source material that the fictional material is based upon, adding to the information available.

As opposed to other fictional material such as Mass Effect, which was criticized for its content without ever playing or even researching the ACTUAL content.  Since Mass Effect, among others, ONLY has the content of the fictional material to go by, then there is no additional material to research and judge its content by.

Nightwng2000

NW2K Software

http://www.facebook.com/nightwing2000

Nightwng2000 is now admin to the group "Parents For Education, Not Legislation" on MySpace as http://groups.myspace.com/pfenl

Nightwng2000 NW2K Software http://www.facebook.com/nightwing2000 Nightwng2000 is now admin to the group "Parents For Education, Not Legislation" on MySpace as http://groups.myspace.com/pfenl

Re: Wal-Mart Backs Rise of the Antichrist Across U.S.

Please explain to me how,

"And while the groups and organizations at the foundation of the beliefs behind both games actually do teach similar treatment of others based on lies, deceit, misinformation, bigotry, and ignorance as being honorable, ethical, and even "moral""

constitutes criticism of the game and/or its content.  That statement comes across as you saying all Christians are bad because a few outspoken groups you've heard of in the news are clearly pretty damn messed up.  That's no different from saying anyone who's Muslim is a terrorist.

Please correct me if I'm wrong in my interpretation because right now you sound to me like you yourself are a total bigot and I have/had a higher opinion of you than that.

Re-read your comment and think about it.  There are no real arguments made aside from what amounts to "they're bad", no reasoning listed, no backing from any sources.  You did make a point of saying that due to our rights to freedom of expression they can make the game regardless of what anyone thinks.  But your post amounts to a pot-shot at the people (seemingly the whole religion) behind the game and not really anything else.

===============

Chris Kimberley

===============

Chris Kimberley

Re: Wal-Mart Backs Rise of the Antichrist Across U.S.

Meh. Had me going there. Read the title wrong.

I thought we were already at the end times and Walmart was sponsoring the Antichrist in the US. Didn't know "Rise of the Antichrist" was a game title.

Re: Wal-Mart Backs Rise of the Antichrist Across U.S.

Eh, I'll excercize my consumer rights and not purchase it.

Re: Wal-Mart Backs Rise of the Antichrist Across U.S.

Isn't Left Behind the game where you try to convert someone to Christianity, and if they refuse you kill them?

Re: Wal-Mart Backs Rise of the Antichrist Across U.S.

I noticed the game was called "healthy." It was not called "good."

Re: Wal-Mart Backs Rise of the Antichrist Across U.S.

About as "healthy" as the game Ethnic Cleansing, but, hey, whatever.  Neither are my genre or plot interest.  They are both based on fictional source material.  And while the groups and organizations at the foundation of the beliefs behind both games actually do teach similar treatment of others based on lies, deceit, misinformation, bigotry, and ignorance as being honorable, ethical, and even "moral", the specific products are still, ultimately, fictional and should be protected by the Human Right of Freedom of Speech/Expression, not only recognized by the US Constitution's First Amendment but by Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights as well.  One doesn't have to like or agree with the foundation source material or the fictional specific products.  You are, as they are, Free to Choose to play or not play such games.

Nightwng2000

NW2K Software

http://www.facebook.com/nightwing2000

Nightwng2000 is now admin to the group "Parents For Education, Not Legislation" on MySpace as http://groups.myspace.com/pfenl

Nightwng2000 NW2K Software http://www.facebook.com/nightwing2000 Nightwng2000 is now admin to the group "Parents For Education, Not Legislation" on MySpace as http://groups.myspace.com/pfenl

Re: Wal-Mart Backs Rise of the Antichrist Across U.S.

(the following is sarcasm) this game offends me how could they allow this religious filth to be rated as T for Teen it clearly should be an 18 only I demand a bigger label aswell how can you force this down the throats of our youth its going to corrupt them. etc etc

hey they ranted about violent games dont we get a turn?

Re: Wal-Mart Backs Rise of the Antichrist Across U.S.

I would never consider the brand of Christianity the Left Behind franchise represents as "healthy".  It's little more than a well-dressed hate group.

I'd rather have my kids view Master Chief as a role model than be exposed to hate-filled antiscience any day.

Re: Wal-Mart Backs Rise of the Antichrist Across U.S.

I like how they describe a game portraying the biblical apocalypse (or at least someone's interpretation of it) as "healthy".

Re: Wal-Mart Backs Rise of the Antichrist Across U.S.

I agree with you, Some Religous Right groups are getting mentally unhinged recently, even though I feel safe it may not last long

Watching JT on GP is just like watching an episode of Jerry springer only as funny as the fights

America has just became its own version of the Jerry Springer Show after a bizarre moment in Florida involving a carnival worker.

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
Matthew WilsonI updated to a clean instill of windows 10.07/29/2015 - 2:36am
Mattsworknameargue that it's wrong, but then please admit it's wrong on ALL Fronts07/29/2015 - 2:06am
MattsworknameTechnoGeek: It's actually NOT, but it is a method used all across the specturm. See Rush limbaugh, MSNBC, Shawn hannity, etc etc, how many compagns have been brought up to try and shut them down by going after there advertisers. It's fine if you wanna07/29/2015 - 2:05am
Mattsworknamediscussed, while not what I liked and not the methods I wanted to see used, were , in a sense, the effort of thsoe game consuming masses to hold what they felt was supposed to be there press accountable for what many of them felt was Betrayal07/29/2015 - 2:03am
MattsworknameAs we say, the gamers are dead article set of a firestorm among the game consuming populace, who, ideally, were the intended audiance for sites like Kotaku, Polygon, Et all. As such, the turn about on them and the attacking of them, via the metods07/29/2015 - 2:03am
MattsworknameAndrew: Thats kind fo the issue at hand, Accountable is a matter of context. For a media group, it means accountable to its reader. to a goverment, to it's voters and tax payer, to a company, to it's share holders.07/29/2015 - 2:02am
Andrew EisenAnd again, you keep saying "accountable." What exactly does that mean? How is Gamasutra not accounting for the editorial it published?07/28/2015 - 11:47pm
Andrew EisenMatt - I disagree with your 9:12 and 9:16 comment. There are myriad ways to address content you don't like. And they're far easier to execute in the online space.07/28/2015 - 11:47pm
Andrew EisenMatt - Banning in the legal sense? Not that I'm aware but there have certainly been groups of gamers who have worked towards getting content they don't like removed.07/28/2015 - 11:45pm
DanJAlexander's editorial was and continues to be grossly misrepresented by her opponents. And if you don't like a site, you stop reading it - same as not watching a tv show. They get your first click, but not your second.07/28/2015 - 11:40pm
TechnogeekYes, because actively trying to convince advertisers to influence the editorial content of media is a perfectly acceptable thing to do, especially for a movement that's ostensibly about journalistic ethics.07/28/2015 - 11:02pm
Mattsworknameanother07/28/2015 - 9:16pm
Mattsworknameyou HAVE TO click on it. So they get the click revenue weather you like what it says or not. as such, the targeting of advertisers most likely seemed like a good course of action to those who wanted to hold those media groups accountable for one reason07/28/2015 - 9:16pm
MattsworknameBut, when you look at online media, it's completely different, with far more options, but far few ways to address issues that the consumers may have. In tv, you don't like what they show, you don't watch. But in order to see if you like something online07/28/2015 - 9:12pm
MattsworknameIn tv, and radio, ratings are how it works. your ratings determine how well you do and how much money you an charge.07/28/2015 - 9:02pm
Mattsworknameexpect to do so without someone wanting to hold you to task for it07/28/2015 - 9:00pm
MattsworknameMecha: I don't think anyone was asking for Editoral changes, what they wanted was to show those media groups that if they were gonna bash there own audiance, the audiance was not gonna take it sitting down. you can write what you want, but you can't07/28/2015 - 8:56pm
MattsworknameAndrew, Im asking as a practical question, Have gamers, as a group, ever asked for a game, or other item, to be banned. Im trying to see if theres any cases anyone else remembers cause I cant find or remember any.07/28/2015 - 8:55pm
Andrew EisenAs mentioned, Gamasutra isn't a gaming site, it's a game industry site. I don't feel it's changed its focus at all. Also, I don't get the sense that the majority of the people who took issue with that one opinion piece were regular readers anyway.07/28/2015 - 8:43pm
MattsworknameDitto kotaku, Gawker, VOX, Polygon, ETC07/28/2015 - 8:41pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician