EA Caves, Renames Taliban in MOH

October 1, 2010 -

Did not see this one coming, but via Kotaku (thanks Cheater87!), Electronic Arts has folded like a cheap suit and announced that it is renaming the Taliban forces in its upcoming Medal of Honor game to the more benign “Opposing Force.”

To be fair, Medal of Honor Greg Goodrich, in a statement on the game’s website, indicated that the renaming was done in response to “reverence for American and Allied soldiers.”

More from Goodrich:

… we have also received feedback from friends and families of fallen soldiers who have expressed concern over the inclusion of the Taliban in the multiplayer portion of our game. This is a very important voice to the Medal of Honor team. This is a voice that has earned the right to be listened to. It is a voice that we care deeply about. Because of this, and because the heartbeat of Medal of Honor has always resided in the reverence for American and Allied soldiers, we have decided to rename the opposing team in Medal of Honor multiplayer from Taliban to Opposing Force.

The change “should not directly affect gamers,” wrote Goodrich, who added that “this franchise will never willfully disrespect, intentionally or otherwise, your memory and service.”

Quite an about-face from August, when EA Games President Frank Gibeau said that the company would not give in to critics seeking to “compromise our creative vision and what we want to do.”

The inclusion and ability to play as the Taliban in Medal of Honor’s multiplayer mode drew fire from the UK’s Defense Secretary, and the Defense Ministers of Canada, New Zealand and the Netherlands. It also resulted in the game being banned from GameStop stores located on U.S. military bases.

Comments

Re: EA Caves, Renames Taliban in MOH

Oh no, a game about a modern war has the taliban in it! GET THE TORCHES!

All this fear mongering about video games... it's sad that politicians actually do it on purpose to fuel the "FOR THE KIDS" mentality. What are they going to do next, tell us 3D TV is the new devil? "But it's so visceral, like you're right in the action! BAN IT"

Re: EA Caves, Renames Taliban in MOH

Freaking EA why did you have to compromise on this? There was little reason to give in and you should've stood your ground. Having the Taliban does not disrespect any Allied solier's memory, especially if you paint them in a bad light.

I trulyn hope this doesn't become a South Park like scenario where you have to cave into everyone making stupid demands to protect their sensitivites.

----------------------------------------------------

 Debates are like merry go rounds. Two people take their positions then they go through the same points over and over and over again. Then when it's over they have the same positions they started in.

---------------------------------------------------- Debates are like merry go rounds. Two people take their positions then they go through the same points over and over and over again. Then when it's over they have the same positions they started in.

Re: EA Caves, Renames Taliban in MOH

This is sad. Nobody gives a crap when you're playing as a Nazi in a World War II game. The enemy is the enemy depending which theatre of war you're fighting in. If you're going to change that, just go ahead and eliminate multiplayer all together. 

Re: EA Caves, Renames Taliban in MOH

I recall SOCOM Combined Assualt suddenly changing the name "Terrorists" to some other name, and I know for a fact that the previous 3 titles had always had Terrorists as one side to play on (other was seals).  I didn't see a problem with it at all, no matter how close to home it may have been.

Re: EA Caves, Renames Taliban in MOH

With the change of one word you would've thought that EA removed entire levels or stopped the game completely judging by the reaction. The word change doesn't change the game or the experience.

Quite frankly this whole mess could've been avoided initially if EA didn't bother explicitly naming the Taliban in the game, although I do wonder whether it was intentional to cause controversy judging by the company's recent record (eg Dante's Inferno and Dead Space). They got their pre-order figures up and good publicity for launch so it appears that they don't have to use that one word in the game now.

Re: EA Caves, Renames Taliban in MOH

Self censorship like this is nothing but subtle fasicsim....

/tinfoil hat


I have a dream, break the chains of copy right oppression! http://zippydsmlee.wordpress.com/2010/05/21/cigital-disobedience/


Copyright infringement is nothing more than civil disobedience to a bad set of laws. Let's renegotiate them.

---

http://zippydsm.deviantart.com/

Re: EA Caves, Renames Taliban in MOH

@Nightwing, you'd better. I want to be able to buy one of those shirts soon. :) Isn't there a modding community MoH (for almost every FPS for that matter)? Why not make a patch that fixes it? We should not allow the "roaches" to win so easily.

-------

"WARNING GUARANTEE: This post contains material which a truly free society would neither fear nor suppress."

Re: EA Caves, Renames Taliban in MOH

I find this very cowardly of EA. I have wanted to play Medal of Honor games since the PSone game, but I haven't had the opportunity yet. Now that they are insulting my intelligence by catering to the whims of a group that doesn't even buy video games (honestly, every complaint over featuring "Taliban" in multiplayer is made by someone who is not a video game player) I cannot justify the purchase. EA has lost a lot of respect from me again. The first time was when they treated their developers and employees unfairly by screwing them out of overtime. They got the respect back by changing how they did things. Now that they're directly insulting the intelligence of their customers, I refuse to buy this product. I may consider other EA products, but even then I will be hesitant to purchase them.

Re: EA Caves, Renames Taliban in MOH

Money trumps principles every time. Why do you think our political system is the morass it is?

Disappointing, EA. If you were going to cave on this, you should have done it immediately. Making it a stand for creative freedom, and then taking a dive just tanks your credibility, and the credibility of the industry with it.

Next time, when the industry is the middle of a big fight to be respected as a legitimate artform, and you happen to get the spotlight thrown on you, try not to look like tools.

Re: EA Caves, Renames Taliban in MOH

 Where does money play into this exactly? I mean i think i recent read that MoH was breaking pre-order sales records. The vast majority of people bitching about the game are people who would have never bought it in the first place. Hell frankly i would hope that we'd see a lot of canceled pre-orders from gamers who are irritated by EA caving to political pressure.

Re: EA Caves, Renames Taliban in MOH

Whilst the people who criticised it never would've bought the game, I wonder how many people would've pre-ordered the game if it didn't generate this controversy?

This controversy helped generate sales, and EA have a track record of trying to create controversy to generate sales.

Re: EA Caves, Renames Taliban in MOH

EA should have never made the promise of never caving into the critics.

http://www.magicinkgaming.com/

Re: EA Caves, Renames Taliban in MOH

EA should have never caved into the critics.

 

Andrew Eisen

Re: EA Caves, Renames Taliban in MOH

Imagination is a wonderful thing.  Thus far Anti-Human Rights supporters cannot arrest, put through trial, and convict anyone who imagines things that they don't like.

Psst!  Although I'm not interested in this genre, here's an idea:  When you play, and see the words "opposing force", mentally envision it saying "Taliban" instead.  So there!  :P

And, hey, actually TELL people that's what you do.  After all, just because you play one on TV, doesn't mean you ARE one in real life.

Edit:  Ya know what?  I actually like that last sentence.  Think I'll make some T-Shirts with it on them.  :)

Nightwng2000

NW2K Software

http://www.facebook.com/nightwing2000

Nightwng2000 is now admin to the group "Parents For Education, Not Legislation" on MySpace as http://groups.myspace.com/pfenl

Nightwng2000 NW2K Software http://www.facebook.com/nightwing2000 Nightwng2000 is now admin to the group "Parents For Education, Not Legislation" on MySpace as http://groups.myspace.com/pfenl

Re: EA Caves, Renames Taliban in MOH

Someone once called me Taliban during a Counter Strike Source match.

Re: EA Caves, Renames Taliban in MOH

The Taliban, or, as they are to be referred to from here on in, They Who Must Not Be Named.

Re: EA Caves, Renames Taliban in MOH

So, how long before more demands are made. Perhaps the "Oposing force" won't even be made to look middle eastern, perhaps they won't be referred to as terrorists.

As I like to say, when changes like those occur due to fear, when the freedom of expression is curbed because another is offended..

*Counter Strike voice* Terrorists win.

Re: EA Caves, Renames Taliban in MOH

Yeah, I think we all made the Counter-Strike reference when this story came out. :( Not that I'm a huge fan of these FPS games, but I'm all for freedom of speech.

300 Episodes and counting: http://www.orangeloungeradio.com/

400 Episodes, TEN YEARS and counting: http://www.orangeloungeradio.com/ | Voice of Geeks Network - http://www.vognetwork.com

Re: EA Caves, Renames Taliban in MOH

If this pacifies the people opposed to this game, they are simply pathetic.  It's okay to have military games set in modern conflict, but actually identifying the opposing faction is insulting?  It's okay to demonize the enemy, but don't you dare actually portray them in equal lights to our own military forces.  Fuck all of you pathetic warmongering roaches.

Re: EA Caves, Renames Taliban in MOH

I doubt this is really going to placate anyone either, as those who are opposed to this game have already made their minds up.  If this was done just so it can be sold on military bases, I agree it is pandering as well as a shallow money-grab from EA to make sure they earn every last dollar (Which doesn't make sense, as any serviceman could simply go and buy the game off-base anyway if they really wanted to.  So the question of potentially lost sales is moot).  Still, I don't think that those who instituted that sales ban are going to be fooled by this, as all that was done is change the name when it's still clear who they're supposed to be.

Re: EA Caves, Renames Taliban in MOH

I, The Master of Saying It, couldn't have said it any better. It's pandering to this kind of xenophobia that got the United States and its allies between a rock and hard place and which'll keep them there.

Re: EA Caves, Renames Taliban in MOH

Shame on you EA.  Shame.

"… we have also received feedback from friends and families of fallen soldiers who have expressed concern over the inclusion of the Taliban in the multiplayer portion of our game. This is a very important voice to the Medal of Honor team."

More important than the voices of the people who were actually going to buy your game in the first place, huh?

And possible shame on you "friends and families of fallen soldiers who have expressed concern over the inclusion of the Taliban in the multiplayer portion of [MOH]."

All EA has done is rename the "Taliban" (which was called "insurgents" in all press materials I've seen) to "Opposing Force."  Does this truly mollify you?  Does this make it all okay?  Will gamers playing the same exact game with a different word used to describe the enemy help you sleep at night?

I hope not.  That would be truly pathetic.

Then again, so is raising a stink about something so innocuous in the first place.

 

Andrew Eisen

Re: EA Caves, Renames Taliban in MOH

Quite an about-face from August, when EA Games President Frank Gibeau said that the company would not give in to critics seeking to “compromise our creative vision and what we want to do.”
 

This is maybe the saddest part. They made a promise and a few months later, they broke it. It´s very disappointing.

The great problem is that now on more and more people without any knowledge or respect for games will demand more and more censorship. And if big companies like EA (and Konami with their own game) are willing to accomplish those demands, it can´t be good for nobody.

Let´s see if in the few next months another company decides that censorship is more important than their "creative vision" or their own costumers.

Good job, EA, good job.

------------------------------------------------------------ My DeviantArt Page (aka DeviantCensorship): http://www.darkknightstrikes.deviantart.com

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

Will Code Avarice's Paranautical Activity make its way back onto Steam?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
prh99Saddly Ubi has locked AC:Unity to 900p and 30fps for all platforms in the name of parity.10/23/2014 - 2:36pm
PHX Corpa little PSA, Tonight is SSB4WiiU's turn at the nintendo direct at 6pm edt http://www.twitch.tv/nintendo I will be also hosting the Stream on my Twitch.tv page http://www.twitch.tv/trustygemtwitch10/23/2014 - 2:27pm
Andrew EisenBayonetta 2 allegedly banned in Saudi Arabi (but not Bayonetta 1). http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=91759010/23/2014 - 2:26pm
prh99Not surprising, it's their MO. I don't think there really much more to be said for GG's values at this point.10/23/2014 - 2:24pm
Neo_DrKefkaPlaces like TheRalphRetort are trash10/23/2014 - 2:02pm
Neo_DrKefkaBoogie who stood on the fence trying to find a neutral ground and peace was called out for the RalphRetort and called evil for doing so but when Boogie was doxxed and came into the folds of GamerGate all of a sudden he is forgiven.10/23/2014 - 2:02pm
Papa MidnightBut it's not about harrassment (http://thinkprogress.org/culture/2014/10/23/3583347/felicia-day-gamergate/).10/23/2014 - 1:58pm
Papa MidnightIn other GamerGate news, Felicia Day (gamer and actress (Eureka, Supernatural), posted her concerns about GamerGate. Doxxed within the hour.10/23/2014 - 1:58pm
Papa MidnightNot for nothing, but considering how Ubisoft titles tend to be horribly unoptimised ports, those requirements actually seem low - especially if you plan to consistently run at 60fps (I'm looking at you "Black Flag" and Splinter Cell).10/23/2014 - 1:55pm
Papa Midnighthttp://www.pcgamer.com/assassins-creed-unity-system-requirements-rumoured-to-be-steep/10/23/2014 - 1:54pm
Neo_DrKefkaI'm upset at all parties but a cue to replace one bad apple for another does not solve the problem. Perhaps I expect to much out of #GamerGate because the early streams were about progress & solutions now they are about a persons ego talking about drinkin10/23/2014 - 1:35pm
prh99Honestly I've never liked Gawker, and considering their own behavior the self righteous indignation in the wake of GG rings a bit hollow. If my email causes them to lose money I will not feel even a twinge of guilt.10/23/2014 - 1:00pm
Papa MidnightNeo_DrKefka: Till outlets such as IGN and GameSpot so much as even acknowledge the mere existence of "GamerGate", I highly doubt it will affect their modus operandi anytime in the future - near or otherwise.10/23/2014 - 12:26pm
Neo_DrKefkaWhat GamerGate is essentially doing whether people like it or not its going to change the gamingmedia but inturn its also going to replace some outlets & practice the same wrongs they claim they fought against. Its happening already look at TheRalphRetort10/23/2014 - 12:18pm
Neo_DrKefkaIf a company claims it supports the Klan or another offensive organization than the advertiser needs to make sure they're brand is not tainted so they pull they're ads. One side does not determine the right to determine what is universally offensive.10/23/2014 - 12:14pm
Neo_DrKefkaActions have consequences however. If you do a Bioware and insult EA's customers would you be suprised if they lost advertisers and customers? Advertisers are not giving money to charity to they putting ads to make money.10/23/2014 - 12:13pm
Matthew Wilsonwhile I disagree with people pushing pressure on advertisers, consumers do not have many other options to show there disagreements with a article or writer. if people are going to do it, it should be for somthing much worse then that guy did.10/23/2014 - 12:10pm
Neo_DrKefkaNow they are about KingofPol & InternetAristocrat making streams that are bait and switch Streams that claims they are about GG but are about them getting drunk and them making fun of Autistic people10/23/2014 - 12:09pm
Neo_DrKefkahttp://tinyurl.com/nhlbgq8 These people some of them are using GamerGate to prop there careers up. GamerGate streams used to be about ideas of change and solutions to problems.10/23/2014 - 12:09pm
Neo_DrKefkaI believe the message of #GamerGate but I do not believe in the Cult of Personality that has formed. Where sites like TechRaptor gained exposure and they are a great site. Sites like TheRalphReport are using this movement for there own personal gain.10/23/2014 - 12:05pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician