Rockstar Wins "GTA Rothbury" Libel Case

October 4, 2010 -

Earlier this summer the UK’s Daily Star fabricated a story claiming that the next entry in Rockstar’s Grand Theft Auto series would be based on the July 2010 crime spree committed by ex-con Raoul Moat (pictured)across the NorthEast section of the UK and that the game would be named GTA Rothbury.

While the paper later apologized for the incident, and the piece’s author insulted gamers, calling them “grown (?!?) men who sit around all day playing computer games with one another,” the paper has been ordered to pay undisclosed damages to Rockstar and Take Two Interactive. According to the Guardian, Rockstar has accepted “substantial” libel damages as awarded by a High Court.

Rockstar’s Solicitor, Melanie Hart, stated, “The defendant now accepts that Rockstar Games never had any intention to create such a video game at any time. The story was entirely false.”

The Daily Mail’s parent company, Express Newspapers, was also ordered to pay Rockstar’s legal fees.

An Express Newspapers spokesperson said that the company “accepted that the allegations were untrue and apologised for the upset and damage caused.”

MCVUK still has a screenshot of the original Daily Star article available on its website.


Comments

Re: Rockstar Wins "GTA Rothbury" Libel Case

It is good that the Daily Star has been effectively fined over this false story. They should check there facts. I personally would not like to see the original journalist handed the fine, as I do believe that the paper has to except responsibility as it decided to run with the story, but I do hope that his name is somewhat blackened.

He made up the story, but what was worse was that he was completely unrepentant over it, in journalism that is the worst thing you can do. The fact that he was so childish over the matter just showed what a hack he was. I hope all publications think twice before employing him or paying for his "stories".

Re: Rockstar Wins "GTA Rothbury" Libel Case

Well, now I want a copy of Red Dead Redemption even more.

As for the author, well, I doubt he's an author with them any more.

Re: Rockstar Wins "GTA Rothbury" Libel Case

First off, yes, congratulations to Rockstar for finally defending itself.

Though, "The defendant now accepts that Rockstar Games never had any intention to create such a video game at any time. The story was entirely false.” Just now? I think they should give them some credit, the Daily Star did write a redaction and apology within a week:

http://www.gamepolitics.com/2010/07/26/daily-star-apologizes-fabricating...

Overall I'm surprised at how well they've been dealing with this thing, other than publishing the thing in the first place. But that makes it all the more upsetting that the dumbass who actually wrote the story is seemingly getting off scot free. He should be fired and never be able to get a job in the industry again. This is disgraceful.

Re: Rockstar Wins "GTA Rothbury" Libel Case

I don't know about the Daily Star, but I if did something stupid that cost my company libel losses plus legal fees, I'm pretty sure they wouldn't even bother with cardboard boxes. They'd just roll my desk with all my stuff out the nearest window. And I'm on the second floor.

This guy being fired after this (if he hasn't already been) is almost a given. Companies just don't usually announce HR decisions like that, for CYA. As far as never getting another job in the industry... Nobody who actually looks at his background as an applicant is ever going to hire him as a writer. After the screaming liability of "I caused my company to lose a ton of money in a lawsuit," he'll probably have problems finding jobs in other, completely unrelated industries.

But, then again, that's what happens when you're an idiot.

Re: Rockstar Wins "GTA Rothbury" Libel Case

I think you overestimate the journalistic standards of the British press.  If he's fired (and even that's not a given), he'll find some other rag which will scold him and tell him to be more vague the next time he wants to make up a story.

Re: Rockstar Wins "GTA Rothbury" Libel Case

About damn time there were some consequences for all the cheap shots taken at us.

Here's to the rag known as the Daily Mail going down the tubes.

EDIT: Sorry, that's Daily Star, not "Mail". Though they are the same thing, really.

Re: Rockstar Wins "GTA Rothbury" Libel Case

I´m very glad they won. I hope this inspire many other companies that are being slandered by oportunistic pricks like the Daily Star.

I´m so buying a Rockstar game this week, lol (probably not).

------------------------------------------------------------ My DeviantArt Page (aka DeviantCensorship): http://www.darkknightstrikes.deviantart.com

Re: Rockstar Wins "GTA Rothbury" Libel Case

It's Jerry Lawton who should have to pay this totally out of pocket.  Daily Star should have verified it, sure.  But Lawton was the individual who made the false claims.

Nightwng2000

NW2K Software

http://www.facebook.com/nightwing2000

Nightwng2000 is now admin to the group "Parents For Education, Not Legislation" on MySpace as http://groups.myspace.com/pfenl

Nightwng2000 NW2K Software http://www.facebook.com/nightwing2000 Nightwng2000 is now admin to the group "Parents For Education, Not Legislation" on MySpace as http://groups.myspace.com/pfenl

Re: Rockstar Wins "GTA Rothbury" Libel Case

I don't know how the law goes in Britain, but in the US, that would qualify as a work of corporate authorship; Lawton may have technically written it, but for all legal purposes the publisher wrote it.

There could hypothetically be a clause in the contract saying the author has responsibility, but it would be simpler just to fire him.

Re: Rockstar Wins "GTA Rothbury" Libel Case

Personally, I would rather see the jerk who wrote the article lose his job. 

Now, if only the entire industry had half the stones R*/TT has, then perhaps they would be better suited to fight that California law.

Re: Rockstar Wins "GTA Rothbury" Libel Case

He cost the publication he works, or posibly worked for thousands, so he probably has lost his job.

Re: Rockstar Wins "GTA Rothbury" Libel Case

This kind of thing should be career/business ending.  I hope the damages were REALLY high.

------- Morality has always been in decline. As you get older, you notice it. When you were younger, you enjoyed it.

Re: Rockstar Wins "GTA Rothbury" Libel Case

Moreover, even the Daily Star reproduced the press release published by The Guardian : http://www.dailystar.co.uk/posts/view/156810/Paper-sorry-for-Moat-game-c...

Meanwhile, Jerry Lawton tries and tries hard : http://www.dailystar.co.uk/posts/view/155632/Raoul-Moat-the-play-Lotto-f...

Re: Rockstar Wins "GTA Rothbury" Libel Case

Finally, FINALLY, some game makers who have enough balls to defend their creation against libels all by THEMSELVES.

But what happened to the paper author ? Has he been sued too ? Because he would be the first one to deserve it.

Re: Rockstar Wins "GTA Rothbury" Libel Case

Congrats on winning the case Rockstar!

http://www.magicinkgaming.com/

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

Which group is more ethically challenged?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
Mattsworknamejob they wanted without the unions getting involved. The problem is, it has some unexpected side effects, like the ones Info mentioned07/07/2015 - 8:49am
MattsworknameThe problem being, right to work states exsist specificly as a counter to Unions, as the last 20 or so years have shown, the unions have been doing this countries economoy NO favors. The right to work states came into being to allow people to work any07/07/2015 - 8:49am
Infophile(cont'd) discriminatory. This can only be done for protected classes which are outlined in law (race, sex, religion, ethnicity everywhere, sexual orientation in some states). So, a gay person could be fired because they're gay and have no recourse there.07/07/2015 - 7:27am
Infophile@Goth: See here: http://www.snopes.com/politics/sexuality/firedforbeinggay.asp for a good discussion on it. Basically, the problem is that in the US, most states allow at will firing, and it's the burden of the fired person to prove the firing was ...07/07/2015 - 7:25am
Goth_SkunkAssuming that's true, then that is a fight worth fighting for.07/07/2015 - 6:58am
Yuuri@ Goth_Skunk, in many states being gay is not a protected status akin to say race or religion. It's also in the "Right to work" states. Those are the states where one can be fired for any reason (provided it isn't a "protected" one.)07/07/2015 - 6:07am
Goth_Skunkregarded as a beacon of liberty and freedom that is the envy of the world, would not have across-the-board Human Rights laws that don't at the very least equal those of my own country.07/07/2015 - 5:47am
Goth_SkunkI find that hard to believe, Infophile. I have difficulty believing employers can *still* fire people for being gay. I would need to see some evidence that this is fact, because as a Canadian, I can't believe that the United States,07/07/2015 - 5:46am
InfophileFor that matter, even women don't yet have full legal equality with men. The US government still places limits on the positions women can serve in the military. And that's just the legal side of things - the "culture wars" are more than just laws.07/07/2015 - 5:43am
InfophileAnd that's just LGB issues. Get ready for an incoming battle on rights for trans* people. And then after that, a battle for poly people.07/07/2015 - 5:41am
InfophileA battle's been won. In many states employers can still fire people for being gay. And in many states, parents can force their children into reparative therapy to try to "fix" being gay. Those battles still need to be fought.07/07/2015 - 5:40am
Goth_Skunkand now they've switched to battles that don't need to be fought.07/07/2015 - 5:37am
Goth_SkunkIn my opinion, it was the final legal hurdle denying homosexual couples final and recognized statuses as eligible spouses. But even though this war's been won, some people are still too keen to keep fighting battles,07/07/2015 - 5:28am
Goth_SkunkAnd it's a trend I don't mind seeing continue. Same-sex marriage was at long-last made definitively legal by SCOTUS, and it's about time. I'm glad it's finally happened, as it was desperately needed.07/07/2015 - 5:25am
Infophile(cont'd) It started long before that. Perhaps the American Civil War comes to mind?)07/07/2015 - 3:59am
InfophileOn Goth's linked article: Historically speaking, there may have been cycles, but remember that the left has steadily gained ground. Is there a good reason to expect that to be different this time? (Oh, and no, Culture War 1.0 wasn't with the Baby Boomers.07/07/2015 - 3:59am
Goth_Skunk"THIS VIDEO IS PROBLEMATIC:" About Social Justice Warriors, by J.T. Sexkik. Excellent video. http://ow.ly/PgGnD07/07/2015 - 3:22am
Goth_Skunkand repeats the cycle, over and over. Presently, the far left culture is overreaching, and is about to lose their stranglehold on power.07/06/2015 - 10:01pm
Goth_SkunkAs far back as the 60's, according to the writers. The culture war moves in cycles from one generation to the next. The left rebels against the right, takes over, overreaches to the point where the right rebels right back, takes over, overreaches ->07/06/2015 - 9:58pm
MattsworknameGoth, what "Comming overreach" , the media and goverment have been overreaching for years07/06/2015 - 9:34pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician