Halo Reach Credit Cheaters Get Rollbacks, Bans

October 5, 2010 -

Halo Reach cheaters and hooligans (you know who you are) are being put in their place as Bungie resets Reach credits. In a post on Friday Bungie announced that thousands of players who have exploited a glitch in the game will have their credits reset. Some players have earned bans too.

"We are in the process of applying credit resets to approximately 15,000 users who we have identified as the most egregious Challenge Reset abusers," a post on Bungie.net read.

More sweeps of questionable player activity are happening this week as well. The exploit in question allowed players to manipulate their network connections to play Challenge mode 20 or more times and earn buckets of credits. Naturally, some users say that they were unfairly targeted because they did not know about the glitch and did not use the exploit knowingly.

How Bungie will respond to those complaints remains to be seen.

Source: MTV Multiplayer

Posted in

Comments

Re: Halo Reach Credit Cheaters Get Rollbacks, Bans

 The credits are used to buy armor pieces, effects, voices for one game setting ect. Yes it's all purely cosmetic but these things take a long time to attain. Hence the exploit being abused as it was.

Re: Halo Reach Credit Cheaters Get Rollbacks, Bans

So there's a bit of wanting everything faster in there too huh? Well, I can understand that one to a degree. Doesn't really excuse their actions, and still plenty of kudos to Bungie for taking appropriate action, but I can see the appeal a bit more clearly now. I myself am known to start some of the more in-depth games over after a couple days because I want to incorporate my gained knowledge into acquiring certain things a little sooner than I normally would. Of course, that's not cheating or exploitative, but I've cheated and exploited things too, just not on multiplayer games. And I especially wouldn't on online games, because quite honestly that takes all the fun out of it. I have a much easier time against human opponents than I do computers. :)

Re: Halo Reach Credit Cheaters Get Rollbacks, Bans

Yes, they do take a long time to obtain. They serve no purpose other than to show off what you've earned in game, but thats cool in and of itself.  Allows you to seperate your spartan from the herd a little.  Some of the items are insanely expensive, and take forever to unlock via normal means.

For instance, some of the neatest things you can buy are armor effects. These make your deaths or armor do various things while in a game.  The cheapest is a confetti effect accompanied by a "YAAAAAAY!" sound effect when you die.  It's 200k.  The most expensive (and what I want) is called inclement weather, and makes electricity arc around your suit in a match.  It's 2,000,000.

To illustrate how slow normal credit gathering is, I've been playing a moderate amount virtually every day, since one day after Reach released, and haven't bought anything.  I have about 240k credits saved up.

Re: Halo Reach Credit Cheaters Get Rollbacks, Bans

Allows you to seperate your spartan from the herd a little.

Except for when everyone cheats, that is. :)

To illustrate how slow normal credit gathering is, I've been playing a moderate amount virtually every day, since one day after Reach released, and haven't bought anything.  I have about 240k credits saved up.

Well, I guess Bungie really wants players to really work at earning status online. I can't blame them for that one. And considering the game's apparently only been out for less than a month, I'd have to say the progress is pretty reasonable from where I sit. I mean, c'mon, there were those people who hung onto their Halo 2 accounts until their damn Xboxes DIED, I have to think that most of the Halo nuts will be playing this latest installment for some time to come.

Then again, I'm no online gamer. Does it actually infuriate you at all?

Re: Halo Reach Credit Cheaters Get Rollbacks, Bans

I'm afraid I'm completely ignorant on Halo Reach, so perhaps anyone cares to explain to me any real point/benefit to the exploit in question?

Or is it just a "My dick is bigger than yours" kind of thing?

I like how there's supposedly 15,000 of them too, and sadly, I'm willing to believe it. Hackers and cheaters are one of the many reasons I don't play online games.

Re: Halo Reach Credit Cheaters Get Rollbacks, Bans

From what I've herd, it's just a "My dick is bigger than yours" kind of thing. Essentialy cosmetic stuff from the currency.

Re: Halo Reach Credit Cheaters Get Rollbacks, Bans

Hmm.

I really don't like situations where I know I'm surrounded by people who care so much about status that they're willing to cheat to get ahead. Although, the upside is, I know that the reason so many do that is because they have nothing else to their lives. The rest probably carry such actions over into their real life. You know, the kind of people who stick a Bentley "B" on their Chrysler 300? The ones who hold so much value in being a head-turner they're willing to risk looking like a complete and utter assclown, or are blissfully oblivious to the fact that they do?

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

Which group is more ethically challenged?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
Goth_SkunkeZeek: No, I do not agree they are union members.07/07/2015 - 7:48pm
E. Zachary KnightTeachers unions are just as bad as police unions, except of course you are far less likely to be killed by a teacher on duty than you are a cop. But they also protect bad teachers from being fired.07/07/2015 - 6:29pm
E. Zachary KnightGoth, so you agree they are still union members. Thankfully we have a first ammendment that protects people from being forced to join groups they don't support (in most cases any way.)07/07/2015 - 6:27pm
E. Zachary KnightAh, police unions. The reason why cops can't get fired when they beat a defenseless mentally ill homeless person to death. Or when they throw a grenade into a baby's crib. Or when theykill people they were called in to help not hurt themselves.07/07/2015 - 6:26pm
Goth_SkunkeZeek: Non-union employees have no right to attend meetings or union convention/AGM, or influence policy. The only time they get to vote is whether or not to strike.07/07/2015 - 6:24pm
Infophile(cont'd) about non-union police officers being given hell until they joined the union.07/07/2015 - 4:58pm
InfophileParadoxically, the drive in the US to get rid of unions seems to have left only the most corrupt surviving. They seem to be the only ones that can find ways to browbeat employees into joining when paying dues isn't mandatory. I've heard some stories ...07/07/2015 - 4:57pm
Matthew WilsonI am old school on this. I believe its a conflict of interest to have public sector unions. that being said, I do not have a positive look on unions in general.07/07/2015 - 3:59pm
TechnogeekWhat's best for the employee tends to be good for the employer; other way around, not so much. So long as that's the case, there's going to be a far stronger incentive for management to behave in such a way that invites retalitation than for the union to.07/07/2015 - 3:10pm
TechnogeekTeachers' unions? State legislatures. UAW? Just look at GM's middle management.07/07/2015 - 3:05pm
TechnogeekIn many ways it seems that the worse a union tends to behave, the worse that the company's management has behaved in the past.07/07/2015 - 3:02pm
james_fudgeCharity starts at home ;)07/07/2015 - 2:49pm
james_fudgeSo mandatory charity? That sounds shitty to me07/07/2015 - 2:49pm
E. Zachary KnightGoth, if Union dues are automatically withdrawn, then there is no such thing as a non-union employee.07/07/2015 - 2:38pm
Goth_Skunka mutually agreed upon charity instead.07/07/2015 - 2:33pm
Goth_Skunkyou enjoy the benefits of working in a union environment. If working in a union is against your religious beliefs or just something you wholeheartedly object to, dues will still be deducted from your pay, but you can instruct that they be directed towards07/07/2015 - 2:33pm
Goth_SkunkBasically, if you are employed in a business where employees are represented by a union for the purposes of collective bargaining, whether or not you are a union member, you will have union dues deducted from your pay, since regardless of membership,07/07/2015 - 2:32pm
Goth_SkunkIt's something that has existed in Canada since 1946. You can read more on it here: http://ow.ly/PiHWR07/07/2015 - 2:27pm
Goth_SkunkSee, we have something similar in Canada, called a "Rand Employee." This is an employee who benefits from the collective bargaining efforts of a union, despite not wanting to be a part of it for whatever reason.07/07/2015 - 2:22pm
Matthew Wilson@info depends on the sector. for example, have you looked at how powerful unions are in the public sector? I will make the argument they have too much power in that sector.07/07/2015 - 12:39pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician