Halo Reach Credit Cheaters Get Rollbacks, Bans

October 5, 2010 -

Halo Reach cheaters and hooligans (you know who you are) are being put in their place as Bungie resets Reach credits. In a post on Friday Bungie announced that thousands of players who have exploited a glitch in the game will have their credits reset. Some players have earned bans too.

"We are in the process of applying credit resets to approximately 15,000 users who we have identified as the most egregious Challenge Reset abusers," a post on Bungie.net read.

More sweeps of questionable player activity are happening this week as well. The exploit in question allowed players to manipulate their network connections to play Challenge mode 20 or more times and earn buckets of credits. Naturally, some users say that they were unfairly targeted because they did not know about the glitch and did not use the exploit knowingly.

How Bungie will respond to those complaints remains to be seen.

Source: MTV Multiplayer

Posted in

Comments

Re: Halo Reach Credit Cheaters Get Rollbacks, Bans

 The credits are used to buy armor pieces, effects, voices for one game setting ect. Yes it's all purely cosmetic but these things take a long time to attain. Hence the exploit being abused as it was.

Re: Halo Reach Credit Cheaters Get Rollbacks, Bans

So there's a bit of wanting everything faster in there too huh? Well, I can understand that one to a degree. Doesn't really excuse their actions, and still plenty of kudos to Bungie for taking appropriate action, but I can see the appeal a bit more clearly now. I myself am known to start some of the more in-depth games over after a couple days because I want to incorporate my gained knowledge into acquiring certain things a little sooner than I normally would. Of course, that's not cheating or exploitative, but I've cheated and exploited things too, just not on multiplayer games. And I especially wouldn't on online games, because quite honestly that takes all the fun out of it. I have a much easier time against human opponents than I do computers. :)

Re: Halo Reach Credit Cheaters Get Rollbacks, Bans

Yes, they do take a long time to obtain. They serve no purpose other than to show off what you've earned in game, but thats cool in and of itself.  Allows you to seperate your spartan from the herd a little.  Some of the items are insanely expensive, and take forever to unlock via normal means.

For instance, some of the neatest things you can buy are armor effects. These make your deaths or armor do various things while in a game.  The cheapest is a confetti effect accompanied by a "YAAAAAAY!" sound effect when you die.  It's 200k.  The most expensive (and what I want) is called inclement weather, and makes electricity arc around your suit in a match.  It's 2,000,000.

To illustrate how slow normal credit gathering is, I've been playing a moderate amount virtually every day, since one day after Reach released, and haven't bought anything.  I have about 240k credits saved up.

Re: Halo Reach Credit Cheaters Get Rollbacks, Bans

Allows you to seperate your spartan from the herd a little.

Except for when everyone cheats, that is. :)

To illustrate how slow normal credit gathering is, I've been playing a moderate amount virtually every day, since one day after Reach released, and haven't bought anything.  I have about 240k credits saved up.

Well, I guess Bungie really wants players to really work at earning status online. I can't blame them for that one. And considering the game's apparently only been out for less than a month, I'd have to say the progress is pretty reasonable from where I sit. I mean, c'mon, there were those people who hung onto their Halo 2 accounts until their damn Xboxes DIED, I have to think that most of the Halo nuts will be playing this latest installment for some time to come.

Then again, I'm no online gamer. Does it actually infuriate you at all?

Re: Halo Reach Credit Cheaters Get Rollbacks, Bans

I'm afraid I'm completely ignorant on Halo Reach, so perhaps anyone cares to explain to me any real point/benefit to the exploit in question?

Or is it just a "My dick is bigger than yours" kind of thing?

I like how there's supposedly 15,000 of them too, and sadly, I'm willing to believe it. Hackers and cheaters are one of the many reasons I don't play online games.

Re: Halo Reach Credit Cheaters Get Rollbacks, Bans

From what I've herd, it's just a "My dick is bigger than yours" kind of thing. Essentialy cosmetic stuff from the currency.

Re: Halo Reach Credit Cheaters Get Rollbacks, Bans

Hmm.

I really don't like situations where I know I'm surrounded by people who care so much about status that they're willing to cheat to get ahead. Although, the upside is, I know that the reason so many do that is because they have nothing else to their lives. The rest probably carry such actions over into their real life. You know, the kind of people who stick a Bentley "B" on their Chrysler 300? The ones who hold so much value in being a head-turner they're willing to risk looking like a complete and utter assclown, or are blissfully oblivious to the fact that they do?

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
E. Zachary KnightGot that same recommendation on Twitter. So I guess that is a good sign.09/15/2014 - 8:39pm
prh99Portlandia, though I don't watch a lot of sitcoms. Heard it was good though.09/15/2014 - 8:02pm
E. Zachary KnightSitcom recommendations for someone who like Parks and Rec but hates The Office: Go.09/15/2014 - 6:08pm
NeenekoEven if they do change their policy, they can only do it moving forward and I could see the mod/pack community simply branching.09/15/2014 - 12:50pm
Michael ChandraAs for take the money and run, the guy must have a networth of 8~9 digits already.09/15/2014 - 10:33am
Michael ChandraMe, I'm more betting on some form of mod API where servers must run donations/payments through them and they take a cut.09/15/2014 - 10:32am
Michael ChandraEspecially since they want it for promoting their phones. Killing user interest is the dumbest move to make.09/15/2014 - 10:32am
Michael ChandraGiven how the EULA actively allows for LPs, I'm not sure Microsoft is ready for the backlash of disallowing that.09/15/2014 - 10:31am
Matthew Wilsonthey wont do that, the backlash would be too big.09/15/2014 - 10:25am
ConsterSleaker: how is that a flipside? Sounds to me like that's basically what Notch himself said, except rudely.09/15/2014 - 10:18am
MaskedPixelanteOn the plus side, no more lazy Minecraft LPs, since iirc Microsoft has a strict "no monetization period" policy when it comes to their stuff.09/15/2014 - 10:13am
james_fudgeBut it continues to sell on every platform it is on, so there's that09/15/2014 - 10:09am
james_fudgeOh, well that's another matter :)09/15/2014 - 10:08am
E. Zachary KnightNothing against Notch here. I think it is great that he made something so cool. I just can't understand how it is worth $2.5 bil09/15/2014 - 9:59am
InfophileWhat a world we live in: Becoming a billionaire was the easy way out for Notch.09/15/2014 - 9:42am
james_fudgelots of hate for Notch here. I don't get it. Sorry he made a game everyone loved. What a monster he is!09/15/2014 - 9:37am
SleakerOn the flipside, Notch has been a horrible CEO for Mojang, and the company has grown on sheer inertia, DESPITE being mishandled over and over.09/15/2014 - 9:33am
SleakerI can understand Notch's statements he made to Kotaku about growing bigger than he intended, and getting hate for EULA changes he didn't enact.09/15/2014 - 9:32am
MaskedPixelantehttp://pastebin.com/n1qTeikM Notch's statement about the MS acquisition. He wanted out for a long time and this was the easiest way.09/15/2014 - 9:08am
ConsterEh, I can't blame him.09/15/2014 - 9:01am
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician