Goldman Sachs: Xbox Division Should be Spun Off

October 6, 2010 -

A Goldman Sachs analyst (whose company was saved by taxpayers, for the record - you're welcome) says that Microsoft should spin off its Xbox division and downgraded Microsoft share recommendations from buy to neutral. In a new report, Goldman Sachs said that "A break-up of the consumer businesses could potentially unlock hidden value, or more discipline on cost could turn the businesses into contributors to profitability and shareholder value."

Goldman Sachs: Microsoft should split off 'unprofitable' Xbox dept. Analyst Goldman Sachs has downgraded Microsoft share recommendations from 'buy' to 'neutral', and suggested that one way to resolve the firm's apparent difficulties is to split off its consumer entertainment division.

Goldman's Sarah Friar added that "The Xbox products could be an appealing stand-alone entity, given the historical success of the Xbox and the products' brand strength, and the business could show unlocked value with forced cost discipline compared to as a piece of Microsoft."

Other analysts strongly disagree with the assessment: "Pulling this off would be like Microsoft learning Geller-ian magic tricks, the equivalent of being able to bend spoons with its brain," said investor Paul Kedrosky.

Finally, analyst Matt Rosoff told ComputerWorld: "I think it's silly to spin off a profitable business. Xbox would lose more than it would gain by going it alone." Rosoff felt that the company would be better off carving its search business, due to the complexities of competing with Google.

Source: GI.biz

Posted in

Comments

Re: Goldman Sachs: Xbox Division Should be Spun Off

Dude, James...sorry to be a downer, but you really need to proofread your posts.  You've got a typo in almost every sentence ("you're welcomed", "In a new report from Goldman Sachs said that", that entire weird second paragraph that restates what's said in the first paragraph in a run-on sentence, "Other analyst strongly disagree with the assessment").

It's a good story, but it looks like you were really in a hurry when you put it up.  Take a minute to check your work before you hit that Post button.

Re: Goldman Sachs: Xbox Division Should be Spun Off

was supposed to be a reply...

 

Re: Goldman Sachs: Xbox Division Should be Spun Off

LOLWUT  This "analyst" doesn't understand anything about Microsoft and Xbox.

Pwnage of Empires Xbox 360 Indie RTS

Re: Goldman Sachs: Xbox Division Should be Spun Off

Yes, I'm sure one of the most successful companies in history is going to take the advice of one that had to be BAILED OUT BY TAXPAYERS!

Sorry, but that's just a LOT of fucking nerve right there. Jack Thompson-sized nerve, you know?

Re: Goldman Sachs: Xbox Division Should be Spun Off

Yeah... I don't see it.

Spinning off would be a great way to make some bankers some money, but I can not picture how it would do anything positive for Microsoft.

Re: Goldman Sachs: Xbox Division Should be Spun Off

100% accurate comment

Re: Goldman Sachs: Xbox Division Should be Spun Off

Yes, let's listen to the people known for falsely raising the value of their own stock.  Sure, Microsoft could probably burn their reputation into the ground and make a few bucks.  But who will bail them out when they eventually realize their stock is worth nothing and collapse?  They can't go crying to the government like Goldman did.

Bill Gates has done something Goldman has failed to do.  He has become richer than god, all the while establishing a brand that actually is worth something.  Goldman should keep their suggestions on "smart" business practices to themselves and leave business to the people who are actually good at it.

Re: Goldman Sachs: Xbox Division Should be Spun Off

I'm inclined to agree with Matt Rosoff here.  Microsoft letting go of the strong brand name and Xbox losing Microsoft's support would hurt both sides of the divorce if it went through.

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

Who's responsible for crappy Netflix performance on Verizon?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
Papa MidnightGoogle+ Integration is coming to Twitch!07/25/2014 - 8:41pm
MaskedPixelanteThis whole Twitch thing just reeks of Google saying "You thought you could get away from us and our policies. That's adorable."07/25/2014 - 2:52pm
Sleaker@james_fudge - hopefully that's the case, but I wont hold my breath for it to happen.07/25/2014 - 1:08pm
SleakerUpdate on crytek situation is a bit ambiguous, but I'm glad they finally said something: http://www.gamesindustry.biz/articles/2014-07-25-crytek-addresses-financial-situation07/25/2014 - 1:07pm
E. Zachary KnightMan Atlas, Why do you not want me to have any money? Why? http://www.atlus.com/tears2/07/25/2014 - 12:06pm
Matthew WilsonI agree with that07/25/2014 - 10:45am
james_fudgeI think Twitch will have more of an impact on how YouTube/Google Plus work than the other way around.07/25/2014 - 10:22am
IanCWelp, twitch is going to suck now. Thanks google.07/25/2014 - 6:30am
Sleaker@MP - Looked up hitbox, thanks.07/24/2014 - 9:40pm
Matthew WilsonI agree, but to me given other known alternatives google seems to the the best option.07/24/2014 - 6:30pm
Andrew EisenTo be clear, I have no problem with Google buying it, I'm just concerned it will make a slew of objectively, quantifiably bad changes to Twitch just as it's done with YouTube over the years.07/24/2014 - 6:28pm
Matthew WilsonI doubt yahoo has the resources to pull it off, and I not just talking about money.07/24/2014 - 6:15pm
SleakerI wouldn't have minded a Yahoo purchase, probably would have been a better deal than Tumblr seeing as they paid the same for it...07/24/2014 - 6:13pm
MaskedPixelanteIt's the golden age of Hitbox, I guess.07/24/2014 - 6:08pm
Matthew Wilsonagain twitch was going to get bought. It was just who was going to buy it . Twitch was not even being able to handle the demand, so hey needed a company with allot of infrastructure to help them. I can understand why you would not want Google to buy it .07/24/2014 - 5:49pm
Andrew Eisen"Google is better than MS or Amazon" Wow. Google, as I mentioned earlier, progressively makes almost everything worse and yet there are still two lesser options. Again, wow!07/24/2014 - 5:43pm
Andrew EisenI don't know. MS, in my experience, is about 50/50 on its products. It's either fine or it's unusable crap. Amazon, well... I've never had a problem buying anything from them but I don't use any of their products or services so I couldn't really say.07/24/2014 - 5:42pm
Matthew WilsonGoogle is better than MS or Amazon.07/24/2014 - 5:33pm
Sleaker@AE - I've never seen youtube as a great portal to interact with people from a comment perspective. like ever. The whole interface doesn't really promote that.07/24/2014 - 5:28pm
Andrew EisenNor I. From a content producer's perspective, almost every change Google implements makes the service more cumbersome to use. It's why I set up a Facebook fan page in the first place; it was becoming too difficult to connect with my viewers on YouTube.07/24/2014 - 4:50pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician