SCOTUS Blog Schwarzenegger v. EMA Preview

October 27, 2010 -

The SCOTUS Blog gives us a preview of the arguments we can expect from both sides of the Schwarzenegger v. Entertainment Merchants Association review before the Supreme Court on November 2. Deputy state attorney general Zackery P. Morazzini will argue for California (Jerry Brown is busy campaigning for Governor of the state), and Paul M. Smith of Jenner & Block will be arguing for the video game industry.

This is a great read because it covers everything about the case that you could possibly imagine, but the bit below sums up a general feeling about the SCOTUS taking up the case in the first place:

One of the briefs, from the Pennsylvania Center for the First Amendment and the Brechner First Amendment Project, implied that the Court may have taken on more of a societal challenge than it realized when it granted review of the case. By granting the petition, it commented, “the Court now stands primed to wade deeply into the culture war over media violence. This is a surreal, surrogate and substitute war…for addressing the problems of real-world violence, as California and other government entities play the media blame game…It also is a war over censorship.” What the Court is being asked to sustain, that brief said dismissively, is “feel-good legislation.”

Read the whole thing here.

Posted in

Comments

Re: SCOTUS Blog Schwarzenegger v. EMA Preview

If there was anything that would have helped California convey to the court how serious they were about this issue and that would have helped it stand a chance, it was having their very own Attorney General stand before them to make the case personally.  However, since Jerry "Moonbeam" Brown won't be there as he is campaigning (and will probably fail...again) and having some other guy nobody's really heard of instead, their argument won't come across as strong as it would have otherwise.  Again, just goes to show what the state's priorities are.

It sounds like the stakes on this really are far higher than we realized.  And that this may indeed be the final word on not just video game violence, but ALL depictons of violence in media.  I relly hope, then, for a favorable outcome.  I think however that since they know that this really is a piece of "feel-good" legislation, and that those types of laws ultimately do nothing, that they may have already made their minds up and will reaffirm the lower court rulings

Re: SCOTUS Blog Schwarzenegger v. EMA Preview

I like to think the Supreme Court is not swayed by name recognition of attorneys.

Re: SCOTUS Blog Schwarzenegger v. EMA Preview

Honestly, that's probably a bit naive.  Certainly its not the main thing they'll be focusing on, but it could have some *small* impact.  It's been pointed out multiple times that thinking the SCOTUS judges are perfectly objective machines is not realistic.  Not saying the name recognition of the lawyers will be main issue, but it could have some small impact.

Re: SCOTUS Blog Schwarzenegger v. EMA Preview

"It's been pointed out multiple times that thinking the SCOTUS judges are perfectly objective machines is not realistic."

Of course it isn't, but that's not the same thing as deducting points from an argument because somebody other than a state AG showed up to argue it.

Now, if he's a worse lawyer than the AG, then yeah, it's going to hurt his case.  And the Justices' own personal biases will play in on some level -- that's why we can say things like "Alito will probably side with California and Thomas with EMA."  But that's not the same thing as taking the argument less seriously because somebody other than the AG showed up.

Re: SCOTUS Blog Schwarzenegger v. EMA Preview

This wait is killing me.  To me, for videogames to lose First Amendment protection is basically a death sentence to the entire medium, as I will not abide a situation where the only games are designed for children in mind.   This court decision had better come fast so I can determine if I need a new hobby or not.

Re: SCOTUS Blog Schwarzenegger v. EMA Preview

Not ot mention the people who play part in getting first ammendment protections removed from video games are unlikely to stop there.

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
E. Zachary KnightGot that same recommendation on Twitter. So I guess that is a good sign.09/15/2014 - 8:39pm
prh99Portlandia, though I don't watch a lot of sitcoms. Heard it was good though.09/15/2014 - 8:02pm
E. Zachary KnightSitcom recommendations for someone who like Parks and Rec but hates The Office: Go.09/15/2014 - 6:08pm
NeenekoEven if they do change their policy, they can only do it moving forward and I could see the mod/pack community simply branching.09/15/2014 - 12:50pm
Michael ChandraAs for take the money and run, the guy must have a networth of 8~9 digits already.09/15/2014 - 10:33am
Michael ChandraMe, I'm more betting on some form of mod API where servers must run donations/payments through them and they take a cut.09/15/2014 - 10:32am
Michael ChandraEspecially since they want it for promoting their phones. Killing user interest is the dumbest move to make.09/15/2014 - 10:32am
Michael ChandraGiven how the EULA actively allows for LPs, I'm not sure Microsoft is ready for the backlash of disallowing that.09/15/2014 - 10:31am
Matthew Wilsonthey wont do that, the backlash would be too big.09/15/2014 - 10:25am
ConsterSleaker: how is that a flipside? Sounds to me like that's basically what Notch himself said, except rudely.09/15/2014 - 10:18am
MaskedPixelanteOn the plus side, no more lazy Minecraft LPs, since iirc Microsoft has a strict "no monetization period" policy when it comes to their stuff.09/15/2014 - 10:13am
james_fudgeBut it continues to sell on every platform it is on, so there's that09/15/2014 - 10:09am
james_fudgeOh, well that's another matter :)09/15/2014 - 10:08am
E. Zachary KnightNothing against Notch here. I think it is great that he made something so cool. I just can't understand how it is worth $2.5 bil09/15/2014 - 9:59am
InfophileWhat a world we live in: Becoming a billionaire was the easy way out for Notch.09/15/2014 - 9:42am
james_fudgelots of hate for Notch here. I don't get it. Sorry he made a game everyone loved. What a monster he is!09/15/2014 - 9:37am
SleakerOn the flipside, Notch has been a horrible CEO for Mojang, and the company has grown on sheer inertia, DESPITE being mishandled over and over.09/15/2014 - 9:33am
SleakerI can understand Notch's statements he made to Kotaku about growing bigger than he intended, and getting hate for EULA changes he didn't enact.09/15/2014 - 9:32am
MaskedPixelantehttp://pastebin.com/n1qTeikM Notch's statement about the MS acquisition. He wanted out for a long time and this was the easiest way.09/15/2014 - 9:08am
ConsterEh, I can't blame him.09/15/2014 - 9:01am
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician