SCOTUS Blog Schwarzenegger v. EMA Preview

October 27, 2010 -

The SCOTUS Blog gives us a preview of the arguments we can expect from both sides of the Schwarzenegger v. Entertainment Merchants Association review before the Supreme Court on November 2. Deputy state attorney general Zackery P. Morazzini will argue for California (Jerry Brown is busy campaigning for Governor of the state), and Paul M. Smith of Jenner & Block will be arguing for the video game industry.

This is a great read because it covers everything about the case that you could possibly imagine, but the bit below sums up a general feeling about the SCOTUS taking up the case in the first place:

One of the briefs, from the Pennsylvania Center for the First Amendment and the Brechner First Amendment Project, implied that the Court may have taken on more of a societal challenge than it realized when it granted review of the case. By granting the petition, it commented, “the Court now stands primed to wade deeply into the culture war over media violence. This is a surreal, surrogate and substitute war…for addressing the problems of real-world violence, as California and other government entities play the media blame game…It also is a war over censorship.” What the Court is being asked to sustain, that brief said dismissively, is “feel-good legislation.”

Read the whole thing here.

Posted in

Comments

Re: SCOTUS Blog Schwarzenegger v. EMA Preview

If there was anything that would have helped California convey to the court how serious they were about this issue and that would have helped it stand a chance, it was having their very own Attorney General stand before them to make the case personally.  However, since Jerry "Moonbeam" Brown won't be there as he is campaigning (and will probably fail...again) and having some other guy nobody's really heard of instead, their argument won't come across as strong as it would have otherwise.  Again, just goes to show what the state's priorities are.

It sounds like the stakes on this really are far higher than we realized.  And that this may indeed be the final word on not just video game violence, but ALL depictons of violence in media.  I relly hope, then, for a favorable outcome.  I think however that since they know that this really is a piece of "feel-good" legislation, and that those types of laws ultimately do nothing, that they may have already made their minds up and will reaffirm the lower court rulings

Re: SCOTUS Blog Schwarzenegger v. EMA Preview

I like to think the Supreme Court is not swayed by name recognition of attorneys.

Re: SCOTUS Blog Schwarzenegger v. EMA Preview

Honestly, that's probably a bit naive.  Certainly its not the main thing they'll be focusing on, but it could have some *small* impact.  It's been pointed out multiple times that thinking the SCOTUS judges are perfectly objective machines is not realistic.  Not saying the name recognition of the lawyers will be main issue, but it could have some small impact.

Re: SCOTUS Blog Schwarzenegger v. EMA Preview

"It's been pointed out multiple times that thinking the SCOTUS judges are perfectly objective machines is not realistic."

Of course it isn't, but that's not the same thing as deducting points from an argument because somebody other than a state AG showed up to argue it.

Now, if he's a worse lawyer than the AG, then yeah, it's going to hurt his case.  And the Justices' own personal biases will play in on some level -- that's why we can say things like "Alito will probably side with California and Thomas with EMA."  But that's not the same thing as taking the argument less seriously because somebody other than the AG showed up.

Re: SCOTUS Blog Schwarzenegger v. EMA Preview

This wait is killing me.  To me, for videogames to lose First Amendment protection is basically a death sentence to the entire medium, as I will not abide a situation where the only games are designed for children in mind.   This court decision had better come fast so I can determine if I need a new hobby or not.

Re: SCOTUS Blog Schwarzenegger v. EMA Preview

Not ot mention the people who play part in getting first ammendment protections removed from video games are unlikely to stop there.

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

Is King right? Should all games adopt the free-to-play model?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
MaskedPixelantehttp://www.joystiq.com/2014/04/18/playstation-99-cent-sale-discounts-tokyo-jungle-super-stardust/ Weekend long PSN flash sale. So much stuff is 99 cents for the rest of the weekend.04/18/2014 - 5:59pm
Adam802http://www.polygon.com/2014/4/18/5627928/newtown-video-game-addiction-forum04/18/2014 - 4:14pm
Matthew Wilsonit is a video talking about why certain games/products/consoles do well, and others do not. he back it up with solid research.04/18/2014 - 3:56pm
Andrew EisenI'm not keen on blind links. What is it?04/18/2014 - 3:45pm
Matthew Wilsonthis is worth a whatch https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MyXcr6sDRtw&list=PL35FE5C4B157509C904/18/2014 - 3:43pm
MaskedPixelanteNumber 3: Night Dive was brought to the attention of the public by a massive game recovery, and yet most of their released catalogue consists of games that other people did the hard work of getting re-released.04/17/2014 - 8:46pm
MaskedPixelanteNumber 2: If Humongous Entertainment wanted their stuff on Steam, why didn't they talk to their parent company, which does have a number of games published on Steam?04/17/2014 - 8:45pm
MaskedPixelanteNumber 1: When Night Dive spent the better part of a year teasing the return of true classics, having their big content dump be edutainment is kind of a kick in the stomach.04/17/2014 - 8:44pm
Matthew Wilsonhttp://www.giantbomb.com/articles/jeff-gerstmann-heads-to-new-york-takes-questions/1100-4900/ He talks about the future games press and the games industry. It is worth your time even though it is a bit long, and stay for the QA. There are some good QA04/17/2014 - 5:28pm
IanCErm so they shouldn't sell edutainment at all? Why?04/17/2014 - 4:42pm
MaskedPixelanteNot that linkable, go onto Steam and there's stuff like Pajama Sam on the front-page, courtesy of Night Dive.04/17/2014 - 4:13pm
Andrew EisenOkay, again, please, please, PLEASE get in a habit of linking to whatever you're talking about.04/17/2014 - 4:05pm
MaskedPixelanteAnother round of Night Dive teasing and promising turns out to be stupid edutainment games. Thanks for wasting all our time, guys. See you never.04/17/2014 - 3:44pm
Matthew WilsonAgain the consequences were not only foreseeable, but very likely. anyone who understood supply demand curvs knew that was going to happen. SF has been a econ/trade hub for the last hundred years.04/17/2014 - 2:45pm
Andrew EisenMixedPixelante - Would you like to expand on that?04/17/2014 - 2:43pm
MaskedPixelanteWell, I am officially done with Night Dive Studios. Unless they can bring something worthwhile back, I'm never buying another game from them.04/17/2014 - 2:29pm
PHX Corphttp://www.msnbc.com/ronan-farrow/watch/video-games-continue-to-break-the-mold-229561923638 Ronan Farrow Daily on Video games breaking the mold04/17/2014 - 2:13pm
NeenekoAh yes, because by building something nice they were just asking for people to come push them out. Consequences are protested all the time when other people are implementing them.04/17/2014 - 2:06pm
Matthew Wilsonok than they should not protest when the consequences of that choice occur.04/17/2014 - 1:06pm
NeenekoIf people want tall buildings, plenty of other cities with them. Part of freedom and markets is communities deciding what they do and do not want built in their collective space.04/17/2014 - 12:55pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician