WWE to Give Away Free Merch at CT Polling Places

October 29, 2010 -

On the heels of a ruling that wearing World Wrestling Entertainment garb to Connecticut voting locations on election day would not constitute illegal electioneering for Republican Senatorial nominee Linda McMahon, former CEO of the WWE, the entertainment organization plans to hand out merchandise at select polling places.

Last week, the office of Connecticut Secretary of State Susan Bysiewicz had posed that the wearing of WWE merchandise in polling places could be illegal, prompting current WWE CEO Vince McMahon to file a lawsuit. U.S. District Judge Janet Bond Arterton eventually ruled that voters could wear WWE gear, a ruling that “pleased” Vince.

Now, going one step farther, Vince announced plans to hand out WWE merchandise, gratis, at select polling places throughout the state on Tuesday, stating, “I can't think of a better way for WWE fans to celebrate their constitutional rights and freedom of expression while voting than to proudly wear the WWE merchandise that Connecticut Secretary of State Susan Bysiewicz attempted to prohibit from the polls.”

“Out of respect for voters from all political parties,” the merchandise stands will be kept 75 feet away from polling places.


Comments

Re: WWE to Give Away Free Merch at CT Polling Places

Here in Chicago if your a Democrat pretty much they will hand you who to vote for before you get in and whether your a Democrat or not if you complain you will go to jail curtousy to King Daley the 2nd. If you prove you can vote Democrat loose squares and some times ciggerate packs will be given away for being such a good boy,

Jessie Jackson will be shipping people from the Black Community to the poles with promises of a chicken dinner and ciggerates and some loose squares curtousy of Rainbow Push. I remember being apart of their Youth Council years ago, what a joke.

Re: WWE to Give Away Free Merch at CT Polling Places

What on Earth are you ranting about?

Re: WWE to Give Away Free Merch at CT Polling Places

75?  Huh, guess it's a state by state thing.  It's 100 feet here in California.

 

Andrew Eisen

Re: WWE to Give Away Free Merch at CT Polling Places

Yeah, from what I gathered from reading about this story on the various wrestling sites, in CT, political signs and messages must be kept at least 75 feet away from polling places.

Geaux Saints, Geaux Tigers, Geaux Hornets, Jack Thompson can geaux chase a chupacabra. Hell will stay frozen over for quite a while since the Saints won the Super Bowl.

Geaux Saints, Geaux Tigers, Geaux Pelicans. Even through the darkest days, this fire burns always.

Re: WWE to Give Away Free Merch at CT Polling Places

Sounds reasonable.  If they were handing out shirts right out front I could see the objection, but 75 feet away sounds fair to me.

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
Andrew EisenAgain, no one likes being lumped in with the bad apples. Gamers or feminists so lets all strive not to do that, yes? Could the petitioners gone about it a better way? Yes, it could have been more factual in its petition.07/28/2015 - 8:25pm
Mattsworknamefor gamers to hold the media sites they had issues with accountable? If we look at those questions, I think we find the answer to the first one07/28/2015 - 8:20pm
MattsworknameEZK: I can't answer that, Im split on it cause I feel both are wrong ,but at the same time, I don't know if theres other ways to go about those seperate con.cerns. Was there a better way for feminists to make there point about GTA? was there a better way07/28/2015 - 8:20pm
MechaTama31Ok, a very different topic.07/28/2015 - 8:13pm
MechaTama31On a slightly different topic, in about a month my fiance will be a Mrs., but I'll still be a Mr., as I've always been. Hardly seems fair. I want a nifty new title!07/28/2015 - 8:13pm
E. Zachary KnightMatt, So, what is it? Is petitioning Intel to pull ads from Gamasutra "bullying and threatening" or is it justified? You can't have it both ways, especially if petition Target is "bullying and threatening".07/28/2015 - 8:10pm
Andrew EisenWhat this comes across as is "we need to find a way to silence anyone who says something we don't like."07/28/2015 - 8:08pm
Andrew EisenAnd how was Gamasutra not accountable for the opinion piece it published and refused to pull or edit even after advertising had been pulled?07/28/2015 - 8:08pm
Andrew EisenThere are tons of options when it comes to an opinion piece you don't agree with. Stating otherwise is dishonest or shows an extraordinary lack of imagination.07/28/2015 - 8:07pm
Mattsworknamethem acounatble. We just didn't have many opttions at the time07/28/2015 - 8:05pm
MattsworknameEZK:I never said it was justified, I just said that some people felt they didn't have any other means to hold them accountable. Weather it's justifited or not is somethign to debate, but I was never a big fan of it cause I wanted some other way to hold07/28/2015 - 8:04pm
Mattsworknameprice07/28/2015 - 8:03pm
MattsworknameAndrew: Your not wrong andrew, but gamasutra , and others like it , were called to task by the audiance that felt they had turned there backs on them. True or not, in media, you have to know how to reach an audiance, and chosing not to, well, you pay a07/28/2015 - 8:03pm
Andrew EisenAt the end of the day, even when Intel pulled its advertising (albeit, temporarily), Gamasutra showed its journalistic integrity by not removing or editing the opinion piece.07/28/2015 - 8:00pm
Andrew EisenNot liking Gamasutra is fine. The audience is primarily industry folk and it's not a game-focused site so it's probably not targeting you anyway.07/28/2015 - 7:57pm
E. Zachary KnightMAtt, So, an online petition asking Target to stop selling GTAV is "bullying and threatening" but a petition and boycott of Intel to force them to stop advertising on Gamasutra is justified?07/28/2015 - 7:56pm
Andrew EisenTrue or not, what it came across as a bunch of people lashing out at a publication over an opinion piece.07/28/2015 - 7:56pm
MattsworknameTo be honest, I've never liked them, but mostly cause rather then being a game focused site, they felt to political for my taste07/28/2015 - 7:56pm
Andrew EisenAnd in the case of Gamasutra?07/28/2015 - 7:54pm
Mattsworknameour concerns about them were well founded.07/28/2015 - 7:50pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician