Atlantic Columnist: Violent Black Ops Ad is “Twisted”

November 9, 2010 -

The latest ad for Call of Duty: Black Ops, which features "common" people plugged into violent, war-based scenarios, is a little too realistic for one Atlantic columnist.

The ad in question is designed to allude to the interactivity of Black Ops and shows a young girl, a hotel concierge and other various people with normal jobs blasting away at unseen enemies with rocket launchers, shotguns and other weaponry. NBA star Kobe Bryant and late night host Jimmy Kimmel also make an appearance, before a tagline offers “There’s a Soldier in All of Us.”

Atlantic writer Sam Machkovech says that he “couldn't have asked for a more disappointing game-related ad,” adding that “These aren't the video games I play.” In clarifying how he views games, even violent ones, Machkovech offers that “Even at their highest levels of action and violence, video games play like sophisticated games of Cops & Robbers. They're silly…”

Regarding the Black Ops ad however, the author writes:

This ad equips people with real guns and simulates real-life, no-CGI combat. The thud of recoil, the screams of rockets, the dust of explosions... and the look of exasperation on that little, shotgun-wielding girl. The only things missing are the dead bodies on the receiving ends of each bullet and blast.

Machkovech finished by stating that Activision's ad "comes closer to selling real death than any video game possibly could.”


Comments

Re: Atlantic Columnist: Violent Black Ops Ad is ...

Hey Atlantic Columnist...

 

GET OVER IT! (and go back to bingo)

Re: Atlantic Columnist: Violent Black Ops Ad is ...

still not nearly as bad as that old XB360 (i think it were) commercial that had a bunch of people going around acting as if they were shooting at one another in public.

 

and tbh i find it in very bad taste this one, it makes real war look more fantasy than regular movies do. i dunno, it just doesn't rub me right taking the fantasy out of my game and replacing it with an altered reality.

this almost furthers the bogus claims that video games can lead to violence, and are trying to desensitize people to real war and its effects.

 

Re: Atlantic Columnist: Violent Black Ops Ad is ...

I thought the ad was entertaining.  I still have zero interest in the game, but whatever.

Re: Atlantic Columnist: Violent Black Ops Ad is ...

Keep this guy away from Future Weapons, Smash Lab, and even Mythbusters.  Seriously, this editorial sounds like the very act of shooting a weapon is violent.  We don't see anybody getting shot or dying.  We see people shooting.  This is no worse than the average A-Team episode.

http://www.deathvanquished.blogspot.com

Re: Atlantic Columnist: Violent Black Ops Ad is ...

I LOVED this ad.  When I saw it two nights ago, I thought for a second it might be an anti-gaming ad, the juxposition of regular people in casual clothing blasting away in a warzone seemed a bit unsettling.  But this feeling only lasted a few seconds, I realized what they were getting at and I was enjoying it fully.  It is a really cool ad that manages to capture your attention.

Re: Atlantic Columnist: Violent Black Ops Ad is ...

I just thought it was hilarious. Real clever actually. The only thing I ever questioned was the statement "there's a soldier in all of us" as though being a soldier is so simplistic. As though being badass is all it is. But, that was my only issue, just that phrase. Certainly not the comerical. Loved that.

 

"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." -Albert Einstein

"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." -Albert Einstein

Re: Atlantic Columnist: Violent Black Ops Ad is ...

I don't see anything wrong with the statement.  It is akin to saying "there is the potential for greatness in all of us".  Problem being that for 99.99% of us, we will never grasp it.

-Ultimately what will do in mankind is a person's fear of their own freedom-

Re: Atlantic Columnist: Violent Black Ops Ad is ...

I don't care what the whiners state this was an awesome ad for the game. Still not gonna get black-ops though.

http://www.magicinkgaming.com/

Re: Atlantic Columnist: Violent Black Ops Ad is ...

 unless there is another shot gun weilding girl i'm missing, Am i the only one who is annoyed that they say "Little shot-gun wielding girl" when the girl in question looks like she is probably more like 20 years old?

Re: Atlantic Columnist: Violent Black Ops Ad is ...

I also facepalm´d at that. This people sure wish we left childhood behind over 30s.

------------------------------------------------------------ My DeviantArt Page (aka DeviantCensorship): http://www.darkknightstrikes.deviantart.com

Re: Atlantic Columnist: Violent Black Ops Ad is ...

^

Re: Atlantic Columnist: Violent Black Ops Ad is ...

I have to agree with Machkovech. It's kinda lame. THIS one's good though: http://activisionvideo.com/ (obviously. because it's on the Activision site). Has anyone here read this about Bobby Kotick? http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000142405274870425660457529574238047350...

Re: Atlantic Columnist: Violent Black Ops Ad is ...

couldn't they have.. I dont know... waited till AFTER the scotus decision before showing this commercial?

╔╦═╣Signature Statement╠═╦╗

If you don't like something I said in a post, don't just hit the dislike, let me know your thoughts! I'm interested in knowing everyone's opinions, even when they don't mesh with my own.

Re: Atlantic Columnist: Violent Black Ops Ad is ...

Do you also want that every M rated game to be halted to release until the SCOTUS make their decision? This is why the industry were struggling against California to hold to their right to produce M rated games and advertising them.

------------------------------------------------------------ My DeviantArt Page (aka DeviantCensorship): http://www.darkknightstrikes.deviantart.com

Re: Atlantic Columnist: Violent Black Ops Ad is ...

The Game released yesterday. If they waited to air the ad, it would have been long after the tiem it was important.

We should not have to put our lives and companies on hold while the Supreme Court decides our fate.

E. Zachary Knight
Oklahoma City Chapter of the ECA
http://www.theeca.com/chapters_oklahoma

Re: Atlantic Columnist: Violent Black Ops Ad is ...

 As entertaining as the ad was, I still can see how it would appear unsettling to some people.  Of course, the commercial is horribly inaccurate.  Had they represented the real FPS online community, it would have been a bunch of skinny homophobic teenagers running around :D

Re: Atlantic Columnist: Violent Black Ops Ad is ...

The guy at the end is a dead ringer for David Della Rocco in The Boondock Saints.  "WYATT EFFIN' EARP!"

Also, interesting that the writer brings up the "banned" Xbox ad (although I could swear I've seen it up here in Canada) which was part of a whole series, including that disarmingly charming one with the water balloon fight.  Yes, it's valid that this ad diminishes some of the complex narrative of the single-player mode, but is that really why we're buying the game?  I feel like this entitled attitude ("these aren't the games I play") comes from the same vein as "hardcore" gamers complaining about the family-friendly approach towards motion sensor technology.  What's wrong with expanding the gamer demographic?  I'm incredibly happy that gaming is becoming something people just do, like reading books, or watching movies and TV.  That's a major step towards video games becoming a legit medium of expression.

Frankly, I was more insulted that a number of the behaviours exhibited would've resulted in instagibs on most of the servers I frequent.  You don't just wander up to the center point with a rifle, lady!  That's a guaranteed headshot for some camp-happy sniper at the far end of the map!

---
Fangamer

---
Fangamer

Re: Atlantic Columnist: Violent Black Ops Ad is ...

I found that ad to be pretty creative. I applaud the advertising company that made it.

E. Zachary Knight
Oklahoma City Chapter of the ECA
http://www.theeca.com/chapters_oklahoma

Re: Atlantic Columnist: Violent Black Ops Ad is ...

I thought it was pretty similar to one Microsoft did for XBL years ago, except there people didn't have real weapons, just their hands.

Re: Atlantic Columnist: Violent Black Ops Ad is ...

Funniest ad ever. The columnist needs to learn to chill out. If I were more in touch with games like COD, I would buy Black Ops.

 

 

 

------------------------------------------------------------ My DeviantArt Page (aka DeviantCensorship): http://www.darkknightstrikes.deviantart.com

Re: Atlantic Columnist: Violent Black Ops Ad is ...

Whiners are going to whine. I thought this was a brilliant ad that showed that anyone can play this game. :)

Re: Atlantic Columnist: Violent Black Ops Ad is ...

That is what I took away from it too,.. I thought it was very well done both in visuals and concept.

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

Did Microsoft pay too much ($2.5 billion) for Minecraft developer Mojang?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
Andrew EisenOh yeah, some outlets sensationalize things (especially with the chosen headline). No argument there. As far as gender issues not being widespread? I'm inclined to disagree but I suppose it depends on what specifically you're talking about.09/19/2014 - 3:43pm
SleakerI think I've been qualitatively informed by those Factual Femenist videos that there isn't reallly a widespread gender issue, and that there are select news outlets that try to sensationalize things.09/19/2014 - 3:37pm
james_fudgeI'm just going to leave this here before someone else does:http://yiannopoulos.net/2014/09/19/gamejournopros-zoe-quinn-email-dump/09/19/2014 - 3:21pm
NeenekoI have met some real jerks and slimeballs in gender activism, but when I hear the idea that there are many 'not nice' people it comes across as code for 'uppity people who do not know their place'.09/19/2014 - 12:10pm
Andrew EisenKrono - Many of the people pushing gender issues aren't nice people? I'm sure not everyone's a sweatheart but so far, everyone I've seen with such a critique had absolutely nothing to back them up.09/19/2014 - 10:46am
InfophileI think there's a qualitative difference between a site and a hashtag though. GP can ban anyone from commenting, so they can have the image they want. But anyone can use any hashtag and try to poison it. Granted, that hasn't happened to the other one yet09/19/2014 - 10:13am
E. Zachary KnightKrono, your comparison to GP does not work. We do not need to get rid of GP, because no one associates GP with trolls and abuse. The same can't be said for gamergate.09/19/2014 - 10:09am
Krono@Michael You don't remember the "other hashtag" because no one actually uses it. We're talking 836,983 uses of #gamergate over it's lifetime, and 8,119 for the "alternative". 47,129 uses on the 18th vs 41. With #notyourshield at 140,133 uses & 5,209 uses09/19/2014 - 9:48am
Kronoresearch it. Changing tags to get away from trolls would be like wiping GamePolitics and restarting under a new name to get away from people calling Jack Thompson a filthy names in the comments section.09/19/2014 - 9:35am
Sleaker@quiknkold - seems like all that page is is a bunch of random developer opinions and rumors that we're supposedto do what with?09/19/2014 - 9:31am
Kronoas an opportunity to push back against them. It's one of the things muddling the issue. @conster A new hashtag would do nothing to improve anything. Trolls will simply follow to the new hashtag, and it will confuse the issue for anyone attempting to09/19/2014 - 9:25am
Krono@Andrew aaah. Yes, I'm sure there's some of that. Part of the problem is many of the people pushing gender issues are not very nice people. Basically the latest incarnation of moralists we've seen in the past couple decades. Naturually some will take this09/19/2014 - 9:23am
quiknkoldhttp://www.nichegamer.net/2014/09/real-gamedevs-sound-off-regarding-the-gamergate-controversy/09/19/2014 - 8:35am
MaskedPixelanteMeanwhile, in news that actually DOES matter, Scotland voted "NO" to Scottish independance.09/19/2014 - 8:20am
ConsterSeriously? "We shouldn't make a new hashtag - it's better to associate ourselves with psychos than to decrease our visibility"?09/19/2014 - 7:54am
Michael ChandraI forget what it is exactly, but there already is another hashtag that some use, exactly to separate themselves from the abusive behaviour. So don't bother lying to me.09/19/2014 - 7:06am
quiknkold2 to 3 or more09/19/2014 - 6:53am
quiknkoldMichael Chandra : I'll say this. The only reason they havent used another hashtag is because it would look like a form of dividing the arguement. Using another Hashtag has come up, and they feel like if they made a new hashtag, it'll split the debate from09/19/2014 - 6:53am
Michael ChandraYou want a debate? Build a wall between you and the poisoned well. Make clear you despise it, despise the behaviour. Then get into the other issues you are troubled with, and don't say a single word again about the poisoned well.09/19/2014 - 3:46am
Michael ChandraAnd someone claiming #notyourshield was to be taken serious, when chatlogs show they wanted it going to hide even more harassment behind? Yeah, not buying a word you're saying. You poisoned your own well.09/19/2014 - 3:45am
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician