When Journalists Attack: Gizmodo

November 12, 2010 -

Everyone loves a good rant, but Gizmodo writer Joel Johnson delivers a particularly scathing rebuke to readers and commenters who are often a little self righteous and overly personal when disagreeing with an article. The colorful verbal lashing from Johnson might be considered beyond the pale by some, though. Here's a bit from a section entitled "You Don't Get To Call Us Unprofessional," where the writer questions the readers' intelligence:

It goes like this: 1) We put up a post you don't like. 2) Rather than ignoring the post and enjoying a different post—or in the worst case deciding you do not enjoy the mix of stories of Gizmodo any longer and going somewhere else—you decide to express your dissatisfaction. 3) You accuse us of being unprofessional, typically without any clear indication by which standards of professionalism we are being judged.

To be fair, you are very stupid. When presented with something that does not match your very rigid preconceptions of what should entertain you this very second, you lash out with the all the weaponry at your disposal, spitting flechettes of feeble cruelty at the slightest provocation. If you could, when presented with your french fries on the left side of the plastic tray and not the obviously superior right side, you would reach across the counter and give the cashier's nipples a hard twist. And then call him unprofessional.

But the most disturbing part is about the author suffering a horrible trauma that he shared with readers, who later use it against him when they don't disagree with him over some story, or issue, or company:

So I was raped when I was a kid by a parent and I wrote about it. In case you're wondering: It f*cking sucked, but I'm much better, thank you.

But when I got into a scuffle with some commenters last week they decided to take something I'd written about that experience and use it to suggest to Brian Lam that I have anger issues. They were concerned for me, you see. They suggested therapy for my unresolved issues.

I do have anger issues, you dumb, cruel,, entitled, tunneled vision shit eaters. My anger issues are with you, because you are so foul, so unable to use the internet as a thoroughfare for human compassion or—Christ—even just a civil conversation. It's so far beyond your comprehension that perhaps you are rude or simply wrong that you'd dredge up something that has absolutely no bearing on—wait for it—arguments about gadgets.

Read the whole thing, and before you go off half-cocked and comment, understand that the story is about people going off half-cocked and commenting..

Posted in

Comments

Re: When Journalists Attack: Gizmodo

Good for him!

The sort of moronism he's attacking is the reason why 6 years ago a group of people abandoned xbox.com forums and started a community for mature people. I haven't looked back since.

It's also the reason why I finally got so fed up with half-wits on the Internet and downloaded CommentBlocker 2.0 Firefox add-on. I couldn't be happier (yes, I'm blocking Gizmodo.com comments with it).

-- http://pixelantes.blogspot.com/

Re: When Journalists Attack: Gizmodo

Wow, that was perhaps one of the most unprofessional things I've ever read.  When you try to defend your professionalism you should do it in a professional way.

-Ultimately what will do in mankind is a person's fear of their own freedom-

Re: When Journalists Attack: Gizmodo

Or hold your words and say nothing. Remain silent and be thought a fool than speak and remove all doubt.

Re: When Journalists Attack: Gizmodo

The Glenn Beck of tech journalism.

Let me know when it's time to give a shit.

Re: When Journalists Attack: Gizmodo

the logic in his rant is scarily similar to other rants that cry foul over the basic rules of criticism.

when he puts up a post, he is opening himself up for criticism, no matter how sophmoric or vulgar. He wants to stand on the soap box but doesn't want any tomatoes thrown at him. can't have it both ways. how does an internat journalist not get that? the fact that he's a journalist and still he doesn't get that very basic concept is the real measure of stupidity (and irony) here.

although irrelevant and inconsiderate, he also made public the facts regarding is childhood trauma. if you don't want it to be used against you, don't post anything publically that can be used against you - another basic rule that appears to be lost on this idiot.

he also had an anger attack back when the ipad got released and many techies were less than enthused. he's like on a hair trigger. but drama generates hits and so he continues to generate news on other sites and therefore still has a job. maybe not so dumb afterall, eh?

Re: When Journalists Attack: Gizmodo

One of the comments best explains it for me: This kind of writer's rant best left to Facebook or Twitter, not on Gizmodo.

 

No reason to rant like that on a site story.  It only hurts the site's image.  Also, he is feeding the troll.

---------
There are only 10 types of people in this world, people who know binary and people who don't.

---------
There are only 10 types of people in this world, people who know binary and people who don't.

Re: When Journalists Attack: Gizmodo

Beat me to it. I was going to say that the words 'Troll' and 'feeding' spring to mind.

Re: When Journalists Attack: Gizmodo

Hey!  I might be dumb, cruel, and entitled, but my eyesight is 20/20, and I always clean the fertilizer off my goddamn vegetables before I eat them.  Always.

---
Fangamer

---
Fangamer

Re: When Journalists Attack: Gizmodo

It made me smile.  But yeah, obviously it's pretty thoroughly unprofessional; he's just as bilious as the lowest-common-denominator commenters, he's just smarter and more coherent than they are.

Under the circumstances, his anger's understandable and forgivable.  There's no excuse for dredging up a guy's childhood trauma to try and win an argument.

In short: stop calling me unprofessional, you twats.

Re: When Journalists Attack: Gizmodo

It's unfortunate that Gizmodo, being the bastion of editorial and journalistic integrity that they are has a problem with the Internet being well...the Internet. If they want to attract a better community, maybe they should look inward and act like proper journalists instead of the lowest common denominator be-first-at-all-costs, typical Gawker site that they are. There's no doubt most comment sections (even ones on good sites) are vile places but that's reality and always has been. If they can't take the heat, they should get out of the kitchen. In the case of Gizmodo I say yes in fact, please DO get out of the kitchen.

Parallax Abstraction
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
www.digital-lifeline.ca

Parallax Abstraction
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Re: When Journalists Attack: Gizmodo

Well I can understand his annoyance, anger, and frustration. However, is this the right way to lash back? 

---------

James Fletcher, member of ECA Canada

Re: When Journalists Attack: Gizmodo

I think this article is completely unprofessional, and the author has issues and should seek help.

Aw come on! Someone had to say it.

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
MaskedPixelanteSWAT teams should be banned until they; 1. Learn not to walk into enemy fire, 2. Learn to throw the flashbang INTO the doorway, not the frame and 3. Stop complaining that I'm in their way.09/21/2014 - 9:53pm
Craig R.I'm getting of the opinion that SWAT teams nationwide should be banned. This probably isn't even the most absurd situation in which they've been used.09/21/2014 - 9:26pm
Andrew EisenAnd, predictably, it encouraged more parody accounts, having the exact opposite effect than what was intended.09/21/2014 - 7:07pm
E. Zachary KnightThis is called a police state people. When public officials can send SWAT raids after anyone for any offense, we are no longer free.09/21/2014 - 6:41pm
E. Zachary KnightJudge rules SWAT raid tageting parody Twitter account was justified. http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/sep/19/illinois-judge-swat-raid-parody-twitter-peoria-mayor09/21/2014 - 6:41pm
MechaTama31quik: But even if it did break, at worst it is only as bad as the powder. Even that is assuming that it is dangerous through skin contact, which is not a given if its delivery vehicle is a syringe.09/21/2014 - 4:30pm
MaskedPixelantehttp://www.forbes.com/sites/insertcoin/2014/09/20/isis-uses-gta-5-in-new-teen-recruitment-video/09/21/2014 - 4:25pm
quiknkoldSyringes can break. And in a transcontinental delivery, the glass could've broken when crushed. I work in a mail center. Shit like this is super serious09/21/2014 - 3:25pm
E. Zachary KnightIt doesn't matter what is inside the needle. As long as it requires him to take the step of purposefully injecting himself, the threat of the substance is as close to zero as you can get.09/21/2014 - 1:27pm
quiknkoldEzach: I'm not talking about the needle. I'm talking about what's inside. Geeze. Depending on what it is, the sender could be guilty of bioterrorism.09/21/2014 - 12:51pm
E. Zachary Knightquiknkold, No. That syringe is not worse than white powder or a bomb. The syringe requires the recipient to actually inject themselves. Not true for other mail threats.09/21/2014 - 12:49pm
Andrew EisenThe closest to a threat I ever received was a handwritten note slipped under my door that read "I KNOW it was you." Still no idea what that was about. I think the author must have got the wrong apartment.09/21/2014 - 12:28pm
InfophileThat's what they call it? I always called it hydroxic acid...09/21/2014 - 11:57am
MaskedPixelanteProbably dihydrogen monoxide, the most dangerous substance in the universe.09/21/2014 - 10:14am
james_fudgewell I hope he called the police so they can let us all know.09/21/2014 - 9:07am
quiknkoldIt's pretty gnarly. Depending on what it is, it could be worse than white powder or a fake bomb.09/21/2014 - 9:06am
james_fudgeI just looked it up on UPS.com09/21/2014 - 8:56am
james_fudgeand expensive for an American to ship to London.09/21/2014 - 8:55am
E. Zachary KnightThat is pretty scary. Would have been worse if it were a fake bomb or white powder.09/21/2014 - 8:49am
quiknkoldThere's some more tweets regarding it with more pictures09/21/2014 - 8:09am
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician