Xenophobic Spanish Political Game Taken Down, Developer Blamed

November 17, 2010 -

A game appearing on the website of a Spanish political party, in which players shot down illegal immigrants, was quickly yanked from the Internet after objections to its content.

The game, entitled Rescue, appeared on the website of the Catalan branch of the conservative Partido Popular (or People’s Party). Further describing the game, the Telegraph indicated that the goal was to “shoot down targets including ‘illegal immigrants’ parachuting from a plane and donkeys intended to represent Catalan separatists."

Once culminated, the game urged players to vote for the PP in the November 28 elections.

Rival political party ICV-EUiA called the game “an apology for violence and trivialisation of human life,” and an example of “xenophobia.”

For its part, the PP blamed the faux pas on the company that designed the game failing to follow instructions. Party spokesperson Esteban Gonzalez Pons told a radio station that "The targets should have been labeled ‘illegal mafia’ and not ‘illegal immigrants.’”

Pons added, “The idea was to show that the candidate Sanchez Camacho was committed to targeting problems such as unemployment and Catalan independence issues.”


Comments

Re: Xenophobic Spanish Political Game Taken Down, Developer ...

...Spain has an illegal immigrant problem? From where?

Re: Xenophobic Spanish Political Game Taken Down, Developer ...

Well... i won't defend their actions, but spain have imigration problems from Moroco, sub saharan africa, Ecuador (and a lot of south american countries), China, Romania and a few ex-sovietic republics.

The problem is that Spain never faced so much immigration in history and we have a doors open policy, so everyone from everywere is comming here, because we are the open gate to europe.

I don't have any problem with immigrants in fact (well... maybe morocians), and yes, i'm spanish.

Re: Xenophobic Spanish Political Game Taken Down, Developer ...

They are being invaded by Andorra? ( population 83,888 :P )

---------

James Fletcher, member of ECA Canada

Re: Xenophobic Spanish Political Game Taken Down, Developer ...

"The targets should have been labeled ‘illegal mafia’ and not ‘illegal immigrants.’”

As opposed to the legal mafia?

 

Andrew Eisen

Re: Xenophobic Spanish Political Game Taken Down, Developer ...

Legal mafia are called politicians :P

---------

James Fletcher, member of ECA Canada

Re: Xenophobic Spanish Political Game Taken Down, Developer ...

Don´t forget lawyers.

------------------------------------------------------------ My DeviantArt Page (aka DeviantCensorship): http://www.darkknightstrikes.deviantart.com

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

Will we ever get Half-Life 3?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
E. Zachary KnightWhat I can't understand is why gamergate supporters feel the need to silence their critics. Why can't they simply fight free speech with free speech.10/02/2014 - 8:23am
E. Zachary KnightSo what I am saying is that since gamergate failed to force Gamasutra to retract their editorial directly, they are now going the starvation route.10/02/2014 - 8:22am
E. Zachary KnightAs an illustration, you can kill someone by shooting them in the head, or you can starve them to death. The means don't matter, just the ends.10/02/2014 - 8:18am
E. Zachary Knightquiknkold, I can't speak for James, but trying to silence a critic by blocking its financial supporters is a censorious activity. It may not be the same as direct censoring, but its ends are the same.10/02/2014 - 8:18am
E. Zachary KnightMecha, I found neither the title nor the content of Gamasutra's Gamers are Dead article inflammatory. But I guess that just means I was the target audience for it.10/02/2014 - 8:16am
prh99@james_fudge Agreed, but then again this group doesn't exactly have high ethical standards or even a grasp of hypocrisy. They do pretty much anything to damage their targets.10/02/2014 - 8:14am
MechaTama31Are... Are you guys suggesting that the content of the "Gamers are over" article is *less* inflammatory than the title?10/02/2014 - 7:58am
quiknkoldhey James, Boycotts are not Censorship. Supreme Court NAACP v. Claiborne Hardware Co. (1982)10/02/2014 - 7:37am
Michael ChandraWhat's in a name? That which we call a rose by any other name would smell as sweet. That said, the name says it all.10/02/2014 - 7:34am
E. Zachary KnightYes.10/02/2014 - 7:29am
ConsterQuestion: is Kefka on drugs, or is he secretly a conspiracy theorist character from a TV show?10/02/2014 - 7:21am
james_fudgeEnjoy my comedy stylings.10/02/2014 - 7:10am
james_fudgehttp://www.breitbart.com/Breitbart-London/2014/10/02/It-s-been-real-GameJournoPros-prepares-to-close-its-doors10/02/2014 - 7:09am
InfophileAnd the headlines-only part is particularly depressing, as in most sites, they're not even written by the author of the article. So the author has to field tons of complaints about what the editor decided to title their article.10/02/2014 - 6:25am
InfophileAE: Most people don't. This has been tested - I remember an article slipped in a request in the second-to-last paragraph to use the word "banana" in your comment if you read that. It took over 50 posts for a banana.10/02/2014 - 6:24am
james_fudgeprh99: Whether you agree with the article or not, fighting alleged censorship with censorship is hella lame10/02/2014 - 4:27am
james_fudgewhoever made that decision at Intel will regret it later on down the road. Boycotts are tricky business.10/02/2014 - 4:26am
prh99The unflattering characterization "They don’t know how to dress or behave." & "‘Games culture’ is a petri dish of people who know so little about how human social interaction..." probably didn't help.10/02/2014 - 1:52am
prh99Probably not many as it was purely a vindictive move. The headline alone was plenty of ammo, but for those that did read and complain..10/02/2014 - 1:42am
Andrew EisenI wonder how many of those who complain about that article actually read past the headline.10/02/2014 - 1:37am
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician