Alberta Police Use Game to Recruit Young People

December 13, 2010 -

Alberta Police have an interesting way of luring youngsters in to learn more about being a police officer: a video game. The Police department is using new approaches to get youngsters interested in a career in law enforcement and what works better than video games?

The official game of the Alberta Police Department is appropriately called Alberta C.O.P.S. Impaired Driver and was developed by Edmonton-based software company Firetext International. C.O.P.S. stands for Career Opportunities in Police Services.

Alberta C.O.P.S. Impaired Driver begins by letting the player select one of five police officers who come from different backgrounds. Next, the player is briefed on objectives for the day, and then sent out in a patrol car to investigate and arrest suspects who appear to be breaking the law. The player has 12 minutes to complete three tasks. For every achieved objective the player is awarded a badge.

The game is being billed as a role-playing simulation, and a recruiting tool, of course. If it's good enough for the United States Army, it's certainly good enough for a police department in Alberta - or anywhere else for that matter. The game and other recruiting efforts are funded by the Alberta solicitor general, which aides all 12 police agencies in the province attract 18- 30 year olds into the profession. As the population changes, people retire and the number of people, living in the province grows, it is important to keep pace with the needs of the community.

The game is almost as interesting as the people that developed it. The alliance approached Firetext with the idea of creating a game a year and a half ago, but the company is best known for creating software that allows nightclub patrons to send text messages to a phone hooked to a computer, which then broadcasts the messages on big screens in the bar for everyone to see.

Firetext owner Raoul Bhatt describes the development of the game as an "exciting opportunity to do positive, community-oriented work for the police." Bhatt said that the challenge for him in developing a game about police work was to keep the experience interesting and deliver a positive message about it.

After six months of planning, storywriting, and obtaining approvals, Bhatt went on two police ride-alongs for research.

"Basically, we had to be very respectful," Bhatt told the Edmonton Journal. "There was no drawing of a gun, no shooting people. We had to keep the game really positive. … You can do a shooter game, which is so easy to do — just blow away people. We had to focus on storyline and strategy and really try to be as accurate as possible as to what real police officers have to go through."

You can check out the game here.

Source: Edmonton Journal


Comments

Re: Alberta Police Use Game to Recruit Young People

Ugh I should smack the Edmonton Journal with a 2 x 4 for that glaring error. Then again it is usually more credible than the Edmonton Sun.

There is no "Alberta Police" :P it is divided amongst the RCMP for the small communities, and larger cities have their own municipal police forces. The largest would be the Edmonton Police Service and Calgary Police Service.

In actuality this is being adopted by EPS (Edmonton), and then may be cycled down to all the municipalities.

I don't think this is a bad idea. I kind of want to see it for myself. Here is hoping it encourages a few more recruits for the EPS (good ones...last batch were not so good). However EPS should have got BIOWARE, since they are based in Edmonton as well :) 

---------

James Fletcher, member of ECA Canada

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

Which group is more ethically challenged?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
PHX Corphttps://trustygem.wordpress.com/2015/07/02/windows-10-insider-preview-phase-3/ My Thoughts on Windows 10 Insider Preview07/02/2015 - 6:17pm
Matthew Wilsonhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?t=18&v=CbGmrySQLIg looks like Inafune is giving capcom the middle finger.07/02/2015 - 5:05pm
TechnogeekUnfortunately, the shoutbox moves fast enough that I can't find why I got that impression, so if was indeed erroneous I do apologize.07/02/2015 - 4:34pm
TechnogeekBut yeah, as far as my earlier comment re: you and the article, I did get the impression at some point that you felt there should have been some sort of reprecussions for the article's existence.07/02/2015 - 4:34pm
TechnogeekI got expletive-censored for posting something a few weeks back wherein I expressed my shock that I agreed with you about something, Skunk; so you're not the only one being hit with that stick.07/02/2015 - 4:31pm
Andrew EisenI know you don't. And you haven't recently so all's well.07/02/2015 - 4:25pm
Goth_SkunkI don't think I misrepresented anything.07/02/2015 - 4:24pm
Andrew EisenHeavy profanity is not permitted in the Shout box. Words like "moron" are but we ask that our readers not resort to name-calling.07/02/2015 - 4:23pm
Goth_SkunkSo I can't say a 4-letter curse word, but Mechacrash is free to call me a moron. Acknowledgment: Mecha was warned about his conduct, but his post was not edited, as mine was.07/02/2015 - 4:20pm
Andrew EisenWhat people took issue with was your misrepresentation of what the author said. Now that you're criticizing what she actually said, no one has a problem (though they might disagree with your opinion).07/02/2015 - 4:19pm
Andrew EisenThat's not comparable at all. One is advice, one is a rule.07/02/2015 - 4:17pm
Goth_SkunkBut apparently, people seem to take issue with my justification and have been jumping down my throat about it for... 24 hours?07/02/2015 - 4:17pm
Goth_SkunkAnd now we've just had an example wherein I was forced to moderate myself in order to minimize offense.07/02/2015 - 4:16pm
Goth_SkunkThat's what this whole conundrum's been about! I strongly disapproved with the Wired article writer's suggestion and made that opinion known here in the shoutbox.07/02/2015 - 4:16pm
Andrew EisenPlease keep such strong language out of the Shout box. Anyway, that's fine. If there's something you want to write about. Go right ahead. Don't like someone's suggestion? Feel free to say so.07/02/2015 - 4:13pm
Goth_SkunkIf I get a response "this rape scene you wrote was offensive. You should've done it differently. Consider examples A, B, C, or D" I would happily take it under advisement should I decide to write something similar in the future.07/02/2015 - 4:12pm
Goth_SkunkIf I get backlash for such a decision consisting of "this rape scene was offensive," that's fine. If I get criticism like "this rape scene was so offensive, you shouldn't have written it," I'll respond "Go (expletive) yourself"07/02/2015 - 4:11pm
Andrew EisenMatthew - Oh, absolutely. But no one's saying any specific trope or subject should be taboo.07/02/2015 - 4:11pm
Andrew EisenA few have opined that I should have left the "I'm on a whore" line out of my Old Spice Parody video. I don't see why that's a problem.07/02/2015 - 4:10pm
Goth_SkunkHypothetical: If I'm writing a story and in my story there is a rape scene, and that rape scene is present because I want it to be there, and it is very relevant to the story as a whole, I'm going to write it.07/02/2015 - 4:10pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician