Wake Forest Professor Offers Holiday Advice For Parents

December 14, 2010 -

Marina Krcmar, associate professor of communication at Wake Forest (Winston-Salem, NC), thinks that most parents just do not have a clue about the affects video games can have on children. Krcmar studies the impact of video games and other media on children and teens. She doles out free advice in a press release urging parents to pick games that are age appropriate and to get educated about the video games kids should be playing.

"Greater realism leads to greater immersion; greater immersion leads to greater effects. One of those effects can be increased aggression."

"The T-rating and M-rating for video games are not very consistent and not very informative for parents, so parents need more information," Krcmar says.

"The quality of the graphics and the sound in this year's new video games is amazing," she says, "It's getting closer and closer to virtual reality."

She adds that "war games like Call of Duty: Black Ops" the level of immersion should raise red flags for parents. Of course, the game is rated "M” by the ESRB, which should also raise some red flags for parents.

"We learn what's right and what's wrong by consequences," she says. In many of the most popular games, shooting people results in no negative consequences. In fact, there is actually a reward."

Next Krcmar tackles Kinect, saying that for non-violent games this can be a good thing, but adds that violent games that use Kinect put players into the action because they are controlling the action simply by moving.

"But, as violent motions feel more natural and the line between real and virtual blurs, there is likely to be a stronger link to increased aggression after playing the game," she says.

One thing most will agree with is some of her recommendations as alternatives to first-person shooters for children like Professor Layton and the Curious Village and the latest "Harvest Moon" game.

In addition to problem-solving, Krcmar says there are some beneficial effects of video games on children. Research shows that video games help with hand eye coordination and teach us how to scan the environment for important visual information.

She offers a few general tips for parents regarding video games:

- Do your homework. Research new games online to find out as much as you can about content.

- Don't trust the marketers. Many games that are marketed to kids are completely inappropriate for them.

- Talk to your kids about the games they are playing.

- Regardless of what games they are playing, set up game systems in family living spaces.

Commentary: While I disagree with some of what she says, she makes some valid points. Young kids should not be playing Call of Duty: Black Ops or any other "M" rated games. Parents should pay attention to what their kids are playing. They should also enable parental controls - most console systems have them.

Krcmar researches video games and violence, and teaches a class called "Video Games: Research and Theory." You can learn more about her by visiting www.wfu.edu.


Comments

Re: Wake Forest Professor Offers Holiday Advice For Parents

Can these people jump off a cliff already.

Re: Wake Forest Professor Offers Holiday Advice For Parents

 I play violent video games all the time and I am completely...CRUSH KILL DESTROY!!!!

Re: Wake Forest Professor Offers Holiday Advice For Parents

"Marina Krcmar, associate professor of communication at Wake Forest (Winston-Salem, NC), thinks that most parents just do not have a clue about the affects video games can have other children."

How does one pronounce that last name?  "Crack"-mar?

Also - "Video games can have other children"?  Wait.  What does that mean?  Having children is a side effect of playing video games?

Sorry.  Got distracted by the first sentence.  What was this about again?

- Left4Dead

Why are zombies always eating brains? I want to see zombies that eat toes for a living. Undead-related pun intended.

- Left4Dead Why are zombies always eating brains? I want to see zombies that eat toes for a living. Undead-related pun intended.

Re: Wake Forest Professor Offers Holiday Advice For Parents

Translation:

1. Games are realistic (maybe not as realistic as movies) but more immersive somehow, therefore more dangerous.

2. Don't trust the ESRB. They play games, but I don't, but I still know more than they do.

3. See Tip 1.

4. Black Ops is the new GTA. It's against the law (either legal or scientific) to mention games and violence without bringing this game up.

5. Remember, every game gives points for killing innocent people.

6. There's no violent games for Kinect yet, but this will still turn your kids into murders!

7. Research online, but make sure to trust those that agree with me!

8. Don't trust marketers or the ESRB; they only care about money. But you can trust me, cause I don't make any money for writing articles like this!

9. Talk to your kids about games, but don't trust them either! The games have warped their minds!

10. Keep the systems set up to the TV, so you can hog their monitor, and make sure they never get to play.

Re: Wake Forest Professor Offers Holiday Advice For Parents

Nice.

Re: Wake Forest Professor Offers Holiday Advice For Parents

 Lies lies lies.  Move along.  

Yet another person who should be well-aware of the decrease in youth violence over the years videogames became more popular.  This fact alone contradicts a fundamental prediction of the "games cause violence" hypothesis.  Game. Set. Match.

Re: Wake Forest Professor Offers Holiday Advice For Parents

Good advice, bad reasons.

Brings up the entire question of ideology vs pragmatism... what do you make of someone doing the right thing for the wrong reasons?

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
E. Zachary KnightPapa, Of course thre is. That has now become a permanent part of the EULA boilerplate template.07/29/2015 - 12:56pm
Papa MidnightIn case anyone is interested, there is a clause written into Section 10 of Windows 10's EULA that provides for a Class Action Waiver, and restricts the user to Binding Arbitration.07/29/2015 - 11:15am
TechnogeekNo, that folder is what gets used for the upgrade process. I already had the upgrade go through on my notebook.07/29/2015 - 10:35am
Andrew EisenMatt - And AGAIN, you keep saying "accountable." What exactly does that mean? How is Gamasutra not accounting for the editorial it published? How is it not accountable to its readership (which, AGAIN, is primarily game industry folk, not gamers)?07/29/2015 - 10:10am
james_fudgeThat's the clean install, for anyone asking07/29/2015 - 9:23am
TechnogeekAlso, it's the upgrade that's available for installation now. You might need to forcibly initiate the Windows Update process before it'll start downloading, though. (If there's a C:\$Windows.~BT folder on your computer, then you're in luck.)07/29/2015 - 8:46am
TechnogeekAdmittedly there's more room to push for an advertiser boycott when you get into opinion content versus pure news, but keep in mind that reviews are opinion content as well.07/29/2015 - 8:46am
TechnogeekMatts: There's a difference between "this person regularly says extremely terrible stuff" and "I don't like the phrasing used in this one specific editorial".07/29/2015 - 8:45am
MattsworknameWait, is that for the upgrade or the clean install only? cause I was gonna do the upgrade07/29/2015 - 8:32am
james_fudgehttps://www.microsoft.com/en-us/software-download/windows1007/29/2015 - 8:30am
PHX Corp@Wilson, I'm still waiting for My upgrade notice aswell07/29/2015 - 7:57am
MattsworknameWilson: how? Im still waiting for my upgrade notice07/29/2015 - 3:44am
Matthew WilsonI updated to a clean instill of windows 10.07/29/2015 - 2:36am
Mattsworknameargue that it's wrong, but then please admit it's wrong on ALL Fronts07/29/2015 - 2:06am
MattsworknameTechnoGeek: It's actually NOT, but it is a method used all across the specturm. See Rush limbaugh, MSNBC, Shawn hannity, etc etc, how many compagns have been brought up to try and shut them down by going after there advertisers. It's fine if you wanna07/29/2015 - 2:05am
Mattsworknamediscussed, while not what I liked and not the methods I wanted to see used, were , in a sense, the effort of thsoe game consuming masses to hold what they felt was supposed to be there press accountable for what many of them felt was Betrayal07/29/2015 - 2:03am
MattsworknameAs we say, the gamers are dead article set of a firestorm among the game consuming populace, who, ideally, were the intended audiance for sites like Kotaku, Polygon, Et all. As such, the turn about on them and the attacking of them, via the metods07/29/2015 - 2:03am
MattsworknameAndrew: Thats kind fo the issue at hand, Accountable is a matter of context. For a media group, it means accountable to its reader. to a goverment, to it's voters and tax payer, to a company, to it's share holders.07/29/2015 - 2:02am
Andrew EisenAnd again, you keep saying "accountable." What exactly does that mean? How is Gamasutra not accounting for the editorial it published?07/28/2015 - 11:47pm
Andrew EisenMatt - I disagree with your 9:12 and 9:16 comment. There are myriad ways to address content you don't like. And they're far easier to execute in the online space.07/28/2015 - 11:47pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician